<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Next: &#8220;He&#8217;s Our You&#8221; (Episode 5&#215;10)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2009/03/25/next-hes-our-you-episode-5x10/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2009/03/25/next-hes-our-you-episode-5x10/</link>
	<description>A fan podcast focused on ABC's hit TV series, "Lost."</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Sep 2010 14:34:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: DaRealDeal</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2009/03/25/next-hes-our-you-episode-5x10/comment-page-4/#comment-37605</link>
		<dc:creator>DaRealDeal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2009 14:55:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/?p=294#comment-37605</guid>
		<description>Ben is not dead, we know this. Don&#039;t OVERthink everything.

And keep in mind we are dealing with things occurring and happening in present time and past tense. HOWEVER, until something happens to someone in the past the future version does not know about these events.

For example Desmond did not know about finding Daniels mother, until Daniel told Desmond to go look for his mother, then at that IMMEDIATE moment the memory was created and then guess what Desmond awakes with a memory!

Therefore, until Sayid shot Ben, Ben had no recollection of it, now going forward I am sure Ben will know what happened to him in the past.

If Jack stays true to character he is not going to HELP Ben, so I believe Juliet may be the one to save him and that is where the &quot;you look so much like her&quot; comment comes in.

REMEMBER they were told EVERYONE needed to come back for everything to return to normal or something would happen which was unknown. That includes Walt and Aaron. So, All of them not returning created this unknown situation that is currently evolving.

Also, did anyone think Sayid may dislike Ben, because he may have found out that maybe Ben is truly behind his wife&#039;s murder.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ben is not dead, we know this. Don&#8217;t OVERthink everything.</p>
<p>And keep in mind we are dealing with things occurring and happening in present time and past tense. HOWEVER, until something happens to someone in the past the future version does not know about these events.</p>
<p>For example Desmond did not know about finding Daniels mother, until Daniel told Desmond to go look for his mother, then at that IMMEDIATE moment the memory was created and then guess what Desmond awakes with a memory!</p>
<p>Therefore, until Sayid shot Ben, Ben had no recollection of it, now going forward I am sure Ben will know what happened to him in the past.</p>
<p>If Jack stays true to character he is not going to HELP Ben, so I believe Juliet may be the one to save him and that is where the &#8220;you look so much like her&#8221; comment comes in.</p>
<p>REMEMBER they were told EVERYONE needed to come back for everything to return to normal or something would happen which was unknown. That includes Walt and Aaron. So, All of them not returning created this unknown situation that is currently evolving.</p>
<p>Also, did anyone think Sayid may dislike Ben, because he may have found out that maybe Ben is truly behind his wife&#8217;s murder.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Laura</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2009/03/25/next-hes-our-you-episode-5x10/comment-page-4/#comment-37599</link>
		<dc:creator>Laura</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2009 01:29:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/?p=294#comment-37599</guid>
		<description>&quot;Although the idea of Ben being saved is attractive,
I will stick to my initial thought that young Ben will be dead
I believe that it will be older Ben who will be coming back in time
and plan the purge
Now that young Ben would be dead
older Ben can now come back to earlier time&quot;

No.  If Ben dies as a child, he does not live to do all those things.  Ben cannot and will not die at this point.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Although the idea of Ben being saved is attractive,<br />
I will stick to my initial thought that young Ben will be dead<br />
I believe that it will be older Ben who will be coming back in time<br />
and plan the purge<br />
Now that young Ben would be dead<br />
older Ben can now come back to earlier time&#8221;</p>
<p>No.  If Ben dies as a child, he does not live to do all those things.  Ben cannot and will not die at this point.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mary Ann</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2009/03/25/next-hes-our-you-episode-5x10/comment-page-4/#comment-37596</link>
		<dc:creator>Mary Ann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 22:26:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/?p=294#comment-37596</guid>
		<description>was that ben and annie with their backs to the camera in the vote scene?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>was that ben and annie with their backs to the camera in the vote scene?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bomir from MTL</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2009/03/25/next-hes-our-you-episode-5x10/comment-page-4/#comment-37595</link>
		<dc:creator>Bomir from MTL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 18:42:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/?p=294#comment-37595</guid>
		<description>Although the idea of Ben being saved is attractive, 
I will stick to my initial thought that young Ben will be dead 
I believe that it will be older Ben who will be coming back in time 
and plan the purge  
Now that young Ben would be dead 
older Ben can now come back to earlier time  
The older Ben would become sort of an ageless Richard  
popping in time when needed</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Although the idea of Ben being saved is attractive,<br />
I will stick to my initial thought that young Ben will be dead<br />
I believe that it will be older Ben who will be coming back in time<br />
and plan the purge<br />
Now that young Ben would be dead<br />
older Ben can now come back to earlier time<br />
The older Ben would become sort of an ageless Richard<br />
popping in time when needed</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: camilles</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2009/03/25/next-hes-our-you-episode-5x10/comment-page-4/#comment-37593</link>
		<dc:creator>camilles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 15:00:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/?p=294#comment-37593</guid>
		<description>i heard someone else say that they think you can change things in the past but your destiny is your destiny (like how charlie &quot;cheated death&quot; for a while, but then desmond told him it was inevitable). i don&#039;t think that sayeed was necessarily ALWAYS the guy that shot ben.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i heard someone else say that they think you can change things in the past but your destiny is your destiny (like how charlie &#8220;cheated death&#8221; for a while, but then desmond told him it was inevitable). i don&#8217;t think that sayeed was necessarily ALWAYS the guy that shot ben.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rich in Cleveland</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2009/03/25/next-hes-our-you-episode-5x10/comment-page-4/#comment-37589</link>
		<dc:creator>Rich in Cleveland</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 06:04:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/?p=294#comment-37589</guid>
		<description>Here are some of my favorite comments from the other forum.

“Why is Kate back? Here’s my bet. Because Ben came to her off island, and explained that she had to get involved, because she needed to be on the island or something very bad would happen (possibly to Aaron). Perhaps he straight out tells her “you need to go back and make sure I don’t die”  —Aaron.  

This is certainly along the lines of what I’m hoping for, something closer to the central mythology than mere blackmail or, even worse, a base appeal to toy around with the paralovagram. Kudos to whoever authored that term though.

“This is making me feel more strongly about my theory that the universe is trying to recreate a series of events that happened (or will happen.. the ‘incident?’) that dislodged the island from normal time/space…”    —Pete

I like to call this “the master scene” that all the repetitions of situations and language that regularly occur reflect in broken fragments, but that will one day come together to some unknown effect.  I think it may reveal the truth more than cause an “incident” to happen.

“Anyone mention that Sayid might have still been under the influence of the mind altering drug when he shot Ben?”—Keith UK

Side effects? I’ll have to review, but it does seem now that the interrogation scene might have been Sayid’s moment of crisis in which he determines his purpose and course of action.  For some reason though, I think he may soon be receiving visitors as a consequence instead.

“All of this talk about Ben having these experiences and knowing who’ll be going back in time and working towards that goal leaves out a very important element. How DOES Ben know what to do? Growing up knowing a certain man shot you in your youth and then meeting him when you grow up doesn’t tell you how to get that guy to go back in time and shoot you.—Michael 281

Definitely.  Future Ben would have had to have visited present Ben or he would have had to cycle through this loop many times while retaining his memory.

On retaining memory:  Faraday’s card trick still bothers me. I’m holding to the theory that the present is in a state of flux.  Was he trying to recall a past or a properly ordered reality with this test?  The cards keep changing just as the picture on the box kept changing. We saw Faraday disturbed when he saw the news footage of 815 as if somewhere in his brain he had a memory of what happened.  We also have the “Charlotte rule” whereby memories of the past that have not yet been created by the flashers can still be recalled.  So is this what’s going on with the card trick?  The other possibility is the study of parapsychology referenced in one of the DI orientation videos. 

“At first I thought young Ben was shot dead. Then I remembered it wasn’t raining.”—Steve.  Good call.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here are some of my favorite comments from the other forum.</p>
<p>“Why is Kate back? Here’s my bet. Because Ben came to her off island, and explained that she had to get involved, because she needed to be on the island or something very bad would happen (possibly to Aaron). Perhaps he straight out tells her “you need to go back and make sure I don’t die”  —Aaron.  </p>
<p>This is certainly along the lines of what I’m hoping for, something closer to the central mythology than mere blackmail or, even worse, a base appeal to toy around with the paralovagram. Kudos to whoever authored that term though.</p>
<p>“This is making me feel more strongly about my theory that the universe is trying to recreate a series of events that happened (or will happen.. the ‘incident?’) that dislodged the island from normal time/space…”    —Pete</p>
<p>I like to call this “the master scene” that all the repetitions of situations and language that regularly occur reflect in broken fragments, but that will one day come together to some unknown effect.  I think it may reveal the truth more than cause an “incident” to happen.</p>
<p>“Anyone mention that Sayid might have still been under the influence of the mind altering drug when he shot Ben?”—Keith UK</p>
<p>Side effects? I’ll have to review, but it does seem now that the interrogation scene might have been Sayid’s moment of crisis in which he determines his purpose and course of action.  For some reason though, I think he may soon be receiving visitors as a consequence instead.</p>
<p>“All of this talk about Ben having these experiences and knowing who’ll be going back in time and working towards that goal leaves out a very important element. How DOES Ben know what to do? Growing up knowing a certain man shot you in your youth and then meeting him when you grow up doesn’t tell you how to get that guy to go back in time and shoot you.—Michael 281</p>
<p>Definitely.  Future Ben would have had to have visited present Ben or he would have had to cycle through this loop many times while retaining his memory.</p>
<p>On retaining memory:  Faraday’s card trick still bothers me. I’m holding to the theory that the present is in a state of flux.  Was he trying to recall a past or a properly ordered reality with this test?  The cards keep changing just as the picture on the box kept changing. We saw Faraday disturbed when he saw the news footage of 815 as if somewhere in his brain he had a memory of what happened.  We also have the “Charlotte rule” whereby memories of the past that have not yet been created by the flashers can still be recalled.  So is this what’s going on with the card trick?  The other possibility is the study of parapsychology referenced in one of the DI orientation videos. </p>
<p>“At first I thought young Ben was shot dead. Then I remembered it wasn’t raining.”—Steve.  Good call.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sleeper</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2009/03/25/next-hes-our-you-episode-5x10/comment-page-4/#comment-37586</link>
		<dc:creator>Sleeper</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 22:52:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/?p=294#comment-37586</guid>
		<description>I think they will redeam Kate a little by revealing that her reason to return to the island is to find Claire and bring her back to raise Aaron.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think they will redeam Kate a little by revealing that her reason to return to the island is to find Claire and bring her back to raise Aaron.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JohnE</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2009/03/25/next-hes-our-you-episode-5x10/comment-page-4/#comment-37584</link>
		<dc:creator>JohnE</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 21:50:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/?p=294#comment-37584</guid>
		<description>Hi Guys, long time listener, first time blogger.

Well that has put a hole in your paradox theory hasn&#039;t it?  Young Ben said that he wanted to join the hostiles so I think that he gets found by them, is somehow &#039;mended&#039; and then begins his Others -v- Dharma life.

That would work perfectly for him killing his own father in the van also.

I can&#039;t believe how many things are tying back to series 1,2,3&amp;4 with the runway, 4 toe&#039;d statue.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Guys, long time listener, first time blogger.</p>
<p>Well that has put a hole in your paradox theory hasn&#8217;t it?  Young Ben said that he wanted to join the hostiles so I think that he gets found by them, is somehow &#8216;mended&#8217; and then begins his Others -v- Dharma life.</p>
<p>That would work perfectly for him killing his own father in the van also.</p>
<p>I can&#8217;t believe how many things are tying back to series 1,2,3&amp;4 with the runway, 4 toe&#8217;d statue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carol</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2009/03/25/next-hes-our-you-episode-5x10/comment-page-4/#comment-37583</link>
		<dc:creator>Carol</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 18:53:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/?p=294#comment-37583</guid>
		<description>Laura I agree with your theory.  Daniel described time as traveling on a string, you can go back and forth on the string, but you can&#039;t create a new string.   Ben cannot die, that would create a new string.  Too many things would change.

Re: Kate&#039;s reason for going back, could it be as simple as Ben does get cusody of Aaron and makes Kate go back to the island in order for her to get him back?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Laura I agree with your theory.  Daniel described time as traveling on a string, you can go back and forth on the string, but you can&#8217;t create a new string.   Ben cannot die, that would create a new string.  Too many things would change.</p>
<p>Re: Kate&#8217;s reason for going back, could it be as simple as Ben does get cusody of Aaron and makes Kate go back to the island in order for her to get him back?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kathy</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2009/03/25/next-hes-our-you-episode-5x10/comment-page-4/#comment-37575</link>
		<dc:creator>Kathy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 02:50:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/?p=294#comment-37575</guid>
		<description>My theory (and thanks to Jen and Ryan for the pods and forum) - Juliet has twins (Sawyer’s) who are Daniel and Penny (this is what Daniel meant when he said “I’m not going to tell her”).  They are kidnapped by Ellie (Hawking) (and maybe Widmore, who were a couple in the 1950&#039;s).  Ellie and Charles are tired of being child-free on the island (probably due to the radiation from the bomb).  When they (have to) leave the Island (which explains their current ages, since they were 20 something in 1954—they didn’t age on the Island—otherwise Widmore is too old to have a daughter Penny’s age). 

Kind of a weird symmetry, since Penny would be as much Widmore’s daughter (not) as Alex was Ben’s….Somewhere Widmore and Hawking split, Widmore got Penny and Eloise got Daniel, but Widmore must have been paying support (as evidenced by his paying for the care of the women who went crazy during the time research).  Note we&#039;ve never seen/heard of Daniel&#039;s father or Penny&#039;s mother...

Sawyer will be so bummed to find out his future son is dweebish.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My theory (and thanks to Jen and Ryan for the pods and forum) &#8211; Juliet has twins (Sawyer’s) who are Daniel and Penny (this is what Daniel meant when he said “I’m not going to tell her”).  They are kidnapped by Ellie (Hawking) (and maybe Widmore, who were a couple in the 1950&#8242;s).  Ellie and Charles are tired of being child-free on the island (probably due to the radiation from the bomb).  When they (have to) leave the Island (which explains their current ages, since they were 20 something in 1954—they didn’t age on the Island—otherwise Widmore is too old to have a daughter Penny’s age). </p>
<p>Kind of a weird symmetry, since Penny would be as much Widmore’s daughter (not) as Alex was Ben’s….Somewhere Widmore and Hawking split, Widmore got Penny and Eloise got Daniel, but Widmore must have been paying support (as evidenced by his paying for the care of the women who went crazy during the time research).  Note we&#8217;ve never seen/heard of Daniel&#8217;s father or Penny&#8217;s mother&#8230;</p>
<p>Sawyer will be so bummed to find out his future son is dweebish.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Digby</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2009/03/25/next-hes-our-you-episode-5x10/comment-page-4/#comment-37572</link>
		<dc:creator>Digby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Mar 2009 23:51:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/?p=294#comment-37572</guid>
		<description>I just wanted to remind everyone that Rose and Bernard went missing for almost all of Season 3 too.  It didn&#039;t matter as much then because they weren&#039;t in 1977, but it was still a long absence.

They&#039;ll come back when they have something to add to the story, or when they&#039;re needed.  I&#039;m sure the writers haven&#039;t forgotten them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just wanted to remind everyone that Rose and Bernard went missing for almost all of Season 3 too.  It didn&#8217;t matter as much then because they weren&#8217;t in 1977, but it was still a long absence.</p>
<p>They&#8217;ll come back when they have something to add to the story, or when they&#8217;re needed.  I&#8217;m sure the writers haven&#8217;t forgotten them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Laura</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2009/03/25/next-hes-our-you-episode-5x10/comment-page-4/#comment-37566</link>
		<dc:creator>Laura</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Mar 2009 16:53:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/?p=294#comment-37566</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve really been wanted to talk about this episode but have been flat-on-my-back sick.  Now that I&#039;m sitting up, a few thoughts:

Ben is absolutely not dead.  This incident (Ben not dying) will prove once and for all that &quot;Whatever Happened Happened&quot; and it cannot be changed.  I do think this sets up a self-contained cycle; as Nate in Ohio succinctly describes it: &quot;Sayid shoots Ben, which causes him to turn evil and torture the losties and manipulate Sayid into killing Widmore’s associates, which causes Sayid to want to kill little Ben.&quot;  I don&#039;t consider this a paradox, though -- merely a loop that we will undoubtedly see a lot more of.  This seems to me to be within the &quot;rules&quot;.

I think the reason Sayid is so out-of-his-mind angry at Ben is that he found out (as many of us suspected) that Ben was responsible for Nadia&#039;s death, and then used that death to lead Sayid on a world-wide killing spree.

And of course, to answer some of the questions around here, Ben totally recognized Sayid when he saw him in Season 2.  He probably expected the plane crash, and knew those people he&#039;d seen before.  He may have had a crush on Juliet before.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve really been wanted to talk about this episode but have been flat-on-my-back sick.  Now that I&#8217;m sitting up, a few thoughts:</p>
<p>Ben is absolutely not dead.  This incident (Ben not dying) will prove once and for all that &#8220;Whatever Happened Happened&#8221; and it cannot be changed.  I do think this sets up a self-contained cycle; as Nate in Ohio succinctly describes it: &#8220;Sayid shoots Ben, which causes him to turn evil and torture the losties and manipulate Sayid into killing Widmore’s associates, which causes Sayid to want to kill little Ben.&#8221;  I don&#8217;t consider this a paradox, though &#8212; merely a loop that we will undoubtedly see a lot more of.  This seems to me to be within the &#8220;rules&#8221;.</p>
<p>I think the reason Sayid is so out-of-his-mind angry at Ben is that he found out (as many of us suspected) that Ben was responsible for Nadia&#8217;s death, and then used that death to lead Sayid on a world-wide killing spree.</p>
<p>And of course, to answer some of the questions around here, Ben totally recognized Sayid when he saw him in Season 2.  He probably expected the plane crash, and knew those people he&#8217;d seen before.  He may have had a crush on Juliet before.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: camille</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2009/03/25/next-hes-our-you-episode-5x10/comment-page-4/#comment-37565</link>
		<dc:creator>camille</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Mar 2009 12:02:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/?p=294#comment-37565</guid>
		<description>Kaysea, I know  this outside the program but in enhanced episodes it says her name is Eloise Hawking, but show-wise we can assume she is the same Ellie since: 

-Widmore knows her well, since he has her information at the ready to give it to Desmond in &quot;Jughead&quot;
- Daniel recognizes her as someone familiar in &quot;Jughead&quot;, and Eloise is his mother (as well as his former lab rat)
- In &quot;316&quot;, when they are in Eloise&#039;s underground pendulum lair there is a photo marked &quot;9/23/54 - U.S. Army - OP 264- Top Secret - Eyes Only&quot;(this corresponds with the same time that Ellie was on the island)

I just don&#039;t think names get repeated like that on this show for no reason. I think one of the rare instances where a name was repeated without any real significance was with the name Charlotte. The first Charlotte we met was when Eko was in Australia (episode &quot;?&quot;, season 2) and he went to investigate a suspicious religious occurrence (a girl named Charlotte -- daughter of Claire&#039;s psychic --drowned to death and then came back to life). In Season 4, we then get (our now dear departed ) Charlotte Staples Lewis.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kaysea, I know  this outside the program but in enhanced episodes it says her name is Eloise Hawking, but show-wise we can assume she is the same Ellie since: </p>
<p>-Widmore knows her well, since he has her information at the ready to give it to Desmond in &#8220;Jughead&#8221;<br />
- Daniel recognizes her as someone familiar in &#8220;Jughead&#8221;, and Eloise is his mother (as well as his former lab rat)<br />
- In &#8220;316&#8243;, when they are in Eloise&#8217;s underground pendulum lair there is a photo marked &#8220;9/23/54 &#8211; U.S. Army &#8211; OP 264- Top Secret &#8211; Eyes Only&#8221;(this corresponds with the same time that Ellie was on the island)</p>
<p>I just don&#8217;t think names get repeated like that on this show for no reason. I think one of the rare instances where a name was repeated without any real significance was with the name Charlotte. The first Charlotte we met was when Eko was in Australia (episode &#8220;?&#8221;, season 2) and he went to investigate a suspicious religious occurrence (a girl named Charlotte &#8212; daughter of Claire&#8217;s psychic &#8211;drowned to death and then came back to life). In Season 4, we then get (our now dear departed ) Charlotte Staples Lewis.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: camille</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2009/03/25/next-hes-our-you-episode-5x10/comment-page-4/#comment-37564</link>
		<dc:creator>camille</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Mar 2009 11:48:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/?p=294#comment-37564</guid>
		<description>rewatching the episode, more thoughts/questions came up:

- Why didn&#039;t Ilana just arrest Sayeed when she saw him? Di she really just want a free meal?
- I am on the side of people who don&#039;t trust Amy and I think Ethan joined the hostiles with his mother. She knew Sayeed wasn&#039;t a Hostile but the longer they kept him alive the more likely he could pose a threat to the Hostiles by sharing secrets of the island with unknowing Dharmites. 
-How did Sayeed know he would get a chance to kill Ben?
-Where does Sayeed think he&#039;s gonna go now that he&#039;s escaped.
-Has anyone mentioned Ms. Hawking or anything to the non O6-ies?
-Juliet&#039;s smile makes me mistrust her, I think it is just the character though...
-Why aren&#039;t any of the Dharmalites particularly peace-loving? I thought they were supposed to be hippies...
-At what point did Ben go from needing glasses all the time to only needing them to read?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>rewatching the episode, more thoughts/questions came up:</p>
<p>- Why didn&#8217;t Ilana just arrest Sayeed when she saw him? Di she really just want a free meal?<br />
- I am on the side of people who don&#8217;t trust Amy and I think Ethan joined the hostiles with his mother. She knew Sayeed wasn&#8217;t a Hostile but the longer they kept him alive the more likely he could pose a threat to the Hostiles by sharing secrets of the island with unknowing Dharmites.<br />
-How did Sayeed know he would get a chance to kill Ben?<br />
-Where does Sayeed think he&#8217;s gonna go now that he&#8217;s escaped.<br />
-Has anyone mentioned Ms. Hawking or anything to the non O6-ies?<br />
-Juliet&#8217;s smile makes me mistrust her, I think it is just the character though&#8230;<br />
-Why aren&#8217;t any of the Dharmalites particularly peace-loving? I thought they were supposed to be hippies&#8230;<br />
-At what point did Ben go from needing glasses all the time to only needing them to read?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rich in Cleveland</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2009/03/25/next-hes-our-you-episode-5x10/comment-page-4/#comment-37560</link>
		<dc:creator>Rich in Cleveland</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Mar 2009 06:49:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/?p=294#comment-37560</guid>
		<description>@ Kaysea: Ben specifically said &quot;Penelope.&quot;

As I thought about &quot;he walks among us...&quot;, there was another great instance of the recurring theme of alienation/otherness in Sayid&#039;s flashback.  The elder brother must remain &quot;outside&quot;  of the community and his father&#039;s affections until he can accomplish his rite of passage, just as Locke remained on the outside until he proved he could rid himself of that most potent symbol of past failures, his father.  I wonder if it matters that Locke cheated a bit by having Sawyer do his dirty work for him.

One other comment: young Ben knocked it out of the park this episode.  No matter how you feel toward Ben, you had to feel tremendous sympathy for him throughout and especially when Sayid shot him for theoretical crimes which he has yet to commit.  I&#039;ll bet he vowed to never be the one caught by surprise from that moment on.

Defend the island.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Kaysea: Ben specifically said &#8220;Penelope.&#8221;</p>
<p>As I thought about &#8220;he walks among us&#8230;&#8221;, there was another great instance of the recurring theme of alienation/otherness in Sayid&#8217;s flashback.  The elder brother must remain &#8220;outside&#8221;  of the community and his father&#8217;s affections until he can accomplish his rite of passage, just as Locke remained on the outside until he proved he could rid himself of that most potent symbol of past failures, his father.  I wonder if it matters that Locke cheated a bit by having Sawyer do his dirty work for him.</p>
<p>One other comment: young Ben knocked it out of the park this episode.  No matter how you feel toward Ben, you had to feel tremendous sympathy for him throughout and especially when Sayid shot him for theoretical crimes which he has yet to commit.  I&#8217;ll bet he vowed to never be the one caught by surprise from that moment on.</p>
<p>Defend the island.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kaysea</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2009/03/25/next-hes-our-you-episode-5x10/comment-page-4/#comment-37559</link>
		<dc:creator>Kaysea</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Mar 2009 05:16:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/?p=294#comment-37559</guid>
		<description>Thanks Camille I didnt know that. What episode was it on? Ive watched them all but I guess I blinked. LOL 

When Ben went to see Widmore did he say that he would kill &quot;Penny&quot; or his &quot;daughter&quot;?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Camille I didnt know that. What episode was it on? Ive watched them all but I guess I blinked. LOL </p>
<p>When Ben went to see Widmore did he say that he would kill &#8220;Penny&#8221; or his &#8220;daughter&#8221;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ron St.Amant</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2009/03/25/next-hes-our-you-episode-5x10/comment-page-4/#comment-37558</link>
		<dc:creator>Ron St.Amant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Mar 2009 03:10:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/?p=294#comment-37558</guid>
		<description>So Sayid shoots &#039;Lil Ben...but wouldn&#039;t you know it...there&#039;s a surgeon on the island...hmmm.

Ben is not dead.  He&#039;s just really ticked off now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So Sayid shoots &#8216;Lil Ben&#8230;but wouldn&#8217;t you know it&#8230;there&#8217;s a surgeon on the island&#8230;hmmm.</p>
<p>Ben is not dead.  He&#8217;s just really ticked off now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott in Philly</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2009/03/25/next-hes-our-you-episode-5x10/comment-page-4/#comment-37557</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott in Philly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Mar 2009 02:04:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/?p=294#comment-37557</guid>
		<description>wow - I just watched &quot;the Lie&quot; enhanced episode... hurley&#039;s dad&#039;s name is DAVE reyes.... is that why hurley hallucinated about a guy named dave?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>wow &#8211; I just watched &#8220;the Lie&#8221; enhanced episode&#8230; hurley&#8217;s dad&#8217;s name is DAVE reyes&#8230;. is that why hurley hallucinated about a guy named dave?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mirepoix from Mtl</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2009/03/25/next-hes-our-you-episode-5x10/comment-page-4/#comment-37556</link>
		<dc:creator>Mirepoix from Mtl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Mar 2009 23:34:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/?p=294#comment-37556</guid>
		<description>Connie 
Maybe Lafleur was just about to ask Kate about Clementine 
They were interrupted by the van on fire 

I still believe that the Ben that will be involved in the purge is the older Ben coming back in time  
History has shown that poeple can come back to before they were born  (Locke) 
If we ever see the injured Ben in 2007 recuperate, we can bet that he will go into this journey back in time  
Now that he is dead in 1977, he can go back to sometime past that point in time  

But on the other hand, all of you who think that he will be cured by Jack have a great hunch too</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Connie<br />
Maybe Lafleur was just about to ask Kate about Clementine<br />
They were interrupted by the van on fire </p>
<p>I still believe that the Ben that will be involved in the purge is the older Ben coming back in time<br />
History has shown that poeple can come back to before they were born  (Locke)<br />
If we ever see the injured Ben in 2007 recuperate, we can bet that he will go into this journey back in time<br />
Now that he is dead in 1977, he can go back to sometime past that point in time  </p>
<p>But on the other hand, all of you who think that he will be cured by Jack have a great hunch too</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Connie in Alaska</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2009/03/25/next-hes-our-you-episode-5x10/comment-page-4/#comment-37555</link>
		<dc:creator>Connie in Alaska</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Mar 2009 21:03:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/?p=294#comment-37555</guid>
		<description>Lydia from MA-Very interesting about Jack&#039;s tattoo.  There are so many little mysteries, details and nuances to Lost that it is way too hard to remember them all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lydia from MA-Very interesting about Jack&#8217;s tattoo.  There are so many little mysteries, details and nuances to Lost that it is way too hard to remember them all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: camille</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2009/03/25/next-hes-our-you-episode-5x10/comment-page-4/#comment-37554</link>
		<dc:creator>camille</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Mar 2009 19:57:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/?p=294#comment-37554</guid>
		<description>Kaysea, It&#039;s already been revealed that that was indeed Eloise Hawking.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kaysea, It&#8217;s already been revealed that that was indeed Eloise Hawking.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lydia from Massachusetts</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2009/03/25/next-hes-our-you-episode-5x10/comment-page-4/#comment-37553</link>
		<dc:creator>Lydia from Massachusetts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Mar 2009 17:05:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/?p=294#comment-37553</guid>
		<description>Hey Ryan and Jen!
I thought for the heck of it I&#039;d click on a random past episode blog post and read the comments just to see how things have changed.  I happened to click on Stranger in a Strange Land and my first observation is -- wow! -- the blog comment quality is so much better now and the dialogue between fans so much richer.  

The other comment I have is maybe we understand Jack&#039;s tattoo better now: &quot;He walks among us but is not one of us.&quot;   Hmm, definitely makes more sense now considering his time travel back to 1977 Dharma times!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Ryan and Jen!<br />
I thought for the heck of it I&#8217;d click on a random past episode blog post and read the comments just to see how things have changed.  I happened to click on Stranger in a Strange Land and my first observation is &#8212; wow! &#8212; the blog comment quality is so much better now and the dialogue between fans so much richer.  </p>
<p>The other comment I have is maybe we understand Jack&#8217;s tattoo better now: &#8220;He walks among us but is not one of us.&#8221;   Hmm, definitely makes more sense now considering his time travel back to 1977 Dharma times!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris in Seattle</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2009/03/25/next-hes-our-you-episode-5x10/comment-page-4/#comment-37552</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris in Seattle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Mar 2009 06:13:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/?p=294#comment-37552</guid>
		<description>Wow.  I loved this week&#039;s episode just as much as I hated last week&#039;s.  I feel like LOST is back on track and has a direction again.  Some of the callers/commenters last week stated their confusion with the castaways&#039; lack of direction better than I did, but this week, I feel like that&#039;s been resolved.  I&#039;m looking forward to several more weeks of finding out why Hurley, Kate, Sun, and even Ben returned to the island.  I&#039;m also betting that the title of next week&#039;s episode will explain why killing 12-year-old Ben didn&#039;t fix anything, and I&#039;m betting Faraday makes an appearance to help explain it.  Nice try, though, Sayid.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow.  I loved this week&#8217;s episode just as much as I hated last week&#8217;s.  I feel like LOST is back on track and has a direction again.  Some of the callers/commenters last week stated their confusion with the castaways&#8217; lack of direction better than I did, but this week, I feel like that&#8217;s been resolved.  I&#8217;m looking forward to several more weeks of finding out why Hurley, Kate, Sun, and even Ben returned to the island.  I&#8217;m also betting that the title of next week&#8217;s episode will explain why killing 12-year-old Ben didn&#8217;t fix anything, and I&#8217;m betting Faraday makes an appearance to help explain it.  Nice try, though, Sayid.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nancy from California</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2009/03/25/next-hes-our-you-episode-5x10/comment-page-4/#comment-37551</link>
		<dc:creator>Nancy from California</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Mar 2009 05:16:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/?p=294#comment-37551</guid>
		<description>I still think Jack would be curious as to why Locke was insisting that everyone would die if they didn&#039;t go back to the island.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I still think Jack would be curious as to why Locke was insisting that everyone would die if they didn&#8217;t go back to the island.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kaysea</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2009/03/25/next-hes-our-you-episode-5x10/comment-page-4/#comment-37550</link>
		<dc:creator>Kaysea</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Mar 2009 01:26:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/?p=294#comment-37550</guid>
		<description>What do you think of the idea that the young woman in the military clothes with the gun on Daniel F. a few shows back was his mom Eloise Hawking. He made a comment to her when he was looking at her saying something about her looking familiar. I heard someone say her name was Ellie. I think Eloise also made a comment back at the Lampost about the Military knowing about the Island. Could she be part of a military project? Could She have been on the island at one time? Could Daniel&#039;s dad be Widmore?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What do you think of the idea that the young woman in the military clothes with the gun on Daniel F. a few shows back was his mom Eloise Hawking. He made a comment to her when he was looking at her saying something about her looking familiar. I heard someone say her name was Ellie. I think Eloise also made a comment back at the Lampost about the Military knowing about the Island. Could she be part of a military project? Could She have been on the island at one time? Could Daniel&#8217;s dad be Widmore?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Connie in Alaska</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2009/03/25/next-hes-our-you-episode-5x10/comment-page-4/#comment-37549</link>
		<dc:creator>Connie in Alaska</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Mar 2009 01:08:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/?p=294#comment-37549</guid>
		<description>@Adriano-If there is no Dharma bus for Hurley to find, how can he rescue Jin, Sayid and Bernard when the Others invade their beach camp?  Of course, if their situation has changed and the Purge never happens, he won&#039;t need the bus...right?....ouch

I think one of Kate&#039;s reasons for coming back to the Island is to tell Sawyer about his daughter.  I found it strange, considering it was the last thing he said to her (we assume) before bailing out of the helicopter,  that he never asked Kate about Clementine during their awkward little encounter at the motor pool shed, nor did Kate offer him any info.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Adriano-If there is no Dharma bus for Hurley to find, how can he rescue Jin, Sayid and Bernard when the Others invade their beach camp?  Of course, if their situation has changed and the Purge never happens, he won&#8217;t need the bus&#8230;right?&#8230;.ouch</p>
<p>I think one of Kate&#8217;s reasons for coming back to the Island is to tell Sawyer about his daughter.  I found it strange, considering it was the last thing he said to her (we assume) before bailing out of the helicopter,  that he never asked Kate about Clementine during their awkward little encounter at the motor pool shed, nor did Kate offer him any info.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LostNTonic</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2009/03/25/next-hes-our-you-episode-5x10/comment-page-4/#comment-37548</link>
		<dc:creator>LostNTonic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Mar 2009 01:06:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/?p=294#comment-37548</guid>
		<description>Ok, I rewatched He&#039;s Our You and I rescind my Horace theory (above).  He&#039;s definitely not a hostile sympathizer.  Don&#039;t know why I had that impression - still feel that Amy is though :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ok, I rewatched He&#8217;s Our You and I rescind my Horace theory (above).  He&#8217;s definitely not a hostile sympathizer.  Don&#8217;t know why I had that impression &#8211; still feel that Amy is though <img src='http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Connie in Alaska</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2009/03/25/next-hes-our-you-episode-5x10/comment-page-4/#comment-37547</link>
		<dc:creator>Connie in Alaska</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Mar 2009 00:55:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/?p=294#comment-37547</guid>
		<description>Russell in Raleigh-Hilarious suggestion ;O)  I wonder how many people here remember where that reference comes from?  I am pushing 50 so I have to admit to being a fan of the Newhart show when it originally aired.  Again, very funny!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Russell in Raleigh-Hilarious suggestion ;O)  I wonder how many people here remember where that reference comes from?  I am pushing 50 so I have to admit to being a fan of the Newhart show when it originally aired.  Again, very funny!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carol from Boston</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2009/03/25/next-hes-our-you-episode-5x10/comment-page-4/#comment-37546</link>
		<dc:creator>Carol from Boston</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Mar 2009 00:43:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/?p=294#comment-37546</guid>
		<description>For a good insight into next weeks episode go to abc.com to view the summary of next weeks episode.  Interesting reading, I don&#039;t want to give any spoilers out so go to the site for a hint on what is to come next week.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For a good insight into next weeks episode go to abc.com to view the summary of next weeks episode.  Interesting reading, I don&#8217;t want to give any spoilers out so go to the site for a hint on what is to come next week.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carol from Boston</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2009/03/25/next-hes-our-you-episode-5x10/comment-page-4/#comment-37545</link>
		<dc:creator>Carol from Boston</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Mar 2009 00:41:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/?p=294#comment-37545</guid>
		<description>Screencap of vote to get rid of Sayid, note that the man on the left is the one behind the camera in the season&#039;s first episode with Chang.  It was not Sawyer as some people suspected.

http://getlostpodcast.iimmgg.com/image/63b6a635bb91651b6bce3d833f7d2e6a</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Screencap of vote to get rid of Sayid, note that the man on the left is the one behind the camera in the season&#8217;s first episode with Chang.  It was not Sawyer as some people suspected.</p>
<p><a href="http://getlostpodcast.iimmgg.com/image/63b6a635bb91651b6bce3d833f7d2e6a" rel="nofollow">http://getlostpodcast.iimmgg.com/image/63b6a635bb91651b6bce3d833f7d2e6a</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LostNTonic</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2009/03/25/next-hes-our-you-episode-5x10/comment-page-4/#comment-37544</link>
		<dc:creator>LostNTonic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 22:57:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/?p=294#comment-37544</guid>
		<description>Really great ideas everyone!  I love the analysis and the theories, makes me look at the story in many different ways.

Here are my thoughts after watching He&#039;s Our You...

Amy - I agree with Nels, she is definitely suspicious!  I said last week that I thought she was a hostile sympathizer and now I&#039;m sure about it from watching her reaction to &quot;the vote&quot; this week.  She does not recognize Sayid as a hostile and if she was able to talk or get any info from a hostile source who could confirm that he was definitely NOT from their camp then she would be very freaked out by his presence and definitely want him out of the way.  Afterall, she needs to protect her own secret identity (and now also protect her new baby).  I&#039;m also thinking that Horace is a hostile sympathizer too.  Don&#039;t know if he was originally an infiltrator, or if he becomes sympathetic due to his love for Amy.  If you can re-watch the vote scene and think of that scene from the perspective of Horace and Amy as hostile-oriented people and see if you don&#039;t agree!

Ben/Sayid -- I think Ben *knew* he needed to be shot by Sayid outside of Dharmaville so that he would be found and saved by the hostile camp.  This was the thing that allows him to officially move into hostile territory.  That is why Ben worked so hard to get Sayid to come back.  

Ethan -- I think he also knows he has to recruit Juliet later in life because she is the only reason he is alive.  He knows it is Juliet who is responsible for his being born and his mom Amy not dying during childbirth.  

Ben - *if* Ben is dead due to Sayid&#039;s shooting, maybe this is what makes &#039;07 Ben unconscious on the cot after the Aijira plane crash - not the oar to the head.  Maybe he can not be conscious in current time if his younger self is not alive.  Don&#039;t know if I altogether buy that theory, but I felt I had to shout it out!  

Can&#039;t wait for the podcast!  Keep those great theories flying!

Tammy</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Really great ideas everyone!  I love the analysis and the theories, makes me look at the story in many different ways.</p>
<p>Here are my thoughts after watching He&#8217;s Our You&#8230;</p>
<p>Amy &#8211; I agree with Nels, she is definitely suspicious!  I said last week that I thought she was a hostile sympathizer and now I&#8217;m sure about it from watching her reaction to &#8220;the vote&#8221; this week.  She does not recognize Sayid as a hostile and if she was able to talk or get any info from a hostile source who could confirm that he was definitely NOT from their camp then she would be very freaked out by his presence and definitely want him out of the way.  Afterall, she needs to protect her own secret identity (and now also protect her new baby).  I&#8217;m also thinking that Horace is a hostile sympathizer too.  Don&#8217;t know if he was originally an infiltrator, or if he becomes sympathetic due to his love for Amy.  If you can re-watch the vote scene and think of that scene from the perspective of Horace and Amy as hostile-oriented people and see if you don&#8217;t agree!</p>
<p>Ben/Sayid &#8212; I think Ben *knew* he needed to be shot by Sayid outside of Dharmaville so that he would be found and saved by the hostile camp.  This was the thing that allows him to officially move into hostile territory.  That is why Ben worked so hard to get Sayid to come back.  </p>
<p>Ethan &#8212; I think he also knows he has to recruit Juliet later in life because she is the only reason he is alive.  He knows it is Juliet who is responsible for his being born and his mom Amy not dying during childbirth.  </p>
<p>Ben &#8211; *if* Ben is dead due to Sayid&#8217;s shooting, maybe this is what makes &#8217;07 Ben unconscious on the cot after the Aijira plane crash &#8211; not the oar to the head.  Maybe he can not be conscious in current time if his younger self is not alive.  Don&#8217;t know if I altogether buy that theory, but I felt I had to shout it out!  </p>
<p>Can&#8217;t wait for the podcast!  Keep those great theories flying!</p>
<p>Tammy</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wednesday</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2009/03/25/next-hes-our-you-episode-5x10/comment-page-4/#comment-37543</link>
		<dc:creator>Wednesday</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 22:20:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/?p=294#comment-37543</guid>
		<description>sorry for the &quot;?&quot; after &quot;him&quot;, wasn&#039;t intentional.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>sorry for the &#8220;?&#8221; after &#8220;him&#8221;, wasn&#8217;t intentional.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wednesday</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2009/03/25/next-hes-our-you-episode-5x10/comment-page-3/#comment-37542</link>
		<dc:creator>Wednesday</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 22:06:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/?p=294#comment-37542</guid>
		<description>Great show and I&#039;m loving the podcast!

We are not told what Oldham uses to gain the truth, but I assume it was sodium pentothal.

Seeing some above comments mentioning the Carlos Castenada book, A Separate Reality, I have a hunch there&#039;s some allusion to using plants (something found in the jungle?), perhaps during a ceremony, for transcending to an alternate state of consciousness. It could be something foreshadowing for the future. We have already seen on the show the time when Boone was able to &quot;see&quot; after Locke drugged him? And we&#039;ve seen a character wake up but they&#039;re not awake, they&#039;re actually dreaming, for example, Michael sees Libby in the hospital; Kate sees Claire in Aaron&#039;s room. Jack, Hurley, Juliet, Kate, Eko and Shannon have all seen someone or something while in the jungle that no one else could see and then have these moments of clarity about what they&#039;ve seen because it is something from their past. It&#039;ll be interesting if they intend to use &quot;states of consciousness&quot; in upcoming episodes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great show and I&#8217;m loving the podcast!</p>
<p>We are not told what Oldham uses to gain the truth, but I assume it was sodium pentothal.</p>
<p>Seeing some above comments mentioning the Carlos Castenada book, A Separate Reality, I have a hunch there&#8217;s some allusion to using plants (something found in the jungle?), perhaps during a ceremony, for transcending to an alternate state of consciousness. It could be something foreshadowing for the future. We have already seen on the show the time when Boone was able to &#8220;see&#8221; after Locke drugged him? And we&#8217;ve seen a character wake up but they&#8217;re not awake, they&#8217;re actually dreaming, for example, Michael sees Libby in the hospital; Kate sees Claire in Aaron&#8217;s room. Jack, Hurley, Juliet, Kate, Eko and Shannon have all seen someone or something while in the jungle that no one else could see and then have these moments of clarity about what they&#8217;ve seen because it is something from their past. It&#8217;ll be interesting if they intend to use &#8220;states of consciousness&#8221; in upcoming episodes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott in Virginia Beach</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2009/03/25/next-hes-our-you-episode-5x10/comment-page-3/#comment-37541</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott in Virginia Beach</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 20:34:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/?p=294#comment-37541</guid>
		<description>Way back in Season 2 when Michael was trying to get Walt back.  The list he was given included Jack, Kate, Hugo, and James.  This must have some current meaning.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Way back in Season 2 when Michael was trying to get Walt back.  The list he was given included Jack, Kate, Hugo, and James.  This must have some current meaning.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Russell from California</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2009/03/25/next-hes-our-you-episode-5x10/comment-page-3/#comment-37540</link>
		<dc:creator>Russell from California</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 19:52:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/?p=294#comment-37540</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s true, but still I didn&#039;t get the impression that she still wanted to be with him. She followed through with whatever she had promised she would do (with or for his daughter or whatever), but even when Jack and Locke were trying to get her to go back, she wasn&#039;t trying to hear it. 

But now things have changed a little bit because she sees that Sawyer&#039;s with Juliet, and jealousy is a green-eyed smoke monster.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s true, but still I didn&#8217;t get the impression that she still wanted to be with him. She followed through with whatever she had promised she would do (with or for his daughter or whatever), but even when Jack and Locke were trying to get her to go back, she wasn&#8217;t trying to hear it. </p>
<p>But now things have changed a little bit because she sees that Sawyer&#8217;s with Juliet, and jealousy is a green-eyed smoke monster.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Richard</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2009/03/25/next-hes-our-you-episode-5x10/comment-page-3/#comment-37539</link>
		<dc:creator>Richard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 19:28:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/?p=294#comment-37539</guid>
		<description>@Russell. You have to remember she (kate) thought she was leaving WITH Sawyer. It was only because of him jumping out of the chopper that stopped that. For all intents and purposes though she was leaving with him.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Russell. You have to remember she (kate) thought she was leaving WITH Sawyer. It was only because of him jumping out of the chopper that stopped that. For all intents and purposes though she was leaving with him.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kim</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2009/03/25/next-hes-our-you-episode-5x10/comment-page-3/#comment-37538</link>
		<dc:creator>Kim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 19:00:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/?p=294#comment-37538</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t think Ben is dead. Interesting to think that when Sayid first met Ben, Ben already knew him. That&#039;s why he knows so much about the status of all the survivors and what needed to be done in the present. I need to go back and watch the episodes where Ben first interacts with the survivors. He already knew a lot of them as a child. Need to see if there&#039;s anything telling in the way he acts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think Ben is dead. Interesting to think that when Sayid first met Ben, Ben already knew him. That&#8217;s why he knows so much about the status of all the survivors and what needed to be done in the present. I need to go back and watch the episodes where Ben first interacts with the survivors. He already knew a lot of them as a child. Need to see if there&#8217;s anything telling in the way he acts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Russell from California</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2009/03/25/next-hes-our-you-episode-5x10/comment-page-3/#comment-37537</link>
		<dc:creator>Russell from California</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 18:07:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/?p=294#comment-37537</guid>
		<description>I agree. I don&#039;t think Kate came back for Sawyer. Off island, she didn&#039;t seem too concerned about him and if she felt that strongly, she would&#039;ve never left in the first place. The only thing we have seen Kate be passionate about is Aaron. So I think all the tension with her conversation with Sawyer was just to get the viewers to assume it was him and raise the intensity of this paralovagram. But I think her reason for returning has something to do with what happened to Aaron.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree. I don&#8217;t think Kate came back for Sawyer. Off island, she didn&#8217;t seem too concerned about him and if she felt that strongly, she would&#8217;ve never left in the first place. The only thing we have seen Kate be passionate about is Aaron. So I think all the tension with her conversation with Sawyer was just to get the viewers to assume it was him and raise the intensity of this paralovagram. But I think her reason for returning has something to do with what happened to Aaron.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rich in Cleveland</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2009/03/25/next-hes-our-you-episode-5x10/comment-page-3/#comment-37536</link>
		<dc:creator>Rich in Cleveland</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 18:03:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/?p=294#comment-37536</guid>
		<description>Can Kate&#039;s reason for returning to the island be as simple as her love for Sawyer?  No doubt she still had those feelings, but it would have to be something larger than that to force her to sacrifice her relationship with Aaron.  I believe Kate received some special knowledge from Ben or one of his agents.  Perhaps it just involved some threat against Aaron or at least an assurance of his safety, although I have the sense she was persuaded more than coerced.  Some revelation made her change from &quot;you people are crazy&quot; to playing along before that 72 hour window closed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can Kate&#8217;s reason for returning to the island be as simple as her love for Sawyer?  No doubt she still had those feelings, but it would have to be something larger than that to force her to sacrifice her relationship with Aaron.  I believe Kate received some special knowledge from Ben or one of his agents.  Perhaps it just involved some threat against Aaron or at least an assurance of his safety, although I have the sense she was persuaded more than coerced.  Some revelation made her change from &#8220;you people are crazy&#8221; to playing along before that 72 hour window closed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HeyKir in NYC</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2009/03/25/next-hes-our-you-episode-5x10/comment-page-3/#comment-37535</link>
		<dc:creator>HeyKir in NYC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 17:52:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/?p=294#comment-37535</guid>
		<description>Great posts everyone!! Amazing theories and conversations!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great posts everyone!! Amazing theories and conversations!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: christy in TX</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2009/03/25/next-hes-our-you-episode-5x10/comment-page-3/#comment-37534</link>
		<dc:creator>christy in TX</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 17:23:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/?p=294#comment-37534</guid>
		<description>@Nancy from CA: I think Jack is glad to be back and would have come back even if no one needed his help.  I think he&#039;s wanted to go back ever since Locke mentioned that Christian said for him to say hello to his son, that was when his downward spiral really got bad.
Kate said she has a reason to be there, I am presuming for Sawyer, but not sure.  The only reason Sun is there is in hopes of finding Jin.
So, we still don&#039;t know what brought Hurley and the guitar case there.
Also, I would bet that Ben had someone hire the &quot;bounty hunter&quot; that brought Sayid there (probably his attorney arranged that) when he realized Sayid was not willingly going along for the ride.
So really, none of them came back to help the time jumpers, how&#039;s that for leadership?  Maybe the O6 will keep returning to the island until they evolve into people who can put interests of others ahead of their own.

Another random thought: If the O6 never left, which Ben thought they were dead anyway since he knew the freighter blew up when Keamy died, then he probably still would have left the island with the donkey wheel.  His first order of business was to see Widmore and tell him he changed the rules and that now Penny would meet the same fate as Alex.  If Ben would have left regardless of the O6 leaving, all the Losties would have jumped through time on the island together until someone else turned the wheel, right?  So maybe their leaving the island was inconsequential and they had to return to the island to course correct events.  
If I remember correctly Richard Alpert, Widmore, Ben, and Miss Hawking all told Locke that the O6 must return, so they must all remember them from the island in the 70&#039;s.
Nosebleeds are still happening here in TX.  Please someone put that wheel back on it&#039;s axis.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Nancy from CA: I think Jack is glad to be back and would have come back even if no one needed his help.  I think he&#8217;s wanted to go back ever since Locke mentioned that Christian said for him to say hello to his son, that was when his downward spiral really got bad.<br />
Kate said she has a reason to be there, I am presuming for Sawyer, but not sure.  The only reason Sun is there is in hopes of finding Jin.<br />
So, we still don&#8217;t know what brought Hurley and the guitar case there.<br />
Also, I would bet that Ben had someone hire the &#8220;bounty hunter&#8221; that brought Sayid there (probably his attorney arranged that) when he realized Sayid was not willingly going along for the ride.<br />
So really, none of them came back to help the time jumpers, how&#8217;s that for leadership?  Maybe the O6 will keep returning to the island until they evolve into people who can put interests of others ahead of their own.</p>
<p>Another random thought: If the O6 never left, which Ben thought they were dead anyway since he knew the freighter blew up when Keamy died, then he probably still would have left the island with the donkey wheel.  His first order of business was to see Widmore and tell him he changed the rules and that now Penny would meet the same fate as Alex.  If Ben would have left regardless of the O6 leaving, all the Losties would have jumped through time on the island together until someone else turned the wheel, right?  So maybe their leaving the island was inconsequential and they had to return to the island to course correct events.<br />
If I remember correctly Richard Alpert, Widmore, Ben, and Miss Hawking all told Locke that the O6 must return, so they must all remember them from the island in the 70&#8242;s.<br />
Nosebleeds are still happening here in TX.  Please someone put that wheel back on it&#8217;s axis.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nancy from California</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2009/03/25/next-hes-our-you-episode-5x10/comment-page-3/#comment-37533</link>
		<dc:creator>Nancy from California</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 16:50:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/?p=294#comment-37533</guid>
		<description>OK, I don&#039;t understand something. Locke went around telling everyone that they had to go back to save those left on the island. Jack in particular was feeling very guilty about the people left behind and the supposed awful things happening to them. Now they are there, and obviously nothing bad is happening to Sawyer etc. So why isn&#039;t Jack pissed that he came back for no apparent reason?????</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK, I don&#8217;t understand something. Locke went around telling everyone that they had to go back to save those left on the island. Jack in particular was feeling very guilty about the people left behind and the supposed awful things happening to them. Now they are there, and obviously nothing bad is happening to Sawyer etc. So why isn&#8217;t Jack pissed that he came back for no apparent reason?????</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Russell from California</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2009/03/25/next-hes-our-you-episode-5x10/comment-page-3/#comment-37532</link>
		<dc:creator>Russell from California</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 16:40:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/?p=294#comment-37532</guid>
		<description>So I finally had a chance to read up on everything. A lot of good thoughts and ideas. 

@Zhami: Great points. The third paragraph especially seems like it is spot on. And I agree with you that in the end, we will all see Ben was doing everything for good.

I actually have this theory that when Dharma learns about the O6, they try to capture them or kill them and the purge could be the Others&#039; taking a stand to save them.

@Steven in Bathurst: I agree that yes, the Island is not done with Ben so he will be saved in one way or another.

@Phil R: I like your idea about Jack and Juliet pairing to save the boy and that creating a a shift in the dynamic of four of them.

Hey Ryan and Jen, I got the perfect term for the Jack/Juliet/Sawyer/Kate thing by the way: Paralovagram.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So I finally had a chance to read up on everything. A lot of good thoughts and ideas. </p>
<p>@Zhami: Great points. The third paragraph especially seems like it is spot on. And I agree with you that in the end, we will all see Ben was doing everything for good.</p>
<p>I actually have this theory that when Dharma learns about the O6, they try to capture them or kill them and the purge could be the Others&#8217; taking a stand to save them.</p>
<p>@Steven in Bathurst: I agree that yes, the Island is not done with Ben so he will be saved in one way or another.</p>
<p>@Phil R: I like your idea about Jack and Juliet pairing to save the boy and that creating a a shift in the dynamic of four of them.</p>
<p>Hey Ryan and Jen, I got the perfect term for the Jack/Juliet/Sawyer/Kate thing by the way: Paralovagram.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: crashcarts</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2009/03/25/next-hes-our-you-episode-5x10/comment-page-3/#comment-37531</link>
		<dc:creator>crashcarts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 16:18:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/?p=294#comment-37531</guid>
		<description>Love the Podcast! If you want crossovers..... Kevin the cop that Kate married (and then drugged) played Kevin Buchanan on the ABC soap OLTL. Faradays Co Pilot who was instantaneously Killed when flight 316 crashed is also a OLTL cross over and also playing a Buchanan son. I want to mention that the best acting I have seen on Lost to date came this season when Locke was standing on the table about to hang himself. Although I am not a huge fan of Terry O&#039;Quins that scene was beyond phenomenal. I never had any doubts that Ben was Evil and think it is interesting to suddenly think that Whidmore may be the lesser of the two. I also truly believe that if anyone screws up Sawyer and Juliet it is Sawyer and Juliet. I really enjoy hearing everybodies thoughts and theories about the show but think that the Kate and Jack bashing is detrimental to what is a wonderful compliment (Your Podcast) to the best show that has ever been on network TV. Keep up the Great work and again Love the poscast!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Love the Podcast! If you want crossovers&#8230;.. Kevin the cop that Kate married (and then drugged) played Kevin Buchanan on the ABC soap OLTL. Faradays Co Pilot who was instantaneously Killed when flight 316 crashed is also a OLTL cross over and also playing a Buchanan son. I want to mention that the best acting I have seen on Lost to date came this season when Locke was standing on the table about to hang himself. Although I am not a huge fan of Terry O&#8217;Quins that scene was beyond phenomenal. I never had any doubts that Ben was Evil and think it is interesting to suddenly think that Whidmore may be the lesser of the two. I also truly believe that if anyone screws up Sawyer and Juliet it is Sawyer and Juliet. I really enjoy hearing everybodies thoughts and theories about the show but think that the Kate and Jack bashing is detrimental to what is a wonderful compliment (Your Podcast) to the best show that has ever been on network TV. Keep up the Great work and again Love the poscast!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adriano</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2009/03/25/next-hes-our-you-episode-5x10/comment-page-3/#comment-37530</link>
		<dc:creator>Adriano</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 16:09:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/?p=294#comment-37530</guid>
		<description>Okay, so I am firm believer in reading the whole blog before I reply but WHEW!   You guys have a lot of great ideas -- a lot to chew on from here til next Wednesday.  

The McFly rule DOES apply (which contradicts Daniel&#039;s notion that &quot;whatever happened will happen,&quot; which Daniel himself disproved when he &quot;gave&quot; Desmond a new memory by interacting with him in Desmond&#039;s past).  So if Sayid killed the young Ben, he will be changing the chain of events therein after.  Which brings me to the supposedly upcoming Purge (as a product of Dharma-Hostiles tensions):

The presence of Sawyer, Juliet, Miles, Jin, and now Hurley, Kate, and Jack has already changed the Dharma-Hostile dynamics (don&#039;t forget that bomb that Sawyer dropped on Richard on their first night).  On the OTHER hand, had Sawyer et al not come along, then Amy would not have given birth to Ethan (who clearly was supposed to have survive the Purge and later harass our Oceanic 815 survivors).  If Ben is dead, it could be argued the Purge would happen anyway (just no patricide and no Dharma Bus for Hurley to discover later).  And remember what Dharmaville looked like in Frank and Sun’s future.  Bottom line, the dynamics have changed.  Or if you prefer, “Everything&#039;s going to change. Have a cluckity cluck-cluck day, Hugo.”</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Okay, so I am firm believer in reading the whole blog before I reply but WHEW!   You guys have a lot of great ideas &#8212; a lot to chew on from here til next Wednesday.  </p>
<p>The McFly rule DOES apply (which contradicts Daniel&#8217;s notion that &#8220;whatever happened will happen,&#8221; which Daniel himself disproved when he &#8220;gave&#8221; Desmond a new memory by interacting with him in Desmond&#8217;s past).  So if Sayid killed the young Ben, he will be changing the chain of events therein after.  Which brings me to the supposedly upcoming Purge (as a product of Dharma-Hostiles tensions):</p>
<p>The presence of Sawyer, Juliet, Miles, Jin, and now Hurley, Kate, and Jack has already changed the Dharma-Hostile dynamics (don&#8217;t forget that bomb that Sawyer dropped on Richard on their first night).  On the OTHER hand, had Sawyer et al not come along, then Amy would not have given birth to Ethan (who clearly was supposed to have survive the Purge and later harass our Oceanic 815 survivors).  If Ben is dead, it could be argued the Purge would happen anyway (just no patricide and no Dharma Bus for Hurley to discover later).  And remember what Dharmaville looked like in Frank and Sun’s future.  Bottom line, the dynamics have changed.  Or if you prefer, “Everything&#8217;s going to change. Have a cluckity cluck-cluck day, Hugo.”</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Russell in Raleigh</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2009/03/25/next-hes-our-you-episode-5x10/comment-page-3/#comment-37529</link>
		<dc:creator>Russell in Raleigh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 15:45:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/?p=294#comment-37529</guid>
		<description>I agree with most of the posts above that Ben will likely survive and gain a lot of knowledge about the future and then take action to ensure the future happens as planned.

The problem I have with that is why did Ben go to such great lengths to try and keep the Losties on the island if he knew that the oceanic 6 needed to leave?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with most of the posts above that Ben will likely survive and gain a lot of knowledge about the future and then take action to ensure the future happens as planned.</p>
<p>The problem I have with that is why did Ben go to such great lengths to try and keep the Losties on the island if he knew that the oceanic 6 needed to leave?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Russell in Raleigh</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2009/03/25/next-hes-our-you-episode-5x10/comment-page-3/#comment-37528</link>
		<dc:creator>Russell in Raleigh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 15:43:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/?p=294#comment-37528</guid>
		<description>I loved the casting of Oldham too. And I know the producers have promised that there is no cloning on the show but they do like to make a lot of pop culture references. 

So I just wanted to say that I would be eternally greatful to Darlton if they could write in for Oldham a brother named Daryl, who gets cloned, so that Oldham must then introduce people to &quot;his brother Daryl, and his other brother Daryl.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I loved the casting of Oldham too. And I know the producers have promised that there is no cloning on the show but they do like to make a lot of pop culture references. </p>
<p>So I just wanted to say that I would be eternally greatful to Darlton if they could write in for Oldham a brother named Daryl, who gets cloned, so that Oldham must then introduce people to &#8220;his brother Daryl, and his other brother Daryl.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MLE in Colorado</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2009/03/25/next-hes-our-you-episode-5x10/comment-page-3/#comment-37527</link>
		<dc:creator>MLE in Colorado</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 15:00:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/?p=294#comment-37527</guid>
		<description>@Phil R. ....but it clearly tells us its 30 years back when they flip from Sun/Lapidus/Ben on the little island to the 1977 Dharmaville...so they are in 2007...3 years after smokey tore apart Dharmaville when Ben unleashed him after his daughter, Alex, was killed.

@Phil R   ...I think Dr. Change is still such a mystery because of all the names he uses and his arm etc.  Hopefully there is more to his story- maybe when we see a Miles backstory- if in fact that theory proves to be true.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Phil R. &#8230;.but it clearly tells us its 30 years back when they flip from Sun/Lapidus/Ben on the little island to the 1977 Dharmaville&#8230;so they are in 2007&#8230;3 years after smokey tore apart Dharmaville when Ben unleashed him after his daughter, Alex, was killed.</p>
<p>@Phil R   &#8230;I think Dr. Change is still such a mystery because of all the names he uses and his arm etc.  Hopefully there is more to his story- maybe when we see a Miles backstory- if in fact that theory proves to be true.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: christy in TX</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2009/03/25/next-hes-our-you-episode-5x10/comment-page-3/#comment-37526</link>
		<dc:creator>christy in TX</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 14:59:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/?p=294#comment-37526</guid>
		<description>@Phil R and @Zhami - I agree, I think that the &quot;war&quot; is caused by the &quot;hostile&quot; (Sayid) shooting a young defenseless DI kid, Ben.  The DI were ready to kill the other just for trespassing, imagine the response they would feel appropriate  for the attempted murder of one of their children.  Perhaps their present-day interest in children is due to the healing young Ben will miraculously experience as the universe course-corrects and the otherwise fatal wound heals.
Then again, perhaps &quot;The Rules&quot; are more flexible, maybe things can change, and if this is the case, the &quot;war&quot; would still be between DI and the hostiles, but it would probably result in an uninhabited island, like the one Sun and Frank Lapidus appear to have found with Christian being the only presence.  Why else would the DI barracks not be taken over by the hostiles when the DI leaves? 
Also, why does Widmore need Locke at the island for the war?  It appears the time the Aljira 316 folks are there, the war has already occurred.
Perhaps preventing the &quot;war&quot; is the loop so that the Others can continue to inhabit the island. 
Also, it must be soon that Widmore is exiled from the island because if he is there in 1977 Penny is an Other or will be one if she is born soon.
Another random thought: Maybe when we see Horace and Olivia happen upon Ben&#039;s birth, they are traveling in time from a future date and are there to make sure he survives his premature birth.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Phil R and @Zhami &#8211; I agree, I think that the &#8220;war&#8221; is caused by the &#8220;hostile&#8221; (Sayid) shooting a young defenseless DI kid, Ben.  The DI were ready to kill the other just for trespassing, imagine the response they would feel appropriate  for the attempted murder of one of their children.  Perhaps their present-day interest in children is due to the healing young Ben will miraculously experience as the universe course-corrects and the otherwise fatal wound heals.<br />
Then again, perhaps &#8220;The Rules&#8221; are more flexible, maybe things can change, and if this is the case, the &#8220;war&#8221; would still be between DI and the hostiles, but it would probably result in an uninhabited island, like the one Sun and Frank Lapidus appear to have found with Christian being the only presence.  Why else would the DI barracks not be taken over by the hostiles when the DI leaves?<br />
Also, why does Widmore need Locke at the island for the war?  It appears the time the Aljira 316 folks are there, the war has already occurred.<br />
Perhaps preventing the &#8220;war&#8221; is the loop so that the Others can continue to inhabit the island.<br />
Also, it must be soon that Widmore is exiled from the island because if he is there in 1977 Penny is an Other or will be one if she is born soon.<br />
Another random thought: Maybe when we see Horace and Olivia happen upon Ben&#8217;s birth, they are traveling in time from a future date and are there to make sure he survives his premature birth.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phil R</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2009/03/25/next-hes-our-you-episode-5x10/comment-page-3/#comment-37525</link>
		<dc:creator>Phil R</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 12:59:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/?p=294#comment-37525</guid>
		<description>Some great thoughts in this comment section. 

There are three outcomes that are possible for young Ben:

- Jin wakes up, sees Ben is shot. Radios in that he has been shot, Sayid is on the loose, and Jack/Juliet saves Ben.
- The others find Ben, and take him in and cure him.
- The island magically heals him.

I believe the first one is more likely than anything. The re-pairing of Jack and Juliet will push Juliet and Sawyer apart. Sawyer will go back to Kate... very confusing, then again I don&#039;t think anyone really knows whats going on there. The relationships between those four are just confusing at best.

@Zhami Had the best suggestion I have read yet. This shooting, which Sayid believes will end his suffering and is for the greater good, will trigger a war between the hostiles and Dharma. 
It will lead up to the Incident- involving Jughead. Somehow the Dharma folks will believe that a large enough explosion will do away with the Others once and for all. Though I would think an explosion the size of Jughead would radiate the entire island and cause a huge mark. 

Also, I believe that Sun and Frank have traveled back in time. That the intake building they saw, and the shell of a brunt out building is shortly after (maybe one to five years, not 20+) what happened with the flaming van. Perhaps right after the Incident. They are going to be sent in to help course correct perhaps via Christian? 

Last point- What DID happen to Doctor Chang? Why wouldn’t he be in with the vote for what happens to Sayid?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some great thoughts in this comment section. </p>
<p>There are three outcomes that are possible for young Ben:</p>
<p>- Jin wakes up, sees Ben is shot. Radios in that he has been shot, Sayid is on the loose, and Jack/Juliet saves Ben.<br />
- The others find Ben, and take him in and cure him.<br />
- The island magically heals him.</p>
<p>I believe the first one is more likely than anything. The re-pairing of Jack and Juliet will push Juliet and Sawyer apart. Sawyer will go back to Kate&#8230; very confusing, then again I don&#8217;t think anyone really knows whats going on there. The relationships between those four are just confusing at best.</p>
<p>@Zhami Had the best suggestion I have read yet. This shooting, which Sayid believes will end his suffering and is for the greater good, will trigger a war between the hostiles and Dharma.<br />
It will lead up to the Incident- involving Jughead. Somehow the Dharma folks will believe that a large enough explosion will do away with the Others once and for all. Though I would think an explosion the size of Jughead would radiate the entire island and cause a huge mark. </p>
<p>Also, I believe that Sun and Frank have traveled back in time. That the intake building they saw, and the shell of a brunt out building is shortly after (maybe one to five years, not 20+) what happened with the flaming van. Perhaps right after the Incident. They are going to be sent in to help course correct perhaps via Christian? </p>
<p>Last point- What DID happen to Doctor Chang? Why wouldn’t he be in with the vote for what happens to Sayid?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Russell from California</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2009/03/25/next-hes-our-you-episode-5x10/comment-page-3/#comment-37524</link>
		<dc:creator>Russell from California</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 07:33:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/?p=294#comment-37524</guid>
		<description>Sayid&#039;s actions also explain why he is not on Ben&#039;s List.

My bad if any of this has been posted but I just finished watching the episode and I never read the posts beforehand so I don&#039;t get spoiled. 

Peace.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sayid&#8217;s actions also explain why he is not on Ben&#8217;s List.</p>
<p>My bad if any of this has been posted but I just finished watching the episode and I never read the posts beforehand so I don&#8217;t get spoiled. </p>
<p>Peace.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Russell from California</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2009/03/25/next-hes-our-you-episode-5x10/comment-page-3/#comment-37523</link>
		<dc:creator>Russell from California</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 07:27:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/?p=294#comment-37523</guid>
		<description>Jack saving Ben in 77 is how Ben will know Jack can save him in the future.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jack saving Ben in 77 is how Ben will know Jack can save him in the future.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Russell from California</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2009/03/25/next-hes-our-you-episode-5x10/comment-page-3/#comment-37522</link>
		<dc:creator>Russell from California</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 07:02:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/?p=294#comment-37522</guid>
		<description>He&#039;s Our You was another brilliant episode. I didn&#039;t know which way it was going and for a minute I thought Sayid might end up really killed in the end.

Like a lot of posters, I too believe that Ben is not dead. I still believe what we are seeing is one timeline so since we know Ben grows up to kill his dad and do all the manipulating he ends up doing, he lives through the gun shot.

I do think that Ben looks up to Sayid. I think seeing Sayid &quot;infiltrate&quot; the Dharma camp as a prisoner is what inspires him to do the same thing in season 2. And I think getting shot by Sayid is what inspires him to shoot Locke later to continue on his mission. 

And I believe the bullet will somehow connect to the reason Ben develops the tumor.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>He&#8217;s Our You was another brilliant episode. I didn&#8217;t know which way it was going and for a minute I thought Sayid might end up really killed in the end.</p>
<p>Like a lot of posters, I too believe that Ben is not dead. I still believe what we are seeing is one timeline so since we know Ben grows up to kill his dad and do all the manipulating he ends up doing, he lives through the gun shot.</p>
<p>I do think that Ben looks up to Sayid. I think seeing Sayid &#8220;infiltrate&#8221; the Dharma camp as a prisoner is what inspires him to do the same thing in season 2. And I think getting shot by Sayid is what inspires him to shoot Locke later to continue on his mission. </p>
<p>And I believe the bullet will somehow connect to the reason Ben develops the tumor.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Russell from California</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2009/03/25/next-hes-our-you-episode-5x10/comment-page-3/#comment-37521</link>
		<dc:creator>Russell from California</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 06:56:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/?p=294#comment-37521</guid>
		<description>I think the Others are ghosts. I think they&#039;ve been on the Island for thousands of centuries and built the four-toed statue. This explains the Whispers. This explains why Richard Alpert doesn&#039;t age and how he was able to walk through the sonic fence. Ghosts don&#039;t die and don&#039;t age. We&#039;ve seen Dharma defectors die (ie: Ethan, presumably Goodwin), but I believe the original Others have figured out that by being one with the Island, they can become immortal. Whereas the Dharma folks were trying to manipulate fate to prevent the end of the world. Another faith versus science reference.

Ben wants this power, but cannot get over his natural inclination to manipulate fate. Ben&#039;s biggest fear is death. We saw this fear manifest twice: first, in season 3, when he had that tumor; and then in this season when he made sure he killed Locke so he wouldn&#039;t be the one to die. Ben lacks the faith needed to live forever.

But I digress. This idea of ghosts I believe will play a pivotal role in the
final season. Perhaps the &quot;war&quot; will be between the living and the undead. But the concept has its roots all the way back in season one because, if you think about, our Losties have been at war with themselves since the beginning and in flashbacks, we saw that each person had his or her own &quot;ghost&quot; of the past.

thoughts?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the Others are ghosts. I think they&#8217;ve been on the Island for thousands of centuries and built the four-toed statue. This explains the Whispers. This explains why Richard Alpert doesn&#8217;t age and how he was able to walk through the sonic fence. Ghosts don&#8217;t die and don&#8217;t age. We&#8217;ve seen Dharma defectors die (ie: Ethan, presumably Goodwin), but I believe the original Others have figured out that by being one with the Island, they can become immortal. Whereas the Dharma folks were trying to manipulate fate to prevent the end of the world. Another faith versus science reference.</p>
<p>Ben wants this power, but cannot get over his natural inclination to manipulate fate. Ben&#8217;s biggest fear is death. We saw this fear manifest twice: first, in season 3, when he had that tumor; and then in this season when he made sure he killed Locke so he wouldn&#8217;t be the one to die. Ben lacks the faith needed to live forever.</p>
<p>But I digress. This idea of ghosts I believe will play a pivotal role in the<br />
final season. Perhaps the &#8220;war&#8221; will be between the living and the undead. But the concept has its roots all the way back in season one because, if you think about, our Losties have been at war with themselves since the beginning and in flashbacks, we saw that each person had his or her own &#8220;ghost&#8221; of the past.</p>
<p>thoughts?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott Branch</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2009/03/25/next-hes-our-you-episode-5x10/comment-page-3/#comment-37520</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Branch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 05:58:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/?p=294#comment-37520</guid>
		<description>WOW!!!! What an episode. The triangle of LOVE is not going away soon,  The dude that is designing the Swan is  psyco and when Sayid&#039;s  final decision is to shoot and kill Ben, then is Ben even involved anymoer??? Does Ben create the problem in thepace/time continuim? I think that with others being smater, If it is on, you need to contact me to get in.   ill hwlp you teh correct way.  See ya\</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WOW!!!! What an episode. The triangle of LOVE is not going away soon,  The dude that is designing the Swan is  psyco and when Sayid&#8217;s  final decision is to shoot and kill Ben, then is Ben even involved anymoer??? Does Ben create the problem in thepace/time continuim? I think that with others being smater, If it is on, you need to contact me to get in.   ill hwlp you teh correct way.  See ya\</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rich in Cleveland</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2009/03/25/next-hes-our-you-episode-5x10/comment-page-3/#comment-37519</link>
		<dc:creator>Rich in Cleveland</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 03:57:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/?p=294#comment-37519</guid>
		<description>To Steve in Bathurst: Amazing third paragraph about how Ben might perceive himself as something approaching immortal and then adding extra meaning to the shooting of Locke at the pit.

I don&#039;t see the realization by Sayid that Ben executed Nadia.  But it would have been great if they had at least hinted that this might have been Sayid&#039;s motivation.  However, that might have destroyed the difficult emotions Sayid felt when he finally went through with the deed.  If Sayid knew for sure, he would show little remorse or pity.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To Steve in Bathurst: Amazing third paragraph about how Ben might perceive himself as something approaching immortal and then adding extra meaning to the shooting of Locke at the pit.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t see the realization by Sayid that Ben executed Nadia.  But it would have been great if they had at least hinted that this might have been Sayid&#8217;s motivation.  However, that might have destroyed the difficult emotions Sayid felt when he finally went through with the deed.  If Sayid knew for sure, he would show little remorse or pity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Connie in Alaska</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2009/03/25/next-hes-our-you-episode-5x10/comment-page-3/#comment-37518</link>
		<dc:creator>Connie in Alaska</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 03:03:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/?p=294#comment-37518</guid>
		<description>@Jeff in Cape Coral-Thanks for doing that bit of research.  Whatever mysteries we can answer amongst ourselves, however small, leaves us more brain cells to obsess over the larger mysteries.  It definitely makes more sense that he said &quot;I hate it here&quot; rather than &quot;I hated him.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Jeff in Cape Coral-Thanks for doing that bit of research.  Whatever mysteries we can answer amongst ourselves, however small, leaves us more brain cells to obsess over the larger mysteries.  It definitely makes more sense that he said &#8220;I hate it here&#8221; rather than &#8220;I hated him.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff in Cape Coral</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2009/03/25/next-hes-our-you-episode-5x10/comment-page-3/#comment-37517</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff in Cape Coral</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 01:52:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/?p=294#comment-37517</guid>
		<description>DaveWR and Atoms...watched back the episode and did think Ben said &quot;I hated him.&quot;  But then I turned on closed captioning, and the script read &quot;I hate it here.&quot;  Watch it back again and it&#039;s clear that&#039;s what Ben said.  He may have swallowed the last sound in &quot;here&quot; to make it sound like &quot;him,&quot; but he definatley said, &quot;I hate it here.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>DaveWR and Atoms&#8230;watched back the episode and did think Ben said &#8220;I hated him.&#8221;  But then I turned on closed captioning, and the script read &#8220;I hate it here.&#8221;  Watch it back again and it&#8217;s clear that&#8217;s what Ben said.  He may have swallowed the last sound in &#8220;here&#8221; to make it sound like &#8220;him,&#8221; but he definatley said, &#8220;I hate it here.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave582</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2009/03/25/next-hes-our-you-episode-5x10/comment-page-3/#comment-37516</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave582</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 01:48:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/?p=294#comment-37516</guid>
		<description>The latest Episode of &#039;Lost Untangled&#039; on Abc.com/lost features a quick shot of Ben in a Hospital Bed. I don&#039;t think we have seen a scene like this before which leads me to believe that BEN IS ALIVE and Jack will save him...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The latest Episode of &#8216;Lost Untangled&#8217; on Abc.com/lost features a quick shot of Ben in a Hospital Bed. I don&#8217;t think we have seen a scene like this before which leads me to believe that BEN IS ALIVE and Jack will save him&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steven in Bathurst</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2009/03/25/next-hes-our-you-episode-5x10/comment-page-3/#comment-37515</link>
		<dc:creator>Steven in Bathurst</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 01:04:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/?p=294#comment-37515</guid>
		<description>First up, Connie, that was very, very funny. I can imagine halfway through their pirate re-enactment, an Other runs up to Richard telling him that young Ben is nearby. Poor Richard. Years of looking respectable to all sorts of island visitors and young Ben has to appear on the same day as their annual Pirate Picnic. The island does have a sense of humour.

So, my thoughts on the Ben thing. I think he won&#039;t die for the same reason that Michael and Locke didn&#039;t die: the island needs him. Someone above suggested that the island is Time. I don&#039;t think that&#039;s true necessarily but I think the island is the &#039;thing&#039; that controls potential paradoxes and thus makes it possible to travel through time. If this is true, I think it is a clever device by the writers. The whole &#039;what if I killed my grandfather&#039; paradox negatively affects most time travel stories. So the writers have created the idea of the island as a mystical, beyond-our-scientific-knowledge (i.e. almost magical) element, whose power lies in ensuring that such paradoxes cannot happen. Now I don&#039;t know how it would work (I mean, how DID it stop Michael from dying in his self-inflicted car crash?) and it might well be something that is never explained. But this could be its role. If that is the case, then the Lost writers should be commended for creating the most satisfying, serious time travel story in the history of time travel stories. There can never be a paradox because the island will not let it happen. Somehow.

If the island does save Ben, even if he has been shot directly in the heart, then this would explain why by 2004 he thinks he is special and why he appears to react so poorly to the arrival of John Locke. While all the island was doing in saving Ben was avoiding a paradox, from Ben&#039;s point of view he will feel like a God, an immortal destined for greatness. He will live his life for the next 27 years thinking this way, until he gets a tumour, which will not heal by itself, and then meets John Locke, a paraplegic who can now walk. Ben surviving a shot by Sayid nicely explains why Ben shot Locke. If Locke can survive a bullet, then he is special. If he doesn&#039;t survive, then he was never as special as Ben, who had survived a bullet. I wonder then whether Walt will appear to Ben, as he did to Locke. That would explain their interest in Walt and why they had to let him go. He still had more to do.

A couple of minor things. Although I&#039;m not a fan of alternate timelines or Ben experiencing the same loop over and over (I don&#039;t think that&#039;s what they&#039;re going with), I did note that when presenting the book &quot;A Separate Reality&quot;, Ben said that he had read it twice. Did he read it twice in separate realities? Secondly, although we didn&#039;t see it in a flashback, I think the moment Sayid stops trusting Ben is when he realises that Ben killed his girlfriend to manipulate him. That&#039;s why he tells Hurley to do the exact opposite of what Ben says. They must be saving this for another flashback, although I would have thought its inclusion here would have been particularly pertinent. Either I&#039;m wrong or the writers are saving that flashback for another reason.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First up, Connie, that was very, very funny. I can imagine halfway through their pirate re-enactment, an Other runs up to Richard telling him that young Ben is nearby. Poor Richard. Years of looking respectable to all sorts of island visitors and young Ben has to appear on the same day as their annual Pirate Picnic. The island does have a sense of humour.</p>
<p>So, my thoughts on the Ben thing. I think he won&#8217;t die for the same reason that Michael and Locke didn&#8217;t die: the island needs him. Someone above suggested that the island is Time. I don&#8217;t think that&#8217;s true necessarily but I think the island is the &#8216;thing&#8217; that controls potential paradoxes and thus makes it possible to travel through time. If this is true, I think it is a clever device by the writers. The whole &#8216;what if I killed my grandfather&#8217; paradox negatively affects most time travel stories. So the writers have created the idea of the island as a mystical, beyond-our-scientific-knowledge (i.e. almost magical) element, whose power lies in ensuring that such paradoxes cannot happen. Now I don&#8217;t know how it would work (I mean, how DID it stop Michael from dying in his self-inflicted car crash?) and it might well be something that is never explained. But this could be its role. If that is the case, then the Lost writers should be commended for creating the most satisfying, serious time travel story in the history of time travel stories. There can never be a paradox because the island will not let it happen. Somehow.</p>
<p>If the island does save Ben, even if he has been shot directly in the heart, then this would explain why by 2004 he thinks he is special and why he appears to react so poorly to the arrival of John Locke. While all the island was doing in saving Ben was avoiding a paradox, from Ben&#8217;s point of view he will feel like a God, an immortal destined for greatness. He will live his life for the next 27 years thinking this way, until he gets a tumour, which will not heal by itself, and then meets John Locke, a paraplegic who can now walk. Ben surviving a shot by Sayid nicely explains why Ben shot Locke. If Locke can survive a bullet, then he is special. If he doesn&#8217;t survive, then he was never as special as Ben, who had survived a bullet. I wonder then whether Walt will appear to Ben, as he did to Locke. That would explain their interest in Walt and why they had to let him go. He still had more to do.</p>
<p>A couple of minor things. Although I&#8217;m not a fan of alternate timelines or Ben experiencing the same loop over and over (I don&#8217;t think that&#8217;s what they&#8217;re going with), I did note that when presenting the book &#8220;A Separate Reality&#8221;, Ben said that he had read it twice. Did he read it twice in separate realities? Secondly, although we didn&#8217;t see it in a flashback, I think the moment Sayid stops trusting Ben is when he realises that Ben killed his girlfriend to manipulate him. That&#8217;s why he tells Hurley to do the exact opposite of what Ben says. They must be saving this for another flashback, although I would have thought its inclusion here would have been particularly pertinent. Either I&#8217;m wrong or the writers are saving that flashback for another reason.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rich in Cleveland</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2009/03/25/next-hes-our-you-episode-5x10/comment-page-3/#comment-37514</link>
		<dc:creator>Rich in Cleveland</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 00:13:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/?p=294#comment-37514</guid>
		<description>Loved the episode and especially loved the flashback so reminiscent of The 23rd Psalm.  The old school narrative structure really provides the context that allows true psychological insight into Sayid&#039;s shocking decision.  He gave in to all those voices telling him he has no choice, can&#039;t change, and must obey a nature stamped into him as indelibly as Jack&#039;s tattoos or Juliet&#039;s brand.  The parallel of Ben&#039;s harsh upbringing to his own causes Sayid to believe, despite his obvious empathy, that Ben&#039;s progression from innocent, yearning child to nefarious mastermind would be inevitable.  But is this &quot;The Appointment in Samarra&quot; moment in which you meet a Fate precisely because you tried to avoid it?

I&#039;ll say it again: change IS possible.  That&#039;s the whole goal and source of dramatic tension, is it not?  To change one of the underlying variables, to change one&#039;s self for the better?  If we can overcome our capacity for violence (Sayid), our inherent selfishness (Sawyer), our fear that makes us take flight (Kate), our dependencies (Jack), our deceitfulness (Sun), and the limitations that we impose on ourselves (Locke), then we might be able to save not only ourselves, but to make a better world as well.  Or a similar six factors.

I think we&#039;ve seen hints that present day reality is in a constant state of flux as evidenced by such details as the barracks never becoming Otherville as well as a whole host of cosmetic shifts and anomalies throughout the history of the show.  More importantly, all the things that were not &quot;supposed&quot; to happen like Alex getting shot. If the present is this dynamic in response to what&#039;s happening in the past, I don&#039;t see how you can say the past can be fixed through a &quot;whatever happened, happened&quot; rule.&quot;  When Faraday or Chang or Hawking talk of rules or what can&#039;t be done, I interpret &quot;can&#039;t&quot; to mean because of the horrific consequences rather than plain impossibility.  Instead, I see a cycle that keeps repeating until we can get it right and go on to the next level.

As for taking the word of TPTB, I think one day we&#039;ll be brought to the edge of the water and, after being whacked from behind with purgatory, time paradoxes, and/or the collective dream, they&#039;ll simply explain &quot;We lied.&quot;

Defend the island.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Loved the episode and especially loved the flashback so reminiscent of The 23rd Psalm.  The old school narrative structure really provides the context that allows true psychological insight into Sayid&#8217;s shocking decision.  He gave in to all those voices telling him he has no choice, can&#8217;t change, and must obey a nature stamped into him as indelibly as Jack&#8217;s tattoos or Juliet&#8217;s brand.  The parallel of Ben&#8217;s harsh upbringing to his own causes Sayid to believe, despite his obvious empathy, that Ben&#8217;s progression from innocent, yearning child to nefarious mastermind would be inevitable.  But is this &#8220;The Appointment in Samarra&#8221; moment in which you meet a Fate precisely because you tried to avoid it?</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll say it again: change IS possible.  That&#8217;s the whole goal and source of dramatic tension, is it not?  To change one of the underlying variables, to change one&#8217;s self for the better?  If we can overcome our capacity for violence (Sayid), our inherent selfishness (Sawyer), our fear that makes us take flight (Kate), our dependencies (Jack), our deceitfulness (Sun), and the limitations that we impose on ourselves (Locke), then we might be able to save not only ourselves, but to make a better world as well.  Or a similar six factors.</p>
<p>I think we&#8217;ve seen hints that present day reality is in a constant state of flux as evidenced by such details as the barracks never becoming Otherville as well as a whole host of cosmetic shifts and anomalies throughout the history of the show.  More importantly, all the things that were not &#8220;supposed&#8221; to happen like Alex getting shot. If the present is this dynamic in response to what&#8217;s happening in the past, I don&#8217;t see how you can say the past can be fixed through a &#8220;whatever happened, happened&#8221; rule.&#8221;  When Faraday or Chang or Hawking talk of rules or what can&#8217;t be done, I interpret &#8220;can&#8217;t&#8221; to mean because of the horrific consequences rather than plain impossibility.  Instead, I see a cycle that keeps repeating until we can get it right and go on to the next level.</p>
<p>As for taking the word of TPTB, I think one day we&#8217;ll be brought to the edge of the water and, after being whacked from behind with purgatory, time paradoxes, and/or the collective dream, they&#8217;ll simply explain &#8220;We lied.&#8221;</p>
<p>Defend the island.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2009/03/25/next-hes-our-you-episode-5x10/comment-page-3/#comment-37513</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 00:07:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/?p=294#comment-37513</guid>
		<description>I agree with MRPEMSTAR. Sawyer acquiesced to torturing Sayid, pretty much voted him off the island, and also pretty much threw him under the figurative Dharma-bus.

I think the writers are possibly setting up for Sawyer getting written out of the show as some sort of emotional retribution for this. Initially I worried that Juliet or Sayid might be killed off, but it seems like the writers are making Sawyer hard to sympathize with.

It must also be the case that young Ben is still alive. I think the writers wanted to show Sayid trying to kill Ben, but it&#039;s not really possible given that we know Ben lives to the present. I think the goal was to show how deep Ben&#039;s manipulation of Sayid went. Ben KNEW he could get Sayid to kill so many people and make him such a fractured, empty man. Ben also KNEW that after he had used Sayid to do awful things, Sayid would be such a worthless shell of a person that he would to try and kill Ben in 1977 as revenge. Really though, this information (Sayid attempting to murder young Ben) would give older Ben the opportunity to take Sayid as far to the breaking point as possible.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with MRPEMSTAR. Sawyer acquiesced to torturing Sayid, pretty much voted him off the island, and also pretty much threw him under the figurative Dharma-bus.</p>
<p>I think the writers are possibly setting up for Sawyer getting written out of the show as some sort of emotional retribution for this. Initially I worried that Juliet or Sayid might be killed off, but it seems like the writers are making Sawyer hard to sympathize with.</p>
<p>It must also be the case that young Ben is still alive. I think the writers wanted to show Sayid trying to kill Ben, but it&#8217;s not really possible given that we know Ben lives to the present. I think the goal was to show how deep Ben&#8217;s manipulation of Sayid went. Ben KNEW he could get Sayid to kill so many people and make him such a fractured, empty man. Ben also KNEW that after he had used Sayid to do awful things, Sayid would be such a worthless shell of a person that he would to try and kill Ben in 1977 as revenge. Really though, this information (Sayid attempting to murder young Ben) would give older Ben the opportunity to take Sayid as far to the breaking point as possible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zhami</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2009/03/25/next-hes-our-you-episode-5x10/comment-page-3/#comment-37512</link>
		<dc:creator>Zhami</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 22:24:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/?p=294#comment-37512</guid>
		<description>What a wonderful ep!

My take is that Ben is who he is not because he is shot in 1977, nor because of years of mis-treatment by Roger ( certainly few abused people go on to become mass murderers -- in fact, I&#039;d say there is a negative correlation there). We haven&#039;t yet seen the primal forces that shape Ben Linus. And while he appears deeply calculating and cold, I think he would (if he&#039;d answer honestly, which he wouldn&#039;t), is that he is merely serving some purpose in some larger scheme, one not of his own making, nor of an agenda that is his (he is not selfish, but a missionary and perhaps even a martyr. Oh, and not dead in 1977 after being shot).

Worse for Ben, he is not in control of events. Ben has been surprised many times by events that have come into being in spite of his intentions. In contrast to whatever Big Mission is going on (which he aims to serve), Ben&#039;s radius of control is small and weak. In the end, I expect that we will come to see Ben as trying hard to accomplish something we will all agree with as important and &quot;good&quot; and come to see that Ben has had to do hard things, bad things, to attain that. Yes, I know I am a minute minority.  

Without debating the question of timelines, Ben will live (and the wound will lead to his tumor 30 years hence). Most likely he will survive at the hands of Janitor Jack who must reveal surgeon skills to save a boy shot by a Hostile. This is a crucial event which no one has yet mentioned: not only has the truce been violated, but a hostile has killed (or attempted to) an innocent Dharmite. Sayid has set a war in motion. The tribunal in the living room over Sayid&#039;s fate shows the DI folks to be capable of setting out a war party for retribution, or even to purge the island of Hostiles. And if that comes to pass, young Ben Linus will see himself as cause. Perhaps this becomes his trigger issue: his actions lead to events completely contrary to his desires. And forever will he become warpingly twisted on mastering his actions for proper outcomes -- and always failing at it.

btw: where is Dr. Chang?  I keep being surprised by the latitude &quot;Security&quot; has in determining courses of action. In all the organizations I know, Security reports to, and takes direction from, Management. And Dr. Chang appears to represent Management.

&quot;He&#039;s Our You&quot; -- something amiss about Sawyer&#039;s comment regarding Oldham (great, great casting!!!). Oldham is no torturer. Why would Jack say this? Was he trying to instill a sense of urgency in Sayid to fight or to flee?  But clearly interrogations have taken place there. Why would the DI need an interrogator? Who else has been tied to that tree and queried?  Seems odd to me that it occurs there, even at all. Can&#039;t be that many Hostiles have been captured... and if so, the DI would only need their story once. So, to me the presence of an interrogation site in the jungle by a Castañeda/Leary-ish Shaman is an anomaly that begs a reveal.  

Actually, if I were to say there was anyone in the DI who might represent a &quot;he&#039;s our you&quot; of Sayid, it would be... Amy. But then I&#039;d say odds are she&#039;s a Hostile that has infiltrated the DI. And so Ethan&#039;s allegiances are shaped as we come to see. In fact, I&#039;d also say Ethan&#039;s father might likely be a hostile. 

Final comment: The exec producers and writers are committed to their art, and the practice of it as craft. They must obey rules of storytelling if their story is to survive in our minds beyond the presentation of the final episode, if Lost is to be called great storymaking and storytelling. In this regard, I agree with a comment read elsewhere that Daniel Farraday serves a literary purpose, his role is as a &quot;reliable narrator&quot; for the revelation of markers that bound and constrain the possibilities, lest the reader/viewer spin out of control. Hence, we can trust the words of Farraday, not because of his character, but because of his role in the narrative. And so: what has happened, happened.

Yet: the paradox remains, for what has happened in 1977 has happened because of what happened in 2007 (Sayid being shaped to hate Ben Linus), then what is happening now in 2009 is happening because of what has (?) happened in 2019.  

Peace out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What a wonderful ep!</p>
<p>My take is that Ben is who he is not because he is shot in 1977, nor because of years of mis-treatment by Roger ( certainly few abused people go on to become mass murderers &#8212; in fact, I&#8217;d say there is a negative correlation there). We haven&#8217;t yet seen the primal forces that shape Ben Linus. And while he appears deeply calculating and cold, I think he would (if he&#8217;d answer honestly, which he wouldn&#8217;t), is that he is merely serving some purpose in some larger scheme, one not of his own making, nor of an agenda that is his (he is not selfish, but a missionary and perhaps even a martyr. Oh, and not dead in 1977 after being shot).</p>
<p>Worse for Ben, he is not in control of events. Ben has been surprised many times by events that have come into being in spite of his intentions. In contrast to whatever Big Mission is going on (which he aims to serve), Ben&#8217;s radius of control is small and weak. In the end, I expect that we will come to see Ben as trying hard to accomplish something we will all agree with as important and &#8220;good&#8221; and come to see that Ben has had to do hard things, bad things, to attain that. Yes, I know I am a minute minority.  </p>
<p>Without debating the question of timelines, Ben will live (and the wound will lead to his tumor 30 years hence). Most likely he will survive at the hands of Janitor Jack who must reveal surgeon skills to save a boy shot by a Hostile. This is a crucial event which no one has yet mentioned: not only has the truce been violated, but a hostile has killed (or attempted to) an innocent Dharmite. Sayid has set a war in motion. The tribunal in the living room over Sayid&#8217;s fate shows the DI folks to be capable of setting out a war party for retribution, or even to purge the island of Hostiles. And if that comes to pass, young Ben Linus will see himself as cause. Perhaps this becomes his trigger issue: his actions lead to events completely contrary to his desires. And forever will he become warpingly twisted on mastering his actions for proper outcomes &#8212; and always failing at it.</p>
<p>btw: where is Dr. Chang?  I keep being surprised by the latitude &#8220;Security&#8221; has in determining courses of action. In all the organizations I know, Security reports to, and takes direction from, Management. And Dr. Chang appears to represent Management.</p>
<p>&#8220;He&#8217;s Our You&#8221; &#8212; something amiss about Sawyer&#8217;s comment regarding Oldham (great, great casting!!!). Oldham is no torturer. Why would Jack say this? Was he trying to instill a sense of urgency in Sayid to fight or to flee?  But clearly interrogations have taken place there. Why would the DI need an interrogator? Who else has been tied to that tree and queried?  Seems odd to me that it occurs there, even at all. Can&#8217;t be that many Hostiles have been captured&#8230; and if so, the DI would only need their story once. So, to me the presence of an interrogation site in the jungle by a Castañeda/Leary-ish Shaman is an anomaly that begs a reveal.  </p>
<p>Actually, if I were to say there was anyone in the DI who might represent a &#8220;he&#8217;s our you&#8221; of Sayid, it would be&#8230; Amy. But then I&#8217;d say odds are she&#8217;s a Hostile that has infiltrated the DI. And so Ethan&#8217;s allegiances are shaped as we come to see. In fact, I&#8217;d also say Ethan&#8217;s father might likely be a hostile. </p>
<p>Final comment: The exec producers and writers are committed to their art, and the practice of it as craft. They must obey rules of storytelling if their story is to survive in our minds beyond the presentation of the final episode, if Lost is to be called great storymaking and storytelling. In this regard, I agree with a comment read elsewhere that Daniel Farraday serves a literary purpose, his role is as a &#8220;reliable narrator&#8221; for the revelation of markers that bound and constrain the possibilities, lest the reader/viewer spin out of control. Hence, we can trust the words of Farraday, not because of his character, but because of his role in the narrative. And so: what has happened, happened.</p>
<p>Yet: the paradox remains, for what has happened in 1977 has happened because of what happened in 2007 (Sayid being shaped to hate Ben Linus), then what is happening now in 2009 is happening because of what has (?) happened in 2019.  </p>
<p>Peace out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim R</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2009/03/25/next-hes-our-you-episode-5x10/comment-page-3/#comment-37511</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim R</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 21:51:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/?p=294#comment-37511</guid>
		<description>Douglas: I also noticed the parallel with Eko&#039;s childhood story, but only superficially. Sayid didn&#039;t do it to protect his brother, he did it just coz. In other words, he was a killer before that incident, suggesting he was just born that way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Douglas: I also noticed the parallel with Eko&#8217;s childhood story, but only superficially. Sayid didn&#8217;t do it to protect his brother, he did it just coz. In other words, he was a killer before that incident, suggesting he was just born that way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kira</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2009/03/25/next-hes-our-you-episode-5x10/comment-page-3/#comment-37510</link>
		<dc:creator>Kira</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 21:35:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/?p=294#comment-37510</guid>
		<description>Crap, I can&#039;t read all these posts now and I WANT TO..but, and I hope this hasn&#039;t been repeated a gazillion times, I think that Ben was shot (and not killed by Sayid) and his relationships with our other buddies, Jack, Hurley, Sawyer, Juliette, et al in the 70&#039;s, are why they&#039;re ALL there. He remembered them, coveted them for various reasons (for ex: as someone mentioned a childhood crush on Juliette) and brought them to the island-we may learn more about other people (Bernard and Rose) later too. Jack, Kate, Sawyer were on Ben&#039;s &#039;list&#039; and obviously Sayid. He manipulated everyone into returning.
Can&#039;t wait to see how locke and his peeps are doing back on the small island in 2004 (or whenever they are).
Also, think the theory about Ilana being hired by Ben to bring Sayid back is spot on.
Will be back to finish reading later..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Crap, I can&#8217;t read all these posts now and I WANT TO..but, and I hope this hasn&#8217;t been repeated a gazillion times, I think that Ben was shot (and not killed by Sayid) and his relationships with our other buddies, Jack, Hurley, Sawyer, Juliette, et al in the 70&#8242;s, are why they&#8217;re ALL there. He remembered them, coveted them for various reasons (for ex: as someone mentioned a childhood crush on Juliette) and brought them to the island-we may learn more about other people (Bernard and Rose) later too. Jack, Kate, Sawyer were on Ben&#8217;s &#8216;list&#8217; and obviously Sayid. He manipulated everyone into returning.<br />
Can&#8217;t wait to see how locke and his peeps are doing back on the small island in 2004 (or whenever they are).<br />
Also, think the theory about Ilana being hired by Ben to bring Sayid back is spot on.<br />
Will be back to finish reading later..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Naga</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2009/03/25/next-hes-our-you-episode-5x10/comment-page-3/#comment-37509</link>
		<dc:creator>Naga</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 21:13:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/?p=294#comment-37509</guid>
		<description>Anyone still thinking Ben could be dead only have to read the synopsis of the next week&#039;s episode. It says Kate goes to extreme measures to save Ben&#039;s life when Jack refuses to help. SO, he is not dead!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anyone still thinking Ben could be dead only have to read the synopsis of the next week&#8217;s episode. It says Kate goes to extreme measures to save Ben&#8217;s life when Jack refuses to help. SO, he is not dead!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David from Ohio</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2009/03/25/next-hes-our-you-episode-5x10/comment-page-3/#comment-37508</link>
		<dc:creator>David from Ohio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 20:48:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/?p=294#comment-37508</guid>
		<description>I have a problem with the writers logic of having Sawyer et al create this lie. They knew that the Darma people were relatively peaceful scientists/open minded thinkers, so why not just tell them the truth? That they are from the future and could prove it by revealing some distant events in world history that would soon be reveled by a check on the outside world. By telling the truth the Losties could forewarn the DI folks of the upcoming genocide and then with the arrival Sayid, Jack, and co. they would have no need for the drama. I think the writers are playing us, and my greatest fear and investment in all this time of watching Lost will come to a concocted conclusion that has nothing to do with the origin of the first show/season. These guys are writing as they go... there is no grand plan!!!
Well at least I always Tivo so as not to be manipulated into watching ABC&#039;s commercials....UGHGH I hate this show so much for making me love it so!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have a problem with the writers logic of having Sawyer et al create this lie. They knew that the Darma people were relatively peaceful scientists/open minded thinkers, so why not just tell them the truth? That they are from the future and could prove it by revealing some distant events in world history that would soon be reveled by a check on the outside world. By telling the truth the Losties could forewarn the DI folks of the upcoming genocide and then with the arrival Sayid, Jack, and co. they would have no need for the drama. I think the writers are playing us, and my greatest fear and investment in all this time of watching Lost will come to a concocted conclusion that has nothing to do with the origin of the first show/season. These guys are writing as they go&#8230; there is no grand plan!!!<br />
Well at least I always Tivo so as not to be manipulated into watching ABC&#8217;s commercials&#8230;.UGHGH I hate this show so much for making me love it so!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael281</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2009/03/25/next-hes-our-you-episode-5x10/comment-page-3/#comment-37507</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael281</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 20:00:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/?p=294#comment-37507</guid>
		<description>An addendum to the statue theory :  Sun or Lapidus also make good candidates for jumping so far back in time since they have a long journey ahead of them.  That won&#039;t change the fact that Desmond HAS to be brought back in somehow to make any of his appearances this year relevant.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An addendum to the statue theory :  Sun or Lapidus also make good candidates for jumping so far back in time since they have a long journey ahead of them.  That won&#8217;t change the fact that Desmond HAS to be brought back in somehow to make any of his appearances this year relevant.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2009/03/25/next-hes-our-you-episode-5x10/comment-page-3/#comment-37506</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 19:54:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/?p=294#comment-37506</guid>
		<description>Oldham will be the author of the brainwashing video Carl was subjected to.  Great character !!!

Illana and Caesar work for Ben Linus and Whidmore.  Can&#039;t tell who works for whom. At this point, I&#039;d say Illana works for Linus.  

Amy is a cutie, but she&#039;s a double-agent.  Horace is a dope.    

Don&#039;t be ridiculous; Dharma Ben&#039;s not dead.  The bullet was reflected by the old &quot;necklace or something metal in his pocket&quot; trick.  Maybe a Dharma bulletproof vest?    

If a bullet caused Ben&#039;s spinal tumor -- wouldn&#039;t have Jack or Juliette seen the bullet in the x-ray?

Terminal pregnancies are caused by residual gas from the purge or radiation from Jughead?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oldham will be the author of the brainwashing video Carl was subjected to.  Great character !!!</p>
<p>Illana and Caesar work for Ben Linus and Whidmore.  Can&#8217;t tell who works for whom. At this point, I&#8217;d say Illana works for Linus.  </p>
<p>Amy is a cutie, but she&#8217;s a double-agent.  Horace is a dope.    </p>
<p>Don&#8217;t be ridiculous; Dharma Ben&#8217;s not dead.  The bullet was reflected by the old &#8220;necklace or something metal in his pocket&#8221; trick.  Maybe a Dharma bulletproof vest?    </p>
<p>If a bullet caused Ben&#8217;s spinal tumor &#8212; wouldn&#8217;t have Jack or Juliette seen the bullet in the x-ray?</p>
<p>Terminal pregnancies are caused by residual gas from the purge or radiation from Jughead?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Connie in Alaska</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2009/03/25/next-hes-our-you-episode-5x10/comment-page-3/#comment-37505</link>
		<dc:creator>Connie in Alaska</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 19:52:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/?p=294#comment-37505</guid>
		<description>Chris from NY-Maybe the Hostiles are really into hardcore Pirate Days re-enactments, kind of like those who like to re-enact Civil War battles or Medieval Times. ;O)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chris from NY-Maybe the Hostiles are really into hardcore Pirate Days re-enactments, kind of like those who like to re-enact Civil War battles or Medieval Times. ;O)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael281</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2009/03/25/next-hes-our-you-episode-5x10/comment-page-3/#comment-37504</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael281</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 19:24:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/?p=294#comment-37504</guid>
		<description>Ben not dying doesn&#039;t make this episode a waste of time.  How can you even say that?  The whole point of Sayid shooting Ben is to test what Faraday has been saying.  Everyone accepts &quot;whatever happened happened&quot; as if it&#039;s absolutely true.  It may very well be, but shouldn&#039;t somebody TRY to see if that rule can be broken?  Who better than someone who hasn&#039;t been told?

The official podcast says we&#039;ll see the entire statue this season.  I&#039;m going out on a limb right now and saying it&#039;s Desmond.  I know, it&#039;s absolutely crazy, but Desmond has to have some twisted way of being brought back into the show.  Talk about a waste of time?  What was the point of Faraday giving Desmond the message to find his mother?  Desmond does so, meets a few of the others, and then takes a hike.  Oh, and he very likely beats the snot out of Ben a little later.  Wow. Now THAT&#039;S a waste of our time... unless Desmond&#039;s story isn&#039;t over yet.  He knows about Ajira Airlines, right?  Could he have snuck aboard and not told the others?  Could he have taken a boat and travelled the exact same course at the same time, hoping to get to the island in his own way?

Oh, and about Desmond remembering the message so many years later, that&#039;s a problem I haven&#039;t come up with a good answer for yet.  I wonder if we might not get a Desmond-centric episode which shows us a condensed series of events in Desmond&#039;s life... as they were changed by Faraday&#039;s message.  We might see where events tried to deviate and were course corrected over and over again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ben not dying doesn&#8217;t make this episode a waste of time.  How can you even say that?  The whole point of Sayid shooting Ben is to test what Faraday has been saying.  Everyone accepts &#8220;whatever happened happened&#8221; as if it&#8217;s absolutely true.  It may very well be, but shouldn&#8217;t somebody TRY to see if that rule can be broken?  Who better than someone who hasn&#8217;t been told?</p>
<p>The official podcast says we&#8217;ll see the entire statue this season.  I&#8217;m going out on a limb right now and saying it&#8217;s Desmond.  I know, it&#8217;s absolutely crazy, but Desmond has to have some twisted way of being brought back into the show.  Talk about a waste of time?  What was the point of Faraday giving Desmond the message to find his mother?  Desmond does so, meets a few of the others, and then takes a hike.  Oh, and he very likely beats the snot out of Ben a little later.  Wow. Now THAT&#8217;S a waste of our time&#8230; unless Desmond&#8217;s story isn&#8217;t over yet.  He knows about Ajira Airlines, right?  Could he have snuck aboard and not told the others?  Could he have taken a boat and travelled the exact same course at the same time, hoping to get to the island in his own way?</p>
<p>Oh, and about Desmond remembering the message so many years later, that&#8217;s a problem I haven&#8217;t come up with a good answer for yet.  I wonder if we might not get a Desmond-centric episode which shows us a condensed series of events in Desmond&#8217;s life&#8230; as they were changed by Faraday&#8217;s message.  We might see where events tried to deviate and were course corrected over and over again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fat Jeff</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2009/03/25/next-hes-our-you-episode-5x10/comment-page-3/#comment-37503</link>
		<dc:creator>Fat Jeff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 19:07:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/?p=294#comment-37503</guid>
		<description>So last night the creators pulled off a major mind freak on the LOST faithful. Taking the action out of context, what happened last night is that a bunch of people watching TV cheered a grown man shooting a 12 year old in the chest. Yes I realize this was not every viewers reaction (or mine), but still...you could imagine plenty of Sayid fans cheering him on...creepy.

Now...how does young Ben survive (and we know he will)?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So last night the creators pulled off a major mind freak on the LOST faithful. Taking the action out of context, what happened last night is that a bunch of people watching TV cheered a grown man shooting a 12 year old in the chest. Yes I realize this was not every viewers reaction (or mine), but still&#8230;you could imagine plenty of Sayid fans cheering him on&#8230;creepy.</p>
<p>Now&#8230;how does young Ben survive (and we know he will)?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris from NY</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2009/03/25/next-hes-our-you-episode-5x10/comment-page-3/#comment-37502</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris from NY</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 19:02:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/?p=294#comment-37502</guid>
		<description>OK maybe I missed this but I would love to hear what other think.
Young Ben told Sayid that he met Richard 4 years before.  In that meeting Richard had long hair and was dressed like a Bum.  However back in 1955 and when he speaks to Sawyer (1 year after young Ben meets him) his hair is cut and he is dressed in clean clothing.  Does this have to do with time travel?  Was Richard dressed that way when he first me young Ben to give young Ben a false impression of the Others?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK maybe I missed this but I would love to hear what other think.<br />
Young Ben told Sayid that he met Richard 4 years before.  In that meeting Richard had long hair and was dressed like a Bum.  However back in 1955 and when he speaks to Sawyer (1 year after young Ben meets him) his hair is cut and he is dressed in clean clothing.  Does this have to do with time travel?  Was Richard dressed that way when he first me young Ben to give young Ben a false impression of the Others?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Broadcloak</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2009/03/25/next-hes-our-you-episode-5x10/comment-page-3/#comment-37501</link>
		<dc:creator>Broadcloak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 18:45:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/?p=294#comment-37501</guid>
		<description>I was really getting worried about this episode, right up until the 58-minute mark. It seemed like good information, but nothing really HAPPENED that brought me to the edge of my seat. Then my DVR stopped recording and I missed the ending!!!

Having finally caught up, I am happy. The episode was &#039;saved&#039;. I really thought Sayid was going to go after Sawyer. But Ben... wow cool. 

So... did Sayid just change time? Does Ben die, or does the island save him? All I can say is that if Ben DOESN&#039;T die, then this episode was a 99% waste of time (as well as portions of prior episodes).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was really getting worried about this episode, right up until the 58-minute mark. It seemed like good information, but nothing really HAPPENED that brought me to the edge of my seat. Then my DVR stopped recording and I missed the ending!!!</p>
<p>Having finally caught up, I am happy. The episode was &#8216;saved&#8217;. I really thought Sayid was going to go after Sawyer. But Ben&#8230; wow cool. </p>
<p>So&#8230; did Sayid just change time? Does Ben die, or does the island save him? All I can say is that if Ben DOESN&#8217;T die, then this episode was a 99% waste of time (as well as portions of prior episodes).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carol from Boston</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2009/03/25/next-hes-our-you-episode-5x10/comment-page-3/#comment-37500</link>
		<dc:creator>Carol from Boston</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 18:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/?p=294#comment-37500</guid>
		<description>MLE - gotta agree with you, Ryan and Jen are the best and their podcast gives me on thing to look forward to on Monday mornings.  I really enjoy the format of the show and how it is broken up into sections.  I don&#039;t listen to the forward cabin because I don&#039;t want spoilers so I like that they put those in a separate part of the podcast. 

MLE - I don&#039;t know if you listened to the podcast last summer, but it is really worth going to their archives for the Comic Con podcasts. I hope they can do it this year as well.  I really enjoyed it and  appreciated that they took the time to share their experience with all their listeners.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MLE &#8211; gotta agree with you, Ryan and Jen are the best and their podcast gives me on thing to look forward to on Monday mornings.  I really enjoy the format of the show and how it is broken up into sections.  I don&#8217;t listen to the forward cabin because I don&#8217;t want spoilers so I like that they put those in a separate part of the podcast. </p>
<p>MLE &#8211; I don&#8217;t know if you listened to the podcast last summer, but it is really worth going to their archives for the Comic Con podcasts. I hope they can do it this year as well.  I really enjoyed it and  appreciated that they took the time to share their experience with all their listeners.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
