<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Next: &#8220;Namaste&#8221; (Episode 5&#215;09)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2009/03/18/next-namaste-episode-5x09/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2009/03/18/next-namaste-episode-5x09/</link>
	<description>A fan podcast focused on ABC's hit TV series, "Lost."</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Aug 2012 14:11:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.4.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tori</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2009/03/18/next-namaste-episode-5x09/comment-page-5/#comment-37378</link>
		<dc:creator>Tori</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 15:41:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/?p=285#comment-37378</guid>
		<description>Rich-- I agree that that the only person&#039;s word we have re course correction is Mrs. Hawkings-- and who&#039;s to say she has the word on the truth, esp. given her pessimistic read on Desmond? 

And Aaron, thank you for the wonderful Michael Emerson story. Time out of mind!! 

I think it would be amazingly cool to have a Lost Podcast reunion before or after the finale.... Would anyone be game? :-) 

Not sure if anyone has brought this up, but it seems to me that the Dharma Initiative guy who showed Jack where Sawyer lived, also saw Jack hugging Juliet. So I&#039;m gathering that the shit is not too far from hitting the fan in terms of the O6 jig being up. Thoughts?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rich&#8211; I agree that that the only person&#8217;s word we have re course correction is Mrs. Hawkings&#8211; and who&#8217;s to say she has the word on the truth, esp. given her pessimistic read on Desmond? </p>
<p>And Aaron, thank you for the wonderful Michael Emerson story. Time out of mind!! </p>
<p>I think it would be amazingly cool to have a Lost Podcast reunion before or after the finale&#8230;. Would anyone be game? <img src='http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' />  </p>
<p>Not sure if anyone has brought this up, but it seems to me that the Dharma Initiative guy who showed Jack where Sawyer lived, also saw Jack hugging Juliet. So I&#8217;m gathering that the shit is not too far from hitting the fan in terms of the O6 jig being up. Thoughts?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kiki</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2009/03/18/next-namaste-episode-5x09/comment-page-5/#comment-37375</link>
		<dc:creator>Kiki</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 14:19:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/?p=285#comment-37375</guid>
		<description>Don&#039;t you think Christian Shephard is more corporeal in 2007, since Jack brought &quot;something of his&quot; back on Agira 316--his shoes? I was looking to see if he was wearing the white tennis shoes, but didn&#039;t notice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t you think Christian Shephard is more corporeal in 2007, since Jack brought &#8220;something of his&#8221; back on Agira 316&#8211;his shoes? I was looking to see if he was wearing the white tennis shoes, but didn&#8217;t notice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aaron from perth</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2009/03/18/next-namaste-episode-5x09/comment-page-5/#comment-37362</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron from perth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 23:07:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/?p=285#comment-37362</guid>
		<description>connie-
Oahu is a beautiful place, being there with the addition of seeing where my favourite show is filmed was like winning the lotto. Cant wait to go back. Definately if you go back do the hummer tour , they have a 5 hour tour that was awesome. Covered a lot of lost groud, highly reccommended. 
i am watching the last 2 episodes i missed, then i can contribute more to the site. : )</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>connie-<br />
Oahu is a beautiful place, being there with the addition of seeing where my favourite show is filmed was like winning the lotto. Cant wait to go back. Definately if you go back do the hummer tour , they have a 5 hour tour that was awesome. Covered a lot of lost groud, highly reccommended.<br />
i am watching the last 2 episodes i missed, then i can contribute more to the site. : )</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Russell from California</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2009/03/18/next-namaste-episode-5x09/comment-page-5/#comment-37360</link>
		<dc:creator>Russell from California</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 20:24:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/?p=285#comment-37360</guid>
		<description>@ tigerline

welcome to the best lost podcast out there. i think your cannibal theory is refreshingly brilliant.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ tigerline</p>
<p>welcome to the best lost podcast out there. i think your cannibal theory is refreshingly brilliant.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Connie in Alaska</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2009/03/18/next-namaste-episode-5x09/comment-page-5/#comment-37356</link>
		<dc:creator>Connie in Alaska</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 18:02:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/?p=285#comment-37356</guid>
		<description>Aaron from Perth-Wow, great story!  Brough back memories from our trip to Oahu in 2001, but of course that was pre-Lost.  Would love to go back on a Lost tour before the series wraps up for good next year.  Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Aaron from Perth-Wow, great story!  Brough back memories from our trip to Oahu in 2001, but of course that was pre-Lost.  Would love to go back on a Lost tour before the series wraps up for good next year.  Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tigerline</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2009/03/18/next-namaste-episode-5x09/comment-page-5/#comment-37355</link>
		<dc:creator>tigerline</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 17:49:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/?p=285#comment-37355</guid>
		<description>greetings from the bayous!

1st time poster and only a recent listener (my son just got me hooked on the podcasts).

i didn&#039;t scroll all of the comments, but I have three observations:

1) &quot;Namaste&quot; is an anagram of &quot;Eats Man&quot;. 
Recall that Richard Alpert was quite anxious to retrieve the three fresh kills in last week&#039;s episode to bring back to his people. Recall that Alpert was anxious to retieve the body of Ben&#039;s murdered father, but was rebuffed by Ben.

Note that, in the time of RA (Richard Alpert), the first pharoh, ancient egyptians were cannibals.
http://www.thekeep.org/~kunoichi/kunoichi/themestream/egypt_humansacrifice.html

it adds up to a potentially grusome development in the series.

2) whoever decided to put jack to work as a janotor was a brilliant move. as a faceless laborer, he can simply hide in plain sight as he sweeps, collects trash, etc. while doing his menial janitorial duties. he can go virtually anywhere in the compound with a broom and a trashcan to snoop around without arousing undue suspicion. if caught, he can play dumb and the worst consequence is getting chased off. 

3) Locke is the key to getting Sun or Ben back to 1977. Recall Charlotte&#039;s observation that objects held or touched by time travelers (like the zodiac inflatable boat) also pass through time with the people. Locke holds the compass. He is &quot;special&quot;. He will be able to go back to 1977. All he has to do is physically hold onto Sun and he will bring her with him.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>greetings from the bayous!</p>
<p>1st time poster and only a recent listener (my son just got me hooked on the podcasts).</p>
<p>i didn&#8217;t scroll all of the comments, but I have three observations:</p>
<p>1) &#8220;Namaste&#8221; is an anagram of &#8220;Eats Man&#8221;.<br />
Recall that Richard Alpert was quite anxious to retrieve the three fresh kills in last week&#8217;s episode to bring back to his people. Recall that Alpert was anxious to retieve the body of Ben&#8217;s murdered father, but was rebuffed by Ben.</p>
<p>Note that, in the time of RA (Richard Alpert), the first pharoh, ancient egyptians were cannibals.<br />
<a href="http://www.thekeep.org/~kunoichi/kunoichi/themestream/egypt_humansacrifice.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.thekeep.org/~kunoichi/kunoichi/themestream/egypt_humansacrifice.html</a></p>
<p>it adds up to a potentially grusome development in the series.</p>
<p>2) whoever decided to put jack to work as a janotor was a brilliant move. as a faceless laborer, he can simply hide in plain sight as he sweeps, collects trash, etc. while doing his menial janitorial duties. he can go virtually anywhere in the compound with a broom and a trashcan to snoop around without arousing undue suspicion. if caught, he can play dumb and the worst consequence is getting chased off. </p>
<p>3) Locke is the key to getting Sun or Ben back to 1977. Recall Charlotte&#8217;s observation that objects held or touched by time travelers (like the zodiac inflatable boat) also pass through time with the people. Locke holds the compass. He is &#8220;special&#8221;. He will be able to go back to 1977. All he has to do is physically hold onto Sun and he will bring her with him.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Digby</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2009/03/18/next-namaste-episode-5x09/comment-page-5/#comment-37347</link>
		<dc:creator>Digby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 10:24:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/?p=285#comment-37347</guid>
		<description>(sorry for the multiple posts, but not are really connected)

I&#039;m getting more convinced that the series finale will result in preventing Flight 815 from ever crashing on the Island (maybe in the Island never having existed at all?).  I&#039;m picturing the show turning out to have some kind of DonnieDarko-esque ending that will completely change the lives of everyone involved.  And so anyone who dies in this timeline is not actually dead because they will never have been killed.

Thats why everyone shows up as ghosts, because they will be alive again in the altered timeline?  Walt is harder to explain, because he never really died.
Maybe Miles being born on the Island (if he was) is the reason that he can talk to ghosts?  Maybe Ethan and Aaron have that power too?

(This is a stretch)  Christian appearing to Michael is the result of the freighter crossing the perimeter, and Michael DID move into the island&#039;s past... which could explain Michael being unable to die... and maybe Walt&#039;s powers?  Or maybe Walt comes back to the island to look for his dad, meaning that he goes back in time too.

The Island cures most of the Castaways of some deep personality flaw... present long before the crash... but all of them have some history with the Island... if the Island is the source of those problems, and if it never existed then they would have been fine from the beginning?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>(sorry for the multiple posts, but not are really connected)</p>
<p>I&#8217;m getting more convinced that the series finale will result in preventing Flight 815 from ever crashing on the Island (maybe in the Island never having existed at all?).  I&#8217;m picturing the show turning out to have some kind of DonnieDarko-esque ending that will completely change the lives of everyone involved.  And so anyone who dies in this timeline is not actually dead because they will never have been killed.</p>
<p>Thats why everyone shows up as ghosts, because they will be alive again in the altered timeline?  Walt is harder to explain, because he never really died.<br />
Maybe Miles being born on the Island (if he was) is the reason that he can talk to ghosts?  Maybe Ethan and Aaron have that power too?</p>
<p>(This is a stretch)  Christian appearing to Michael is the result of the freighter crossing the perimeter, and Michael DID move into the island&#8217;s past&#8230; which could explain Michael being unable to die&#8230; and maybe Walt&#8217;s powers?  Or maybe Walt comes back to the island to look for his dad, meaning that he goes back in time too.</p>
<p>The Island cures most of the Castaways of some deep personality flaw&#8230; present long before the crash&#8230; but all of them have some history with the Island&#8230; if the Island is the source of those problems, and if it never existed then they would have been fine from the beginning?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Digby</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2009/03/18/next-namaste-episode-5x09/comment-page-5/#comment-37346</link>
		<dc:creator>Digby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 10:07:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/?p=285#comment-37346</guid>
		<description>@ Knives again:

I can&#039;t come up with a good reason that Lapidus wouldn&#039;t have made the jump, but I think the pregnancy can explain Sun.  Maybe he just wasn&#039;t on the island long enough, or maybe its because he wasn&#039;t there when Desmond turned the failsafe key?

If the freighter had passed through the island&#039;s perimeter, would Michael have jumped in time too?

And Locke and Ben not making the jump must have something to do with their turning the wheel... If Ben said that turning the wheel meant they could never return, does that mean that the island in 2007 is less meaningful significant somehow, less powerful?  Still, it resurrected Locke...

I feel like what Hawking said about replicating the first flight was a lie, and that she knew who could jump and how... and she was somehow using the &quot;recreate815&quot; story as an excuse to get the 6minusAaron all on the same plane ... but why wouldn&#039;t she have told the truth?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Knives again:</p>
<p>I can&#8217;t come up with a good reason that Lapidus wouldn&#8217;t have made the jump, but I think the pregnancy can explain Sun.  Maybe he just wasn&#8217;t on the island long enough, or maybe its because he wasn&#8217;t there when Desmond turned the failsafe key?</p>
<p>If the freighter had passed through the island&#8217;s perimeter, would Michael have jumped in time too?</p>
<p>And Locke and Ben not making the jump must have something to do with their turning the wheel&#8230; If Ben said that turning the wheel meant they could never return, does that mean that the island in 2007 is less meaningful significant somehow, less powerful?  Still, it resurrected Locke&#8230;</p>
<p>I feel like what Hawking said about replicating the first flight was a lie, and that she knew who could jump and how&#8230; and she was somehow using the &#8220;recreate815&#8243; story as an excuse to get the 6minusAaron all on the same plane &#8230; but why wouldn&#8217;t she have told the truth?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Digby</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2009/03/18/next-namaste-episode-5x09/comment-page-5/#comment-37345</link>
		<dc:creator>Digby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 09:48:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/?p=285#comment-37345</guid>
		<description>@ Knives Monroe:

I think that making the jump to 1977 has more to do with getting off the island than being a passenger of 815.  Locke was a passenger of 815, but he didn&#039;t make the jump.

Sun /was/ one of the Oceanic 6, but at that time she was pregnant.
So the journey that Christian was talking about will involve getting off the island again and returning with Ji Yeon, which would allow her to make the time-jump.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Knives Monroe:</p>
<p>I think that making the jump to 1977 has more to do with getting off the island than being a passenger of 815.  Locke was a passenger of 815, but he didn&#8217;t make the jump.</p>
<p>Sun /was/ one of the Oceanic 6, but at that time she was pregnant.<br />
So the journey that Christian was talking about will involve getting off the island again and returning with Ji Yeon, which would allow her to make the time-jump.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aaron from perth</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2009/03/18/next-namaste-episode-5x09/comment-page-5/#comment-37344</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron from perth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 08:24:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/?p=285#comment-37344</guid>
		<description>Got back from hawaii last nite, long flight from Australia but reaqlly worth it. Was lucky enough to have a good look around some old filming locations. Couple little funny stories......
My wife and i went swimming and sun baking at waikki beach, on our first couple of days there . i didnt take my camera or money or any thing coz every one warns you that theft is a big problem. So any way we finished up and started walking back to our hotel. The honolulu festival was on that day and a massive parade was going down the main stretch, blocking the street. So my wife and i had to stand and wait for a gap in the parade before we could cross the road. We quicky ran across the street and as we did we ran past a little sushi place that had no one inside except for one man sitting all by himself. My wife has good eyes and pulls me to a halt and says , hey isnt that whats his name from lost? I had seen him and thought the same thing but it didnt click till she said it.
My wife was like what should, we do. but i had already grabbed her by the hand and practically ran into the sushi bar. Every one in the shop like stopped and watched us coz we were in our bathers, still wet. I walked over with a big smile on my face. It was Michael Emmerson, Mr Benjimin Linus himself. I quickly apologised for disturbing him, and told him we had to say hello. Told him i loved his work. And after some small talk apologised for bothering him again and then we left. I was sort of spewing coz it was like the only time we didnt have our camera. But he was a super nice guy, and we were gratefull he made time for us to say hello. 

The next funny story , i decided i had to rent this beautiful corvette i had seen in waikki, it was bright yellow convertable with shiny rims. Hard on material. It was a dream of mine to drive around the island in a bit of american muscle. So we cruised up heading to the north shore. The day before we had been on a hummer tour in the kuola ranch and we spotted some filming taking place just off the main road. they told us that was were the cock pit was stored and i had spotted a blue dharma van. Any way we come accross the filming, and my wife says just pull in. There was no where to park and i was hesitant at first. The words of the car hire man was sticking in my head. This car is in perfect condition, becarefull because its super low , off road is a no no and dont scratch those rims!!! But i gulped hard and drove in super slow. Now it was quite well protected by security. The actors trailers all grouped together and people every where. So we are sitting there in this corvette, top down, and no body comes to the car so i keep driving. We got almost entirely inside before a guy in a blue shirt wanders over. Can i help you guys?
The only thing i could think of was: Are you guys filming here today.
then the security guy looks at us, then the car and finally says, Yes but we dont let public inside.
Then i was like bugger we got caught. Let me tell you, doing a 3 point turn on a jungle road in a corvette was so worth the risk. From there we cruised up to police beach. Looked like they had filmed there recently. was awesome to see.

I cant recommend going to Hawaii enough. The place is amazing. Even if your not a lost fan. All three of you. The hummer tours are awesome as well get out there and do it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Got back from hawaii last nite, long flight from Australia but reaqlly worth it. Was lucky enough to have a good look around some old filming locations. Couple little funny stories&#8230;&#8230;<br />
My wife and i went swimming and sun baking at waikki beach, on our first couple of days there . i didnt take my camera or money or any thing coz every one warns you that theft is a big problem. So any way we finished up and started walking back to our hotel. The honolulu festival was on that day and a massive parade was going down the main stretch, blocking the street. So my wife and i had to stand and wait for a gap in the parade before we could cross the road. We quicky ran across the street and as we did we ran past a little sushi place that had no one inside except for one man sitting all by himself. My wife has good eyes and pulls me to a halt and says , hey isnt that whats his name from lost? I had seen him and thought the same thing but it didnt click till she said it.<br />
My wife was like what should, we do. but i had already grabbed her by the hand and practically ran into the sushi bar. Every one in the shop like stopped and watched us coz we were in our bathers, still wet. I walked over with a big smile on my face. It was Michael Emmerson, Mr Benjimin Linus himself. I quickly apologised for disturbing him, and told him we had to say hello. Told him i loved his work. And after some small talk apologised for bothering him again and then we left. I was sort of spewing coz it was like the only time we didnt have our camera. But he was a super nice guy, and we were gratefull he made time for us to say hello. </p>
<p>The next funny story , i decided i had to rent this beautiful corvette i had seen in waikki, it was bright yellow convertable with shiny rims. Hard on material. It was a dream of mine to drive around the island in a bit of american muscle. So we cruised up heading to the north shore. The day before we had been on a hummer tour in the kuola ranch and we spotted some filming taking place just off the main road. they told us that was were the cock pit was stored and i had spotted a blue dharma van. Any way we come accross the filming, and my wife says just pull in. There was no where to park and i was hesitant at first. The words of the car hire man was sticking in my head. This car is in perfect condition, becarefull because its super low , off road is a no no and dont scratch those rims!!! But i gulped hard and drove in super slow. Now it was quite well protected by security. The actors trailers all grouped together and people every where. So we are sitting there in this corvette, top down, and no body comes to the car so i keep driving. We got almost entirely inside before a guy in a blue shirt wanders over. Can i help you guys?<br />
The only thing i could think of was: Are you guys filming here today.<br />
then the security guy looks at us, then the car and finally says, Yes but we dont let public inside.<br />
Then i was like bugger we got caught. Let me tell you, doing a 3 point turn on a jungle road in a corvette was so worth the risk. From there we cruised up to police beach. Looked like they had filmed there recently. was awesome to see.</p>
<p>I cant recommend going to Hawaii enough. The place is amazing. Even if your not a lost fan. All three of you. The hummer tours are awesome as well get out there and do it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pete</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2009/03/18/next-namaste-episode-5x09/comment-page-5/#comment-37342</link>
		<dc:creator>Pete</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 05:32:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/?p=285#comment-37342</guid>
		<description>Or, wait... maybe the &#039;incident&#039; is what caused the unstuckness in the first place.  Maybe it sent Faraday back in time, or he was so obsessed with going back in time because of Charlotte, that he was sent back to egyptian times, sparking this whole thing in the first place. Recall the promo photo of Faraday with the missing foot, and the picture of the statue behind him?    I guess if you are talking time travel, the &#039;incident&#039; could be the trigger to set off the &#039;wrinkle in time&#039; (let us call it that - another good book btw, maybe that is what Sawyer was reading).     Phew, my brain hurts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Or, wait&#8230; maybe the &#8216;incident&#8217; is what caused the unstuckness in the first place.  Maybe it sent Faraday back in time, or he was so obsessed with going back in time because of Charlotte, that he was sent back to egyptian times, sparking this whole thing in the first place. Recall the promo photo of Faraday with the missing foot, and the picture of the statue behind him?    I guess if you are talking time travel, the &#8216;incident&#8217; could be the trigger to set off the &#8216;wrinkle in time&#8217; (let us call it that &#8211; another good book btw, maybe that is what Sawyer was reading).     Phew, my brain hurts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pete</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2009/03/18/next-namaste-episode-5x09/comment-page-5/#comment-37340</link>
		<dc:creator>Pete</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 05:27:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/?p=285#comment-37340</guid>
		<description>Hmmm, interesting.  I think someone mentioned it above, but I noticed that Dharmaville certainly looked like it had been abandoned as Dharmaville, and had not undergone the transformation to Otherville.  THe Dharma logo on the door, the pictures, etc.  So... something must now have happened in the past that prevented the others from taking over - possibly someone (like Sawyer) stopped the purge from happening?  I wouldn&#039;t put it past him to be able to do that, what with the foreknowlege and all.  But it seems Dharma is gone anyway, possibly they were all killed some other way - i.e. course correction.  

Ow... I just experienced a flash and now my nose is bleeding... ...

What if the island, because of it&#039;s special &#039;unstuck from time&#039; properties is a sort of thorn in the side of the normal universe, and because somehow, long ago something happened on the island, another &#039;incident&#039; maybe, that buggered up the normal space-time continuum, maybe now the universe is trying to correct itself by bringing those conditions together again to recreate the event, and in such a way that things become corrected again.  The Valenzetti numbers predict the end of the world yes?  They remain unchanged and therefore indicate that the disturbance created by the island will eventually lead to the end of the end of the world.  A change in those numbers would indicate that the disturbance had been corrected.  I postulate that the original disturbance may have happened a long long time ago, i.e. during Egyptian times (statue!),  The fight between the &#039;gods&#039; Horus and Set maybe.  The wrong side won, and things are screwed up, island unstuck in time, causing all sorts of paradoxes and sh*t.  Now, periodically in order to attempt to correct itself, the universe pulls together those same players again and again, the reincarnations of those original players must re-fight the battle, until the right side wins, and the universe is corrected, the valenzetti parameters changed, and the island returns to being a normal island.  Our Losties are some of those players, however they are unwittingly so.  Some of the &#039;others&#039; are other players in that battle, maybe the ones that won the first time, but wrongly so?

Or maybe I have had WAY too much coffee today.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmmm, interesting.  I think someone mentioned it above, but I noticed that Dharmaville certainly looked like it had been abandoned as Dharmaville, and had not undergone the transformation to Otherville.  THe Dharma logo on the door, the pictures, etc.  So&#8230; something must now have happened in the past that prevented the others from taking over &#8211; possibly someone (like Sawyer) stopped the purge from happening?  I wouldn&#8217;t put it past him to be able to do that, what with the foreknowlege and all.  But it seems Dharma is gone anyway, possibly they were all killed some other way &#8211; i.e. course correction.  </p>
<p>Ow&#8230; I just experienced a flash and now my nose is bleeding&#8230; &#8230;</p>
<p>What if the island, because of it&#8217;s special &#8216;unstuck from time&#8217; properties is a sort of thorn in the side of the normal universe, and because somehow, long ago something happened on the island, another &#8216;incident&#8217; maybe, that buggered up the normal space-time continuum, maybe now the universe is trying to correct itself by bringing those conditions together again to recreate the event, and in such a way that things become corrected again.  The Valenzetti numbers predict the end of the world yes?  They remain unchanged and therefore indicate that the disturbance created by the island will eventually lead to the end of the end of the world.  A change in those numbers would indicate that the disturbance had been corrected.  I postulate that the original disturbance may have happened a long long time ago, i.e. during Egyptian times (statue!),  The fight between the &#8216;gods&#8217; Horus and Set maybe.  The wrong side won, and things are screwed up, island unstuck in time, causing all sorts of paradoxes and sh*t.  Now, periodically in order to attempt to correct itself, the universe pulls together those same players again and again, the reincarnations of those original players must re-fight the battle, until the right side wins, and the universe is corrected, the valenzetti parameters changed, and the island returns to being a normal island.  Our Losties are some of those players, however they are unwittingly so.  Some of the &#8216;others&#8217; are other players in that battle, maybe the ones that won the first time, but wrongly so?</p>
<p>Or maybe I have had WAY too much coffee today.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: baruch spinoza</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2009/03/18/next-namaste-episode-5x09/comment-page-5/#comment-37337</link>
		<dc:creator>baruch spinoza</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 03:03:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/?p=285#comment-37337</guid>
		<description>Does anyone know what Sawyer was reading? They always make a point about showing us, right?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does anyone know what Sawyer was reading? They always make a point about showing us, right?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Knives Monroe</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2009/03/18/next-namaste-episode-5x09/comment-page-5/#comment-37326</link>
		<dc:creator>Knives Monroe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2009 10:01:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/?p=285#comment-37326</guid>
		<description>Digby: Sun wasnt pregnant on flight 815. she got knocked up (pardon my vernacular) on the island.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Digby: Sun wasnt pregnant on flight 815. she got knocked up (pardon my vernacular) on the island.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Digby</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2009/03/18/next-namaste-episode-5x09/comment-page-5/#comment-37325</link>
		<dc:creator>Digby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2009 09:55:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/?p=285#comment-37325</guid>
		<description>I agree that Sun didn&#039;t make the jump because she wasn&#039;t pregnant this time, but not because of failing to recreate flight 815.

Its because as part of the Oceanic 6, she was pregnant.  I think she will have to leave the island, find Ji Yeon, and when she returns again she will make the jump to 1977.  Maybe she&#039;ll have to bring Aaron too?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that Sun didn&#8217;t make the jump because she wasn&#8217;t pregnant this time, but not because of failing to recreate flight 815.</p>
<p>Its because as part of the Oceanic 6, she was pregnant.  I think she will have to leave the island, find Ji Yeon, and when she returns again she will make the jump to 1977.  Maybe she&#8217;ll have to bring Aaron too?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Knives Monroe</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2009/03/18/next-namaste-episode-5x09/comment-page-5/#comment-37324</link>
		<dc:creator>Knives Monroe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2009 07:15:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/?p=285#comment-37324</guid>
		<description>No. He couldn&#039;t. The universe was trying to kill him, Final Destination style.

Sure charlie went in through his own free will, that  changes nothing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No. He couldn&#8217;t. The universe was trying to kill him, Final Destination style.</p>
<p>Sure charlie went in through his own free will, that  changes nothing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rich in Cleveland</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2009/03/18/next-namaste-episode-5x09/comment-page-5/#comment-37323</link>
		<dc:creator>Rich in Cleveland</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2009 07:08:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/?p=285#comment-37323</guid>
		<description>Knives:  couldn&#039;t Charlie have again avoided that particular fate?  He chose to go down to that place. What of Desmond&#039;s comment that his interventions &quot;changed the picture on the box.&quot;  I think this principle of  actions being capable of altering the picture on the box (the fabric of reality)  might be more generally applicable than most have argued.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Knives:  couldn&#8217;t Charlie have again avoided that particular fate?  He chose to go down to that place. What of Desmond&#8217;s comment that his interventions &#8220;changed the picture on the box.&#8221;  I think this principle of  actions being capable of altering the picture on the box (the fabric of reality)  might be more generally applicable than most have argued.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LOST Podcast: The Transmission &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Trans 2009-03-22: &#8220;Namaste&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2009/03/18/next-namaste-episode-5x09/comment-page-5/#comment-37321</link>
		<dc:creator>LOST Podcast: The Transmission &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Trans 2009-03-22: &#8220;Namaste&#8221;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2009 06:33:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/?p=285#comment-37321</guid>
		<description>[...] &#160;      &#171; Next: &#8220;Namaste&#8221; (Episode 5&#215;09) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] &nbsp;      &laquo; Next: &#8220;Namaste&#8221; (Episode 5&#215;09) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NotFreckles</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2009/03/18/next-namaste-episode-5x09/comment-page-5/#comment-37320</link>
		<dc:creator>NotFreckles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2009 04:35:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/?p=285#comment-37320</guid>
		<description>I really am beginning to believe along the lines of what Brenda was saying above that maybe  that Ethan was always to be born, but not necessarily with the same parents.  Had Sawyer and friends not interfered, maybe Amy would have been taken and assimilated into &#039;Others&#039; status. And then maybe Ethan would have been born an Other. That would make sense in the future because in 2004 he IS an Other.   Since they interfered though, she ended up with Horace and had Ethan as part of the DI.  So, whatever happened did happen-- Ethan was born, but with the variation that now he is born into the DI family, not Other family.

Otherwise, I&#039;m not sure how he would have avoided the purge, unless he was not on the island at the time.  I guess that is possible if he was off island training to be a doctor?  Would he have been old enough for that when the purge happened?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really am beginning to believe along the lines of what Brenda was saying above that maybe  that Ethan was always to be born, but not necessarily with the same parents.  Had Sawyer and friends not interfered, maybe Amy would have been taken and assimilated into &#8216;Others&#8217; status. And then maybe Ethan would have been born an Other. That would make sense in the future because in 2004 he IS an Other.   Since they interfered though, she ended up with Horace and had Ethan as part of the DI.  So, whatever happened did happen&#8211; Ethan was born, but with the variation that now he is born into the DI family, not Other family.</p>
<p>Otherwise, I&#8217;m not sure how he would have avoided the purge, unless he was not on the island at the time.  I guess that is possible if he was off island training to be a doctor?  Would he have been old enough for that when the purge happened?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Knives Monroe</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2009/03/18/next-namaste-episode-5x09/comment-page-5/#comment-37319</link>
		<dc:creator>Knives Monroe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2009 02:07:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/?p=285#comment-37319</guid>
		<description>Well I personally believe Mrs Hawking, as far as the Universe having to course correct itself. After all, that was proven with Charlie (dying)

Eko was meant to go to the island one way or the other and he did.
Things like that, yknow. 

Its the writters using MRs Hawking as a story constant to put over their Course Correcting Ratonale, that a complicated yet rewarding show deserves/needs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well I personally believe Mrs Hawking, as far as the Universe having to course correct itself. After all, that was proven with Charlie (dying)</p>
<p>Eko was meant to go to the island one way or the other and he did.<br />
Things like that, yknow. </p>
<p>Its the writters using MRs Hawking as a story constant to put over their Course Correcting Ratonale, that a complicated yet rewarding show deserves/needs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rich in Cleveland</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2009/03/18/next-namaste-episode-5x09/comment-page-5/#comment-37318</link>
		<dc:creator>Rich in Cleveland</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2009 01:44:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/?p=285#comment-37318</guid>
		<description>Great catch Steve (assuming it&#039;s correct.)  As to Doug and the problem of perspective: the timeline could be changing around our characters all the time, but they never realize it because their perspective shifts just as objects and events spontaneously change. 

Only we, the viewers, from our external, omniscient perspective can see the telltale signs of these shifts.  Such as the discrepancy with the class of 77 photo mentioned above.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great catch Steve (assuming it&#8217;s correct.)  As to Doug and the problem of perspective: the timeline could be changing around our characters all the time, but they never realize it because their perspective shifts just as objects and events spontaneously change. </p>
<p>Only we, the viewers, from our external, omniscient perspective can see the telltale signs of these shifts.  Such as the discrepancy with the class of 77 photo mentioned above.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rich in Cleveland</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2009/03/18/next-namaste-episode-5x09/comment-page-5/#comment-37317</link>
		<dc:creator>Rich in Cleveland</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2009 01:37:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/?p=285#comment-37317</guid>
		<description>Why does the universe necessarily &quot;have&quot; to course correct?  Don&#039;t we only have Mrs. Hawking&#039;s word on this? 

And didn&#039;t she say this at at a time when she was desperately trying to convince Desmond to accept a destiny that that he did in fact have the power to change?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why does the universe necessarily &#8220;have&#8221; to course correct?  Don&#8217;t we only have Mrs. Hawking&#8217;s word on this? </p>
<p>And didn&#8217;t she say this at at a time when she was desperately trying to convince Desmond to accept a destiny that that he did in fact have the power to change?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michele &#38; Blue-Skye</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2009/03/18/next-namaste-episode-5x09/comment-page-5/#comment-37316</link>
		<dc:creator>Michele &#38; Blue-Skye</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2009 00:04:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/?p=285#comment-37316</guid>
		<description>episode just aired here in Ireland Sunday night, but podcast isn&#039;t downloading... is everything alright??  I hope so, we always look forward to listening on our way to work Monday morning.  Great job!  thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>episode just aired here in Ireland Sunday night, but podcast isn&#8217;t downloading&#8230; is everything alright??  I hope so, we always look forward to listening on our way to work Monday morning.  Great job!  thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt from Cleveland</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2009/03/18/next-namaste-episode-5x09/comment-page-5/#comment-37315</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt from Cleveland</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Mar 2009 19:30:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/?p=285#comment-37315</guid>
		<description>So I just called in and let Ryan and Jen know, but for everyone else:

I was playing Lexulous (Which is like an online scrabble game) and everytime you log into the Lexulous main menu it greets you with a different greeting from another country.

Today when I logged on I almost went nuts when I saw it said Namaste.

I was like woah thats kind of cool they even incorperate made up greetings.

I clicked on it to see what they said about it and was surprised when I saw it said: 

&quot;Namaste

A popular form of greeting in India usually said with folded palms and fingers pointing upwards. Pronounced as &quot;Nam-a-stay&quot;.&quot;

So I&#039;m not certain what the fact that it is a popular Indian greeting has to do with the show, if anything at all, but I thought I&#039;d post here to see what y&#039;all thought.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So I just called in and let Ryan and Jen know, but for everyone else:</p>
<p>I was playing Lexulous (Which is like an online scrabble game) and everytime you log into the Lexulous main menu it greets you with a different greeting from another country.</p>
<p>Today when I logged on I almost went nuts when I saw it said Namaste.</p>
<p>I was like woah thats kind of cool they even incorperate made up greetings.</p>
<p>I clicked on it to see what they said about it and was surprised when I saw it said: </p>
<p>&#8220;Namaste</p>
<p>A popular form of greeting in India usually said with folded palms and fingers pointing upwards. Pronounced as &#8220;Nam-a-stay&#8221;.&#8221;</p>
<p>So I&#8217;m not certain what the fact that it is a popular Indian greeting has to do with the show, if anything at all, but I thought I&#8217;d post here to see what y&#8217;all thought.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Night from Bordeaux</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2009/03/18/next-namaste-episode-5x09/comment-page-5/#comment-37314</link>
		<dc:creator>Night from Bordeaux</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Mar 2009 17:39:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/?p=285#comment-37314</guid>
		<description>Just had this idea about Richard sometimes knowing what would happen and sometimes not (like when he healed Locke and knew Locke would disappear and the next time Locke would see him Richard would&#039;nt recognize him).

What if the incident was similar to the explosion of the hatch in some way?
And what if Richard would be exposed the same way Desmond was with the Hatch. He could then experience the same &quot;side effects&quot; and see the future.

It could be wrong, but i thought with what we know for the moment it could make sense.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just had this idea about Richard sometimes knowing what would happen and sometimes not (like when he healed Locke and knew Locke would disappear and the next time Locke would see him Richard would&#8217;nt recognize him).</p>
<p>What if the incident was similar to the explosion of the hatch in some way?<br />
And what if Richard would be exposed the same way Desmond was with the Hatch. He could then experience the same &#8220;side effects&#8221; and see the future.</p>
<p>It could be wrong, but i thought with what we know for the moment it could make sense.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Knives Monroe</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2009/03/18/next-namaste-episode-5x09/comment-page-5/#comment-37313</link>
		<dc:creator>Knives Monroe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Mar 2009 10:55:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/?p=285#comment-37313</guid>
		<description>Pete: Wow, great theory on The Incident. I love how you tied in the Time Traveling LOSTIES, creating the Incident, and this Ben must PURGE the Dharma folk to ensure the 815&#039;ers arrival to the island. I must say, you might have figured it out.

I agree the Incident must have something to do with the Orchid, after all, season 5 opens with what Chang says &quot;God help us all&quot;

truly and inspiring epic!

xxxWEST-SAYIDxxx</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pete: Wow, great theory on The Incident. I love how you tied in the Time Traveling LOSTIES, creating the Incident, and this Ben must PURGE the Dharma folk to ensure the 815&#8242;ers arrival to the island. I must say, you might have figured it out.</p>
<p>I agree the Incident must have something to do with the Orchid, after all, season 5 opens with what Chang says &#8220;God help us all&#8221;</p>
<p>truly and inspiring epic!</p>
<p>xxxWEST-SAYIDxxx</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steven in Bathurst</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2009/03/18/next-namaste-episode-5x09/comment-page-5/#comment-37312</link>
		<dc:creator>Steven in Bathurst</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Mar 2009 10:46:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/?p=285#comment-37312</guid>
		<description>Wait, there&#039;s more to the photo than Hurley not facing the camera. In the photo shown by Christian, there are 16 new recruits. In the photo-taking scene, there are only 15 new recruits. The man standing third from the right in Christian&#039;s photo is not in the scene when they take the photo. Everyone else is in the same place with exactly the same pose (except Hurley of course) but this man, who should be standing behind a woman with long brown hair, is not there at all. I don&#039;t recognise him though. He appears to have a shaved head and might be about 30-40 years old. Note too that 15 and 16 are two of Hurley&#039;s numbers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wait, there&#8217;s more to the photo than Hurley not facing the camera. In the photo shown by Christian, there are 16 new recruits. In the photo-taking scene, there are only 15 new recruits. The man standing third from the right in Christian&#8217;s photo is not in the scene when they take the photo. Everyone else is in the same place with exactly the same pose (except Hurley of course) but this man, who should be standing behind a woman with long brown hair, is not there at all. I don&#8217;t recognise him though. He appears to have a shaved head and might be about 30-40 years old. Note too that 15 and 16 are two of Hurley&#8217;s numbers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Knives Monroe</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2009/03/18/next-namaste-episode-5x09/comment-page-5/#comment-37311</link>
		<dc:creator>Knives Monroe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Mar 2009 10:36:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/?p=285#comment-37311</guid>
		<description>Doug. You are the person that has explained the Time Travel perfectly to me. Thank you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Doug. You are the person that has explained the Time Travel perfectly to me. Thank you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steven in Bathurst</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2009/03/18/next-namaste-episode-5x09/comment-page-4/#comment-37310</link>
		<dc:creator>Steven in Bathurst</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Mar 2009 09:46:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/?p=285#comment-37310</guid>
		<description>Here&#039;s something that I only just picked up while showing my daughter the &#039;shadowy girl behind Sun&#039; scene. The 1977 photo that Christian shows Sun and Frank is clearly wrong. In the photo Hurley is shown looking directly at the camera but when they immediately cut to the photo-taking scene, Hurley is very obviously turned towards Kate, asking her what Namaste means. You can hear the camera go click while his head is turned. What does that mean? Is there an element of fakery about what Christian is showing them?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s something that I only just picked up while showing my daughter the &#8216;shadowy girl behind Sun&#8217; scene. The 1977 photo that Christian shows Sun and Frank is clearly wrong. In the photo Hurley is shown looking directly at the camera but when they immediately cut to the photo-taking scene, Hurley is very obviously turned towards Kate, asking her what Namaste means. You can hear the camera go click while his head is turned. What does that mean? Is there an element of fakery about what Christian is showing them?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben M</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2009/03/18/next-namaste-episode-5x09/comment-page-4/#comment-37307</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben M</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Mar 2009 06:15:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/?p=285#comment-37307</guid>
		<description>Jacob theory....

When Sawyer and the new others arrived, they took on new names.  Daniel will take the name Jacob.

Daniel has &quot;vanished&quot;, probably because of the incident, and as such, he&#039;s trapped in his current &quot;state&quot;, and Ben knew about the whole thing since he was there when it happened as a child.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jacob theory&#8230;.</p>
<p>When Sawyer and the new others arrived, they took on new names.  Daniel will take the name Jacob.</p>
<p>Daniel has &#8220;vanished&#8221;, probably because of the incident, and as such, he&#8217;s trapped in his current &#8220;state&#8221;, and Ben knew about the whole thing since he was there when it happened as a child.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Trish</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2009/03/18/next-namaste-episode-5x09/comment-page-4/#comment-37306</link>
		<dc:creator>Trish</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Mar 2009 04:38:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/?p=285#comment-37306</guid>
		<description>The fact that Amy&#039;s child turns out to be Ethan (who we know will eventually be an Other) makes me wonder whether Amy (and Paul) have some kind of connection to the Others.  Things to consider in this regard:  1) Paul&#039;s necklace (the ankh), which connects him to the presumably indigenous statue and was prominently shown several times (and caused a major fight between Horace and Amy); 2) the fact that Paul and Amy were outside the sonar fence--something Horace never questions; 3) the fact that Paul was executed (and Amy was about to be executed) by the Others, which was a clear violation of the truce on the part of the Others but something that has never been explained in the plot or questioned by any of the characters;4) the fact Alpert wanted Paul&#039;s body (he gives one reason for why he wants the body, but perhaps there is another); 5) the fact that Amy is shown to be a little devious, what with the earplug incident; and finally 6), getting back to my first point, the fact that Amy&#039;s son, Ethan, turns out to be an Other.  It is possible that during the purge, the Others decide to assimilate rather than kill all the children (which I guess would be in keeping with their early chlid collecting behaviors).  But overall, there seemed to be more to the Paul and Amy incident than has yet been addressed.  It could be something significant, or it could just be bad writing....

In terms of the awful state of New Otherton when Frank and Sun arrive:  I am not sure that the destruction we see is just from Keamy&#039;s misadventures three years back. Many people have assumed that Sun and Lapidas are in the present day, and the one clear reason to think this is the presence of the airplane runway.  But I think it&#039;s possible that we don&#039;t know yet what timeframe they are really in.   It seems clear that something is about to go awry back in the 70s (Jack *really* does not want to clean toilets while Sawyer reads books!).  I believe there may yet be some new outcomes--and that there might be a conflict coming that dismantles New Otherton that hasn&#039;t happened in the previously set timeline.  This idea just repeats what others have already said here;  just because the universe corrects itself eventually, doesn&#039;t mean that everything has to be the same along the way.

Finally, why were Jack, Hurley, and Kate on Ben&#039;s &quot;list&quot; at the end of season two (and am I remembering correctly that they were the only three)?  Is it possible he had already seen their picture in the Dharma clubhouse--the three new recruits from the class of 77?  Like most coincidences in the cross-temporal plot, the time travel both creates an explanatory possibility and yet embeds within that possibility its own impossibility (or more simply put, present us with a time traveling contradiction):  i.e., how could Ben know they were there in 1977 yet they didn&#039;t remember they were there yet?  Still, it seems a significant coincidence.

Thanks for your podcast Ryan and Jen.  You do a really great job.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The fact that Amy&#8217;s child turns out to be Ethan (who we know will eventually be an Other) makes me wonder whether Amy (and Paul) have some kind of connection to the Others.  Things to consider in this regard:  1) Paul&#8217;s necklace (the ankh), which connects him to the presumably indigenous statue and was prominently shown several times (and caused a major fight between Horace and Amy); 2) the fact that Paul and Amy were outside the sonar fence&#8211;something Horace never questions; 3) the fact that Paul was executed (and Amy was about to be executed) by the Others, which was a clear violation of the truce on the part of the Others but something that has never been explained in the plot or questioned by any of the characters;4) the fact Alpert wanted Paul&#8217;s body (he gives one reason for why he wants the body, but perhaps there is another); 5) the fact that Amy is shown to be a little devious, what with the earplug incident; and finally 6), getting back to my first point, the fact that Amy&#8217;s son, Ethan, turns out to be an Other.  It is possible that during the purge, the Others decide to assimilate rather than kill all the children (which I guess would be in keeping with their early chlid collecting behaviors).  But overall, there seemed to be more to the Paul and Amy incident than has yet been addressed.  It could be something significant, or it could just be bad writing&#8230;.</p>
<p>In terms of the awful state of New Otherton when Frank and Sun arrive:  I am not sure that the destruction we see is just from Keamy&#8217;s misadventures three years back. Many people have assumed that Sun and Lapidas are in the present day, and the one clear reason to think this is the presence of the airplane runway.  But I think it&#8217;s possible that we don&#8217;t know yet what timeframe they are really in.   It seems clear that something is about to go awry back in the 70s (Jack *really* does not want to clean toilets while Sawyer reads books!).  I believe there may yet be some new outcomes&#8211;and that there might be a conflict coming that dismantles New Otherton that hasn&#8217;t happened in the previously set timeline.  This idea just repeats what others have already said here;  just because the universe corrects itself eventually, doesn&#8217;t mean that everything has to be the same along the way.</p>
<p>Finally, why were Jack, Hurley, and Kate on Ben&#8217;s &#8220;list&#8221; at the end of season two (and am I remembering correctly that they were the only three)?  Is it possible he had already seen their picture in the Dharma clubhouse&#8211;the three new recruits from the class of 77?  Like most coincidences in the cross-temporal plot, the time travel both creates an explanatory possibility and yet embeds within that possibility its own impossibility (or more simply put, present us with a time traveling contradiction):  i.e., how could Ben know they were there in 1977 yet they didn&#8217;t remember they were there yet?  Still, it seems a significant coincidence.</p>
<p>Thanks for your podcast Ryan and Jen.  You do a really great job.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pete</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2009/03/18/next-namaste-episode-5x09/comment-page-4/#comment-37305</link>
		<dc:creator>Pete</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Mar 2009 02:17:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/?p=285#comment-37305</guid>
		<description>The whole &quot;can&#039;t exist with yourself in the same time line&quot; is nonsense.  They are in 1977, and on the mainland, they exist.  I still think Miles is Chang&#039;s kid.  I think they made that abundantly apparent. Not sure why (evil) Sun and Lapidas are not.  Lock did not flash cause he was dead, and we saw with Charlotte that you don&#039;t flash when dead.   Hmmmm.  All so strange.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The whole &#8220;can&#8217;t exist with yourself in the same time line&#8221; is nonsense.  They are in 1977, and on the mainland, they exist.  I still think Miles is Chang&#8217;s kid.  I think they made that abundantly apparent. Not sure why (evil) Sun and Lapidas are not.  Lock did not flash cause he was dead, and we saw with Charlotte that you don&#8217;t flash when dead.   Hmmmm.  All so strange.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pete</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2009/03/18/next-namaste-episode-5x09/comment-page-4/#comment-37304</link>
		<dc:creator>Pete</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Mar 2009 02:08:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/?p=285#comment-37304</guid>
		<description>hmmm, how about this.  The losties get outed in 1977 or a bit after as time travellers.  The incident happens.  I think the &#039;incident&#039; is when they finally get through the wall and into the frozen donkey wheel chamber.  Something happens then.  I think Candle gets his arm chopped off when it gets turned and wedged in there. Either that or a bear chomps it off (oh yes, I like that one).  With the incident, someone gets turned into Jacob? Daniel or maybe Jack even?   Ben however must kill all the Dharma, because they know and have seen the Losties, and it is imperative that they not not interfere with the losties comming to the island in the future, and the only way to do it is to kill all the witnesses. Young children not included.  Young Ben must then make it his mission to see that the future transpires as he has been told it will.  So he is not all bad, just really bitter, and will use whatever means he needs to to achieve the objective, whatever it ends up being, because it is really, really important. Maybe it is as important as a change in the Valenzetti parameters?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hmmm, how about this.  The losties get outed in 1977 or a bit after as time travellers.  The incident happens.  I think the &#8216;incident&#8217; is when they finally get through the wall and into the frozen donkey wheel chamber.  Something happens then.  I think Candle gets his arm chopped off when it gets turned and wedged in there. Either that or a bear chomps it off (oh yes, I like that one).  With the incident, someone gets turned into Jacob? Daniel or maybe Jack even?   Ben however must kill all the Dharma, because they know and have seen the Losties, and it is imperative that they not not interfere with the losties comming to the island in the future, and the only way to do it is to kill all the witnesses. Young children not included.  Young Ben must then make it his mission to see that the future transpires as he has been told it will.  So he is not all bad, just really bitter, and will use whatever means he needs to to achieve the objective, whatever it ends up being, because it is really, really important. Maybe it is as important as a change in the Valenzetti parameters?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Connie in Alaska</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2009/03/18/next-namaste-episode-5x09/comment-page-4/#comment-37303</link>
		<dc:creator>Connie in Alaska</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Mar 2009 01:09:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/?p=285#comment-37303</guid>
		<description>The Purge is the anomoly in the time line (was never supposed to have happened) and the crash of flight 815 and what has followed (all of what we now as the series &quot;LOST&quot;) is what the universe is using to course correct that event.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Purge is the anomoly in the time line (was never supposed to have happened) and the crash of flight 815 and what has followed (all of what we now as the series &#8220;LOST&#8221;) is what the universe is using to course correct that event.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hector from Mexico</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2009/03/18/next-namaste-episode-5x09/comment-page-4/#comment-37302</link>
		<dc:creator>Hector from Mexico</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Mar 2009 00:30:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/?p=285#comment-37302</guid>
		<description>Hey Josh,

I like your theory of Sun being Chang&#039;s baby and therefore she and Ben could not go back to the 70&#039;s since the new selves cannot meet with the old ones. We can be sure that they landed in 2007, as when we see the marquee of &quot;30 years ago&quot; the flash goes straight to the 1977 DI times.

Going back to the Sun/Ben theory not being in 1977, there&#039;s still something that goes around in my mind. If they couldn&#039;t co-exist with their younger selves, then everyone on the plane should have been transported to 1977. You might say &quot;yes, but the other people on the plane had never been on the island before&quot;. There&#039;s where Frank comes in. He had been on the island, and he wasn&#039;t around during the DI times.......or was he?

Cheers everyone and it&#039;s great to read your posts!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Josh,</p>
<p>I like your theory of Sun being Chang&#8217;s baby and therefore she and Ben could not go back to the 70&#8242;s since the new selves cannot meet with the old ones. We can be sure that they landed in 2007, as when we see the marquee of &#8220;30 years ago&#8221; the flash goes straight to the 1977 DI times.</p>
<p>Going back to the Sun/Ben theory not being in 1977, there&#8217;s still something that goes around in my mind. If they couldn&#8217;t co-exist with their younger selves, then everyone on the plane should have been transported to 1977. You might say &#8220;yes, but the other people on the plane had never been on the island before&#8221;. There&#8217;s where Frank comes in. He had been on the island, and he wasn&#8217;t around during the DI times&#8230;&#8230;.or was he?</p>
<p>Cheers everyone and it&#8217;s great to read your posts!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DocJKM</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2009/03/18/next-namaste-episode-5x09/comment-page-4/#comment-37301</link>
		<dc:creator>DocJKM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Mar 2009 22:57:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/?p=285#comment-37301</guid>
		<description>Let me begin where I should have.  Jen and Ryan, excellent work, enthusiasm, and dedication.  Without your vision and effort we would all be posting somewhere else, or not at all.  I have enjoyed your podcasts for quite some time, and only this week have taken the time to discover this blog.  Thank you.

Doug: Your posts re: time travel have the eloquence of logic, and are thus approachable, and attractive.  Nice.

I have been feeling that I might be missing something significant, and I rewatched &#039;Jeremy Bentham&#039;, or started to.  I found something I think is very significant.  When Whidmore confronts Locke in the Tunisian infirmary (and I do think the woman there is more that slightly familiar), he gives a very brief history of his (C. Whidmore&#039;s) time on the island.  I urge anyone interested to review that scene.

Locke met him in &#039;54, on the island, and CW is quite young.  CW states in the infirmary that he was leader of &#039;the others&#039; for over 3 decades, until &quot;forced&quot; off by Benjamin Linus.  54+30=1984 (can fudge a bit here).  I do not think Ben is in a position in 1977 to &quot;force&quot; anyone off the island.

Ergo- Charles Whidmore is on the island, with &#039;the others&#039; (&quot;hostiles&quot;), in 1977.  (&#039;Right now&#039; on the show)

It may just be me, but I think THAT is as significant to the development of developments as anything so far discussed, and I am just getting my mind around what that might possibly portend.  

Anyone?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let me begin where I should have.  Jen and Ryan, excellent work, enthusiasm, and dedication.  Without your vision and effort we would all be posting somewhere else, or not at all.  I have enjoyed your podcasts for quite some time, and only this week have taken the time to discover this blog.  Thank you.</p>
<p>Doug: Your posts re: time travel have the eloquence of logic, and are thus approachable, and attractive.  Nice.</p>
<p>I have been feeling that I might be missing something significant, and I rewatched &#8216;Jeremy Bentham&#8217;, or started to.  I found something I think is very significant.  When Whidmore confronts Locke in the Tunisian infirmary (and I do think the woman there is more that slightly familiar), he gives a very brief history of his (C. Whidmore&#8217;s) time on the island.  I urge anyone interested to review that scene.</p>
<p>Locke met him in &#8217;54, on the island, and CW is quite young.  CW states in the infirmary that he was leader of &#8216;the others&#8217; for over 3 decades, until &#8220;forced&#8221; off by Benjamin Linus.  54+30=1984 (can fudge a bit here).  I do not think Ben is in a position in 1977 to &#8220;force&#8221; anyone off the island.</p>
<p>Ergo- Charles Whidmore is on the island, with &#8216;the others&#8217; (&#8220;hostiles&#8221;), in 1977.  (&#8216;Right now&#8217; on the show)</p>
<p>It may just be me, but I think THAT is as significant to the development of developments as anything so far discussed, and I am just getting my mind around what that might possibly portend.  </p>
<p>Anyone?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2009/03/18/next-namaste-episode-5x09/comment-page-4/#comment-37300</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Mar 2009 22:30:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/?p=285#comment-37300</guid>
		<description>What is it with the number 3? Desmond pushed the button for three years before the 815ers hit the beach, Juliette had been there for three years also, the time elapsed for the Oceanic 6 and the rest of the group to re-unite was......three years. Coincidence?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What is it with the number 3? Desmond pushed the button for three years before the 815ers hit the beach, Juliette had been there for three years also, the time elapsed for the Oceanic 6 and the rest of the group to re-unite was&#8230;&#8230;three years. Coincidence?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2009/03/18/next-namaste-episode-5x09/comment-page-4/#comment-37299</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Mar 2009 22:17:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/?p=285#comment-37299</guid>
		<description>ugggh, I contradicted myself a bit. What I should have said: The future is not preordained in it&#039;s entirety, but when you dip your feet in the time travel wading pool, some events become time posts that are required to happen in order to make the timeline line up and ensure you get where you need to be. Course correction makes this happen</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ugggh, I contradicted myself a bit. What I should have said: The future is not preordained in it&#8217;s entirety, but when you dip your feet in the time travel wading pool, some events become time posts that are required to happen in order to make the timeline line up and ensure you get where you need to be. Course correction makes this happen</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2009/03/18/next-namaste-episode-5x09/comment-page-4/#comment-37298</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Mar 2009 22:13:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/?p=285#comment-37298</guid>
		<description>One more thing. Given that the Oceanic Six are in 1977 through time travel, there must be some point in the timeline of events where they go back in time. In this way, what happened rigidly in the past (the presence of Jack, Juliet, Sawyer, Kate, Hurley, etc. in 1977) must synchronize in some way with the past so that there is a point where the timeline doubles back over itself.

Brandon is exactly right, when the timeline isn&#039;t linear, the future must be in accord with events of the past. Course correcting is making sure the timeline matches up if people are dipping their feet in time travel.

This is where course-correction is important. Ms. Hawking says that some things are preordained and the universe course corrects to ensure certain things happen. No matter how hard Jack, Kate, Hurley, Sayid, and anyone else who time travels try, they will in some way be forced to go to the place where the timeline says they are. If they hadn&#039;t gotten on 316, they just would have gotten back to 1977 another way. It cannot be changed because it has already happened that 1977 occurred with them in it. The universe must find a way to bring them back to that time. The past isn&#039;t changed. The past occurs and the future must accommodate (course correct) what happens in the past in some way. The future isn&#039;t changed, nor is it preordained, but there are time posts and events that must occur.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One more thing. Given that the Oceanic Six are in 1977 through time travel, there must be some point in the timeline of events where they go back in time. In this way, what happened rigidly in the past (the presence of Jack, Juliet, Sawyer, Kate, Hurley, etc. in 1977) must synchronize in some way with the past so that there is a point where the timeline doubles back over itself.</p>
<p>Brandon is exactly right, when the timeline isn&#8217;t linear, the future must be in accord with events of the past. Course correcting is making sure the timeline matches up if people are dipping their feet in time travel.</p>
<p>This is where course-correction is important. Ms. Hawking says that some things are preordained and the universe course corrects to ensure certain things happen. No matter how hard Jack, Kate, Hurley, Sayid, and anyone else who time travels try, they will in some way be forced to go to the place where the timeline says they are. If they hadn&#8217;t gotten on 316, they just would have gotten back to 1977 another way. It cannot be changed because it has already happened that 1977 occurred with them in it. The universe must find a way to bring them back to that time. The past isn&#8217;t changed. The past occurs and the future must accommodate (course correct) what happens in the past in some way. The future isn&#8217;t changed, nor is it preordained, but there are time posts and events that must occur.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2009/03/18/next-namaste-episode-5x09/comment-page-4/#comment-37297</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Mar 2009 21:57:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/?p=285#comment-37297</guid>
		<description>On this debate about whether the past can be changed, I think the point that Damon and Carleton are making when they say that they are &quot;paradox averse&quot; is that the events of the past cannot be altered by going back in time. It always happened the way it happened. The timeline is very rigid, and we as observers just do not see the entirety of all events.

(This is in some sense like The Prisoner of Azkaban: Harry and Hermione didn&#039;t change the past, they merely acted to ensure that the time line synchronized correctly with the present -- when they use the time-turner -- to the way it always was. For example, Buckbeak was never executed like the events seemed to indicate. We simply didn&#039;t observe everything we needed to realize that Harry and Hermione were always in two places at once and Buckbeak was never killed a first time. There was never a *first* or *second* time, there was only one event. We the reader and they the agents are just biased by perception.
Also, had Harry and Hermione not followed Dumbledore&#039;s instructions and returned promptly to the infirmary at nearly the same moment they left using time-travel, the whole world wouldn&#039;t have unraveled, it just could have been obvious to others that someone had used time travel and that the perception of a linear time line of events is false.)

So in this sense, it&#039;s more important that the time-line be rigid. But this is not to say that the time-line must be linear. That&#039;s just an false assumption due to perception bias.

Similarly, some of the Oceanic Six, Sawyer, Juliet, et al. are always in the Dharma Initiative. The picture of the recruits of 1977 has always existed since 1977. We as the observer (and the Oceanic Six) have just not had all the information we needed to realize this.

The only paradox is in our perception, not in the time line.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On this debate about whether the past can be changed, I think the point that Damon and Carleton are making when they say that they are &#8220;paradox averse&#8221; is that the events of the past cannot be altered by going back in time. It always happened the way it happened. The timeline is very rigid, and we as observers just do not see the entirety of all events.</p>
<p>(This is in some sense like The Prisoner of Azkaban: Harry and Hermione didn&#8217;t change the past, they merely acted to ensure that the time line synchronized correctly with the present &#8212; when they use the time-turner &#8212; to the way it always was. For example, Buckbeak was never executed like the events seemed to indicate. We simply didn&#8217;t observe everything we needed to realize that Harry and Hermione were always in two places at once and Buckbeak was never killed a first time. There was never a *first* or *second* time, there was only one event. We the reader and they the agents are just biased by perception.<br />
Also, had Harry and Hermione not followed Dumbledore&#8217;s instructions and returned promptly to the infirmary at nearly the same moment they left using time-travel, the whole world wouldn&#8217;t have unraveled, it just could have been obvious to others that someone had used time travel and that the perception of a linear time line of events is false.)</p>
<p>So in this sense, it&#8217;s more important that the time-line be rigid. But this is not to say that the time-line must be linear. That&#8217;s just an false assumption due to perception bias.</p>
<p>Similarly, some of the Oceanic Six, Sawyer, Juliet, et al. are always in the Dharma Initiative. The picture of the recruits of 1977 has always existed since 1977. We as the observer (and the Oceanic Six) have just not had all the information we needed to realize this.</p>
<p>The only paradox is in our perception, not in the time line.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Beth</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2009/03/18/next-namaste-episode-5x09/comment-page-4/#comment-37296</link>
		<dc:creator>Beth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Mar 2009 20:06:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/?p=285#comment-37296</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m going with MLE in Colorado- Othersville at the time of the Ajira crash looks just like boarded up Dharmaville, so the &#039;77 Losties DID change the future somehow. Although, I am also of the belief that they ALWAYS were supposed to be in &#039;77, otherwise, how would Ethan even have existed? When Amy went into labor, Juliet knew that both Amy and the baby would die without a C-section, and the intern guy said flat-out he couldn&#039;t do one. Juliet always was supposed to deliver Ethan. So I think that they are responsible for certain things we already know to be true (Ethan), but also are informed enough to have the capacity to change elements of the future, i.e. the &quot;Incident&quot; or the Purge.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m going with MLE in Colorado- Othersville at the time of the Ajira crash looks just like boarded up Dharmaville, so the &#8217;77 Losties DID change the future somehow. Although, I am also of the belief that they ALWAYS were supposed to be in &#8217;77, otherwise, how would Ethan even have existed? When Amy went into labor, Juliet knew that both Amy and the baby would die without a C-section, and the intern guy said flat-out he couldn&#8217;t do one. Juliet always was supposed to deliver Ethan. So I think that they are responsible for certain things we already know to be true (Ethan), but also are informed enough to have the capacity to change elements of the future, i.e. the &#8220;Incident&#8221; or the Purge.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carol from Boston</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2009/03/18/next-namaste-episode-5x09/comment-page-4/#comment-37295</link>
		<dc:creator>Carol from Boston</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Mar 2009 19:16:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/?p=285#comment-37295</guid>
		<description>I hope that last post made sense, I just got out of work, so I am a bit tired.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hope that last post made sense, I just got out of work, so I am a bit tired.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carol from Boston</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2009/03/18/next-namaste-episode-5x09/comment-page-4/#comment-37294</link>
		<dc:creator>Carol from Boston</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Mar 2009 19:15:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/?p=285#comment-37294</guid>
		<description>MLE - I agree, why use time travel as a plot device if time can&#039;t be altered or changed?  Damon and Carlton do have the &quot;back to the future&quot; rule where they don&#039;t want to be able to go back in time to purposely change the future, they don&#039;t Sayid going back and saving Shannon, etc.  Because they feel it would be cheating the audience.  But of course there will always be some changes to the future because the Oceanic 6 were not there the first time around to see how things unfolded, they don&#039;t know they are actually changing the future.  Ethan would have been born whether Juliet delivered him or not.

But on the other hand, My real question is did she always deliver him?  Was she always meant to be there?  If they were already there and did all these things why didn&#039;t it change the future the first time?  Why are things changing now like Dharmaville?  Were these people always in the past or just visiting it for the first time now.  One minute I have one theory and then the next I change my mind.  Does Charlotte know Korean because Jin taught her? If that is how she learned it why didn&#039;t she remember Jin? 

These are the questions that give me headaches and bring me to visit this board.  You all have such good theories, but on the other hand, some of you are so convincing that I have to rethink my theories.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MLE &#8211; I agree, why use time travel as a plot device if time can&#8217;t be altered or changed?  Damon and Carlton do have the &#8220;back to the future&#8221; rule where they don&#8217;t want to be able to go back in time to purposely change the future, they don&#8217;t Sayid going back and saving Shannon, etc.  Because they feel it would be cheating the audience.  But of course there will always be some changes to the future because the Oceanic 6 were not there the first time around to see how things unfolded, they don&#8217;t know they are actually changing the future.  Ethan would have been born whether Juliet delivered him or not.</p>
<p>But on the other hand, My real question is did she always deliver him?  Was she always meant to be there?  If they were already there and did all these things why didn&#8217;t it change the future the first time?  Why are things changing now like Dharmaville?  Were these people always in the past or just visiting it for the first time now.  One minute I have one theory and then the next I change my mind.  Does Charlotte know Korean because Jin taught her? If that is how she learned it why didn&#8217;t she remember Jin? </p>
<p>These are the questions that give me headaches and bring me to visit this board.  You all have such good theories, but on the other hand, some of you are so convincing that I have to rethink my theories.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carol from Boston</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2009/03/18/next-namaste-episode-5x09/comment-page-4/#comment-37293</link>
		<dc:creator>Carol from Boston</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Mar 2009 19:04:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/?p=285#comment-37293</guid>
		<description>Darryl,

Kate asked Jack if the lady who told him the plan to get back to the island mentioned that they would go back 30 years earlier.  That is when Jack said &quot;no, she left that part out&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Darryl,</p>
<p>Kate asked Jack if the lady who told him the plan to get back to the island mentioned that they would go back 30 years earlier.  That is when Jack said &#8220;no, she left that part out&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Russell from California</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2009/03/18/next-namaste-episode-5x09/comment-page-4/#comment-37292</link>
		<dc:creator>Russell from California</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Mar 2009 18:52:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/?p=285#comment-37292</guid>
		<description>here are my thoughts: i think Radzinski is going become a pivotal part of the show. i can see him somehow getting knowledge of future events (probably telling young Ben) and doing everything in his power to make these events come to pass.

i believe he was the one who set up the self-destruct code in the Flame (Enter 77) and used 77 as a reference to the year the O6 &quot;entered&quot; when they returned to the island, possibly as a clue for Locke to use later. 

also, the drawing on the Swan hatch door i believe was more for Locke&#039;s benefit and his suicide/death i think will end up being something that he knew he had to do to keep Kelvin from killing Desmond when he arrives.

thoughts?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>here are my thoughts: i think Radzinski is going become a pivotal part of the show. i can see him somehow getting knowledge of future events (probably telling young Ben) and doing everything in his power to make these events come to pass.</p>
<p>i believe he was the one who set up the self-destruct code in the Flame (Enter 77) and used 77 as a reference to the year the O6 &#8220;entered&#8221; when they returned to the island, possibly as a clue for Locke to use later. </p>
<p>also, the drawing on the Swan hatch door i believe was more for Locke&#8217;s benefit and his suicide/death i think will end up being something that he knew he had to do to keep Kelvin from killing Desmond when he arrives.</p>
<p>thoughts?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Connie in Alaska</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2009/03/18/next-namaste-episode-5x09/comment-page-4/#comment-37291</link>
		<dc:creator>Connie in Alaska</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Mar 2009 18:19:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/?p=285#comment-37291</guid>
		<description>NuckinFuts-Check the time of the last post you were reading or the last post you posted before signing off and jot it down.  Works for me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NuckinFuts-Check the time of the last post you were reading or the last post you posted before signing off and jot it down.  Works for me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NuckinFuts</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2009/03/18/next-namaste-episode-5x09/comment-page-4/#comment-37290</link>
		<dc:creator>NuckinFuts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Mar 2009 17:39:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/?p=285#comment-37290</guid>
		<description>RE:  MLE in Colorado : &quot;BTW it would be cool if posts were numbered…I can never remember where I left off when I sign back in to see what everyone is saying… I mean I could say “I left off at Knives Monroe’s post” but that wouldn’t help because Knives is like our glue holding other posts together!! : )

Perhaps along the way down the board people could voluntarily post &quot;Iteration 175132&quot;, &quot;Iteration 175133&quot; about every 10 posts or so.  Haha - 

Rich in Cleveland : RE: Agreeing that Juliett is a mole.  Good point...she may have allegieances that even go further back than Ben.  Hmmm...I always thought that the Ben / Richard / Ethan recruitment process was a little odd and that a smart scientist of her caliber would be unlikely to buy into their pitch.  Maybe she had other reasons, not just &quot;Other&quot; reasons....lame joke, huh?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>RE:  MLE in Colorado : &#8220;BTW it would be cool if posts were numbered…I can never remember where I left off when I sign back in to see what everyone is saying… I mean I could say “I left off at Knives Monroe’s post” but that wouldn’t help because Knives is like our glue holding other posts together!! : )</p>
<p>Perhaps along the way down the board people could voluntarily post &#8220;Iteration 175132&#8243;, &#8220;Iteration 175133&#8243; about every 10 posts or so.  Haha &#8211; </p>
<p>Rich in Cleveland : RE: Agreeing that Juliett is a mole.  Good point&#8230;she may have allegieances that even go further back than Ben.  Hmmm&#8230;I always thought that the Ben / Richard / Ethan recruitment process was a little odd and that a smart scientist of her caliber would be unlikely to buy into their pitch.  Maybe she had other reasons, not just &#8220;Other&#8221; reasons&#8230;.lame joke, huh?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MLE in Colorado</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2009/03/18/next-namaste-episode-5x09/comment-page-4/#comment-37288</link>
		<dc:creator>MLE in Colorado</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Mar 2009 17:23:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/?p=285#comment-37288</guid>
		<description>I just don&#039;t buy that the past cannot be changed.  I get that Desmond could try and try and try to keep Charlie alive but he had to die somehow...but lets remember that he did keep him alive long enough to be a self sacrifice for Claire and aaron et al.  In other words- if you are supposed to die you will- but there is some control we still have over our destiny.  I really think it means something that it is clearly 30 years ahead because they told us that- but othersville looks like boarded up dharmaville...something is changed by their time travel.

and guess what---that is what makes the show interesting...that they can play with what happened in the past...if they can affect nothing in the past then why the heck are we watching?  In other words- in 2006 that photograph of the new recruits would not have Hurley etc in it...but now it does.  They are there to &quot;make things right&quot;.  I suppose one could argue that they are there to help things happen the way they are supposed to...like Desmond was there to help Charlie live long enough to enable the connection to the outside world- thereby revealing the Islands presence to Widmore and Penny.

BTW it would be cool if posts were numbered...I can never remember where I left off when I sign back in to see what everyone is saying...   I mean I could say &quot;I left off at Knives Monroe&#039;s post&quot; but that wouldn&#039;t help because Knives is like our glue holding other posts together!!   : )</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just don&#8217;t buy that the past cannot be changed.  I get that Desmond could try and try and try to keep Charlie alive but he had to die somehow&#8230;but lets remember that he did keep him alive long enough to be a self sacrifice for Claire and aaron et al.  In other words- if you are supposed to die you will- but there is some control we still have over our destiny.  I really think it means something that it is clearly 30 years ahead because they told us that- but othersville looks like boarded up dharmaville&#8230;something is changed by their time travel.</p>
<p>and guess what&#8212;that is what makes the show interesting&#8230;that they can play with what happened in the past&#8230;if they can affect nothing in the past then why the heck are we watching?  In other words- in 2006 that photograph of the new recruits would not have Hurley etc in it&#8230;but now it does.  They are there to &#8220;make things right&#8221;.  I suppose one could argue that they are there to help things happen the way they are supposed to&#8230;like Desmond was there to help Charlie live long enough to enable the connection to the outside world- thereby revealing the Islands presence to Widmore and Penny.</p>
<p>BTW it would be cool if posts were numbered&#8230;I can never remember where I left off when I sign back in to see what everyone is saying&#8230;   I mean I could say &#8220;I left off at Knives Monroe&#8217;s post&#8221; but that wouldn&#8217;t help because Knives is like our glue holding other posts together!!   : )</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MLE in Colorado</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2009/03/18/next-namaste-episode-5x09/comment-page-4/#comment-37289</link>
		<dc:creator>MLE in Colorado</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Mar 2009 17:23:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/?p=285#comment-37289</guid>
		<description>I just don&#039;t buy that the past cannot be changed.  I get that Desmond could try and try and try to keep Charlie alive but he had to die somehow...but lets remember that he did keep him alive long enough to be a self sacrifice for Claire and aaron et al.  In other words- if you are supposed to die you will- but there is some control we still have over our destiny.  I really think it means something that it is clearly 30 years ahead because they told us that- but othersville looks like boarded up dharmaville...something is changed by their time travel.

and guess what---that is what makes the show interesting...that they can play with what happened in the past...if they can affect nothing in the past then why the heck are we watching?  In other words- in 2006 that photograph of the new recruits would not have Hurley etc in it...but now it does.  They are there to &quot;make things right&quot;.  I suppose one could argue that they are there to help things happen the way they are supposed to...like Desmond was there to help Charlie live long enough to enable the connection to the outside world- thereby revealing the Islands presence to Widmore and Penny.

BTW it would be cool if posts were numbered...I can never remember where I left off when I sign back in to see what everyone is saying...   I mean I could say &quot;I left off at Knives Monroe&#039;s post&quot; but that wouldn&#039;t help because Knives is like our glue holding other posts together!!   : )</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just don&#8217;t buy that the past cannot be changed.  I get that Desmond could try and try and try to keep Charlie alive but he had to die somehow&#8230;but lets remember that he did keep him alive long enough to be a self sacrifice for Claire and aaron et al.  In other words- if you are supposed to die you will- but there is some control we still have over our destiny.  I really think it means something that it is clearly 30 years ahead because they told us that- but othersville looks like boarded up dharmaville&#8230;something is changed by their time travel.</p>
<p>and guess what&#8212;that is what makes the show interesting&#8230;that they can play with what happened in the past&#8230;if they can affect nothing in the past then why the heck are we watching?  In other words- in 2006 that photograph of the new recruits would not have Hurley etc in it&#8230;but now it does.  They are there to &#8220;make things right&#8221;.  I suppose one could argue that they are there to help things happen the way they are supposed to&#8230;like Desmond was there to help Charlie live long enough to enable the connection to the outside world- thereby revealing the Islands presence to Widmore and Penny.</p>
<p>BTW it would be cool if posts were numbered&#8230;I can never remember where I left off when I sign back in to see what everyone is saying&#8230;   I mean I could say &#8220;I left off at Knives Monroe&#8217;s post&#8221; but that wouldn&#8217;t help because Knives is like our glue holding other posts together!!   : )</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daryl</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2009/03/18/next-namaste-episode-5x09/comment-page-4/#comment-37287</link>
		<dc:creator>Daryl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Mar 2009 17:12:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/?p=285#comment-37287</guid>
		<description>I had some audio problems during the scene that shows Hugo, Kate and Jack hanging out waiting on Sawyer to get back. Kate turned to Jack and said...something... and he responded with something like, &quot;...she left that part out.&quot;

Can anyone clue me in on that discussion between the two of them?

It was a great episode!!

Thanks!
Daryl</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had some audio problems during the scene that shows Hugo, Kate and Jack hanging out waiting on Sawyer to get back. Kate turned to Jack and said&#8230;something&#8230; and he responded with something like, &#8220;&#8230;she left that part out.&#8221;</p>
<p>Can anyone clue me in on that discussion between the two of them?</p>
<p>It was a great episode!!</p>
<p>Thanks!<br />
Daryl</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh in California</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2009/03/18/next-namaste-episode-5x09/comment-page-4/#comment-37286</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh in California</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Mar 2009 16:54:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/?p=285#comment-37286</guid>
		<description>I think that Sun and Ben didn&#039;t go back to 1977 since they were both on the island before. Sun is Chang&#039;s daughter! You can&#039;t run into yourself in your own past that&#039;s why Ben and Sun didn&#039;t flash. If Miles was Chang&#039;s baby he wouldn&#039;t have flashed back. That&#039;s my theory. 

I also think that the incident is going to have to do with the electromagneticsm going off like it did when Desmond pulled turned the key. That&#039;s what will kill Horace and make Chang loose his arm. That&#039;s what will make someone have to type in the numbers every 108 minutes to release the energy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that Sun and Ben didn&#8217;t go back to 1977 since they were both on the island before. Sun is Chang&#8217;s daughter! You can&#8217;t run into yourself in your own past that&#8217;s why Ben and Sun didn&#8217;t flash. If Miles was Chang&#8217;s baby he wouldn&#8217;t have flashed back. That&#8217;s my theory. </p>
<p>I also think that the incident is going to have to do with the electromagneticsm going off like it did when Desmond pulled turned the key. That&#8217;s what will kill Horace and make Chang loose his arm. That&#8217;s what will make someone have to type in the numbers every 108 minutes to release the energy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2009/03/18/next-namaste-episode-5x09/comment-page-4/#comment-37285</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Mar 2009 15:03:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/?p=285#comment-37285</guid>
		<description>I rewatched the episode today, and something funny struck me about the scene with Jack and Sawyer. I now think Jack&#039;s motivation for going there was to find out what&#039;s going on and what the plan is. Sawyer thought Jack was there to do the white man dance again and challenge his alpha male status. So, when Sawyer basically asserts himself and says he&#039;s in charge, Jack just says &#039;OK.&#039; I interpreted Jack&#039;s unresponsiveness to Sawyer&#039;s charges of poor leadership as a tacit concession to Sawyer. Jack doesn&#039;t really defend his decisions except to say, &quot;I got us off the island.&quot; His &#039;OK&#039; remark to me indicates his attitude is &quot;You want the job of leader? Cooll, you can have it. I&#039;ll be over here sweeping the floor.&quot;

Also, I wonder if Christian really is there physically and could be a manifestation of Ol&#039; Smokey. Smokey was rustling the brush before Christian appeared and appears to be in the house when he is talking to Frank and Sun. Could this explain why he can&#039;t help Locke with standing up and getting the wheel? Maybe Ol&#039; Smokey wasn&#039;t holding the lantern in the wheel cave but simply projecting the appearance and light from one. Or,  maybe there are other limits to what Ol&#039; Smokey can and can&#039;t do. Maybe Mr. Cloud Monster couldn&#039;t help Locke to the wheel because it&#039;s like kryptonite to &#039;him.&#039;

Anyway, just some thoughts. I look forward to this weekend&#039;s podcast.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I rewatched the episode today, and something funny struck me about the scene with Jack and Sawyer. I now think Jack&#8217;s motivation for going there was to find out what&#8217;s going on and what the plan is. Sawyer thought Jack was there to do the white man dance again and challenge his alpha male status. So, when Sawyer basically asserts himself and says he&#8217;s in charge, Jack just says &#8216;OK.&#8217; I interpreted Jack&#8217;s unresponsiveness to Sawyer&#8217;s charges of poor leadership as a tacit concession to Sawyer. Jack doesn&#8217;t really defend his decisions except to say, &#8220;I got us off the island.&#8221; His &#8216;OK&#8217; remark to me indicates his attitude is &#8220;You want the job of leader? Cooll, you can have it. I&#8217;ll be over here sweeping the floor.&#8221;</p>
<p>Also, I wonder if Christian really is there physically and could be a manifestation of Ol&#8217; Smokey. Smokey was rustling the brush before Christian appeared and appears to be in the house when he is talking to Frank and Sun. Could this explain why he can&#8217;t help Locke with standing up and getting the wheel? Maybe Ol&#8217; Smokey wasn&#8217;t holding the lantern in the wheel cave but simply projecting the appearance and light from one. Or,  maybe there are other limits to what Ol&#8217; Smokey can and can&#8217;t do. Maybe Mr. Cloud Monster couldn&#8217;t help Locke to the wheel because it&#8217;s like kryptonite to &#8216;him.&#8217;</p>
<p>Anyway, just some thoughts. I look forward to this weekend&#8217;s podcast.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Knives Monroe</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2009/03/18/next-namaste-episode-5x09/comment-page-4/#comment-37284</link>
		<dc:creator>Knives Monroe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Mar 2009 14:11:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/?p=285#comment-37284</guid>
		<description>Well if I had things my way, Sawyer and Jack would end up together. Hugo and Juliet would get married and have babies. Sayid and Kate would be together. 

but what do I know, I&#039;m from Texas.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well if I had things my way, Sawyer and Jack would end up together. Hugo and Juliet would get married and have babies. Sayid and Kate would be together. </p>
<p>but what do I know, I&#8217;m from Texas.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tori</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2009/03/18/next-namaste-episode-5x09/comment-page-4/#comment-37283</link>
		<dc:creator>Tori</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Mar 2009 13:40:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/?p=285#comment-37283</guid>
		<description>Rebecca makes a great point noting how Daniel says from the beginning that we cannot change what has already happened in the future, and that means our folks were ALWAYS with the DI in 1974/77. Still, that blows my mind -- what does that in fact mean re the TT issue? And Tom, I&#039;m not sure that our gang leaving a photo proves that they changed history, unless I&#039;m missing something. All it says to me is the they were in both sets of time, as well as other periods of time, and all of that is part of reality. (Help, anyone?)  

Also, one of the O6 has NOT made it back to the island, right? I.e., Aaron?  Does that mean that destiny can&#039;t play out the way Benry needs it to?

Re the romantic side of things, it was palpable that Jack and Juliet have a serious thing for each other and so do Sawyer and Kate- I&#039;m always amazed at how filmmakers can get that feeling across. Perhaps Juliet and Sawyer hooked up so J could help Sawyer evolve into a kinder, gentler person-- and perhaps all of Jack&#039;s travails have made him a slightly less hot-headed guy, readier to be with Juliet... We&#039;ll see, I guess! ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rebecca makes a great point noting how Daniel says from the beginning that we cannot change what has already happened in the future, and that means our folks were ALWAYS with the DI in 1974/77. Still, that blows my mind &#8212; what does that in fact mean re the TT issue? And Tom, I&#8217;m not sure that our gang leaving a photo proves that they changed history, unless I&#8217;m missing something. All it says to me is the they were in both sets of time, as well as other periods of time, and all of that is part of reality. (Help, anyone?)  </p>
<p>Also, one of the O6 has NOT made it back to the island, right? I.e., Aaron?  Does that mean that destiny can&#8217;t play out the way Benry needs it to?</p>
<p>Re the romantic side of things, it was palpable that Jack and Juliet have a serious thing for each other and so do Sawyer and Kate- I&#8217;m always amazed at how filmmakers can get that feeling across. Perhaps Juliet and Sawyer hooked up so J could help Sawyer evolve into a kinder, gentler person&#8211; and perhaps all of Jack&#8217;s travails have made him a slightly less hot-headed guy, readier to be with Juliet&#8230; We&#8217;ll see, I guess! ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Knives Monroe</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2009/03/18/next-namaste-episode-5x09/comment-page-4/#comment-37282</link>
		<dc:creator>Knives Monroe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Mar 2009 13:19:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/?p=285#comment-37282</guid>
		<description>And now I&#039;m glad I didn&#039;t know
The way it all would end, the way it all would go
Our lives are better left to chance
I could have missed the pain
But I&#039;d have had to miss the dance  - Garth Brooks (The Dance)

These lyrics remind me of John Locke saying that he wouldnt go back and change the past because it brought him to where he is now. 

Sorry if it&#039;s off topic. But thats how I feel in regards of said Time Travel.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And now I&#8217;m glad I didn&#8217;t know<br />
The way it all would end, the way it all would go<br />
Our lives are better left to chance<br />
I could have missed the pain<br />
But I&#8217;d have had to miss the dance  &#8211; Garth Brooks (The Dance)</p>
<p>These lyrics remind me of John Locke saying that he wouldnt go back and change the past because it brought him to where he is now. </p>
<p>Sorry if it&#8217;s off topic. But thats how I feel in regards of said Time Travel.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rebecca in Copenhagen</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2009/03/18/next-namaste-episode-5x09/comment-page-4/#comment-37281</link>
		<dc:creator>Rebecca in Copenhagen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Mar 2009 09:57:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/?p=285#comment-37281</guid>
		<description>Hi Hector,

I really like your idea that Ethan is abducted as a child, which would lead to his being an Other and escaping the Purge. It seems though that the balance between the Others and the DI is governed by such a strict set of rules that I don&#039;t think they would just swoop in and grab the infant without proper justificiation.

I&#039;m wondering if his kidnapping would be the result of some violation of the Truce that we have yet to see. Perhaps our Losties are responsible for something happening that demands a more serious kind of &quot;justice&quot; from Richard&#039;s people - namely, the exchange of one life for another instead of just one body for another body (like with Paul&#039;s corpse). What do you think?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Hector,</p>
<p>I really like your idea that Ethan is abducted as a child, which would lead to his being an Other and escaping the Purge. It seems though that the balance between the Others and the DI is governed by such a strict set of rules that I don&#8217;t think they would just swoop in and grab the infant without proper justificiation.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m wondering if his kidnapping would be the result of some violation of the Truce that we have yet to see. Perhaps our Losties are responsible for something happening that demands a more serious kind of &#8220;justice&#8221; from Richard&#8217;s people &#8211; namely, the exchange of one life for another instead of just one body for another body (like with Paul&#8217;s corpse). What do you think?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Doug</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2009/03/18/next-namaste-episode-5x09/comment-page-4/#comment-37280</link>
		<dc:creator>Doug</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Mar 2009 09:06:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/?p=285#comment-37280</guid>
		<description>Isn&#039;t &quot;He&#039;s Our You&quot; a concise definition of what it means to be a proxy? perhaps this next episode we&#039;ll find out a little more (with Christian narrating) about what it meant for each of the characters to have a proxy when returning to the island. Perhaps Sun, Frank, Ben didn&#039;t go to 1977 because something was askew.

-2008

Do we even know if Sun, Frank, and Ben are in 2008? Night changed to day after the flash that took the other 4 off the plane. Perhaps they&#039;re not even where we think they are. If there are Dharma signs littered everywhere, what if they&#039;re in the 90s just after the Purge (but if it&#039;s the 90s, how could Christian be there?)?

-Aaron and Sun

Sun&#039;s failure to return to 1977 must relate to some purpose she needs to serve to help bring Aaron and Ji Yeon back to the Island. Perhaps since Aaron was in Sun&#039;s custody when they left the Island, they would need each other to get back. There are some problems with this thinking (all the Oceanic 6 + Frank left with Desmond, and they were able to get back just fine without Desmond.) It just seems fitting that if Aaron doesn&#039;t come back to the Island at the right time, Sun won&#039;t either.

Then, does Sun know where Aaron is? Sun intimated that Aaron would be Ji Yeon&#039;s playmate in The Little Prince. She has been his caretaker before and took Aaron off the Island physically to the freighter. Perhaps Ben was trying to steal Aaron because Widmore (through Sun) also wanted him for some nefarious purpose.

-Juliet.

It&#039;s not that Juliet can&#039;t be trusted, it&#039;s just that she has always been manipulated by Ben to do his bidding. She wants to get off the Island more than anything else. Ben knows this and dangles the carrot: if you follow orders, I may let you go.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Isn&#8217;t &#8220;He&#8217;s Our You&#8221; a concise definition of what it means to be a proxy? perhaps this next episode we&#8217;ll find out a little more (with Christian narrating) about what it meant for each of the characters to have a proxy when returning to the island. Perhaps Sun, Frank, Ben didn&#8217;t go to 1977 because something was askew.</p>
<p>-2008</p>
<p>Do we even know if Sun, Frank, and Ben are in 2008? Night changed to day after the flash that took the other 4 off the plane. Perhaps they&#8217;re not even where we think they are. If there are Dharma signs littered everywhere, what if they&#8217;re in the 90s just after the Purge (but if it&#8217;s the 90s, how could Christian be there?)?</p>
<p>-Aaron and Sun</p>
<p>Sun&#8217;s failure to return to 1977 must relate to some purpose she needs to serve to help bring Aaron and Ji Yeon back to the Island. Perhaps since Aaron was in Sun&#8217;s custody when they left the Island, they would need each other to get back. There are some problems with this thinking (all the Oceanic 6 + Frank left with Desmond, and they were able to get back just fine without Desmond.) It just seems fitting that if Aaron doesn&#8217;t come back to the Island at the right time, Sun won&#8217;t either.</p>
<p>Then, does Sun know where Aaron is? Sun intimated that Aaron would be Ji Yeon&#8217;s playmate in The Little Prince. She has been his caretaker before and took Aaron off the Island physically to the freighter. Perhaps Ben was trying to steal Aaron because Widmore (through Sun) also wanted him for some nefarious purpose.</p>
<p>-Juliet.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s not that Juliet can&#8217;t be trusted, it&#8217;s just that she has always been manipulated by Ben to do his bidding. She wants to get off the Island more than anything else. Ben knows this and dangles the carrot: if you follow orders, I may let you go.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Knives Monroe</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2009/03/18/next-namaste-episode-5x09/comment-page-4/#comment-37279</link>
		<dc:creator>Knives Monroe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Mar 2009 08:00:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/?p=285#comment-37279</guid>
		<description>Kudos to you dear DocJKM

Has this, or hasnt this been the best season of LOST thus far?
Season 1 could have ended and it would have been triumphant in its own right! but.

I see it this way:

In every story, video game, movie, tv show, play, we have...THREE ACTS

3 acts in every story.

Your Beginning, your middle, and your end.

I see the series as such, Season 1 and 2 are ACT 1.
Season 3 and 4 is ACT 2
And obviously Season 5 and 6 is ACT 3.

Sincerely &#039;Act 1&#039; is INCREDIBLE! And &#039;Act 2&#039; is extraordinary in establishing where we are going. &#039;Act 3&#039; is the end, and boy what a journey we are on!

So in my perspective, every ACT is amazing, but ACT 3 will be the best and most remembered. 

But what do I know? I&#039;m from Texas

xxxstraightedgexxx
xxxWEST-SAYIDxxx</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kudos to you dear DocJKM</p>
<p>Has this, or hasnt this been the best season of LOST thus far?<br />
Season 1 could have ended and it would have been triumphant in its own right! but.</p>
<p>I see it this way:</p>
<p>In every story, video game, movie, tv show, play, we have&#8230;THREE ACTS</p>
<p>3 acts in every story.</p>
<p>Your Beginning, your middle, and your end.</p>
<p>I see the series as such, Season 1 and 2 are ACT 1.<br />
Season 3 and 4 is ACT 2<br />
And obviously Season 5 and 6 is ACT 3.</p>
<p>Sincerely &#8216;Act 1&#8242; is INCREDIBLE! And &#8216;Act 2&#8242; is extraordinary in establishing where we are going. &#8216;Act 3&#8242; is the end, and boy what a journey we are on!</p>
<p>So in my perspective, every ACT is amazing, but ACT 3 will be the best and most remembered. </p>
<p>But what do I know? I&#8217;m from Texas</p>
<p>xxxstraightedgexxx<br />
xxxWEST-SAYIDxxx</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DocJKM</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2009/03/18/next-namaste-episode-5x09/comment-page-4/#comment-37278</link>
		<dc:creator>DocJKM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Mar 2009 07:35:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/?p=285#comment-37278</guid>
		<description>Quick belated cudos also to MLE in Colorado, and Knives Monroe in Texas, for their posts on &quot;The Life and Death of Jeremy Bentham&quot;.

Ben is not the Bad Guy.

T. O&#039;Quinn and M. Emerson should share the Emmy.


John Locke is God.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Quick belated cudos also to MLE in Colorado, and Knives Monroe in Texas, for their posts on &#8220;The Life and Death of Jeremy Bentham&#8221;.</p>
<p>Ben is not the Bad Guy.</p>
<p>T. O&#8217;Quinn and M. Emerson should share the Emmy.</p>
<p>John Locke is God.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rich in Cleveland</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2009/03/18/next-namaste-episode-5x09/comment-page-4/#comment-37277</link>
		<dc:creator>Rich in Cleveland</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Mar 2009 07:33:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/?p=285#comment-37277</guid>
		<description>N-Futs: I too feel Juliet is a mole.  However, I&#039;ve been leaning toward the idea that she&#039;s been a Widmore plant all along.  The pivotal moment that indicates she knows far more than she&#039;s letting on is when she has a conversation with Sayid by the creek bed just before she joins the beach camp.  

Juliet says, &quot;If I told you everything I know, you&#039;d kill me.&quot;  

Maybe it&#039;s her secret Other knowledge that prompts this, but maybe it&#039;s her secret alignment as well.

To Hector: Is this the same &quot;nice and tender&quot; Sun that lied, blackmailed, and threatened murder in her own sordid back story?  Who dragged her beloved into her Father&#039;s dark world, fully aware of what that would mean, because she couldn&#039;t abide  the shame of his lowliness?  Just wondering</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>N-Futs: I too feel Juliet is a mole.  However, I&#8217;ve been leaning toward the idea that she&#8217;s been a Widmore plant all along.  The pivotal moment that indicates she knows far more than she&#8217;s letting on is when she has a conversation with Sayid by the creek bed just before she joins the beach camp.  </p>
<p>Juliet says, &#8220;If I told you everything I know, you&#8217;d kill me.&#8221;  </p>
<p>Maybe it&#8217;s her secret Other knowledge that prompts this, but maybe it&#8217;s her secret alignment as well.</p>
<p>To Hector: Is this the same &#8220;nice and tender&#8221; Sun that lied, blackmailed, and threatened murder in her own sordid back story?  Who dragged her beloved into her Father&#8217;s dark world, fully aware of what that would mean, because she couldn&#8217;t abide  the shame of his lowliness?  Just wondering</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DocJKM</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2009/03/18/next-namaste-episode-5x09/comment-page-4/#comment-37276</link>
		<dc:creator>DocJKM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Mar 2009 07:07:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/?p=285#comment-37276</guid>
		<description>Cudos to soko (re: Greg in Honolulu says:).  But I think you go not far enough.  Surprise?  No.  Shock would be in order, and I think J/K/H were far too nonplussed.  For all the reasons soko lists.  Perhaps it is simply a nod to the viewers, who have had to stomach this time travel nonsense a bit too much, and have had to accept it to keep the suspension of disbelief going.  Any story involving time travel Becomes a story of time travel.  Look, I love where this story has gone and what it is doing, but the story mechanism of time travel is cheap, unless it is time travel itself that is the subject.  So, with that in mind, I will offer respect to the writers, and assume that the time travel is CENTRAL to the basic theme of the story.

Greg in Honolulu- If someone offers you a slinky tomorrow, it&#039;s ok, we won&#039;t expect you to think you&#039;re back in the 60&#039;s.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cudos to soko (re: Greg in Honolulu says:).  But I think you go not far enough.  Surprise?  No.  Shock would be in order, and I think J/K/H were far too nonplussed.  For all the reasons soko lists.  Perhaps it is simply a nod to the viewers, who have had to stomach this time travel nonsense a bit too much, and have had to accept it to keep the suspension of disbelief going.  Any story involving time travel Becomes a story of time travel.  Look, I love where this story has gone and what it is doing, but the story mechanism of time travel is cheap, unless it is time travel itself that is the subject.  So, with that in mind, I will offer respect to the writers, and assume that the time travel is CENTRAL to the basic theme of the story.</p>
<p>Greg in Honolulu- If someone offers you a slinky tomorrow, it&#8217;s ok, we won&#8217;t expect you to think you&#8217;re back in the 60&#8242;s.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: soko</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2009/03/18/next-namaste-episode-5x09/comment-page-4/#comment-37275</link>
		<dc:creator>soko</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Mar 2009 06:40:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/?p=285#comment-37275</guid>
		<description>Greg in Honolulu Says: 

It’s a small thing nagging me, but it seems to strain the fabric of the story. Why were Jack, Kate, and Hurley surprised when told that they were back in time (1977).They all arrived in the Dharma VW bus, freshly painted and running well. Hurley, especially, would have recognized it as the old beat-up van he’d found and used to come to the rescue back in 2004(?). What have I missed?

Because time travel is 
1. not possible... as far as they or anyone but a few island folk know
2. not an expected part of their return to the island
3. not a normal occurrence   (except for Greg apparently)

A van does not mean time travel... it could mean that they had 3 years to fix restore and paint a van.  That is more likely than time travel.  Also, there are several  DI vans and jeeps.

so surprise is in order</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Greg in Honolulu Says: </p>
<p>It’s a small thing nagging me, but it seems to strain the fabric of the story. Why were Jack, Kate, and Hurley surprised when told that they were back in time (1977).They all arrived in the Dharma VW bus, freshly painted and running well. Hurley, especially, would have recognized it as the old beat-up van he’d found and used to come to the rescue back in 2004(?). What have I missed?</p>
<p>Because time travel is<br />
1. not possible&#8230; as far as they or anyone but a few island folk know<br />
2. not an expected part of their return to the island<br />
3. not a normal occurrence   (except for Greg apparently)</p>
<p>A van does not mean time travel&#8230; it could mean that they had 3 years to fix restore and paint a van.  That is more likely than time travel.  Also, there are several  DI vans and jeeps.</p>
<p>so surprise is in order</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pete</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2009/03/18/next-namaste-episode-5x09/comment-page-4/#comment-37274</link>
		<dc:creator>Pete</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Mar 2009 06:12:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/?p=285#comment-37274</guid>
		<description>Tom, I dunno.  What happened happened.  That photo was probably there in series 1, we just never saw it.

My Ben theory:  I think he will turn out not to be the vicious little bastard we all think he is. That would be typical of the writers to give us a twist like that.  I think things will happen that will force him to act as he does to get the O6 to where they need to be - back on the island.  I think the losties will at least in part come to realize that and coach young Ben, giving him knowledge of the future.  At least, one of them will. I also think some of the losties will join the others, maybe even be pitted against one another in the final battle.  Ohhh, so exciting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tom, I dunno.  What happened happened.  That photo was probably there in series 1, we just never saw it.</p>
<p>My Ben theory:  I think he will turn out not to be the vicious little bastard we all think he is. That would be typical of the writers to give us a twist like that.  I think things will happen that will force him to act as he does to get the O6 to where they need to be &#8211; back on the island.  I think the losties will at least in part come to realize that and coach young Ben, giving him knowledge of the future.  At least, one of them will. I also think some of the losties will join the others, maybe even be pitted against one another in the final battle.  Ohhh, so exciting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FC</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2009/03/18/next-namaste-episode-5x09/comment-page-4/#comment-37273</link>
		<dc:creator>FC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Mar 2009 06:08:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/?p=285#comment-37273</guid>
		<description>I am wondering about Sayid&#039;s encounter with young ben. Based on what we&#039;ve seen happen, in all the flashing through time, now b/w Daniel and Desmond, Locke and Alpert, and Locke and Widmore  is it safe to say that 2007 Ben (who Sun has just knocked out and who is in the makeshift infirmary) now &quot;remembers&quot; having met Sayid (and probably Sawyer/LeFleur, Juliet, and the other returned 06&#039;ers). Has this now newly happened event (so much for &quot;whatever happened, happens&quot;; since the whole rub there is what the &#039;whatever&#039; is) implanted itself into 2007 Ben&#039;s mind as a memory that he can no better distinguish as having just gotten there from whatever memories of his childhood he had when we (the audience) first met him in 2004?

And relatedly, I don&#039;t think it was Ben who wanted the runway constructed back in season 3 but jacob. That is to say, I don&#039;t think Ben, at that point, &quot;knew&quot; the future, though I do think Jacob did. Ben was probably just following orders and so then, in turn, ordered the Others to build the runway. If so, does this mean one characteristic Jacob has is that he does know the future, as in, he has been around the &#039;spinning record&#039; of time at least a few times already?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am wondering about Sayid&#8217;s encounter with young ben. Based on what we&#8217;ve seen happen, in all the flashing through time, now b/w Daniel and Desmond, Locke and Alpert, and Locke and Widmore  is it safe to say that 2007 Ben (who Sun has just knocked out and who is in the makeshift infirmary) now &#8220;remembers&#8221; having met Sayid (and probably Sawyer/LeFleur, Juliet, and the other returned 06&#8242;ers). Has this now newly happened event (so much for &#8220;whatever happened, happens&#8221;; since the whole rub there is what the &#8216;whatever&#8217; is) implanted itself into 2007 Ben&#8217;s mind as a memory that he can no better distinguish as having just gotten there from whatever memories of his childhood he had when we (the audience) first met him in 2004?</p>
<p>And relatedly, I don&#8217;t think it was Ben who wanted the runway constructed back in season 3 but jacob. That is to say, I don&#8217;t think Ben, at that point, &#8220;knew&#8221; the future, though I do think Jacob did. Ben was probably just following orders and so then, in turn, ordered the Others to build the runway. If so, does this mean one characteristic Jacob has is that he does know the future, as in, he has been around the &#8216;spinning record&#8217; of time at least a few times already?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KarenX</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2009/03/18/next-namaste-episode-5x09/comment-page-4/#comment-37272</link>
		<dc:creator>KarenX</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Mar 2009 03:45:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/?p=285#comment-37272</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s pretty funny about the guitar case, Hector. Maybe Hurley stocked it with all the goodies he missed the first time he was stranded.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s pretty funny about the guitar case, Hector. Maybe Hurley stocked it with all the goodies he missed the first time he was stranded.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom in NJ</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2009/03/18/next-namaste-episode-5x09/comment-page-4/#comment-37270</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom in NJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Mar 2009 00:43:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/?p=285#comment-37270</guid>
		<description>One interesting thing about this episode that just occurred to me is that we are actually shown proof that the 815 survivors ARE capable of changing the future, at least in some small way. If there&#039;s a framed photo of the 1977 crop of DHARMA recruits in abandoned New Otherton in 2007 with Hurley, Kate, and Jack in it, that means that they are at least leaving evidence that they were in the DHARMA initiative, so that&#039;s changing history right there... Unless that picture was just conjured by the smoke monster/The Island/Jakob, or it existed before and no one ever stumbled upon it...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One interesting thing about this episode that just occurred to me is that we are actually shown proof that the 815 survivors ARE capable of changing the future, at least in some small way. If there&#8217;s a framed photo of the 1977 crop of DHARMA recruits in abandoned New Otherton in 2007 with Hurley, Kate, and Jack in it, that means that they are at least leaving evidence that they were in the DHARMA initiative, so that&#8217;s changing history right there&#8230; Unless that picture was just conjured by the smoke monster/The Island/Jakob, or it existed before and no one ever stumbled upon it&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Garrett J</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2009/03/18/next-namaste-episode-5x09/comment-page-4/#comment-37269</link>
		<dc:creator>Garrett J</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 23:52:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/?p=285#comment-37269</guid>
		<description>Dupin-

You propose three theories why Sun didn&#039;t flash back to 1977, but how about looking at it from another perspective: Why did Jack, Hugo, Kate, and Sayid flash back? Maybe it&#039;s something special about Sun that kept her from flashing back or maybe it&#039;s something special about the other four that caused them to flash back.

One other thought about Sun- she&#039;s not the only one of our 815ers who&#039;s not in 1977. The other one, whom some people think they saw the other night? Claire. And what do Claire and Sun have in common- they were both pregnant on the island and have both seen Christian.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dupin-</p>
<p>You propose three theories why Sun didn&#8217;t flash back to 1977, but how about looking at it from another perspective: Why did Jack, Hugo, Kate, and Sayid flash back? Maybe it&#8217;s something special about Sun that kept her from flashing back or maybe it&#8217;s something special about the other four that caused them to flash back.</p>
<p>One other thought about Sun- she&#8217;s not the only one of our 815ers who&#8217;s not in 1977. The other one, whom some people think they saw the other night? Claire. And what do Claire and Sun have in common- they were both pregnant on the island and have both seen Christian.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hector from Mexico</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2009/03/18/next-namaste-episode-5x09/comment-page-4/#comment-37268</link>
		<dc:creator>Hector from Mexico</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 23:28:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/?p=285#comment-37268</guid>
		<description>Hello Ryan and Jen and all,

I tried to read all the comments, but man! 150+ is a bit tiring to do! So I&#039;m going to point some stuff that maybe has already been discussed.

First, I think that Ethan was abducted from the others as a youngster (maybe not as a baby) by the Others before Ben joined them. That&#039;s how he survived the purge and always acts like a very loyal Other. I came to this conclusion because I remember that since S1, the others have always been interested in young children (remember those two little kids that survived the 815 crash? I forgot their names) Probably Ethan was one of these &quot;special children&quot; and more as he was born on the island.

Second, I think it was a great joke from Sawyer to Jack how he assigned a janitor job. It was sort of a way of showing him who&#039;s the boss now.

Third, Sun beating Ben after getting the info she needed was simply awesome. But on the other side, it shows how she&#039;s gone evil and mad. Maybe when she meets with Jin again, she&#039;ll become the nice and tender Sun that we remember.

Finally, what&#039;s up with Hurley&#039;s guitar case? They have been taking care of it everywhere and we don&#039;t even know what it contains! I even remember a scene where we see Sawyer loading it up on the Dharma van, and I&#039;m sure they showed that scene for a reason. I don&#039;t think there&#039;s a guitar inside, but can&#039;t wait to see what will come out when they open it.

Anyway, love the podcast and everybody&#039;s comments, too bad I don&#039;t have the time to read all of them. I guess I&#039;ll have to wait till the podcast comes out to have a summary for all of them.

Greetings from sunny Mexico!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello Ryan and Jen and all,</p>
<p>I tried to read all the comments, but man! 150+ is a bit tiring to do! So I&#8217;m going to point some stuff that maybe has already been discussed.</p>
<p>First, I think that Ethan was abducted from the others as a youngster (maybe not as a baby) by the Others before Ben joined them. That&#8217;s how he survived the purge and always acts like a very loyal Other. I came to this conclusion because I remember that since S1, the others have always been interested in young children (remember those two little kids that survived the 815 crash? I forgot their names) Probably Ethan was one of these &#8220;special children&#8221; and more as he was born on the island.</p>
<p>Second, I think it was a great joke from Sawyer to Jack how he assigned a janitor job. It was sort of a way of showing him who&#8217;s the boss now.</p>
<p>Third, Sun beating Ben after getting the info she needed was simply awesome. But on the other side, it shows how she&#8217;s gone evil and mad. Maybe when she meets with Jin again, she&#8217;ll become the nice and tender Sun that we remember.</p>
<p>Finally, what&#8217;s up with Hurley&#8217;s guitar case? They have been taking care of it everywhere and we don&#8217;t even know what it contains! I even remember a scene where we see Sawyer loading it up on the Dharma van, and I&#8217;m sure they showed that scene for a reason. I don&#8217;t think there&#8217;s a guitar inside, but can&#8217;t wait to see what will come out when they open it.</p>
<p>Anyway, love the podcast and everybody&#8217;s comments, too bad I don&#8217;t have the time to read all of them. I guess I&#8217;ll have to wait till the podcast comes out to have a summary for all of them.</p>
<p>Greetings from sunny Mexico!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stefani from Mass</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2009/03/18/next-namaste-episode-5x09/comment-page-4/#comment-37267</link>
		<dc:creator>Stefani from Mass</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 23:27:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/?p=285#comment-37267</guid>
		<description>The scene with Sun in GhostDharmaville creeped me out - but I agree with the camp who says they saw CLAIRE behind her when the door opened!

But what I don&#039;t get it is why it is GhostDharmaville in the first place.  Why would there be the dangling recruiting signs if it was the same timeline as before... I&#039;m thinking that the TimeTravel stuff is more like the Back to the Future alternate timelines.  It reminds me of BTTF#2 when Marty was in the Las Vegas Hill Valley. - although I don&#039;t remember Sun going to Dharmaville during the 815-ers, she was always at the beach - or in the boat - never in the village.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The scene with Sun in GhostDharmaville creeped me out &#8211; but I agree with the camp who says they saw CLAIRE behind her when the door opened!</p>
<p>But what I don&#8217;t get it is why it is GhostDharmaville in the first place.  Why would there be the dangling recruiting signs if it was the same timeline as before&#8230; I&#8217;m thinking that the TimeTravel stuff is more like the Back to the Future alternate timelines.  It reminds me of BTTF#2 when Marty was in the Las Vegas Hill Valley. &#8211; although I don&#8217;t remember Sun going to Dharmaville during the 815-ers, she was always at the beach &#8211; or in the boat &#8211; never in the village.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Knives Monroe</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2009/03/18/next-namaste-episode-5x09/comment-page-4/#comment-37266</link>
		<dc:creator>Knives Monroe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 23:27:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/?p=285#comment-37266</guid>
		<description>I completely agree with the unpredictability, I&#039;ve mentioned that before as well. 

However we know how the LOST universe is, more or less, and we know that things happen for a reason, so its possible that Sun has work to do in 2007. 

I like your, Locke rising after 3 days. Thats bloody brilliant and scary! :0 

xxxWEST-SAYIDxxx</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I completely agree with the unpredictability, I&#8217;ve mentioned that before as well. </p>
<p>However we know how the LOST universe is, more or less, and we know that things happen for a reason, so its possible that Sun has work to do in 2007. </p>
<p>I like your, Locke rising after 3 days. Thats bloody brilliant and scary! :0 </p>
<p>xxxWEST-SAYIDxxx</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Z in DC</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2009/03/18/next-namaste-episode-5x09/comment-page-4/#comment-37265</link>
		<dc:creator>Z in DC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 23:23:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/?p=285#comment-37265</guid>
		<description>I am surprised at how few people are talking about the girl behind Sun in the Sun/Frank/Christian scene.  I missed it at first...my wife saw it (kudos to her). Its weird...its almost like a mistake (i know its not). Like a PA standing there holding Damon and Carlton&#039;s coffee and accidentally got in the shot. She has blonde hair but in my opinion doesnt look like Claire...although that would be the obvious guess at who it was.  I&#039;ve heard entire podcasts where the hosts nor any callers even mentioned it.  I think just a lot of people missed it....like i said before, i did also at first.  

On another note, here is  an observation on Richard Alpert that I have not heard anyone mention or talk about either.  When the the losties were flashies and jumping thru time, it seems that everyone they came in contact with thought they were contemporaries...until they flashed. And as we learned from Russo, whenever they flashed, apparently they disappeared.  Thats also alluded to when sawyer is talking to Richard and mentions that a guy named Locke wandered into his camp and disappeared before his eyes when he met him years ago (and Richard seemed to agree).  

But what is strange to me, is that in the one scene before that, after Locke got shot and Richard shows up....he is the only one who seems to realize that not only are they flashing, b/c he new they only had limited time...but he knew where they were going to flash to next b/c he told Locke that &quot;i wont recognize you&quot; next time i see you...therefore giving him the compass.  That is astronomical more amount of knowledge and insight than anyone else they come into contact with.  Can u imagine Russo or any others saying something like that?  

Its almost like in that instance...Richard was in a godspot of some kind...it seems he was aware of the whole picture (which plays into the theories of him being a pharoh, eternal, etc). He steps out of the character in the play and sits in the audience who knows it IS a play.

But then...when he sees locke next he&#039;s back on the same level as everyone else who saw this guy disappear before his eyes.  Then in the future scenes with Sawyer he also appears to be someone with limited knowledge as he is caught off-guard and somewhat impressed by what sawyer is telling him. 

I dont know....seeing Im the only one asking such stupid questions...that could be telling in itself.  I&#039;m prepared to have missed the obvious.

Z</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am surprised at how few people are talking about the girl behind Sun in the Sun/Frank/Christian scene.  I missed it at first&#8230;my wife saw it (kudos to her). Its weird&#8230;its almost like a mistake (i know its not). Like a PA standing there holding Damon and Carlton&#8217;s coffee and accidentally got in the shot. She has blonde hair but in my opinion doesnt look like Claire&#8230;although that would be the obvious guess at who it was.  I&#8217;ve heard entire podcasts where the hosts nor any callers even mentioned it.  I think just a lot of people missed it&#8230;.like i said before, i did also at first.  </p>
<p>On another note, here is  an observation on Richard Alpert that I have not heard anyone mention or talk about either.  When the the losties were flashies and jumping thru time, it seems that everyone they came in contact with thought they were contemporaries&#8230;until they flashed. And as we learned from Russo, whenever they flashed, apparently they disappeared.  Thats also alluded to when sawyer is talking to Richard and mentions that a guy named Locke wandered into his camp and disappeared before his eyes when he met him years ago (and Richard seemed to agree).  </p>
<p>But what is strange to me, is that in the one scene before that, after Locke got shot and Richard shows up&#8230;.he is the only one who seems to realize that not only are they flashing, b/c he new they only had limited time&#8230;but he knew where they were going to flash to next b/c he told Locke that &#8220;i wont recognize you&#8221; next time i see you&#8230;therefore giving him the compass.  That is astronomical more amount of knowledge and insight than anyone else they come into contact with.  Can u imagine Russo or any others saying something like that?  </p>
<p>Its almost like in that instance&#8230;Richard was in a godspot of some kind&#8230;it seems he was aware of the whole picture (which plays into the theories of him being a pharoh, eternal, etc). He steps out of the character in the play and sits in the audience who knows it IS a play.</p>
<p>But then&#8230;when he sees locke next he&#8217;s back on the same level as everyone else who saw this guy disappear before his eyes.  Then in the future scenes with Sawyer he also appears to be someone with limited knowledge as he is caught off-guard and somewhat impressed by what sawyer is telling him. </p>
<p>I dont know&#8230;.seeing Im the only one asking such stupid questions&#8230;that could be telling in itself.  I&#8217;m prepared to have missed the obvious.</p>
<p>Z</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Heather from the UK</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2009/03/18/next-namaste-episode-5x09/comment-page-4/#comment-37264</link>
		<dc:creator>Heather from the UK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 23:19:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/?p=285#comment-37264</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s probably already been posted, but when Sun is talking to Christian in the house, behind her right shoulder, just after he says about their &#039;long journey ahead of them&#039;, you can see a woman sitting. I think this is either Claire or Charlotte, Claire because, well duh she&#039;s hanging out with her dad, and Charlotte because the woman&#039;s hair looks very red... Love the podcast :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s probably already been posted, but when Sun is talking to Christian in the house, behind her right shoulder, just after he says about their &#8216;long journey ahead of them&#8217;, you can see a woman sitting. I think this is either Claire or Charlotte, Claire because, well duh she&#8217;s hanging out with her dad, and Charlotte because the woman&#8217;s hair looks very red&#8230; Love the podcast <img src='http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NuckinFuts</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2009/03/18/next-namaste-episode-5x09/comment-page-4/#comment-37263</link>
		<dc:creator>NuckinFuts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 22:51:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/?p=285#comment-37263</guid>
		<description>RE : # 3 Above:  Sorry...Sayid flashed too.  It&#039;s unpredictable, what can I tell ya.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>RE : # 3 Above:  Sorry&#8230;Sayid flashed too.  It&#8217;s unpredictable, what can I tell ya.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NuckinFuts</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2009/03/18/next-namaste-episode-5x09/comment-page-4/#comment-37262</link>
		<dc:creator>NuckinFuts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 22:46:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/?p=285#comment-37262</guid>
		<description>A few thoughts on questions people have raised.  

1.  The New Dock - I didn&#039;t think that the dock blew up...the sub did.  Or it could have been repaired if damaged.  Maybe by the people in &quot;The Temple&quot; that were left.  They also would be there to put out the boats for Ben&#039;s return.  I am also assuming they have been waiting for Ben&#039;s return.
2.  Juliet -I am convinced that Juliet is still Ben&#039;s mole.  She and Ben had a long conversation before she handcuffed herself to Kate.  They were going over the tail end of a very large plan.  Ben &amp; the Others had already worked on the runway for the airplane.  Ben must have let her in on a very long story and very big secret.  She was told to act like she &#039;re-deemed&#039; herself to the group after Claire&#039;s implant went off causing her to be sick.  We are under the impression that she may have switched sides and hates Ben, but that could still be a trick ~ even if partially true.  She has stated that she is a &quot;believer&quot; in Jacob.
3.  Sun - The technical reason that Sun did not go back with J/K/Hurley is that the circumstances are different and according to Hawking &amp; Faraday &quot;unpredictable&quot;.  If you look at it another way then perhaps J/K/Hurley should have landed w/ the plane, but flashed back due to the &quot;unpredictableness&quot;.  To me it seems much more unpredictable that someone would flash off of an airplane to 1977 than to assume that just because 3 people did that 4 should.  Or even 1 person should ever flash out of existence.  If it were predictable then all would have crash landed.  Perhaps Sun is the lucky one?
4.  Where was Locke?  -  I like to think that Locke&#039;s body was in the cargo area of the plane.  He may have been trapped there until found...and his casket may not have even opened from the inside.  The scene people are worrying about seems right after the crash when Ben / Sun / Frank bolt towards the other side of the small island.  One of 2 things.  He will be found soon by 316ers when rummaging through whats left of the plane, OR He will raise after 3 days of being dead on the island. 
5.  Why is Ben on the cot?  - - Obviously many of the injured are taken to the buildings of the small island.  While scouting they will soon find an unconcious Ben laying there since Sun whacked that SOB.  ( Although I&#039;m not letting go that he may be one of the good guys........I love this show ).

Brian &quot;NuckinFuts&quot; ~ Atlanta, GA</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A few thoughts on questions people have raised.  </p>
<p>1.  The New Dock &#8211; I didn&#8217;t think that the dock blew up&#8230;the sub did.  Or it could have been repaired if damaged.  Maybe by the people in &#8220;The Temple&#8221; that were left.  They also would be there to put out the boats for Ben&#8217;s return.  I am also assuming they have been waiting for Ben&#8217;s return.<br />
2.  Juliet -I am convinced that Juliet is still Ben&#8217;s mole.  She and Ben had a long conversation before she handcuffed herself to Kate.  They were going over the tail end of a very large plan.  Ben &amp; the Others had already worked on the runway for the airplane.  Ben must have let her in on a very long story and very big secret.  She was told to act like she &#8216;re-deemed&#8217; herself to the group after Claire&#8217;s implant went off causing her to be sick.  We are under the impression that she may have switched sides and hates Ben, but that could still be a trick ~ even if partially true.  She has stated that she is a &#8220;believer&#8221; in Jacob.<br />
3.  Sun &#8211; The technical reason that Sun did not go back with J/K/Hurley is that the circumstances are different and according to Hawking &amp; Faraday &#8220;unpredictable&#8221;.  If you look at it another way then perhaps J/K/Hurley should have landed w/ the plane, but flashed back due to the &#8220;unpredictableness&#8221;.  To me it seems much more unpredictable that someone would flash off of an airplane to 1977 than to assume that just because 3 people did that 4 should.  Or even 1 person should ever flash out of existence.  If it were predictable then all would have crash landed.  Perhaps Sun is the lucky one?<br />
4.  Where was Locke?  &#8211;  I like to think that Locke&#8217;s body was in the cargo area of the plane.  He may have been trapped there until found&#8230;and his casket may not have even opened from the inside.  The scene people are worrying about seems right after the crash when Ben / Sun / Frank bolt towards the other side of the small island.  One of 2 things.  He will be found soon by 316ers when rummaging through whats left of the plane, OR He will raise after 3 days of being dead on the island.<br />
5.  Why is Ben on the cot?  &#8211; - Obviously many of the injured are taken to the buildings of the small island.  While scouting they will soon find an unconcious Ben laying there since Sun whacked that SOB.  ( Although I&#8217;m not letting go that he may be one of the good guys&#8230;&#8230;..I love this show ).</p>
<p>Brian &#8220;NuckinFuts&#8221; ~ Atlanta, GA</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Knives Monroe</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2009/03/18/next-namaste-episode-5x09/comment-page-4/#comment-37261</link>
		<dc:creator>Knives Monroe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 22:37:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/?p=285#comment-37261</guid>
		<description>In the preview for He&#039;s Our You next week, Sayid looks at Horace and some other Dharma man, and says &quot;You&#039;re all going to die you know&quot; That is very wrong and obviously Sayid knows about the purge. I think, as much as I love Sayid and he&#039;s my favourite, I think he&#039;s going to try to change the past/future. And going at horribly drastic lengths to do so.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the preview for He&#8217;s Our You next week, Sayid looks at Horace and some other Dharma man, and says &#8220;You&#8217;re all going to die you know&#8221; That is very wrong and obviously Sayid knows about the purge. I think, as much as I love Sayid and he&#8217;s my favourite, I think he&#8217;s going to try to change the past/future. And going at horribly drastic lengths to do so.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg in Honolulu</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2009/03/18/next-namaste-episode-5x09/comment-page-4/#comment-37260</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg in Honolulu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 22:31:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/?p=285#comment-37260</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s a small thing nagging me, but it seems to strain the fabric of the story. Why were Jack, Kate, and Hurley surprised when told that they were back in time (1977). They all arrived in the Dharma VW bus, freshly painted and running well. Hurley, especially, would have recognized it as the old beat-up van he&#039;d found and used to come to the rescue back in 2004(?). What have I missed?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s a small thing nagging me, but it seems to strain the fabric of the story. Why were Jack, Kate, and Hurley surprised when told that they were back in time (1977). They all arrived in the Dharma VW bus, freshly painted and running well. Hurley, especially, would have recognized it as the old beat-up van he&#8217;d found and used to come to the rescue back in 2004(?). What have I missed?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff in Cape Coral</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2009/03/18/next-namaste-episode-5x09/comment-page-4/#comment-37259</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff in Cape Coral</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 21:19:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/?p=285#comment-37259</guid>
		<description>I like Leah&#039;s idea that Juliette will break Sawyer&#039;s heart.

When we see Juliette looking distraught over Jack and Kate&#039;s return, I assumed she was worried that Kate was coming back to ruin what she had with Sawyer.  But watching again last night, I was struck by the wamrness of her embrace of Jack when he showed up at her doorstep.  What if her angst was over her unresolved feelings for Jack, not Sawyer&#039;s for Kate?  Jack and Sawyer will obviously be pitted against one another...certainly an opportunity for Juliette to choose sides.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like Leah&#8217;s idea that Juliette will break Sawyer&#8217;s heart.</p>
<p>When we see Juliette looking distraught over Jack and Kate&#8217;s return, I assumed she was worried that Kate was coming back to ruin what she had with Sawyer.  But watching again last night, I was struck by the wamrness of her embrace of Jack when he showed up at her doorstep.  What if her angst was over her unresolved feelings for Jack, not Sawyer&#8217;s for Kate?  Jack and Sawyer will obviously be pitted against one another&#8230;certainly an opportunity for Juliette to choose sides.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: carol from Boston</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2009/03/18/next-namaste-episode-5x09/comment-page-4/#comment-37258</link>
		<dc:creator>carol from Boston</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 21:06:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/?p=285#comment-37258</guid>
		<description>Rich, In the lost magazine, Matthew Fox said that the turning point for his character was saying yes to Ben to going back to the island.   He is now becoming a man of faith, and has stopped his denial of what was happening on the island.  He is now more open to seeing what the Island needs from him.  I do remember an important line from him in a previous season &quot;you all want me to be the leader, but then when I try to lead, you don&#039;t want to listen to me and do what I say&quot;.   I think he did a pretty good job except for last season where he just wouldn&#039;t believe that those people weren&#039;t there to rescue them.  

So Rich, I think it is a bit of redemption and a bit of &quot;man of faith vs man of science&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rich, In the lost magazine, Matthew Fox said that the turning point for his character was saying yes to Ben to going back to the island.   He is now becoming a man of faith, and has stopped his denial of what was happening on the island.  He is now more open to seeing what the Island needs from him.  I do remember an important line from him in a previous season &#8220;you all want me to be the leader, but then when I try to lead, you don&#8217;t want to listen to me and do what I say&#8221;.   I think he did a pretty good job except for last season where he just wouldn&#8217;t believe that those people weren&#8217;t there to rescue them.  </p>
<p>So Rich, I think it is a bit of redemption and a bit of &#8220;man of faith vs man of science&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MK</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2009/03/18/next-namaste-episode-5x09/comment-page-3/#comment-37257</link>
		<dc:creator>MK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 19:27:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/?p=285#comment-37257</guid>
		<description>Sun was not preggers when she got on 815, she was relieved because it was Jin&#039;s baby and it was conceived on the island.  So different reason she is not traveling with the rest of them.

Also, how do you think Claire will play into all of this?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sun was not preggers when she got on 815, she was relieved because it was Jin&#8217;s baby and it was conceived on the island.  So different reason she is not traveling with the rest of them.</p>
<p>Also, how do you think Claire will play into all of this?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rich in Cleveland</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2009/03/18/next-namaste-episode-5x09/comment-page-3/#comment-37256</link>
		<dc:creator>Rich in Cleveland</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 19:06:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/?p=285#comment-37256</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s killing me what the writers have done with Jack&#039;s character.  What happened to the guy who trounced Sawyer all day in poker? Who didn&#039;t break a sweat about the gambit for the guns because he knew if he needed them, he&#039;d get them?  Who, despite his incredulity about the mystic wonder of the island, orchestrated an amazingly successful evacuation of his &quot;people&quot;/ambush of the others? (Remember these are the same super warrior others who cut Widmore&#039;s mercenary army apart).

I kind of get the symbolism of Jack starting over at the bottom (work man) just as someone who doesn&#039;t learn the lessons of this life is destined to repeat another karmic cycle of until they get it right.  It just gets under my skin that all the hatred of Jack gets rewarded much in the same way that Nikki &amp; Paolo &amp; Frogurt got the collective thumbs down from the mob.

Here&#039;s a vote for the common welfare as opposed to &quot;every man for himself&quot; as Sawyer again says in this week&#039;s preview.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s killing me what the writers have done with Jack&#8217;s character.  What happened to the guy who trounced Sawyer all day in poker? Who didn&#8217;t break a sweat about the gambit for the guns because he knew if he needed them, he&#8217;d get them?  Who, despite his incredulity about the mystic wonder of the island, orchestrated an amazingly successful evacuation of his &#8220;people&#8221;/ambush of the others? (Remember these are the same super warrior others who cut Widmore&#8217;s mercenary army apart).</p>
<p>I kind of get the symbolism of Jack starting over at the bottom (work man) just as someone who doesn&#8217;t learn the lessons of this life is destined to repeat another karmic cycle of until they get it right.  It just gets under my skin that all the hatred of Jack gets rewarded much in the same way that Nikki &amp; Paolo &amp; Frogurt got the collective thumbs down from the mob.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s a vote for the common welfare as opposed to &#8220;every man for himself&#8221; as Sawyer again says in this week&#8217;s preview.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: carol from Boston</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2009/03/18/next-namaste-episode-5x09/comment-page-3/#comment-37255</link>
		<dc:creator>carol from Boston</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 18:28:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/?p=285#comment-37255</guid>
		<description>Jin was not in the picture because he was with Sayid, Sawyer and Juliet aren&#039;t in the picture either.  I&#039;ll have to look for the Asian couple.

Well as jen likes to say &quot;My head hurts&quot;.   I am sure we will find out soon what is going on, and in the meantime, I just bought the LOST magazine and I am enjoying reading about Damon and Carlton&#039;s info about season 5.   There are also interviews with Michael Emerson, Matthew Fox and Terry O&#039;Quinn,  

re: the figure behind Sun, I still can&#039;t see it on my tv and I have tried slow mo and still no luck, this show is filmed in stardard format right?  Not letterbox?  I keep wondering if my tv is cutting off that part of the screen.  I see it in the screen cap but not on my own television.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jin was not in the picture because he was with Sayid, Sawyer and Juliet aren&#8217;t in the picture either.  I&#8217;ll have to look for the Asian couple.</p>
<p>Well as jen likes to say &#8220;My head hurts&#8221;.   I am sure we will find out soon what is going on, and in the meantime, I just bought the LOST magazine and I am enjoying reading about Damon and Carlton&#8217;s info about season 5.   There are also interviews with Michael Emerson, Matthew Fox and Terry O&#8217;Quinn,  </p>
<p>re: the figure behind Sun, I still can&#8217;t see it on my tv and I have tried slow mo and still no luck, this show is filmed in stardard format right?  Not letterbox?  I keep wondering if my tv is cutting off that part of the screen.  I see it in the screen cap but not on my own television.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leah from Largo, MD</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2009/03/18/next-namaste-episode-5x09/comment-page-3/#comment-37254</link>
		<dc:creator>Leah from Largo, MD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 18:21:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/?p=285#comment-37254</guid>
		<description>One more comment.

I believe that the whole not having babies issue started after the purge.  I think maybe the purge wasn&#039;t supposed to happen and it effected future time and events on the island and that is why women can&#039;t have babies.  The Others were responsible for the purge and maybe they are being punished by the island for it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One more comment.</p>
<p>I believe that the whole not having babies issue started after the purge.  I think maybe the purge wasn&#8217;t supposed to happen and it effected future time and events on the island and that is why women can&#8217;t have babies.  The Others were responsible for the purge and maybe they are being punished by the island for it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leah from Largo, MD</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2009/03/18/next-namaste-episode-5x09/comment-page-3/#comment-37253</link>
		<dc:creator>Leah from Largo, MD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 18:16:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/?p=285#comment-37253</guid>
		<description>I first want to say that I did not like Lafleur, as many Losties did.  I&#039;m still rooting for Kate and Sawyer.  I still believe that Juliet is sneaky and has some information about the island that she has not revealed to the Sawyer and others that are stuck with the Dharma group.  She definitely knows more about the Others.

My theory is that Juliet will break Sawyer&#039;s heart and not the other way around.  

Also, I really like Sawyer&#039;s new attitude. I think it makes him even sexier!!

Questions:
Wasn&#039;t Ben unconscious and badly injured the after the plane crash and Locke told the other crashees that Ben killed him? What happened with that? What happened to Locke and why didn&#039;t Sun see him? Or was the Locke scene in the near future after Sun went back to the main island?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I first want to say that I did not like Lafleur, as many Losties did.  I&#8217;m still rooting for Kate and Sawyer.  I still believe that Juliet is sneaky and has some information about the island that she has not revealed to the Sawyer and others that are stuck with the Dharma group.  She definitely knows more about the Others.</p>
<p>My theory is that Juliet will break Sawyer&#8217;s heart and not the other way around.  </p>
<p>Also, I really like Sawyer&#8217;s new attitude. I think it makes him even sexier!!</p>
<p>Questions:<br />
Wasn&#8217;t Ben unconscious and badly injured the after the plane crash and Locke told the other crashees that Ben killed him? What happened with that? What happened to Locke and why didn&#8217;t Sun see him? Or was the Locke scene in the near future after Sun went back to the main island?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mirepoix from Mtl</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2009/03/18/next-namaste-episode-5x09/comment-page-3/#comment-37252</link>
		<dc:creator>Mirepoix from Mtl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 17:25:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/?p=285#comment-37252</guid>
		<description>Posts are really piling on 

Lets do some math about young Ben 
If he was 14 in 1977, that would make him in his mid 20s in 1988 when Rousseau arrived. 
The purge must have occured before Rousseau got there. 
However, Ben looked much older than 25 when the purge happened. 
One would think that Sawier would be sort of taking Ben under his wing in the mid 70s, straigthening Roger (who will certainly come across Jack in their janitorial capacity; would Jack get involved in making Roger a better man?) 
Obviously, Ben may already have become interested in helping Hostiles, by supplying some side help to the prison keepers. or at least becoming exposed to Hostiles in trying to know more about them... 
It seems likely that he woud help Said escape. 
But why would he escape? 

Why would Radzinsky be building the Swan model in the Flame? 
Horace seems to be still in charge in 1977 (according to Radzinsky) 
Pierre Chang is a scientist forced to take care of incoming recruits but not at all in charge 
We have to believe that his child is not born yet, as the orientation fils were shot in the early 80s 
Was Daniel out of the island for a while, and came back as a workman when the Orchid was built in the early 80s. 
Why wouldnt he assume his role as proemiment physicist? (as Chang did not appear to acknowledge him as a scientist when bumping into him)

Indeed it seems strange that the DI would not question further Juliets involvement in delivering baby Ethan. 
As for his presence among the others in 2004, I guess it is fair to admit that he was out of the island studying at medical school when the purge happened. 
Ben got him to come back later 

Another theory behind Sun not going to 1977 could be that she left her baby Jeon behind. See below for my own  hehehe 
 I think I heard the second part of the whispers as «Its alright Sun» 
Regarding the blond silouhette in the background behind Sun, I have rewatched it many times in slowmo (one fifteenth frames) and frankly I tip my hat to those who picked it up cause it is not easy to see even in HD 
The image posted dismisses any doubts. 
It seems that those present were oblivious of its presence. 
Could it be that 3 years of abandonment destroy the barracks so much? 
I guess there must have been a change in history cause the place looks abandoned for a far longer time. 
Maybe the DI was not wiped out after all... 

I carefully monitored the people present during the welcoming procedure of the recruits 
No sign of Ben 
I believe I caught a glimpse of young teen Ben in DI jumpsuit outside the admission compound  
No other person of note. 
Now check out the picture of the 1977 recruits (and the live picture taking) 
The friends are there, but not Jin. 
Look at the Asian couple 
Could it be Mr. Paik and a pregnant Mrs Paik ? and Sun was already on the Island (freaky huh...?)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Posts are really piling on </p>
<p>Lets do some math about young Ben<br />
If he was 14 in 1977, that would make him in his mid 20s in 1988 when Rousseau arrived.<br />
The purge must have occured before Rousseau got there.<br />
However, Ben looked much older than 25 when the purge happened.<br />
One would think that Sawier would be sort of taking Ben under his wing in the mid 70s, straigthening Roger (who will certainly come across Jack in their janitorial capacity; would Jack get involved in making Roger a better man?)<br />
Obviously, Ben may already have become interested in helping Hostiles, by supplying some side help to the prison keepers. or at least becoming exposed to Hostiles in trying to know more about them&#8230;<br />
It seems likely that he woud help Said escape.<br />
But why would he escape? </p>
<p>Why would Radzinsky be building the Swan model in the Flame?<br />
Horace seems to be still in charge in 1977 (according to Radzinsky)<br />
Pierre Chang is a scientist forced to take care of incoming recruits but not at all in charge<br />
We have to believe that his child is not born yet, as the orientation fils were shot in the early 80s<br />
Was Daniel out of the island for a while, and came back as a workman when the Orchid was built in the early 80s.<br />
Why wouldnt he assume his role as proemiment physicist? (as Chang did not appear to acknowledge him as a scientist when bumping into him)</p>
<p>Indeed it seems strange that the DI would not question further Juliets involvement in delivering baby Ethan.<br />
As for his presence among the others in 2004, I guess it is fair to admit that he was out of the island studying at medical school when the purge happened.<br />
Ben got him to come back later </p>
<p>Another theory behind Sun not going to 1977 could be that she left her baby Jeon behind. See below for my own  hehehe<br />
 I think I heard the second part of the whispers as «Its alright Sun»<br />
Regarding the blond silouhette in the background behind Sun, I have rewatched it many times in slowmo (one fifteenth frames) and frankly I tip my hat to those who picked it up cause it is not easy to see even in HD<br />
The image posted dismisses any doubts.<br />
It seems that those present were oblivious of its presence.<br />
Could it be that 3 years of abandonment destroy the barracks so much?<br />
I guess there must have been a change in history cause the place looks abandoned for a far longer time.<br />
Maybe the DI was not wiped out after all&#8230; </p>
<p>I carefully monitored the people present during the welcoming procedure of the recruits<br />
No sign of Ben<br />
I believe I caught a glimpse of young teen Ben in DI jumpsuit outside the admission compound<br />
No other person of note.<br />
Now check out the picture of the 1977 recruits (and the live picture taking)<br />
The friends are there, but not Jin.<br />
Look at the Asian couple<br />
Could it be Mr. Paik and a pregnant Mrs Paik ? and Sun was already on the Island (freaky huh&#8230;?)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rebecca in Copenhagen</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2009/03/18/next-namaste-episode-5x09/comment-page-3/#comment-37251</link>
		<dc:creator>Rebecca in Copenhagen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 17:21:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/?p=285#comment-37251</guid>
		<description>Hi Brandon...
I definitely get what you&#039;re saying about course-correcting, and I think that it fits in well with the idea that you can&#039;t change the future...But my question is this:

Is course-correction and the idea that &quot;you can&#039;t change anything&quot; in the future (Daniel&#039;s words) mutually exclusive? Because I would argue that it is...

If we look at the case of Charlie in Season 3, we see Desmond trying four times to save his life (the first drowning incident, the lightening strike, the drowning-after-chasing-the-par-avion-bird incident, and the arrow to the throat while hiking off after Naomi). Some would say that the universe just had it out for Charlie, so when the first attempt to off him failed, the course-correcting kicked in and the lightening strike was set into motion. So, eventually Charlie&#039;s time runs out after switching off the jamming mechanism in the Looking Glass, and when he dies the course is finally corrected.

But let&#039;s think of it another way: What if Charlie&#039;s timeline wasn&#039;t supposed to end at the very first attempt to save Claire when Desmond stepped in instead? What if, no matter what, Desmond always saved Charlie all four times, because his path was SUPPOSED to lead to the Looking Glass? If Charlie had died trying to save Claire, Sayid would have been the volunteer to swim down and disable the jamming device, which certainly wouldn&#039;t have been easy for a military man. Instead, it&#039;s a job suited for a musician who would know the tune to Good Vibrations. It&#039;s something ONLY he could do. 

I think this course-correcting is just one way of looking at a small piece of the bigger picture - that in any character&#039;s timeline, they may think that they are averting certain disasters or insuring certain events, but really things always happen the way they are supposed to, and this can&#039;t be changed - not by going to the past, nor by trying to manipulate the present. Desmond wasn&#039;t delaying Charlie&#039;s death by &quot;saving him&quot; four times - He was unaware that his actions were actually bringing Charlie to where he needed to be in the finale of Season 3.

What do you think?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Brandon&#8230;<br />
I definitely get what you&#8217;re saying about course-correcting, and I think that it fits in well with the idea that you can&#8217;t change the future&#8230;But my question is this:</p>
<p>Is course-correction and the idea that &#8220;you can&#8217;t change anything&#8221; in the future (Daniel&#8217;s words) mutually exclusive? Because I would argue that it is&#8230;</p>
<p>If we look at the case of Charlie in Season 3, we see Desmond trying four times to save his life (the first drowning incident, the lightening strike, the drowning-after-chasing-the-par-avion-bird incident, and the arrow to the throat while hiking off after Naomi). Some would say that the universe just had it out for Charlie, so when the first attempt to off him failed, the course-correcting kicked in and the lightening strike was set into motion. So, eventually Charlie&#8217;s time runs out after switching off the jamming mechanism in the Looking Glass, and when he dies the course is finally corrected.</p>
<p>But let&#8217;s think of it another way: What if Charlie&#8217;s timeline wasn&#8217;t supposed to end at the very first attempt to save Claire when Desmond stepped in instead? What if, no matter what, Desmond always saved Charlie all four times, because his path was SUPPOSED to lead to the Looking Glass? If Charlie had died trying to save Claire, Sayid would have been the volunteer to swim down and disable the jamming device, which certainly wouldn&#8217;t have been easy for a military man. Instead, it&#8217;s a job suited for a musician who would know the tune to Good Vibrations. It&#8217;s something ONLY he could do. </p>
<p>I think this course-correcting is just one way of looking at a small piece of the bigger picture &#8211; that in any character&#8217;s timeline, they may think that they are averting certain disasters or insuring certain events, but really things always happen the way they are supposed to, and this can&#8217;t be changed &#8211; not by going to the past, nor by trying to manipulate the present. Desmond wasn&#8217;t delaying Charlie&#8217;s death by &#8220;saving him&#8221; four times &#8211; He was unaware that his actions were actually bringing Charlie to where he needed to be in the finale of Season 3.</p>
<p>What do you think?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rebecca in Copenhagen</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2009/03/18/next-namaste-episode-5x09/comment-page-3/#comment-37250</link>
		<dc:creator>Rebecca in Copenhagen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 16:10:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/?p=285#comment-37250</guid>
		<description>Hi Carol and John...
I like the idea about not being able to change the ultimate outcome but rather the circumstances that bring it about but I&#039;m wondering about those buildings that Sun and Frank find when they go searching for Jin. I mean, it&#039;s clearly a very abandoned Dharmaville, and not the shiny New Otherton we saw in the premiere of Season 3. 

Still, I really don&#039;t know how to explain the ghost town they find.
Daniel&#039;s explains that you can&#039;t change anything in the future by altering the past - I take that to mean that you may THINK you&#039;re altering the course of events, but you actually always did it that way - for example, Sawyer stepping in to save Amy...it wasn&#039;t just an impulse decision that changed everything...I see it as him simply doing what he always did in that timeline, and it brought about the events that follow which in the end brings our Losties to the Island on 815. This is how it always was, there was no rewriting history and leading to a completely different 2004 or 2007. At least that&#039;s how I hear Daniel...

So I wonder if Sun and Frank walked into a scene that Smokie created. We know that Mr. Eko saw and talked with a vision of what he thought was his brother Yemi in the episode where he died, and that&#039;s generally assumed to be Smokie...so why couldn&#039;t that ghost town have been the same? I just have a hard time reconciling Daniel&#039;s absolute statement of &quot;It doesn&#039;t matter what we do&quot; with an altered future where New Otherton never existed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Carol and John&#8230;<br />
I like the idea about not being able to change the ultimate outcome but rather the circumstances that bring it about but I&#8217;m wondering about those buildings that Sun and Frank find when they go searching for Jin. I mean, it&#8217;s clearly a very abandoned Dharmaville, and not the shiny New Otherton we saw in the premiere of Season 3. </p>
<p>Still, I really don&#8217;t know how to explain the ghost town they find.<br />
Daniel&#8217;s explains that you can&#8217;t change anything in the future by altering the past &#8211; I take that to mean that you may THINK you&#8217;re altering the course of events, but you actually always did it that way &#8211; for example, Sawyer stepping in to save Amy&#8230;it wasn&#8217;t just an impulse decision that changed everything&#8230;I see it as him simply doing what he always did in that timeline, and it brought about the events that follow which in the end brings our Losties to the Island on 815. This is how it always was, there was no rewriting history and leading to a completely different 2004 or 2007. At least that&#8217;s how I hear Daniel&#8230;</p>
<p>So I wonder if Sun and Frank walked into a scene that Smokie created. We know that Mr. Eko saw and talked with a vision of what he thought was his brother Yemi in the episode where he died, and that&#8217;s generally assumed to be Smokie&#8230;so why couldn&#8217;t that ghost town have been the same? I just have a hard time reconciling Daniel&#8217;s absolute statement of &#8220;It doesn&#8217;t matter what we do&#8221; with an altered future where New Otherton never existed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dupin</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2009/03/18/next-namaste-episode-5x09/comment-page-3/#comment-37249</link>
		<dc:creator>Dupin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 15:59:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/?p=285#comment-37249</guid>
		<description>I am hung up on why Sun didn&#039;t flash back to &#039;77.  There are 3 prevailing theories proposed already: 
1.  She is not pregnant this time as she was before.
This is possible, but I&#039;m not buying it.

2.  She was not visited by John off Island.
I guess this is also possible, but do we absolutley know she didn&#039;t see John?

3.  She is already there.
I think this can be ruled out because Sawyer and company have been flashing back and forth to time zones when we&#039;re certain they present in.

So it must be that Sun has a history differrent from the O6 that we just haven&#039;t learned about yet.  She must have been on Island before or there is some back story we have yet to see.  We&#039;ve all seen how creepy she&#039;s been off Island and we did not see the entirety of her conversation with Widmore at the airport.  I&#039;ll bet there&#039;s much more about Sun than we realize.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am hung up on why Sun didn&#8217;t flash back to &#8217;77.  There are 3 prevailing theories proposed already:<br />
1.  She is not pregnant this time as she was before.<br />
This is possible, but I&#8217;m not buying it.</p>
<p>2.  She was not visited by John off Island.<br />
I guess this is also possible, but do we absolutley know she didn&#8217;t see John?</p>
<p>3.  She is already there.<br />
I think this can be ruled out because Sawyer and company have been flashing back and forth to time zones when we&#8217;re certain they present in.</p>
<p>So it must be that Sun has a history differrent from the O6 that we just haven&#8217;t learned about yet.  She must have been on Island before or there is some back story we have yet to see.  We&#8217;ve all seen how creepy she&#8217;s been off Island and we did not see the entirety of her conversation with Widmore at the airport.  I&#8217;ll bet there&#8217;s much more about Sun than we realize.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brandon from Harrisburg</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2009/03/18/next-namaste-episode-5x09/comment-page-3/#comment-37248</link>
		<dc:creator>Brandon from Harrisburg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 15:56:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/?p=285#comment-37248</guid>
		<description>Carol from Boston, I just re-watched &quot;Flashes Before Your Eyes&quot; yesterday (one of my favorite episodes, incidentally), and it confirms your note to John, more or less.  This is the episode where we learned about course correction from Ms. Hawking, as well as Desmond explaining to Charlie that no matter how many times he tries to save him, eventually Charlie&#039;s going to die.  Well, as we all know, that&#039;s exactly what happened.  The universe has a way of course correcting, after all.

So, if we follow this line of thinking and agree with Daniel and Ms. Hawking (interesting, by the way, that they would be of the same mind, seeing as how they&#039;re mother and son), you can&#039;t change the future.  You can delay the unfolding of events, and perhaps change the order/manner in which things take place, but eventually what&#039;s supposed to happen will happen.  In other words, we&#039;ll always get from point A to point B.  Sometimes we&#039;ll follow a straight line, and sometimes we&#039;ll get off course, but in the end we&#039;ll always reach our destination.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Carol from Boston, I just re-watched &#8220;Flashes Before Your Eyes&#8221; yesterday (one of my favorite episodes, incidentally), and it confirms your note to John, more or less.  This is the episode where we learned about course correction from Ms. Hawking, as well as Desmond explaining to Charlie that no matter how many times he tries to save him, eventually Charlie&#8217;s going to die.  Well, as we all know, that&#8217;s exactly what happened.  The universe has a way of course correcting, after all.</p>
<p>So, if we follow this line of thinking and agree with Daniel and Ms. Hawking (interesting, by the way, that they would be of the same mind, seeing as how they&#8217;re mother and son), you can&#8217;t change the future.  You can delay the unfolding of events, and perhaps change the order/manner in which things take place, but eventually what&#8217;s supposed to happen will happen.  In other words, we&#8217;ll always get from point A to point B.  Sometimes we&#8217;ll follow a straight line, and sometimes we&#8217;ll get off course, but in the end we&#8217;ll always reach our destination.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Duncan From Puerto Rico</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2009/03/18/next-namaste-episode-5x09/comment-page-3/#comment-37247</link>
		<dc:creator>Duncan From Puerto Rico</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 15:26:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/?p=285#comment-37247</guid>
		<description>Ryan And Jen 
Best Pod cast out there.
Just wanted to add on that since everyone were concentrating in the WOW moments of the episode everyone forgot the pivotal scene where Kate, Jack and Hurley were in the Orientation building signing up and getting their assignments. We see that Kate was not on the manifest or any of the Logs, and didn&#039;t know the name of her recruiter. This brought a gut wrenching fear to Kate that she was done for, until Juliette came in and saved the day with a last minute entry Log. Their expressions were priceless on the fact that there was an actual conversation in their expressions alone. It would of went something like this:
Kate &quot;Whew,  Juliette thanks&quot;
Juliette &quot; Kate just remember who and where you are&quot;
Kate &quot; Err um hmm&quot;
Juliette &quot;I am not going to let you ruin the best three years of my life, and remember i can have you removed in a heart beat&quot;
The best moments in this series are the actual interpretation of emotions by the actors telling their story without saying a single word</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ryan And Jen<br />
Best Pod cast out there.<br />
Just wanted to add on that since everyone were concentrating in the WOW moments of the episode everyone forgot the pivotal scene where Kate, Jack and Hurley were in the Orientation building signing up and getting their assignments. We see that Kate was not on the manifest or any of the Logs, and didn&#8217;t know the name of her recruiter. This brought a gut wrenching fear to Kate that she was done for, until Juliette came in and saved the day with a last minute entry Log. Their expressions were priceless on the fact that there was an actual conversation in their expressions alone. It would of went something like this:<br />
Kate &#8220;Whew,  Juliette thanks&#8221;<br />
Juliette &#8221; Kate just remember who and where you are&#8221;<br />
Kate &#8221; Err um hmm&#8221;<br />
Juliette &#8220;I am not going to let you ruin the best three years of my life, and remember i can have you removed in a heart beat&#8221;<br />
The best moments in this series are the actual interpretation of emotions by the actors telling their story without saying a single word</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: carol from Boston</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2009/03/18/next-namaste-episode-5x09/comment-page-3/#comment-37246</link>
		<dc:creator>carol from Boston</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 15:21:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/?p=285#comment-37246</guid>
		<description>Metasteve,  yeah, I cracked up at how quickly Juliet got rid of the baby once she knew it was  Ethan, though she knew him in a different context then the Oceanic survivors.

John, interesting theory re: the dharma buildings.  I keep thinking the theory of time travel is that you can&#039;t change the ultimate outcome (a person will did if they are supposed to die) but you can change the circumstances and how the death came about.  So if Dharma is meant to be destroyed it will be, but how it will be destroyed can change.   After the purge the others could take over the buildings because the people died but the buildings stayed intact.  It looks like in the previews next week that there will be a fire, perhaps caused by the Oceanic  6, if the fire destroys the village then the others won&#039;t choose to live there and it will be abandoned.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Metasteve,  yeah, I cracked up at how quickly Juliet got rid of the baby once she knew it was  Ethan, though she knew him in a different context then the Oceanic survivors.</p>
<p>John, interesting theory re: the dharma buildings.  I keep thinking the theory of time travel is that you can&#8217;t change the ultimate outcome (a person will did if they are supposed to die) but you can change the circumstances and how the death came about.  So if Dharma is meant to be destroyed it will be, but how it will be destroyed can change.   After the purge the others could take over the buildings because the people died but the buildings stayed intact.  It looks like in the previews next week that there will be a fire, perhaps caused by the Oceanic  6, if the fire destroys the village then the others won&#8217;t choose to live there and it will be abandoned.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Metasteve</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2009/03/18/next-namaste-episode-5x09/comment-page-3/#comment-37245</link>
		<dc:creator>Metasteve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 14:56:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/?p=285#comment-37245</guid>
		<description>When I watched last night, I was a little worried that it did not look like we got ANY reaction from Julia when she found out she was holding Ethan. I just went back and watched online and her reaction was PERFECT, actually.... brilliant.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When I watched last night, I was a little worried that it did not look like we got ANY reaction from Julia when she found out she was holding Ethan. I just went back and watched online and her reaction was PERFECT, actually&#8230;. brilliant.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Knives Monroe</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2009/03/18/next-namaste-episode-5x09/comment-page-3/#comment-37244</link>
		<dc:creator>Knives Monroe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 14:32:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/?p=285#comment-37244</guid>
		<description>BTW We think, obviously and with good cause that its in 2007, but LOSTPEDIA says its 2008. I wonder why that is.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BTW We think, obviously and with good cause that its in 2007, but LOSTPEDIA says its 2008. I wonder why that is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Knives Monroe</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2009/03/18/next-namaste-episode-5x09/comment-page-3/#comment-37243</link>
		<dc:creator>Knives Monroe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 14:21:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/?p=285#comment-37243</guid>
		<description>To: John Fischer

May God help us all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To: John Fischer</p>
<p>May God help us all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nordy</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2009/03/18/next-namaste-episode-5x09/comment-page-3/#comment-37242</link>
		<dc:creator>Nordy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 14:19:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/?p=285#comment-37242</guid>
		<description>They WILL change the &quot;future&quot;... Though D&amp;C have said that there are no paradoxes... reallity is this whole show will be one big &quot;course correction&quot;... so the future (flight 815 etc) as we know it will be &quot;changed&quot; but only because it &quot;shouldn&#039;t&quot; have happened that way in the future....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They WILL change the &#8220;future&#8221;&#8230; Though D&amp;C have said that there are no paradoxes&#8230; reallity is this whole show will be one big &#8220;course correction&#8221;&#8230; so the future (flight 815 etc) as we know it will be &#8220;changed&#8221; but only because it &#8220;shouldn&#8217;t&#8221; have happened that way in the future&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Liz in MI</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2009/03/18/next-namaste-episode-5x09/comment-page-3/#comment-37241</link>
		<dc:creator>Liz in MI</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 13:51:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/?p=285#comment-37241</guid>
		<description>Many people have commented that the Processing Center appeared a lot different than it should have.  Perhaps Jacob/Christian changed it&#039;s appearance to what they wanted after the area was re-abandoned.  The cabin appeared to move.  Is it a stretch to think they could change another building  to suit themselves.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Many people have commented that the Processing Center appeared a lot different than it should have.  Perhaps Jacob/Christian changed it&#8217;s appearance to what they wanted after the area was re-abandoned.  The cabin appeared to move.  Is it a stretch to think they could change another building  to suit themselves.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Fischer</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2009/03/18/next-namaste-episode-5x09/comment-page-3/#comment-37240</link>
		<dc:creator>John Fischer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 13:29:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/?p=285#comment-37240</guid>
		<description>I watched the episode again last night and took special note of Dharmaville in 2007 that Sun and Frank found. There were still Dharma symbols on the buildings and the windows were all boarded up. It is almost as if the Others never lived there, but that the village was abandoned years ago. This begs the question... was Daniel lying or wrong about not being able to change the future? Are the Losties that are back in 1977 indeed changing and going to change the future? The dock that Sun and Frank landed on was intact. This is the same dock that Locke blew up a couple of years ago. Why was it still intact?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I watched the episode again last night and took special note of Dharmaville in 2007 that Sun and Frank found. There were still Dharma symbols on the buildings and the windows were all boarded up. It is almost as if the Others never lived there, but that the village was abandoned years ago. This begs the question&#8230; was Daniel lying or wrong about not being able to change the future? Are the Losties that are back in 1977 indeed changing and going to change the future? The dock that Sun and Frank landed on was intact. This is the same dock that Locke blew up a couple of years ago. Why was it still intact?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex in MD</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2009/03/18/next-namaste-episode-5x09/comment-page-3/#comment-37239</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex in MD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 12:51:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/?p=285#comment-37239</guid>
		<description>As for the scene in the registration cabin in 2007...I watched it again this morning after reading the forum yesterday.  I did not see any woman outside the door...but I DID see smoke when the door noticeable swung open.  But it looked like dust from inside the room...not our old pal, &quot;Smokie&quot;.  

But I&#039;ll agree that even if it wasn&#039;t the Smoke Monster, I think the writers really, really, really want us to keep in mind that Smokie is there in 2007 on &quot;our island&quot; and he is there for a reason.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As for the scene in the registration cabin in 2007&#8230;I watched it again this morning after reading the forum yesterday.  I did not see any woman outside the door&#8230;but I DID see smoke when the door noticeable swung open.  But it looked like dust from inside the room&#8230;not our old pal, &#8220;Smokie&#8221;.  </p>
<p>But I&#8217;ll agree that even if it wasn&#8217;t the Smoke Monster, I think the writers really, really, really want us to keep in mind that Smokie is there in 2007 on &#8220;our island&#8221; and he is there for a reason.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex in MD</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2009/03/18/next-namaste-episode-5x09/comment-page-3/#comment-37238</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex in MD</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 12:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/?p=285#comment-37238</guid>
		<description>Aloha, Ryan and Amym

A few paranoid thoughts on Juliet:

As much as I love her, I have not ever really trusted her.  Not that I think she is still in cahoots with Ben...it&#039;s just that I have not forgotten how many times the &quot;Others&quot; have lied to the &quot;816ers&quot;.  That being said, here are a few things that I noticed from &quot;Namaste&quot;:

* Her expression when she found out that Jack, Kate and Hurley came back seemed shocked.  This could have been not because she was just surprised that they came back, but if she, as an Other, had been told that once you left the island, it would not let you back on.

* Sawyer said to Juliet, &quot;I don&#039;t understand it any more than you&quot;.  I think that is the writers letting the audience know that Juliet DOES understand more than Sawyer.  Or at least, she knows more and as she observes her current timeline, she is seeing events unfold that she has observed (or have been told) about since she originally arrived on the island as an Other back in, what was it...2002?

* Amy asks Juliet when she and James are going to have a baby.  Juliet responds, &quot;The timing needs to be right.&quot;  I think this is the writers telling the audience that Juliet WILL have a baby and that the timing will need to be right for that baby to grow up to be pivotal later in the history of the island.   Whether the Juliet character knows this is hard to tell.

* At the end of the episode, Jack tells Juliet that he wanted to acknowledge er when he saw her at registration.  She responded, &quot;We aren&#039;t supposed to know each other.&quot;  I think that either she has realized (or the writers are foreshadowing) that she was not meant to have been an Other or the 816ers were never meant to have landed on the island in the first place and that all of the events due to the turning of the Donkey Wheel and the subsequent war will involve correcting this cosmic mistake.

*  Oh...and as for the LOST, the Soap Opera...when Juliet shows up in the nick of time to save Kate from Phil&#039;s suspicions, Juliet tells Kate, &quot;Sorry about the mix-up&quot;.   I think the mix-up she is really talking about the swapping of herself as James&#039; love interest in Kate&#039;s absence.

Namaste,
Alex in MD</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Aloha, Ryan and Amym</p>
<p>A few paranoid thoughts on Juliet:</p>
<p>As much as I love her, I have not ever really trusted her.  Not that I think she is still in cahoots with Ben&#8230;it&#8217;s just that I have not forgotten how many times the &#8220;Others&#8221; have lied to the &#8220;816ers&#8221;.  That being said, here are a few things that I noticed from &#8220;Namaste&#8221;:</p>
<p>* Her expression when she found out that Jack, Kate and Hurley came back seemed shocked.  This could have been not because she was just surprised that they came back, but if she, as an Other, had been told that once you left the island, it would not let you back on.</p>
<p>* Sawyer said to Juliet, &#8220;I don&#8217;t understand it any more than you&#8221;.  I think that is the writers letting the audience know that Juliet DOES understand more than Sawyer.  Or at least, she knows more and as she observes her current timeline, she is seeing events unfold that she has observed (or have been told) about since she originally arrived on the island as an Other back in, what was it&#8230;2002?</p>
<p>* Amy asks Juliet when she and James are going to have a baby.  Juliet responds, &#8220;The timing needs to be right.&#8221;  I think this is the writers telling the audience that Juliet WILL have a baby and that the timing will need to be right for that baby to grow up to be pivotal later in the history of the island.   Whether the Juliet character knows this is hard to tell.</p>
<p>* At the end of the episode, Jack tells Juliet that he wanted to acknowledge er when he saw her at registration.  She responded, &#8220;We aren&#8217;t supposed to know each other.&#8221;  I think that either she has realized (or the writers are foreshadowing) that she was not meant to have been an Other or the 816ers were never meant to have landed on the island in the first place and that all of the events due to the turning of the Donkey Wheel and the subsequent war will involve correcting this cosmic mistake.</p>
<p>*  Oh&#8230;and as for the LOST, the Soap Opera&#8230;when Juliet shows up in the nick of time to save Kate from Phil&#8217;s suspicions, Juliet tells Kate, &#8220;Sorry about the mix-up&#8221;.   I think the mix-up she is really talking about the swapping of herself as James&#8217; love interest in Kate&#8217;s absence.</p>
<p>Namaste,<br />
Alex in MD</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rebecca in Copenhagen</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2009/03/18/next-namaste-episode-5x09/comment-page-3/#comment-37237</link>
		<dc:creator>Rebecca in Copenhagen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 09:53:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/?p=285#comment-37237</guid>
		<description>Knives Monroe - 
I really liked your math adding up to 77...
If it&#039;s true that the numbers represent the Valenzetti Equation and each number is a different way for humanity to end itself, I&#039;d really like to know which number represents which dark end, and whether those four numbers together that add up to 77 are actually a clue to what leads to &quot;The Incident&quot; that brings our Losties back to 2004!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Knives Monroe &#8211;<br />
I really liked your math adding up to 77&#8230;<br />
If it&#8217;s true that the numbers represent the Valenzetti Equation and each number is a different way for humanity to end itself, I&#8217;d really like to know which number represents which dark end, and whether those four numbers together that add up to 77 are actually a clue to what leads to &#8220;The Incident&#8221; that brings our Losties back to 2004!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lydia from Massachusetts</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2009/03/18/next-namaste-episode-5x09/comment-page-3/#comment-37236</link>
		<dc:creator>Lydia from Massachusetts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 09:39:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/?p=285#comment-37236</guid>
		<description>I was pretty firmly in the &quot;Sun didn&#039;t jump to &#039;77 because she was already there as a baby&quot; camp until I remembered to check her and Jin&#039;s tombstone.  It says she was born in 1980.  You can see a picture of he here -- Sun&#039;s birth date is on the left side:
http://lost.cubit.net/archives/2008/03/4x07-jins-tombstone.php

However, I still think that a person can not or should not encounter themselves during time travel.  This was stated in the first Orchid video that came out when Dr. Haliwax (Pierre Chang) freaks out about the possibility of the bunnies #15 getting near each other:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_gERdALb5vQ  Damon and Carlton said in a podcast last year that this video was one of the few non-TV-episode parts of the Lost canon, and it is relevant to the story/mythology of Lost.

What do we make of the fact that Charlotte&#039;s body disappeared after the original flash to 1974, and everybody was a little confused about where it went?  I think it was gone because Charlotte existed as a child in 1974 on the island.  But I don&#039;t know how to explain the &quot;Sawyer watching Aaron&#039;s birth&quot; scene -- he would have been in that time/place already.  Maybe that was just because the donkey wheel was broken.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was pretty firmly in the &#8220;Sun didn&#8217;t jump to &#8217;77 because she was already there as a baby&#8221; camp until I remembered to check her and Jin&#8217;s tombstone.  It says she was born in 1980.  You can see a picture of he here &#8212; Sun&#8217;s birth date is on the left side:<br />
<a href="http://lost.cubit.net/archives/2008/03/4x07-jins-tombstone.php" rel="nofollow">http://lost.cubit.net/archives/2008/03/4&#215;07-jins-tombstone.php</a></p>
<p>However, I still think that a person can not or should not encounter themselves during time travel.  This was stated in the first Orchid video that came out when Dr. Haliwax (Pierre Chang) freaks out about the possibility of the bunnies #15 getting near each other:<br />
<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_gERdALb5vQ" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_gERdALb5vQ</a>  Damon and Carlton said in a podcast last year that this video was one of the few non-TV-episode parts of the Lost canon, and it is relevant to the story/mythology of Lost.</p>
<p>What do we make of the fact that Charlotte&#8217;s body disappeared after the original flash to 1974, and everybody was a little confused about where it went?  I think it was gone because Charlotte existed as a child in 1974 on the island.  But I don&#8217;t know how to explain the &#8220;Sawyer watching Aaron&#8217;s birth&#8221; scene &#8212; he would have been in that time/place already.  Maybe that was just because the donkey wheel was broken.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JJ</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2009/03/18/next-namaste-episode-5x09/comment-page-3/#comment-37235</link>
		<dc:creator>JJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 08:06:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/?p=285#comment-37235</guid>
		<description>To Those Who Don&#039;t Get or Appreciate Time Travel Elements of Season 5:

You might want to look up what quantum theorists refer to as &quot;the Multiverse.&quot; The writers behind the Back to The Future trilogy did a good job at explaining how one navigates around the Multiverse in Back to the Future II, when Doc Brown used a chalkboard to explain to Marty why the 1985 they arrived in was not the same 1985 he remembered.

On a side note... I believe that the writers of the Sarah Connor Chronicles don&#039;t get how the Multiverse works, IMHO.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To Those Who Don&#8217;t Get or Appreciate Time Travel Elements of Season 5:</p>
<p>You might want to look up what quantum theorists refer to as &#8220;the Multiverse.&#8221; The writers behind the Back to The Future trilogy did a good job at explaining how one navigates around the Multiverse in Back to the Future II, when Doc Brown used a chalkboard to explain to Marty why the 1985 they arrived in was not the same 1985 he remembered.</p>
<p>On a side note&#8230; I believe that the writers of the Sarah Connor Chronicles don&#8217;t get how the Multiverse works, IMHO.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott in Chicago</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2009/03/18/next-namaste-episode-5x09/comment-page-3/#comment-37234</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott in Chicago</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 07:17:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/?p=285#comment-37234</guid>
		<description>The official podcast says season five finale is called &quot;The Incident&quot; looks like a lot of answers are coming!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The official podcast says season five finale is called &#8220;The Incident&#8221; looks like a lot of answers are coming!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Knives Monroe</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2009/03/18/next-namaste-episode-5x09/comment-page-3/#comment-37233</link>
		<dc:creator>Knives Monroe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 04:59:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/?p=285#comment-37233</guid>
		<description>I think Jack is the way he is now, cause he is a changed man. Or at least a changing man. Well see how long that lasts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think Jack is the way he is now, cause he is a changed man. Or at least a changing man. Well see how long that lasts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: carol from Boston</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2009/03/18/next-namaste-episode-5x09/comment-page-3/#comment-37232</link>
		<dc:creator>carol from Boston</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 03:59:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/?p=285#comment-37232</guid>
		<description>Why did the &quot;others&quot; from 2004, let their houses fall in such disreapair?   They have had time to fix them up and live in some of them.  Why abandon them all?   Maybe the falling apart camp and the processing building are like Jacob&#039;s cabin.  It is an illusion or some kind of magic.   I never remember seeing a processing cabin before.  Where are Richard and the others now.

Where are Rose and Bernard?  Why aren&#039;t they ever mentioned?

I think Daniel might be the real scientist behind alll the Dharma Bunny experiments.  

Anybody else miss Sawyer calling Kate &quot;freckles?&quot; I also thought jack seemed a bit too mellow and happy with Kate and Sawyer reuniting, he was so jealous that she was just doing Sawyer a favor, why doesn&#039;t he act threatened now?

Now that we are starting to get questions answered, I am wondering what all of you want to see resolved by the end of the series.   What would be the worst way this series could end?

I do not want to find out it is aliens or something stupid like that, I like the idea that the island is mystical.   

Finally, in an interview with Terry O&#039;Quinn he was asked what was one of the big questions he had about his character and show. This is not a spoiler, this is just his opinon.  He stated that he wonders if the Island is good or bad.  John always assumes the island is good, but what if the island&#039;s motives are sinister?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why did the &#8220;others&#8221; from 2004, let their houses fall in such disreapair?   They have had time to fix them up and live in some of them.  Why abandon them all?   Maybe the falling apart camp and the processing building are like Jacob&#8217;s cabin.  It is an illusion or some kind of magic.   I never remember seeing a processing cabin before.  Where are Richard and the others now.</p>
<p>Where are Rose and Bernard?  Why aren&#8217;t they ever mentioned?</p>
<p>I think Daniel might be the real scientist behind alll the Dharma Bunny experiments.  </p>
<p>Anybody else miss Sawyer calling Kate &#8220;freckles?&#8221; I also thought jack seemed a bit too mellow and happy with Kate and Sawyer reuniting, he was so jealous that she was just doing Sawyer a favor, why doesn&#8217;t he act threatened now?</p>
<p>Now that we are starting to get questions answered, I am wondering what all of you want to see resolved by the end of the series.   What would be the worst way this series could end?</p>
<p>I do not want to find out it is aliens or something stupid like that, I like the idea that the island is mystical.   </p>
<p>Finally, in an interview with Terry O&#8217;Quinn he was asked what was one of the big questions he had about his character and show. This is not a spoiler, this is just his opinon.  He stated that he wonders if the Island is good or bad.  John always assumes the island is good, but what if the island&#8217;s motives are sinister?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wednesday</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2009/03/18/next-namaste-episode-5x09/comment-page-3/#comment-37231</link>
		<dc:creator>Wednesday</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 03:56:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/?p=285#comment-37231</guid>
		<description>Oh, I forgot, I wouldn&#039;t be surprised if Sun does turn and see Claire in a future episode and the topic of Aaron comes up!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, I forgot, I wouldn&#8217;t be surprised if Sun does turn and see Claire in a future episode and the topic of Aaron comes up!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wednesday</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2009/03/18/next-namaste-episode-5x09/comment-page-3/#comment-37230</link>
		<dc:creator>Wednesday</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 03:51:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/?p=285#comment-37230</guid>
		<description>I liked this episode but the commercial breaks were too close together near the bottom of the hour and, at that point where the clock strikes 9:48, there I am on the edge of my seat again.

I found it interesting that the tables are now turned on Sayid and his hands are handcuffed, thought to be a hostile, which seems to parallel when Ben was tied up and put in the armory when he was known as Henry Gale, thought to be an &quot;Other.&quot; In both situations, the person in prison is not to be trusted. The way that Sawyer said, &quot;Bring him some food, we&#039;re not savages,&quot; was similar to the gestures made by people who took the bindings off of Ben and when Locke gave him The Brothers Karamazov to read. There&#039;s, again, a struggle over where the prisoner is locked up and who gets to talk to him first. The issues over the keys, all similar to locking Ben in the armory.

I liked the counter clockwise spin of the plane as it went through the &quot;open window&quot; and I liked when Sayid and Jin met up again and then, Jin: &quot;Say another word and you&#039;re dead.&quot;

It is significant that we know Ethan is Amy&#039;s baby and that Juliet helped him come into this world. Can they change the course of Ethan&#039;s destiny?

I think Faraday left the island. Sawyer seems disappointed in his theories of what you can or can&#039;t do and Faraday could have left to do more research, or as others said, could have been on the same sub departure with Charlotte.

I liked how Miles couldn&#039;t stop staring at Jack, Kate and Hurley.

Kate was looking absolutely pissed at seeing Juliet again. At the end, Kate looks at Sawyer as if he appears to be a different man now and he looks back at her sort of embarrassed that he&#039;s not who he used to be, especially now that he&#039;s leader and he just sent Jack on his way. There&#039;s no &quot;the gangs all here&quot; vibe for them to feel good about returning. How can Jack, Hurley and Kate feel a sense that those they left behind need their help?

I loved the obvious animosity Ben showed towards Frank; what&#039;s Ben carrying? I loved when Sun knocked out Ben and said, &quot;I lied.&quot; I wish Sun would have looked in his bag.

I was very freaked when the sound of &quot;smokey&quot; appeared at the dock when Sun and Frank arrived. 

Christian saying to Sun, &quot;I&#039;m sorry, but you have a bit of a journey ahead of you.&quot; What method of travel will be her journey? I also noticed how the weather turned for the worse upon Christian&#039;s appearance; hasn&#039;t this happened after Locke left Jacob&#039;s cabin? I couldn&#039;t see Claire with watching it so thanks for the screencaps that showed her. I think it must be Claire.

Sayid, meeting young Ben, and young Ben being everso curious about meeting a hostile. Is this the first hostile Ben has ever been this close to?

Going back to why the first pilot of 815 was killed by &quot;Smokey&quot;... Frank was supposed to be the pilot. I loved the parallel of the co-pilot of Ajira with the tree limb through him, but here Frank was walking on the boat dock and we could hear &quot;Smokey&quot; in the distance, retreating. So I want to see if &quot;Smokey&quot; is picky about whom it chooses to sacrifice; is it one&#039;s individual destiny to die by this method if one is not meant to be on the island?

And watching the preview for next week has really sent me over the edge!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I liked this episode but the commercial breaks were too close together near the bottom of the hour and, at that point where the clock strikes 9:48, there I am on the edge of my seat again.</p>
<p>I found it interesting that the tables are now turned on Sayid and his hands are handcuffed, thought to be a hostile, which seems to parallel when Ben was tied up and put in the armory when he was known as Henry Gale, thought to be an &#8220;Other.&#8221; In both situations, the person in prison is not to be trusted. The way that Sawyer said, &#8220;Bring him some food, we&#8217;re not savages,&#8221; was similar to the gestures made by people who took the bindings off of Ben and when Locke gave him The Brothers Karamazov to read. There&#8217;s, again, a struggle over where the prisoner is locked up and who gets to talk to him first. The issues over the keys, all similar to locking Ben in the armory.</p>
<p>I liked the counter clockwise spin of the plane as it went through the &#8220;open window&#8221; and I liked when Sayid and Jin met up again and then, Jin: &#8220;Say another word and you&#8217;re dead.&#8221;</p>
<p>It is significant that we know Ethan is Amy&#8217;s baby and that Juliet helped him come into this world. Can they change the course of Ethan&#8217;s destiny?</p>
<p>I think Faraday left the island. Sawyer seems disappointed in his theories of what you can or can&#8217;t do and Faraday could have left to do more research, or as others said, could have been on the same sub departure with Charlotte.</p>
<p>I liked how Miles couldn&#8217;t stop staring at Jack, Kate and Hurley.</p>
<p>Kate was looking absolutely pissed at seeing Juliet again. At the end, Kate looks at Sawyer as if he appears to be a different man now and he looks back at her sort of embarrassed that he&#8217;s not who he used to be, especially now that he&#8217;s leader and he just sent Jack on his way. There&#8217;s no &#8220;the gangs all here&#8221; vibe for them to feel good about returning. How can Jack, Hurley and Kate feel a sense that those they left behind need their help?</p>
<p>I loved the obvious animosity Ben showed towards Frank; what&#8217;s Ben carrying? I loved when Sun knocked out Ben and said, &#8220;I lied.&#8221; I wish Sun would have looked in his bag.</p>
<p>I was very freaked when the sound of &#8220;smokey&#8221; appeared at the dock when Sun and Frank arrived. </p>
<p>Christian saying to Sun, &#8220;I&#8217;m sorry, but you have a bit of a journey ahead of you.&#8221; What method of travel will be her journey? I also noticed how the weather turned for the worse upon Christian&#8217;s appearance; hasn&#8217;t this happened after Locke left Jacob&#8217;s cabin? I couldn&#8217;t see Claire with watching it so thanks for the screencaps that showed her. I think it must be Claire.</p>
<p>Sayid, meeting young Ben, and young Ben being everso curious about meeting a hostile. Is this the first hostile Ben has ever been this close to?</p>
<p>Going back to why the first pilot of 815 was killed by &#8220;Smokey&#8221;&#8230; Frank was supposed to be the pilot. I loved the parallel of the co-pilot of Ajira with the tree limb through him, but here Frank was walking on the boat dock and we could hear &#8220;Smokey&#8221; in the distance, retreating. So I want to see if &#8220;Smokey&#8221; is picky about whom it chooses to sacrifice; is it one&#8217;s individual destiny to die by this method if one is not meant to be on the island?</p>
<p>And watching the preview for next week has really sent me over the edge!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew Capobianco</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2009/03/18/next-namaste-episode-5x09/comment-page-3/#comment-37229</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Capobianco</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 03:33:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/?p=285#comment-37229</guid>
		<description>Hi you two!

Why was Radzinski building the Swan? I think that just lie the Orchid was constructed over a magnetic pocket, the Swan was as well. Then I believe that &quot;The Incident,&quot; was some massive over-exposure of the magnetic energy, forcing them to release the energy on a timely basis. That mssive over-exposure may have been caused by a feud of some sort with the Hostiles. Could that be the &quot;war?&quot; Probably not. Anyways I did enjoy the episode, it is what I refer to as a &quot;bridge&quot; episode, setting up a connection to the next batch.

It seems like there is a lot of chitter-chatter about a death coming which is never a good thing. My guess is Juliet, her story is all over but the relationship with Jim. as shown in the preview, she says &quot;stay away!&quot; and I assume this is directed to Kate, but, I think her point on the triangle will be filed down due to death. We are due for this and I do not see her lasting.

Wasn&#039;t the episode &quot;Lafleur&quot; episode great! he more I watch it the more I love it.I had to show my girlfriend just so she could see the flower/dinner/spooning scene, that was so slick as was Jim talking to Alpert.  I call this episode &quot;The Egypt Episode.&quot; And what rock and roll band is famous for playing in Egypt in the 70&#039;s??? The Grateful Dead. And what was the name of the two Dharma guys in the Pearl???

PHIL and JERRY!!! Someone is a Deadhead among the Lost writers, I LOVE IT!!!! This keeps getting better. Shannon, Thailand, Migratory Birds, SOS and Charlie joining the priesthood are all in the past! This show doesn&#039;t waste time anymore!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi you two!</p>
<p>Why was Radzinski building the Swan? I think that just lie the Orchid was constructed over a magnetic pocket, the Swan was as well. Then I believe that &#8220;The Incident,&#8221; was some massive over-exposure of the magnetic energy, forcing them to release the energy on a timely basis. That mssive over-exposure may have been caused by a feud of some sort with the Hostiles. Could that be the &#8220;war?&#8221; Probably not. Anyways I did enjoy the episode, it is what I refer to as a &#8220;bridge&#8221; episode, setting up a connection to the next batch.</p>
<p>It seems like there is a lot of chitter-chatter about a death coming which is never a good thing. My guess is Juliet, her story is all over but the relationship with Jim. as shown in the preview, she says &#8220;stay away!&#8221; and I assume this is directed to Kate, but, I think her point on the triangle will be filed down due to death. We are due for this and I do not see her lasting.</p>
<p>Wasn&#8217;t the episode &#8220;Lafleur&#8221; episode great! he more I watch it the more I love it.I had to show my girlfriend just so she could see the flower/dinner/spooning scene, that was so slick as was Jim talking to Alpert.  I call this episode &#8220;The Egypt Episode.&#8221; And what rock and roll band is famous for playing in Egypt in the 70&#8242;s??? The Grateful Dead. And what was the name of the two Dharma guys in the Pearl???</p>
<p>PHIL and JERRY!!! Someone is a Deadhead among the Lost writers, I LOVE IT!!!! This keeps getting better. Shannon, Thailand, Migratory Birds, SOS and Charlie joining the priesthood are all in the past! This show doesn&#8217;t waste time anymore!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Garrett J</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2009/03/18/next-namaste-episode-5x09/comment-page-3/#comment-37228</link>
		<dc:creator>Garrett J</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 03:29:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/?p=285#comment-37228</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t think anyone else has mentioned this yet, but I may have missed it- 

When Sun and Frank return to the Barracks in what&#039;s supposed to be 2007, not only is the place eerily abandoned, but it&#039;s noticeably different than what we saw in 2004 when the Others and then Locke&#039;s group lived there. The cabin Christian emerges from has a Dharma logo on the door and there are still Dharma pictures on the wall, certainly not indicative of how the Others kept things when they were there.

There are supposed to be rules that you can&#039;t go back and change the past, but what else could this mean? How could all that Dharma stuff be there in 2007 when it wouldn&#039;t have been there in 2004?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think anyone else has mentioned this yet, but I may have missed it- </p>
<p>When Sun and Frank return to the Barracks in what&#8217;s supposed to be 2007, not only is the place eerily abandoned, but it&#8217;s noticeably different than what we saw in 2004 when the Others and then Locke&#8217;s group lived there. The cabin Christian emerges from has a Dharma logo on the door and there are still Dharma pictures on the wall, certainly not indicative of how the Others kept things when they were there.</p>
<p>There are supposed to be rules that you can&#8217;t go back and change the past, but what else could this mean? How could all that Dharma stuff be there in 2007 when it wouldn&#8217;t have been there in 2004?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom in NJ</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2009/03/18/next-namaste-episode-5x09/comment-page-3/#comment-37227</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom in NJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 03:23:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/?p=285#comment-37227</guid>
		<description>As a longtime fan of the DHARMA initiative mythology, I can&#039;t complain about any of these episodes! I guess this episode was a lot of set-up, but it moved pretty fast. And come on, we got to meet Radzinsky! The one thing that didn&#039;t really make sense to me was young Ben&#039;s appearance. It was pretty cool, what with the reference to his early interest in the hostiles. But isn&#039;t it kinda weird that Sawyer and Juliet have been a fixture in the DHARMA Initiative and either don&#039;t know or aren&#039;t too concerned about Ben&#039;s presence here? Then again maybe they do know, I guess there&#039;s a lot they know that hasn&#039;t been revealed to the audience yet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a longtime fan of the DHARMA initiative mythology, I can&#8217;t complain about any of these episodes! I guess this episode was a lot of set-up, but it moved pretty fast. And come on, we got to meet Radzinsky! The one thing that didn&#8217;t really make sense to me was young Ben&#8217;s appearance. It was pretty cool, what with the reference to his early interest in the hostiles. But isn&#8217;t it kinda weird that Sawyer and Juliet have been a fixture in the DHARMA Initiative and either don&#8217;t know or aren&#8217;t too concerned about Ben&#8217;s presence here? Then again maybe they do know, I guess there&#8217;s a lot they know that hasn&#8217;t been revealed to the audience yet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AnnLouise</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2009/03/18/next-namaste-episode-5x09/comment-page-3/#comment-37226</link>
		<dc:creator>AnnLouise</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 03:17:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/?p=285#comment-37226</guid>
		<description>Two great moments this week.  Jack finally gets put in his place, and Ben gets whapped in the noggin.  I couldn&#039;t believe Jack&#039;s snide little &quot;reading a book&quot; remark to Sawyer, or Ben&#039;s snide &quot;go look after your passengers&quot; putdown to Lapidus.  Both got what they had coming.
But I&#039;m interested in what you think about the trailer and what it means for Juliet/Sawyer - as I heard/read recenly - Kate ruins lives!  I&#039;ve gone from neutral towards her (and Jack) to loathing.  They are going to do a huge amount of damage.  I think the trailer shows the result of Jack&#039;s &quot;reaction&quot; style of leadership.  He has to do something, just to do something.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Two great moments this week.  Jack finally gets put in his place, and Ben gets whapped in the noggin.  I couldn&#8217;t believe Jack&#8217;s snide little &#8220;reading a book&#8221; remark to Sawyer, or Ben&#8217;s snide &#8220;go look after your passengers&#8221; putdown to Lapidus.  Both got what they had coming.<br />
But I&#8217;m interested in what you think about the trailer and what it means for Juliet/Sawyer &#8211; as I heard/read recenly &#8211; Kate ruins lives!  I&#8217;ve gone from neutral towards her (and Jack) to loathing.  They are going to do a huge amount of damage.  I think the trailer shows the result of Jack&#8217;s &#8220;reaction&#8221; style of leadership.  He has to do something, just to do something.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LostNTonic</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2009/03/18/next-namaste-episode-5x09/comment-page-3/#comment-37225</link>
		<dc:creator>LostNTonic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 03:10:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/?p=285#comment-37225</guid>
		<description>Wow!  This place is amazing :)  I was a Lost-aholic from day one of season one.  Right about season 2.5 I stopped watching &quot;live&quot; on tv and would watch via the internet.   Sadly, I lost track but was able to catch up to season 5 just last week  (I&#039;d call myself Lost saturated for sure!) and I&#039;d love to share some ideas with you all...

Here&#039;s a hunch (could be a bit of a stretch) from La Fleur...  

When Sawyer and gang &quot;rescue&quot; Amy from the hostiles we don&#039;t see any of the events that lead up to that scene.  What we see is Amy, hooded,  2 men who look like hostiles with guns, one man in a jumpsuit - dead.  The armed men are shot immediately so we never get any story but Amy&#039;s.  Let&#039;s ponder for a moment the scene.  Looks like a friendly picnic was interrupted.  Amy says David was her husband.  But for all we know she was romantic-picnicing with her &quot;hostile&quot; lover -- they are beyond the sonic zone after all.  I mean why would two Dharmans need to lunch romantically outside the safe perimeter?  

I think she was meeting her hostile friends, one who she was perhaps more friendly with than the other.  I think her husband David was on to her, followed her there, and confronted them.  I think the quick drawing hostiles got one up on David and shot him before he could react and maybe we are misinterpreting the scene by thinking she and David were jumped by hostiles.

Didn&#039;t guyliner say that the sonic barrier couldn&#039;t keep them out?  Well, maybe it&#039;s thanks to Amy - she does obviously know the code.   Amy could be their plant and why, eventually her son Ethan becomes a Hostile not an Other.  This would answer why she was ok with handing her husband&#039;s body over to the hostiles without much fuss.  Just a thought to throw out there.

Now a question -- are we sure Ms. Hawking is Mother Faraday?  Did Daniel give his mom&#039;s name as Hawking or are we taking this as the truth?  Did anyone ever say Hawking = Faraday&#039;s mom?  For sure?

My observances of the Kate/Sawyer/Jack/Juliet situation -- Kate does not seem happy with any guy she&#039;s with.  Not Sawyer, not Jack.  Especially not Jack.  I don&#039;t think she needs to be with EITHER guy.  Juliet - I still don&#039;t trust.  I think we&#039;re going to come up with some big wiz-bang episode where she rocks our Losties world and turns on them.  The whole reason she stays is to carry out this one big upsetting event.  Don&#039;t know what or why.  Just have a feeling.  I&#039;ve been known to be wrong before.

I love the Rose/Bernard = Adam/Eve in the cave.  That has to be right!

And what if Whitmore and Ben are both NOT the bad guy?  What if there is an even bigger baddie calling the shots and THEY are pawns?  What if Jacob is the bad guy pitting Whitmore against Ben for total annihilation to get the island all to himself.  A master contortionist of human weaknesses, so to speak?

or...

What if Jacob is Jack in time travel state - Jack could be a nickname.

Ok, I&#039;ll stop there.

&#039;till rescued,
Tammy</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow!  This place is amazing <img src='http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />   I was a Lost-aholic from day one of season one.  Right about season 2.5 I stopped watching &#8220;live&#8221; on tv and would watch via the internet.   Sadly, I lost track but was able to catch up to season 5 just last week  (I&#8217;d call myself Lost saturated for sure!) and I&#8217;d love to share some ideas with you all&#8230;</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s a hunch (could be a bit of a stretch) from La Fleur&#8230;  </p>
<p>When Sawyer and gang &#8220;rescue&#8221; Amy from the hostiles we don&#8217;t see any of the events that lead up to that scene.  What we see is Amy, hooded,  2 men who look like hostiles with guns, one man in a jumpsuit &#8211; dead.  The armed men are shot immediately so we never get any story but Amy&#8217;s.  Let&#8217;s ponder for a moment the scene.  Looks like a friendly picnic was interrupted.  Amy says David was her husband.  But for all we know she was romantic-picnicing with her &#8220;hostile&#8221; lover &#8212; they are beyond the sonic zone after all.  I mean why would two Dharmans need to lunch romantically outside the safe perimeter?  </p>
<p>I think she was meeting her hostile friends, one who she was perhaps more friendly with than the other.  I think her husband David was on to her, followed her there, and confronted them.  I think the quick drawing hostiles got one up on David and shot him before he could react and maybe we are misinterpreting the scene by thinking she and David were jumped by hostiles.</p>
<p>Didn&#8217;t guyliner say that the sonic barrier couldn&#8217;t keep them out?  Well, maybe it&#8217;s thanks to Amy &#8211; she does obviously know the code.   Amy could be their plant and why, eventually her son Ethan becomes a Hostile not an Other.  This would answer why she was ok with handing her husband&#8217;s body over to the hostiles without much fuss.  Just a thought to throw out there.</p>
<p>Now a question &#8212; are we sure Ms. Hawking is Mother Faraday?  Did Daniel give his mom&#8217;s name as Hawking or are we taking this as the truth?  Did anyone ever say Hawking = Faraday&#8217;s mom?  For sure?</p>
<p>My observances of the Kate/Sawyer/Jack/Juliet situation &#8212; Kate does not seem happy with any guy she&#8217;s with.  Not Sawyer, not Jack.  Especially not Jack.  I don&#8217;t think she needs to be with EITHER guy.  Juliet &#8211; I still don&#8217;t trust.  I think we&#8217;re going to come up with some big wiz-bang episode where she rocks our Losties world and turns on them.  The whole reason she stays is to carry out this one big upsetting event.  Don&#8217;t know what or why.  Just have a feeling.  I&#8217;ve been known to be wrong before.</p>
<p>I love the Rose/Bernard = Adam/Eve in the cave.  That has to be right!</p>
<p>And what if Whitmore and Ben are both NOT the bad guy?  What if there is an even bigger baddie calling the shots and THEY are pawns?  What if Jacob is the bad guy pitting Whitmore against Ben for total annihilation to get the island all to himself.  A master contortionist of human weaknesses, so to speak?</p>
<p>or&#8230;</p>
<p>What if Jacob is Jack in time travel state &#8211; Jack could be a nickname.</p>
<p>Ok, I&#8217;ll stop there.</p>
<p>&#8217;till rescued,<br />
Tammy</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Knives Monroe</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2009/03/18/next-namaste-episode-5x09/comment-page-3/#comment-37224</link>
		<dc:creator>Knives Monroe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 02:49:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/?p=285#comment-37224</guid>
		<description>I think Ben HAS met Alpert. I mean, young Ben hears that they&#039;ve captured a &#039;hostile&#039; and being that he favours the hostiles evidently, he makes Sayid a sandwhich. He&#039;s on their side, you know. :)

xxxWEST-SAYIDxxx</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think Ben HAS met Alpert. I mean, young Ben hears that they&#8217;ve captured a &#8216;hostile&#8217; and being that he favours the hostiles evidently, he makes Sayid a sandwhich. He&#8217;s on their side, you know. <img src='http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>xxxWEST-SAYIDxxx</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: soko</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2009/03/18/next-namaste-episode-5x09/comment-page-3/#comment-37223</link>
		<dc:creator>soko</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 02:45:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/?p=285#comment-37223</guid>
		<description>I think that Faraday not being there means that he went &quot;mad&quot; and he&#039;s not &quot;all there&quot; anymore.

Jared Ladish-  Sun conceived on the island she wasn&#039;t pregnant on the original flight.

The island got two people that it missed the first time around... Lapidus was supposed to fly the original plane and Mr Echo was supposed to be in the drug plane.  

Jack looked relieved because now he doesn&#039;t have to take care of everyone and get blamed for it all if it doesn&#039;t work.

Again the writers do a great job with plot and the actors do a good job of delivering lines.  But they fail again with real life believable interaction.  No way do Sawyer and Jack go back to bickering after all that they went through.  No way at all.  How many hours of talking about time travel, history, and what the hell happened do you think would pass before they even remembered being rivals for a woman that has moved on?  where&#039;s Ben? Can we turn this around to our favor?  What can we find out?  Star Wars is coming out this year!  ugh.  they have a little fight then walk off ?

Looks like they are going to get found out by that snooping Dharma guy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that Faraday not being there means that he went &#8220;mad&#8221; and he&#8217;s not &#8220;all there&#8221; anymore.</p>
<p>Jared Ladish-  Sun conceived on the island she wasn&#8217;t pregnant on the original flight.</p>
<p>The island got two people that it missed the first time around&#8230; Lapidus was supposed to fly the original plane and Mr Echo was supposed to be in the drug plane.  </p>
<p>Jack looked relieved because now he doesn&#8217;t have to take care of everyone and get blamed for it all if it doesn&#8217;t work.</p>
<p>Again the writers do a great job with plot and the actors do a good job of delivering lines.  But they fail again with real life believable interaction.  No way do Sawyer and Jack go back to bickering after all that they went through.  No way at all.  How many hours of talking about time travel, history, and what the hell happened do you think would pass before they even remembered being rivals for a woman that has moved on?  where&#8217;s Ben? Can we turn this around to our favor?  What can we find out?  Star Wars is coming out this year!  ugh.  they have a little fight then walk off ?</p>
<p>Looks like they are going to get found out by that snooping Dharma guy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NuckinFuts</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2009/03/18/next-namaste-episode-5x09/comment-page-3/#comment-37222</link>
		<dc:creator>NuckinFuts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 02:42:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/?p=285#comment-37222</guid>
		<description>Hello and Namaste, Ryan &amp; Jen and Everyone!

I agree w/ Michael281 and many others here that there is no reason to think that 2 people can&#039;t be in the same place &amp; time.  I&#039;m guessing it&#039;s better if they don&#039;t touch, but it&#039;s gotta be possible.  Sun &amp; Ben ended up there for different reasons to be determined.

I also don&#039;t understand the confusion in some of the first posts above as to whether or not Ben had met Richard in the jungle as a younger child.  This is the same actor playing young Ben as last season ( or was it 2 ago? ).  He is older now, has longer hair, is taller than when he glimpsed his mom &amp; Alpert.  This of course means that Ben is on his mission of joining the &#039;hostiles&#039;.  

The photograph:  If I caught what was said correclty, then Christian Shepard clearly says 1972.74.78,..ah 77.  By this I take it that DHARMA definitely exists in 1978 so I don&#039;t think that we are looking at an &quot;alternate&quot; timeline of Sun &amp; Lapidus in the future.  

My personal theory of the week:

I believe whatever happens this year will bring about &quot;The Incident&quot;.  I think 815er&#039;s are involved.  After the incident DHARMA will realize that they should focus on other projects, but will stay out of the time travel business.  So, DHARMA survives it, but Chang loses his arm as a result of it.  

Somewhere between 1974 &amp; 1977 Chang &amp; Co. / DHARMA have discovered the donkey wheel / time travel &quot;properties&quot; / capabilities and studied for 3 or more years now.  Here come the bunnies.  

Other remarks:

I think that Juliet&#039;s &quot;mark&quot; on her back will come into play and give away that she has been there or is not to be trusted.  I think it&#039;s a tool used by DHARMA and passed down to the &quot;Others&quot; when Ben takes over after the purge.  

I am starting to wonder if Ben&#039;s original list of names was to know who he should kidnap and escort to the &quot;Temple&quot; or join them and those who he knew he had interacted with when he was a kid.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hello and Namaste, Ryan &amp; Jen and Everyone!</p>
<p>I agree w/ Michael281 and many others here that there is no reason to think that 2 people can&#8217;t be in the same place &amp; time.  I&#8217;m guessing it&#8217;s better if they don&#8217;t touch, but it&#8217;s gotta be possible.  Sun &amp; Ben ended up there for different reasons to be determined.</p>
<p>I also don&#8217;t understand the confusion in some of the first posts above as to whether or not Ben had met Richard in the jungle as a younger child.  This is the same actor playing young Ben as last season ( or was it 2 ago? ).  He is older now, has longer hair, is taller than when he glimpsed his mom &amp; Alpert.  This of course means that Ben is on his mission of joining the &#8216;hostiles&#8217;.  </p>
<p>The photograph:  If I caught what was said correclty, then Christian Shepard clearly says 1972.74.78,..ah 77.  By this I take it that DHARMA definitely exists in 1978 so I don&#8217;t think that we are looking at an &#8220;alternate&#8221; timeline of Sun &amp; Lapidus in the future.  </p>
<p>My personal theory of the week:</p>
<p>I believe whatever happens this year will bring about &#8220;The Incident&#8221;.  I think 815er&#8217;s are involved.  After the incident DHARMA will realize that they should focus on other projects, but will stay out of the time travel business.  So, DHARMA survives it, but Chang loses his arm as a result of it.  </p>
<p>Somewhere between 1974 &amp; 1977 Chang &amp; Co. / DHARMA have discovered the donkey wheel / time travel &#8220;properties&#8221; / capabilities and studied for 3 or more years now.  Here come the bunnies.  </p>
<p>Other remarks:</p>
<p>I think that Juliet&#8217;s &#8220;mark&#8221; on her back will come into play and give away that she has been there or is not to be trusted.  I think it&#8217;s a tool used by DHARMA and passed down to the &#8220;Others&#8221; when Ben takes over after the purge.  </p>
<p>I am starting to wonder if Ben&#8217;s original list of names was to know who he should kidnap and escort to the &#8220;Temple&#8221; or join them and those who he knew he had interacted with when he was a kid.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Knives Monroe</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2009/03/18/next-namaste-episode-5x09/comment-page-3/#comment-37221</link>
		<dc:creator>Knives Monroe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 02:20:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/?p=285#comment-37221</guid>
		<description>Well he also interacted with Aaron, I THINK. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well he also interacted with Aaron, I THINK. <img src='http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RedPolygon</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2009/03/18/next-namaste-episode-5x09/comment-page-3/#comment-37220</link>
		<dc:creator>RedPolygon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 02:11:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/?p=285#comment-37220</guid>
		<description>Notice that Christian Shephard took the 1977 Dharma picture off the wall and held it out for Sun? There has been speculation in the past whether Christian is real or is an apparition. I think this is the first episode where we&#039;ve seen him interact with the physical world that makes it pretty clear that he is real.
So, where is this show going now! Have things been turned upside down or what???? How will they all get back together across thirty years of time????</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Notice that Christian Shephard took the 1977 Dharma picture off the wall and held it out for Sun? There has been speculation in the past whether Christian is real or is an apparition. I think this is the first episode where we&#8217;ve seen him interact with the physical world that makes it pretty clear that he is real.<br />
So, where is this show going now! Have things been turned upside down or what???? How will they all get back together across thirty years of time????</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hurley Bird</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2009/03/18/next-namaste-episode-5x09/comment-page-3/#comment-37219</link>
		<dc:creator>Hurley Bird</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 02:07:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/?p=285#comment-37219</guid>
		<description>Loved the episode.

Seems like Ben for once in the island does now know what to do from here, 
It seemed to me when he killed Locke that it was his last mission, which was restore faith into Locke. Thats why I think he said &quot;we&#039;ll miss you John&quot; referring not to him being DEAD but for John to become different, and having faith in himself and the island again. It was also shown that Ben&#039;s arm was injured, yet it healed after the plane crash, either the Island cured him or it was another act.

Now for the question: 
If the picture of the new Dharma recruits were there all along does this mean that Ben is lying about knowing where Kate Jack Hugo and Sayid really are?
But if Ben doesn&#039;t know that would mean they were not in the picture until the O4 jumped through time with flight 316, which would mean Faradays string theory was wrong, because that would prove that the past could be changed.
(like McFly&#039;s picture in Back to the Future)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Loved the episode.</p>
<p>Seems like Ben for once in the island does now know what to do from here,<br />
It seemed to me when he killed Locke that it was his last mission, which was restore faith into Locke. Thats why I think he said &#8220;we&#8217;ll miss you John&#8221; referring not to him being DEAD but for John to become different, and having faith in himself and the island again. It was also shown that Ben&#8217;s arm was injured, yet it healed after the plane crash, either the Island cured him or it was another act.</p>
<p>Now for the question:<br />
If the picture of the new Dharma recruits were there all along does this mean that Ben is lying about knowing where Kate Jack Hugo and Sayid really are?<br />
But if Ben doesn&#8217;t know that would mean they were not in the picture until the O4 jumped through time with flight 316, which would mean Faradays string theory was wrong, because that would prove that the past could be changed.<br />
(like McFly&#8217;s picture in Back to the Future)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Knives Monroe</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2009/03/18/next-namaste-episode-5x09/comment-page-3/#comment-37218</link>
		<dc:creator>Knives Monroe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 01:11:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/?p=285#comment-37218</guid>
		<description>To Michael281:

You and I are on the same page.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To Michael281:</p>
<p>You and I are on the same page.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bit.bucket</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2009/03/18/next-namaste-episode-5x09/comment-page-3/#comment-37217</link>
		<dc:creator>bit.bucket</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 01:05:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/?p=285#comment-37217</guid>
		<description>At the start of the episode, the co-piolot says they&#039;re flying over the south Pacific. Why would a plane, flying from L.A. to Guam fly over the south Pacific? Even a the flight (realistically), was flown in two legs, L.A. to Honolulu and Honolulu to Guam, it would never approach the south Pacific.

Jack asks if Faraday&#039;s here and Sawyer replies &quot;Not any more&quot;. Consider some facts. 1) He has spent his entire adult life studying space-time. 2) He was conducting time travel experiments at Oxford. 3) On the island, he continued studying time travel. 4) He was seen, working as part of DHARMA, around a power source, according to Dr. Chang, strong enough to manipulate time. Has Faraday again jumped through time, either forward or backwards?r

Sun saying &quot;I lied&quot; while standing over Ben was great, but why did she stop after whacking him only once? After all, Sun has stated that she and Charles Widmore have common interests in killing Ben.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At the start of the episode, the co-piolot says they&#8217;re flying over the south Pacific. Why would a plane, flying from L.A. to Guam fly over the south Pacific? Even a the flight (realistically), was flown in two legs, L.A. to Honolulu and Honolulu to Guam, it would never approach the south Pacific.</p>
<p>Jack asks if Faraday&#8217;s here and Sawyer replies &#8220;Not any more&#8221;. Consider some facts. 1) He has spent his entire adult life studying space-time. 2) He was conducting time travel experiments at Oxford. 3) On the island, he continued studying time travel. 4) He was seen, working as part of DHARMA, around a power source, according to Dr. Chang, strong enough to manipulate time. Has Faraday again jumped through time, either forward or backwards?r</p>
<p>Sun saying &#8220;I lied&#8221; while standing over Ben was great, but why did she stop after whacking him only once? After all, Sun has stated that she and Charles Widmore have common interests in killing Ben.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: eanus</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2009/03/18/next-namaste-episode-5x09/comment-page-3/#comment-37216</link>
		<dc:creator>eanus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 00:07:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/?p=285#comment-37216</guid>
		<description>And I think Miles Straum is doctor Chang´s baby. I still want to know why Ethan got mad and try to kill Charlie in season 1, waht he reaaly did with Claire and why he did it by himself, I mean if Juliet was responsable for the pregnants´ investigation, why Ethan did all of that horrible things.

And other aspect is: the hatch when desmond was for 3 years pressing the numbers to save the world. What was the incident (told by Chang in the videotape) that justified the construction of the hatch?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And I think Miles Straum is doctor Chang´s baby. I still want to know why Ethan got mad and try to kill Charlie in season 1, waht he reaaly did with Claire and why he did it by himself, I mean if Juliet was responsable for the pregnants´ investigation, why Ethan did all of that horrible things.</p>
<p>And other aspect is: the hatch when desmond was for 3 years pressing the numbers to save the world. What was the incident (told by Chang in the videotape) that justified the construction of the hatch?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: eanus</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2009/03/18/next-namaste-episode-5x09/comment-page-3/#comment-37215</link>
		<dc:creator>eanus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 23:55:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/?p=285#comment-37215</guid>
		<description>The Michael´s list on season 2 was writen by Ben so that Jack could take his tumor off, using Kate and Sawyer in a mind game to convince him. This was explained when Rodrigo Santoro died.

Hurley was on the list just to warn the rest of the survivors to not come back to rescue them, because he is not dangerous. The list of season 2 is not related to the fact of Sun being in the future and Sayid in the past.

Maybe Sayid, Jin, Sawyer, Jack, Kate and Hugo have something to do in the past, maybe to prevent some facts like &quot;Dharma extermination&quot;.  Maybe John Locke and Sun stayed on the plain just to stay in the future to find a way to bring the others back in time after all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Michael´s list on season 2 was writen by Ben so that Jack could take his tumor off, using Kate and Sawyer in a mind game to convince him. This was explained when Rodrigo Santoro died.</p>
<p>Hurley was on the list just to warn the rest of the survivors to not come back to rescue them, because he is not dangerous. The list of season 2 is not related to the fact of Sun being in the future and Sayid in the past.</p>
<p>Maybe Sayid, Jin, Sawyer, Jack, Kate and Hugo have something to do in the past, maybe to prevent some facts like &#8220;Dharma extermination&#8221;.  Maybe John Locke and Sun stayed on the plain just to stay in the future to find a way to bring the others back in time after all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael281</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2009/03/18/next-namaste-episode-5x09/comment-page-3/#comment-37214</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael281</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 23:31:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/?p=285#comment-37214</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t get this attraction to the idea that Sun (and Ben) didn&#039;t go back because they already existed.  As pointed out already, this hasn&#039;t stopped any of the others from Time Travelling.  Besides the fact that they visited different times in the island&#039;s history where they existed, they are currently in 1977.... a time they were all alive in as well, though not on the island.

How could Sun be Chang&#039;s baby?  Wasn&#039;t it a boy?

I was very amused by the Ethan reveal as I had jokingly guessed it.  When the talk started out about who the baby was, I didn&#039;t think we really had a lot of evidence any which way and had commented that Ethan was the right age so maybe it was him.  I&#039;m glad it turned out that way, not to be right, but because I like the minor connection of Ethan more than a major connection like Jacob.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t get this attraction to the idea that Sun (and Ben) didn&#8217;t go back because they already existed.  As pointed out already, this hasn&#8217;t stopped any of the others from Time Travelling.  Besides the fact that they visited different times in the island&#8217;s history where they existed, they are currently in 1977&#8230;. a time they were all alive in as well, though not on the island.</p>
<p>How could Sun be Chang&#8217;s baby?  Wasn&#8217;t it a boy?</p>
<p>I was very amused by the Ethan reveal as I had jokingly guessed it.  When the talk started out about who the baby was, I didn&#8217;t think we really had a lot of evidence any which way and had commented that Ethan was the right age so maybe it was him.  I&#8217;m glad it turned out that way, not to be right, but because I like the minor connection of Ethan more than a major connection like Jacob.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Knives Monroe</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2009/03/18/next-namaste-episode-5x09/comment-page-3/#comment-37213</link>
		<dc:creator>Knives Monroe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 23:25:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/?p=285#comment-37213</guid>
		<description>Well I think that we allready know that you can be on the island and see your previous self. Like in that episode in season 5 where we see Locke, and the hatch LIGHT is on, and he know&#039;s where he&#039;s at etc.

I&#039;m of the opinion that because Aaron, and maybe even Ji Yeon didn&#039;t go back, that it was an occurence that resulted in a &#039;unpredictable&#039; outcome. I guess &quot;ALL&quot; of them really had to go back.

I don&#039;t think that it matters that 2 of the same people can go back in time and see it each other. I think Charlotte only stayed because she passed away. 

Oh and for the record, Miles HAS to be Changs kid. We know that Sun is the daughter of Mr. Paik. 

xxxWEST-SAYIDxxx</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well I think that we allready know that you can be on the island and see your previous self. Like in that episode in season 5 where we see Locke, and the hatch LIGHT is on, and he know&#8217;s where he&#8217;s at etc.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m of the opinion that because Aaron, and maybe even Ji Yeon didn&#8217;t go back, that it was an occurence that resulted in a &#8216;unpredictable&#8217; outcome. I guess &#8220;ALL&#8221; of them really had to go back.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think that it matters that 2 of the same people can go back in time and see it each other. I think Charlotte only stayed because she passed away. </p>
<p>Oh and for the record, Miles HAS to be Changs kid. We know that Sun is the daughter of Mr. Paik. </p>
<p>xxxWEST-SAYIDxxx</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HeyKir in NYC</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2009/03/18/next-namaste-episode-5x09/comment-page-3/#comment-37212</link>
		<dc:creator>HeyKir in NYC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 23:03:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/?p=285#comment-37212</guid>
		<description>Hey all! Hey Jen&amp; Ryan!
Can&#039;t wait to hear the podcast on Namaste!

I am in LOVE with the idea that Sun and Ben (and maybe Lapidus and Locke too?) didn&#039;t travel back to 77 because they are already on the island during that time: Ben being small Ben and Sun being perhaps a child on the island (not Pierre Chang&#039;s!)  Hmmmm! Interesting!!

Also, can anyone post a link to the clip in the recruitment center where someone is behind Sun? Thanks for the screen cap Carol from Boston, but I was hoping for a clip...

Stay Lost!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey all! Hey Jen&amp; Ryan!<br />
Can&#8217;t wait to hear the podcast on Namaste!</p>
<p>I am in LOVE with the idea that Sun and Ben (and maybe Lapidus and Locke too?) didn&#8217;t travel back to 77 because they are already on the island during that time: Ben being small Ben and Sun being perhaps a child on the island (not Pierre Chang&#8217;s!)  Hmmmm! Interesting!!</p>
<p>Also, can anyone post a link to the clip in the recruitment center where someone is behind Sun? Thanks for the screen cap Carol from Boston, but I was hoping for a clip&#8230;</p>
<p>Stay Lost!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: carol from Boston</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2009/03/18/next-namaste-episode-5x09/comment-page-3/#comment-37211</link>
		<dc:creator>carol from Boston</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 22:50:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/?p=285#comment-37211</guid>
		<description>I just watched the first 3 minutes of season 5, and when Pierre Chang wakes up, his wife says go get the &quot;baby&quot;, she never refers to it as a boy, so I think the baby may be Sun, I wish I knew what year it was supposed to be.   Hmmm, something to think about.  I like the concept, we just always assumed it was Miles.    

It also looks like Jack&#039;s watch stopped, he was tapping it like it was broken, this was the watch given to him by his grandfather in one of the webisodes from a couple of years ago.

Also note that Lapidus got a cut in the same place as when he crashed the helicopter.  Plus suddenly Ben&#039;s arm was healed (like John&#039;s legs were healed when he crashed)

I think the video of Chang that was shown at comicon showed something dire happening when the video was being shot, he says they are all going to die unless someone can help them, sounds like an &quot;incident&quot; to me.  They also mention getting the &quot;baby&quot; to be quiet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just watched the first 3 minutes of season 5, and when Pierre Chang wakes up, his wife says go get the &#8220;baby&#8221;, she never refers to it as a boy, so I think the baby may be Sun, I wish I knew what year it was supposed to be.   Hmmm, something to think about.  I like the concept, we just always assumed it was Miles.    </p>
<p>It also looks like Jack&#8217;s watch stopped, he was tapping it like it was broken, this was the watch given to him by his grandfather in one of the webisodes from a couple of years ago.</p>
<p>Also note that Lapidus got a cut in the same place as when he crashed the helicopter.  Plus suddenly Ben&#8217;s arm was healed (like John&#8217;s legs were healed when he crashed)</p>
<p>I think the video of Chang that was shown at comicon showed something dire happening when the video was being shot, he says they are all going to die unless someone can help them, sounds like an &#8220;incident&#8221; to me.  They also mention getting the &#8220;baby&#8221; to be quiet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Connie in Alaska</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2009/03/18/next-namaste-episode-5x09/comment-page-3/#comment-37210</link>
		<dc:creator>Connie in Alaska</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 22:12:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/?p=285#comment-37210</guid>
		<description>Nanners-Brilliant theory about why Sun did not jump!

Knives Monroe-Great though about the flashlight vs the lantern.  The first time Ben takes Locke to Jacob&#039;s cabin, he says that Jacob doesn&#039;t like technology and therefore they had to use a lantern for light.  Has Jacob decided to tech-up?  at least as far as using a flashlight?

Keep those theories coming!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nanners-Brilliant theory about why Sun did not jump!</p>
<p>Knives Monroe-Great though about the flashlight vs the lantern.  The first time Ben takes Locke to Jacob&#8217;s cabin, he says that Jacob doesn&#8217;t like technology and therefore they had to use a lantern for light.  Has Jacob decided to tech-up?  at least as far as using a flashlight?</p>
<p>Keep those theories coming!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Luke in California</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2009/03/18/next-namaste-episode-5x09/comment-page-3/#comment-37209</link>
		<dc:creator>Luke in California</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 22:00:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/?p=285#comment-37209</guid>
		<description>Thanks, DocJKM, for that note about Charlotte. It&#039;s never great to hear that the writers make mistakes, but at least that question isn&#039;t hanging around in the back of our minds anymore.

Also, Dave: see Adam in Missouri&#039;s point about Sawyer, Locke, et al. being on the Island when the hatch light goes off. Two places, same time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, DocJKM, for that note about Charlotte. It&#8217;s never great to hear that the writers make mistakes, but at least that question isn&#8217;t hanging around in the back of our minds anymore.</p>
<p>Also, Dave: see Adam in Missouri&#8217;s point about Sawyer, Locke, et al. being on the Island when the hatch light goes off. Two places, same time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Knives Monroe</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2009/03/18/next-namaste-episode-5x09/comment-page-3/#comment-37208</link>
		<dc:creator>Knives Monroe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 21:33:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/?p=285#comment-37208</guid>
		<description>4+8+23+42= 77!!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>4+8+23+42= 77!!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Luke in California</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2009/03/18/next-namaste-episode-5x09/comment-page-2/#comment-37206</link>
		<dc:creator>Luke in California</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 21:28:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/?p=285#comment-37206</guid>
		<description>Ben, I&#039;m not sure it&#039;s safe to say &quot;Dharma ends&quot; until the Purge, which happens in the mid-80s when Ben is an adult.

Before that, the Incident (a big electromagnetic discharge) has to occur. Lostpedia records that the blast door map dates the Incident in 1985--still eight years away for the returnees. You can see the image itself at http://lostpedia.wikia.com/wiki/The_Incident.  If that&#039;s the case, I can&#039;t see (at this point) a way for the 1977ers to be directly involved in either the Incident or the Purge without more time-jumping.

I would very much like to agree with cat, that Sun&#039;s not jumping back with the other four is simply a result of there not being enough similarity between this group and the group on Oceanic 815. As many commented a few weeks ago, there really were enormous differences, and it could be that Mrs. Hawking was right--it&#039;s just less predictable this way.

Finally, Ryan, is Radzinski&#039;s attitude about keeping the Swan a secret any real indication that it was still unknown by the Others in 2004? As has already been pointed out, it was in the Others&#039; best interests to leave someone in the hatch (clearly visible from the Pearl and known about by Ben) to keep pressing the button. Radzinski clearly survived the Purge, but was aware of what happened, as evidenced by the gas mask protocol passed on to Kelvin and Desmond. He clearly understood the importance of his post inside the Swan, and had to stay put. Rather than sacrifice one of their own people to the hatch, and rather than set up a system of button-pushing shifts, the Others saved time and effort by letting this one Dharma employee live, doing the work for them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ben, I&#8217;m not sure it&#8217;s safe to say &#8220;Dharma ends&#8221; until the Purge, which happens in the mid-80s when Ben is an adult.</p>
<p>Before that, the Incident (a big electromagnetic discharge) has to occur. Lostpedia records that the blast door map dates the Incident in 1985&#8211;still eight years away for the returnees. You can see the image itself at <a href="http://lostpedia.wikia.com/wiki/The_Incident" rel="nofollow">http://lostpedia.wikia.com/wiki/The_Incident</a>.  If that&#8217;s the case, I can&#8217;t see (at this point) a way for the 1977ers to be directly involved in either the Incident or the Purge without more time-jumping.</p>
<p>I would very much like to agree with cat, that Sun&#8217;s not jumping back with the other four is simply a result of there not being enough similarity between this group and the group on Oceanic 815. As many commented a few weeks ago, there really were enormous differences, and it could be that Mrs. Hawking was right&#8211;it&#8217;s just less predictable this way.</p>
<p>Finally, Ryan, is Radzinski&#8217;s attitude about keeping the Swan a secret any real indication that it was still unknown by the Others in 2004? As has already been pointed out, it was in the Others&#8217; best interests to leave someone in the hatch (clearly visible from the Pearl and known about by Ben) to keep pressing the button. Radzinski clearly survived the Purge, but was aware of what happened, as evidenced by the gas mask protocol passed on to Kelvin and Desmond. He clearly understood the importance of his post inside the Swan, and had to stay put. Rather than sacrifice one of their own people to the hatch, and rather than set up a system of button-pushing shifts, the Others saved time and effort by letting this one Dharma employee live, doing the work for them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Knives Monroe</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2009/03/18/next-namaste-episode-5x09/comment-page-2/#comment-37205</link>
		<dc:creator>Knives Monroe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 21:17:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/?p=285#comment-37205</guid>
		<description>Enter 77? 1977. Is there relevance?

xxxWEST-SAYIDxxx</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Enter 77? 1977. Is there relevance?</p>
<p>xxxWEST-SAYIDxxx</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2009/03/18/next-namaste-episode-5x09/comment-page-2/#comment-37204</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 21:17:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/?p=285#comment-37204</guid>
		<description>Nick from Southampton -- really nice call on not having two Bens/Suns in the same place at the same time!  I like it.

Phil R wrote:
&quot;What I just cannot wrap my brain around is that the island might exist in multiple times and locations. I don’t think it has jumped the shark at all… but the logic behind the setup is beyond me right now. The plane obviously jumped in SOME time, but it is unknown how much.&quot;

Phil, you and I exist in multiple times and locations.  12 hours ago I was asleep at home in bed.  Now I&#039;m slacking off at work five miles away.  What we CAN&#039;T do is be in two places at one time.  We also can&#039;t be thirty years older or younger than we are at the moment we&#039;re whatever age... a 10 year old Ben and 40 year old Ben can&#039;t be in the same place, but a 10 year old Ben could meet a 35 year old Sayid.  Any individual&#039;s perspective can only be in one place at one time, but can be in multiple different places over time.

Put another way, why couldn&#039;t someone live nonlinearly?  Instead of going 1974 --&gt; 1975 --&gt; 1976 --&gt; 1977 ----&gt; 2007, why not 1974 --&gt; 2007 --&gt; 1977?  It can&#039;t really happen -- not without time travel -- but if time travel exists (the sci-fi conceit here), why not?

Imagine if you asked someone in 1930 if a man could go into space or walk on the moon?  Now ask someone in 1970 or 2000.  There is a similar analogy in play.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nick from Southampton &#8212; really nice call on not having two Bens/Suns in the same place at the same time!  I like it.</p>
<p>Phil R wrote:<br />
&#8220;What I just cannot wrap my brain around is that the island might exist in multiple times and locations. I don’t think it has jumped the shark at all… but the logic behind the setup is beyond me right now. The plane obviously jumped in SOME time, but it is unknown how much.&#8221;</p>
<p>Phil, you and I exist in multiple times and locations.  12 hours ago I was asleep at home in bed.  Now I&#8217;m slacking off at work five miles away.  What we CAN&#8217;T do is be in two places at one time.  We also can&#8217;t be thirty years older or younger than we are at the moment we&#8217;re whatever age&#8230; a 10 year old Ben and 40 year old Ben can&#8217;t be in the same place, but a 10 year old Ben could meet a 35 year old Sayid.  Any individual&#8217;s perspective can only be in one place at one time, but can be in multiple different places over time.</p>
<p>Put another way, why couldn&#8217;t someone live nonlinearly?  Instead of going 1974 &#8211;&gt; 1975 &#8211;&gt; 1976 &#8211;&gt; 1977 &#8212;-&gt; 2007, why not 1974 &#8211;&gt; 2007 &#8211;&gt; 1977?  It can&#8217;t really happen &#8212; not without time travel &#8212; but if time travel exists (the sci-fi conceit here), why not?</p>
<p>Imagine if you asked someone in 1930 if a man could go into space or walk on the moon?  Now ask someone in 1970 or 2000.  There is a similar analogy in play.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam in Missouri</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2009/03/18/next-namaste-episode-5x09/comment-page-2/#comment-37203</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam in Missouri</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 21:16:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/?p=285#comment-37203</guid>
		<description>Ethan can&#039;t be Paul&#039;s son, it is 3 years later. Although I did think Paul was an other.
Also, the idea that you can&#039;t exist in two time periods at the same time seems wrong to me.  We see the Hatch light in one of the time flashes and we know what night this is.  Sawyer, Locke and probably Juliette for that matter were all on the island on that night and in the time flash meaning there were 2 of each of them on the island at that time. I like Nanners Idea, that Sun was the only one not visited by Locke.  I also like the idea that since Aaron [and possibly Walt] did not come back the results were unpredictable and this was just a roll of the dice. Although I don&#039;t understand how it would be unpredictable if this all happened before, unless they know telling them the truth the O6 would NOT come back to the island. It kind of throws the &quot;What happened, happened&quot; line out the window then.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ethan can&#8217;t be Paul&#8217;s son, it is 3 years later. Although I did think Paul was an other.<br />
Also, the idea that you can&#8217;t exist in two time periods at the same time seems wrong to me.  We see the Hatch light in one of the time flashes and we know what night this is.  Sawyer, Locke and probably Juliette for that matter were all on the island on that night and in the time flash meaning there were 2 of each of them on the island at that time. I like Nanners Idea, that Sun was the only one not visited by Locke.  I also like the idea that since Aaron [and possibly Walt] did not come back the results were unpredictable and this was just a roll of the dice. Although I don&#8217;t understand how it would be unpredictable if this all happened before, unless they know telling them the truth the O6 would NOT come back to the island. It kind of throws the &#8220;What happened, happened&#8221; line out the window then.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DocJKM</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2009/03/18/next-namaste-episode-5x09/comment-page-2/#comment-37202</link>
		<dc:creator>DocJKM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 21:12:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/?p=285#comment-37202</guid>
		<description>Last night was putting in the clutch, and shifting gears.

I share the concern of character motivation at this juncture, and am left marveling at the forces that would have all our participants (or almost all), on the island they so wanted to leave.  And, for example Juliet, those that stuck it out on the island when off (to the 70&#039;s though) was just a sub ride away.  Really am stuck on that.  Loved the episode, as it played, but left disquieted by apparent disconnect of everyone together, for why.

Rewatched, in slo-mo and HD, Sun getting photo from Christian, and see something, at times looks a bit like Juliet, and at times like Hurley.  Claire?  She COULD have packed it on in three years.

What are we missing?  Why the fuss over Ethan?  Is there a reason this is a central concern?  I/we are missing it.  Should I care?

Agree that our reunited 815&#039;ers fall into predictable interpersonal patterns a bit too readily after three years.  Would predict more a prolonged open-mouth, dumbfounded amazement to not only be back, but back in &#039;77? That would take some serious acclimatization.  Serious.

The Offical audio podcast today put to rest the Charlotte age issue.  They goofed because the actress would not accept being as old as the script called for.  So, the little redhead WAS Charlotte.  So, they goof.  Remember to factor that in when theorizing.  AND remember on the Official podcast a couple-three years ago we were promised the writers were keeping things real, and would not be resorting to any far-out time travel schtick.

Nanners- good call on the lack of a Bentham visit for Sun, and her staying with the plane.  DO think something connects there.

I love this show, and think that TV has been significantly elevated overall by this show.  Expectations, and bar levels raised.

Who&#039;s Jacob?  Vincent?  And will Sawyer and Jack rip into each other leaving Jacob to enjoy a Kate/Juliet threesome?  Stay Lost.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Last night was putting in the clutch, and shifting gears.</p>
<p>I share the concern of character motivation at this juncture, and am left marveling at the forces that would have all our participants (or almost all), on the island they so wanted to leave.  And, for example Juliet, those that stuck it out on the island when off (to the 70&#8242;s though) was just a sub ride away.  Really am stuck on that.  Loved the episode, as it played, but left disquieted by apparent disconnect of everyone together, for why.</p>
<p>Rewatched, in slo-mo and HD, Sun getting photo from Christian, and see something, at times looks a bit like Juliet, and at times like Hurley.  Claire?  She COULD have packed it on in three years.</p>
<p>What are we missing?  Why the fuss over Ethan?  Is there a reason this is a central concern?  I/we are missing it.  Should I care?</p>
<p>Agree that our reunited 815&#8242;ers fall into predictable interpersonal patterns a bit too readily after three years.  Would predict more a prolonged open-mouth, dumbfounded amazement to not only be back, but back in &#8217;77? That would take some serious acclimatization.  Serious.</p>
<p>The Offical audio podcast today put to rest the Charlotte age issue.  They goofed because the actress would not accept being as old as the script called for.  So, the little redhead WAS Charlotte.  So, they goof.  Remember to factor that in when theorizing.  AND remember on the Official podcast a couple-three years ago we were promised the writers were keeping things real, and would not be resorting to any far-out time travel schtick.</p>
<p>Nanners- good call on the lack of a Bentham visit for Sun, and her staying with the plane.  DO think something connects there.</p>
<p>I love this show, and think that TV has been significantly elevated overall by this show.  Expectations, and bar levels raised.</p>
<p>Who&#8217;s Jacob?  Vincent?  And will Sawyer and Jack rip into each other leaving Jacob to enjoy a Kate/Juliet threesome?  Stay Lost.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2009/03/18/next-namaste-episode-5x09/comment-page-2/#comment-37201</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 21:09:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/?p=285#comment-37201</guid>
		<description>The title said, &quot;Thirty Years Later.&quot;  That would put the date at 2007 when Sun and Frank are greeted by Christian in Dharma Ghost Town.  Sun has done something to &quot;taint&quot; her failed &quot;rapture&quot; from flight 316.  Lots of 3&#039;s being batted around.    

When they were doing all those Hydra episodes, Sawyer and Kate were being forced to build a &quot;runway&quot;.  Sawyer questioned, &quot;Runway?&quot;  Juliette, &quot;yeah for aliens&quot;.  Kate and Sawyer sure cleared out a considerable piece of real estate for the landing strip.  And how did Ben know there were boats hidden on  the beach?  Ben knew he would need a runway and getaway boats for an upcoming episode, that&#039;s why.

I enjoyed Namaste.  Still beats anything else on TV by a mile.  Am not enjoying Caesar and the bounty hunter woman --  like them far less than Nikki and what&#039;s-his-name, oh yeah, Paulo.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The title said, &#8220;Thirty Years Later.&#8221;  That would put the date at 2007 when Sun and Frank are greeted by Christian in Dharma Ghost Town.  Sun has done something to &#8220;taint&#8221; her failed &#8220;rapture&#8221; from flight 316.  Lots of 3&#8242;s being batted around.    </p>
<p>When they were doing all those Hydra episodes, Sawyer and Kate were being forced to build a &#8220;runway&#8221;.  Sawyer questioned, &#8220;Runway?&#8221;  Juliette, &#8220;yeah for aliens&#8221;.  Kate and Sawyer sure cleared out a considerable piece of real estate for the landing strip.  And how did Ben know there were boats hidden on  the beach?  Ben knew he would need a runway and getaway boats for an upcoming episode, that&#8217;s why.</p>
<p>I enjoyed Namaste.  Still beats anything else on TV by a mile.  Am not enjoying Caesar and the bounty hunter woman &#8212;  like them far less than Nikki and what&#8217;s-his-name, oh yeah, Paulo.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EdFromDC</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2009/03/18/next-namaste-episode-5x09/comment-page-2/#comment-37200</link>
		<dc:creator>EdFromDC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 21:09:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/?p=285#comment-37200</guid>
		<description>Here’s a theory for you: The Ajira castaways aren’t in “the present” at all, they’re in the early 1980s.

When Sun and Lupidis go to New Otherton and meet Christian, there are relics of the Dharma Initiative everywhere -- Dharma logos on the yellow huts, signs that say &quot;uniforms&quot; in the intake center, etc. Correct me if I&#039;m wrong, but I don&#039;t think those things existed in the Others-controlled community. When we saw the Others’ community in the beginning of Season 3, there were no Dharma logos anywhere; it looked like they had made it their own.

Plus, I&#039;ve heard that when Lupidis was trying to crash-land the Ajira plane, as his co-pilot made a mayday call, you can hear the numbers being transmitted. I need to watch the episode again, but if that&#039;s true ... 
We know Danielle switched the numbers transmission to her own SOS call in the late 1980s (1988?). 

The Ajira castaways are not in 1977, obviously, so I think they’re somewhere between the Purge and whenever it is that the Others settled into New Otherton (at some stage before 1988).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here’s a theory for you: The Ajira castaways aren’t in “the present” at all, they’re in the early 1980s.</p>
<p>When Sun and Lupidis go to New Otherton and meet Christian, there are relics of the Dharma Initiative everywhere &#8212; Dharma logos on the yellow huts, signs that say &#8220;uniforms&#8221; in the intake center, etc. Correct me if I&#8217;m wrong, but I don&#8217;t think those things existed in the Others-controlled community. When we saw the Others’ community in the beginning of Season 3, there were no Dharma logos anywhere; it looked like they had made it their own.</p>
<p>Plus, I&#8217;ve heard that when Lupidis was trying to crash-land the Ajira plane, as his co-pilot made a mayday call, you can hear the numbers being transmitted. I need to watch the episode again, but if that&#8217;s true &#8230;<br />
We know Danielle switched the numbers transmission to her own SOS call in the late 1980s (1988?). </p>
<p>The Ajira castaways are not in 1977, obviously, so I think they’re somewhere between the Purge and whenever it is that the Others settled into New Otherton (at some stage before 1988).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: carol from Boston</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2009/03/18/next-namaste-episode-5x09/comment-page-2/#comment-37199</link>
		<dc:creator>carol from Boston</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 20:52:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/?p=285#comment-37199</guid>
		<description>Screencap of Sun with figure behind her, good catch by all of you, I missed it.  
 
http://getlostpodcast.iimmgg.com/image/3cfb39ff4d6728d560e1e7b8c0bd8b39

I guess I need a nicer television.  I am wondering if I can justify a high def tv to my dh, does missing important Lost clues classify as an emergency?  My old tv is just not cutting it.  If someone hadn&#039;t mentioned it I would have never had seen it.

Lovethis podcast and board.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Screencap of Sun with figure behind her, good catch by all of you, I missed it.  </p>
<p><a href="http://getlostpodcast.iimmgg.com/image/3cfb39ff4d6728d560e1e7b8c0bd8b39" rel="nofollow">http://getlostpodcast.iimmgg.com/image/3cfb39ff4d6728d560e1e7b8c0bd8b39</a></p>
<p>I guess I need a nicer television.  I am wondering if I can justify a high def tv to my dh, does missing important Lost clues classify as an emergency?  My old tv is just not cutting it.  If someone hadn&#8217;t mentioned it I would have never had seen it.</p>
<p>Lovethis podcast and board.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Knives Monroe</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2009/03/18/next-namaste-episode-5x09/comment-page-2/#comment-37198</link>
		<dc:creator>Knives Monroe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 20:50:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/?p=285#comment-37198</guid>
		<description>Just thought it was interesting to note that usually when we see Christian he is carrying a lamp, but last night he had a flashlight for the first time. Is this significant? Possibly.

xxxWEST-SAYIDxxx</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just thought it was interesting to note that usually when we see Christian he is carrying a lamp, but last night he had a flashlight for the first time. Is this significant? Possibly.</p>
<p>xxxWEST-SAYIDxxx</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KarenX</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2009/03/18/next-namaste-episode-5x09/comment-page-2/#comment-37197</link>
		<dc:creator>KarenX</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 20:34:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/?p=285#comment-37197</guid>
		<description>Aanndd... I just remembered the other thing I wanted to mention. Sawyer comes back all flustered about what to do with the O6 who showed up in his time. Juliet points out that there&#039;s a submarine on its way. By the end of the show, you think, &quot;Oh! She&#039;s giving him a solution!&quot; but at the time, I think she was mentioning to Sawyer that an incoming sub means an outgoing sub. I don&#039;t know if that&#039;s code for bringing up a touchy subject between them without bringing it up or not, but my first thought was that she was referring to people just leaving the place altogether. Maybe even her, too.

It&#039;s a tough call for Juliet. She&#039;s wanted to get off the island forever, but if your only way off was to a completely different year, would you take it? She&#039;ll never see her family in any meaningful way for at least the next thirty years, and then she&#039;ll be too aged to reunite with them without some splaining to do. If she stays on the island, is it a reasonable expectation that she&#039;ll find a way to the future again and then can leave? She&#039;s inscrutable, that Juliet! But it&#039;s a difficult decision to make, and clearly one she&#039;s been actively putting off for years now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Aanndd&#8230; I just remembered the other thing I wanted to mention. Sawyer comes back all flustered about what to do with the O6 who showed up in his time. Juliet points out that there&#8217;s a submarine on its way. By the end of the show, you think, &#8220;Oh! She&#8217;s giving him a solution!&#8221; but at the time, I think she was mentioning to Sawyer that an incoming sub means an outgoing sub. I don&#8217;t know if that&#8217;s code for bringing up a touchy subject between them without bringing it up or not, but my first thought was that she was referring to people just leaving the place altogether. Maybe even her, too.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s a tough call for Juliet. She&#8217;s wanted to get off the island forever, but if your only way off was to a completely different year, would you take it? She&#8217;ll never see her family in any meaningful way for at least the next thirty years, and then she&#8217;ll be too aged to reunite with them without some splaining to do. If she stays on the island, is it a reasonable expectation that she&#8217;ll find a way to the future again and then can leave? She&#8217;s inscrutable, that Juliet! But it&#8217;s a difficult decision to make, and clearly one she&#8217;s been actively putting off for years now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KarenX</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2009/03/18/next-namaste-episode-5x09/comment-page-2/#comment-37196</link>
		<dc:creator>KarenX</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 20:20:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/?p=285#comment-37196</guid>
		<description>I thought I read everyone&#039;s comments carefully, but I could have missed this. Regarding Ethan as an Other. I suppose the Others could have recruited the boy like they recruited Ben, but they also could have kidnapped him like they kidnapped Alex and tried to kidnap Aaron. We&#039;ve seen him for one day; he could be gone by next week.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought I read everyone&#8217;s comments carefully, but I could have missed this. Regarding Ethan as an Other. I suppose the Others could have recruited the boy like they recruited Ben, but they also could have kidnapped him like they kidnapped Alex and tried to kidnap Aaron. We&#8217;ve seen him for one day; he could be gone by next week.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nanners</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2009/03/18/next-namaste-episode-5x09/comment-page-2/#comment-37195</link>
		<dc:creator>Nanners</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 20:10:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/?p=285#comment-37195</guid>
		<description>Ok, nobody observed that Sun was the only person in the Oceanic 6 not visited by John, and she&#039;s the only one of them who didn&#039;t &#039;jump&#039; backward.  Has to be a connection there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ok, nobody observed that Sun was the only person in the Oceanic 6 not visited by John, and she&#8217;s the only one of them who didn&#8217;t &#8216;jump&#8217; backward.  Has to be a connection there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sarah</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2009/03/18/next-namaste-episode-5x09/comment-page-2/#comment-37194</link>
		<dc:creator>sarah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 19:57:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/?p=285#comment-37194</guid>
		<description>I know after reading through all the comments I will have more to say.  But the scene that made me call me friend to make sure she&#039;s watching was the scene with Sun.  First of all, wow she just will use anyone to get what she wants - just like Ben would- and this is making me love her character even more.  Second the wispers in abandoned Dharma-ville [before Christian appeared], I can nearly swear the whispers said &quot;Sorry, Sun&quot;.

Could it have been Jacob?  Or the island?  Apologizing because she, more than anyone who landed in 1977, she wanted to be there with Jin.  But her journey lead her to &quot;2007 island&quot; first for a reason.

I do hope they reunite.  It was awful enough that the writers took away Charlie and Claire without telling us if they are together now.  But Jin and Sun need to be together, just like Desmond and Penny.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know after reading through all the comments I will have more to say.  But the scene that made me call me friend to make sure she&#8217;s watching was the scene with Sun.  First of all, wow she just will use anyone to get what she wants &#8211; just like Ben would- and this is making me love her character even more.  Second the wispers in abandoned Dharma-ville [before Christian appeared], I can nearly swear the whispers said &#8220;Sorry, Sun&#8221;.</p>
<p>Could it have been Jacob?  Or the island?  Apologizing because she, more than anyone who landed in 1977, she wanted to be there with Jin.  But her journey lead her to &#8220;2007 island&#8221; first for a reason.</p>
<p>I do hope they reunite.  It was awful enough that the writers took away Charlie and Claire without telling us if they are together now.  But Jin and Sun need to be together, just like Desmond and Penny.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2009/03/18/next-namaste-episode-5x09/comment-page-2/#comment-37193</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 19:15:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/?p=285#comment-37193</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d like to note, for what it&#039;s worth, that when Christian pulled the picture of the 1977 team off the wall, there is a nail to the left, but no such 1978 team, so I think it&#039;s safe to say Dharma ends here.

http://gallery.lost-media.com/displayimage-1475-478.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d like to note, for what it&#8217;s worth, that when Christian pulled the picture of the 1977 team off the wall, there is a nail to the left, but no such 1978 team, so I think it&#8217;s safe to say Dharma ends here.</p>
<p><a href="http://gallery.lost-media.com/displayimage-1475-478.html" rel="nofollow">http://gallery.lost-media.com/displayimage-1475-478.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam in Missouri</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2009/03/18/next-namaste-episode-5x09/comment-page-2/#comment-37191</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam in Missouri</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 18:39:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/?p=285#comment-37191</guid>
		<description>Sawyer was age 35 in Season 3 When Ben asked him before he put the &quot;pacemaker&quot; in Sawyer. So I&#039;d say he is around 38. Why would they introduce another Ethan at this point, The baby is Ethan. Etan Looked older than 30, but so did Ben when the purge happened.  He was supposed to be in his 20&#039;s? yeah right. As Faraday has stated time moves differently on the island, maybe the island makes some people appear older than they are as well as other people appearing not to age [Richard Alpert].  

As far as the manifest, Juliette is told by Amy 2 male recruits dropped out and the tell Dr. Chang, she just didn&#039;t him and changed the roster names for Hugo and Jack. Then sha had to go write up a revised roster adding Kate which took more time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sawyer was age 35 in Season 3 When Ben asked him before he put the &#8220;pacemaker&#8221; in Sawyer. So I&#8217;d say he is around 38. Why would they introduce another Ethan at this point, The baby is Ethan. Etan Looked older than 30, but so did Ben when the purge happened.  He was supposed to be in his 20&#8242;s? yeah right. As Faraday has stated time moves differently on the island, maybe the island makes some people appear older than they are as well as other people appearing not to age [Richard Alpert].  </p>
<p>As far as the manifest, Juliette is told by Amy 2 male recruits dropped out and the tell Dr. Chang, she just didn&#8217;t him and changed the roster names for Hugo and Jack. Then sha had to go write up a revised roster adding Kate which took more time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jared Ladish</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2009/03/18/next-namaste-episode-5x09/comment-page-2/#comment-37190</link>
		<dc:creator>Jared Ladish</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 18:30:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/?p=285#comment-37190</guid>
		<description>Just speculating and maybe its been mentioned already but is it possible that Sun didn&#039;t make the jump because she was not pregnant this time? There seems to be such attention to detail for recreating history that was a noticeble difference.  Just pondering...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just speculating and maybe its been mentioned already but is it possible that Sun didn&#8217;t make the jump because she was not pregnant this time? There seems to be such attention to detail for recreating history that was a noticeble difference.  Just pondering&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Constantine from Greece</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2009/03/18/next-namaste-episode-5x09/comment-page-2/#comment-37189</link>
		<dc:creator>Constantine from Greece</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 18:26:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/?p=285#comment-37189</guid>
		<description>Hi guys

Great podcast, just 2 questions I would like to make:

1. Ethan was Horace and Amy&#039;s son and part of the Dharma but it seems like he survived the purge and then joined Ben and the hostiles. That means that he agreed his parents to be killed in some way?

2. When the Ajira flight 316 disappeared, I think that someone from the media should notice that all of the Oceanic 6 were on board and are missing again - wouldn&#039;t this raise questions? Does this mean that Widmore knows that they returned to the island?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi guys</p>
<p>Great podcast, just 2 questions I would like to make:</p>
<p>1. Ethan was Horace and Amy&#8217;s son and part of the Dharma but it seems like he survived the purge and then joined Ben and the hostiles. That means that he agreed his parents to be killed in some way?</p>
<p>2. When the Ajira flight 316 disappeared, I think that someone from the media should notice that all of the Oceanic 6 were on board and are missing again &#8211; wouldn&#8217;t this raise questions? Does this mean that Widmore knows that they returned to the island?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zhami</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2009/03/18/next-namaste-episode-5x09/comment-page-2/#comment-37187</link>
		<dc:creator>Zhami</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 18:21:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/?p=285#comment-37187</guid>
		<description>Oh, so many thoughts!  Yes, the episode seemed to plod along, but that&#039;s because our interest is so highly charged -- we want more answers because we have so very man puzzle pieces that we don&#039;t know how to fit together. 

I agree with Nel: Ben is a masterful plotter, I doubt that he was surprised by Sun&#039;s attack on him. Ben doesn&#039;t need anyone. He needed to get rid of her. There are multiple canoes -- he&#039;ll use another.

I agree with Kira: Jin taught a young Charlotte Korean. What a beautiful cyclicity!

Recall that dying Charlotte referred to a &quot;crazy man.&quot; Daniel is &quot;gone&quot; because he has gone mad. Perhaps he is, as some have conjectured, lost in time, the voice of Jacob, and needs &quot;help.&quot;

There has been some conjecture that Sun is Marvin Candle (Pierre Chang)&#039;s child. But in teh episode when we first learn of the child (isn&#039;t that with the masterful metaphor of the skipping record), that the child is referred to as a &quot;him.&quot;?  Regardless, I&#039;d wager that, as Matt from Ohio asserts, the child is Miles.
 
Someone in the room with Sun and Christian  -- &#039;sgotta be Claire.

Regarding the Baby Ethan reveal: not necessarily the same person as Ethan Rom. In fact, I&#039;d be surprised if they are the same person.

What a fantastic ride!  All I can do is go with the series and let it take me where it will..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, so many thoughts!  Yes, the episode seemed to plod along, but that&#8217;s because our interest is so highly charged &#8212; we want more answers because we have so very man puzzle pieces that we don&#8217;t know how to fit together. </p>
<p>I agree with Nel: Ben is a masterful plotter, I doubt that he was surprised by Sun&#8217;s attack on him. Ben doesn&#8217;t need anyone. He needed to get rid of her. There are multiple canoes &#8212; he&#8217;ll use another.</p>
<p>I agree with Kira: Jin taught a young Charlotte Korean. What a beautiful cyclicity!</p>
<p>Recall that dying Charlotte referred to a &#8220;crazy man.&#8221; Daniel is &#8220;gone&#8221; because he has gone mad. Perhaps he is, as some have conjectured, lost in time, the voice of Jacob, and needs &#8220;help.&#8221;</p>
<p>There has been some conjecture that Sun is Marvin Candle (Pierre Chang)&#8217;s child. But in teh episode when we first learn of the child (isn&#8217;t that with the masterful metaphor of the skipping record), that the child is referred to as a &#8220;him.&#8221;?  Regardless, I&#8217;d wager that, as Matt from Ohio asserts, the child is Miles.</p>
<p>Someone in the room with Sun and Christian  &#8212; &#8216;sgotta be Claire.</p>
<p>Regarding the Baby Ethan reveal: not necessarily the same person as Ethan Rom. In fact, I&#8217;d be surprised if they are the same person.</p>
<p>What a fantastic ride!  All I can do is go with the series and let it take me where it will..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: carol from Boston</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2009/03/18/next-namaste-episode-5x09/comment-page-2/#comment-37186</link>
		<dc:creator>carol from Boston</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 18:16:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/?p=285#comment-37186</guid>
		<description>makes sense!  I can&#039;t believe I forgot that Brandon.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>makes sense!  I can&#8217;t believe I forgot that Brandon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brandon from Harrisburg</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2009/03/18/next-namaste-episode-5x09/comment-page-2/#comment-37185</link>
		<dc:creator>Brandon from Harrisburg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 18:07:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/?p=285#comment-37185</guid>
		<description>Hey, Carol:

If she does, in fact, say &quot;Jaraah,&quot; that would make the most sense, seeing as how that&#039;s Sayid&#039;s last name, and he was in her custody.  Thanks for clarifying.

bd</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, Carol:</p>
<p>If she does, in fact, say &#8220;Jaraah,&#8221; that would make the most sense, seeing as how that&#8217;s Sayid&#8217;s last name, and he was in her custody.  Thanks for clarifying.</p>
<p>bd</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: carol from Boston</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2009/03/18/next-namaste-episode-5x09/comment-page-2/#comment-37184</link>
		<dc:creator>carol from Boston</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 18:00:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/?p=285#comment-37184</guid>
		<description>A quick question,  how did pierre have Jack&#039;s name and assignment when Julliet hadn&#039;t gotten there yet with the new list?  She came in when Kate was being processed, which was after Jack.

Loved when Sawyer stuck it to Jack with the whole &quot;I&#039;m in charge now speech&quot; and then i thought it was funny when Jack looked relieved and said fine.  Sawyer&#039;s was shocked and got a very funny look on his face.

BTW, I put the closed captioning on and when the plane crashed the woman deputy said &quot;Jaraah&quot; not &quot;Sarah&quot;.  Anybody recognise the  name?

Well time to get in my Dharma van and pick up the kids from school. BBL</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A quick question,  how did pierre have Jack&#8217;s name and assignment when Julliet hadn&#8217;t gotten there yet with the new list?  She came in when Kate was being processed, which was after Jack.</p>
<p>Loved when Sawyer stuck it to Jack with the whole &#8220;I&#8217;m in charge now speech&#8221; and then i thought it was funny when Jack looked relieved and said fine.  Sawyer&#8217;s was shocked and got a very funny look on his face.</p>
<p>BTW, I put the closed captioning on and when the plane crashed the woman deputy said &#8220;Jaraah&#8221; not &#8220;Sarah&#8221;.  Anybody recognise the  name?</p>
<p>Well time to get in my Dharma van and pick up the kids from school. BBL</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jose Mexico</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2009/03/18/next-namaste-episode-5x09/comment-page-2/#comment-37183</link>
		<dc:creator>Jose Mexico</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 17:55:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/?p=285#comment-37183</guid>
		<description>This episode was great. I am so glad that we got to see Young Ben. He showed his early interest in the forbidden, and perhaps that is why he is always stirring up trouble. It seems like he has always wanted to do what is not supposed to be done. &quot;Are you a hostile?&quot; he asked. Maybe he was thinking, &quot;Because I want to go live with you. The people here stink. Especially my father.&quot; Will Ben break Sayid out of jail? That would be awesome. 

Are Juliet and Kate going to do some Foxy Boxing? The tension was great, and for once I wasn&#039;t all that frustrated with the relationships being examined a bit. 

I love when Christian Sheppard shows up. He told Sun that they had some work to do. Does that mean that they too are going to go back in time? Or is she going to be the way everyone gets back to present time? 

Thanks for all the great work. You guys rock.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This episode was great. I am so glad that we got to see Young Ben. He showed his early interest in the forbidden, and perhaps that is why he is always stirring up trouble. It seems like he has always wanted to do what is not supposed to be done. &#8220;Are you a hostile?&#8221; he asked. Maybe he was thinking, &#8220;Because I want to go live with you. The people here stink. Especially my father.&#8221; Will Ben break Sayid out of jail? That would be awesome. </p>
<p>Are Juliet and Kate going to do some Foxy Boxing? The tension was great, and for once I wasn&#8217;t all that frustrated with the relationships being examined a bit. </p>
<p>I love when Christian Sheppard shows up. He told Sun that they had some work to do. Does that mean that they too are going to go back in time? Or is she going to be the way everyone gets back to present time? </p>
<p>Thanks for all the great work. You guys rock.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam in Grapevine, TX</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2009/03/18/next-namaste-episode-5x09/comment-page-2/#comment-37182</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam in Grapevine, TX</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 17:37:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/?p=285#comment-37182</guid>
		<description>I know the timing doesn&#039;t work at all, but I couldn&#039;t help thinking when Sawyer told Jack they were in 1977... OMG Jack&#039;s going to become his own Grandpa!  Then I started counting and thought better of it.  But for a second there I was laughing my head off.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know the timing doesn&#8217;t work at all, but I couldn&#8217;t help thinking when Sawyer told Jack they were in 1977&#8230; OMG Jack&#8217;s going to become his own Grandpa!  Then I started counting and thought better of it.  But for a second there I was laughing my head off.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick from Southampton</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2009/03/18/next-namaste-episode-5x09/comment-page-2/#comment-37181</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick from Southampton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 17:22:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/?p=285#comment-37181</guid>
		<description>Enjoyable episode, my quick thought is that Sun and Ben are not with the O6 because they are BOTH in that time zone already! Young Ben is there as we have seen and I think Sun must also already be in 1977. I think she is Changs daughter. The rules of time must be that you cant be in the same place twice so Ben and Sun are stuck in 2007. i&#039;ll also go one step further and go out on a limb saying that Chang either is Mr Paik or at least hands Sun over to Mr Paik at a young age.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Enjoyable episode, my quick thought is that Sun and Ben are not with the O6 because they are BOTH in that time zone already! Young Ben is there as we have seen and I think Sun must also already be in 1977. I think she is Changs daughter. The rules of time must be that you cant be in the same place twice so Ben and Sun are stuck in 2007. i&#8217;ll also go one step further and go out on a limb saying that Chang either is Mr Paik or at least hands Sun over to Mr Paik at a young age.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott in Chicago</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2009/03/18/next-namaste-episode-5x09/comment-page-2/#comment-37180</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott in Chicago</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 17:21:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/?p=285#comment-37180</guid>
		<description>I enjoyed the episode very much.  @Knives -- 14J = 23?  How?  J is the tenth letter of the alphabet.  I will have to re-watch the Sun and CS scene to look for the shadowed person mentioned above.  I too am a little dismayed to learn the  baby is Ethan.  The actor playing Ethan Rom is NOT in his twenties.  I, probably like most of you, went to Lostpedia to type in Ethan&#039;s name when his name was revealed; could there be a second Ethan on (or off) the island from Ethan Rom.  I know Lostpedia said Ethan was Amy and Horace&#039;s son, do we know that from any other episode besides Namaste?  As for the young Ben, Sayid&#039;s guard knew the kid well enough to simply allow him to  bring a sandwich to the &quot;hostile&quot;; he had to be there a while.  I look forward to the podcast and future comments.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I enjoyed the episode very much.  @Knives &#8212; 14J = 23?  How?  J is the tenth letter of the alphabet.  I will have to re-watch the Sun and CS scene to look for the shadowed person mentioned above.  I too am a little dismayed to learn the  baby is Ethan.  The actor playing Ethan Rom is NOT in his twenties.  I, probably like most of you, went to Lostpedia to type in Ethan&#8217;s name when his name was revealed; could there be a second Ethan on (or off) the island from Ethan Rom.  I know Lostpedia said Ethan was Amy and Horace&#8217;s son, do we know that from any other episode besides Namaste?  As for the young Ben, Sayid&#8217;s guard knew the kid well enough to simply allow him to  bring a sandwich to the &#8220;hostile&#8221;; he had to be there a while.  I look forward to the podcast and future comments.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff in Cape Coral</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2009/03/18/next-namaste-episode-5x09/comment-page-2/#comment-37179</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff in Cape Coral</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 17:06:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/?p=285#comment-37179</guid>
		<description>I think Rebecca hits the nail on the head re: Ethan.  But my question is how quickly/perfectly was the universe able to course-correct?  Amy should have been kidnapped by the Others until Sawyer intervened.  Had he not been there, she would&#039;ve presumably had a baby named Ethan with an Other (Mr. Rom, perhaps.)  Instead, Sawyer saves her and brings her back to Dharma.  The universe takes three years to find Ethan a new dad, then a while longer to bring him back to the Others, but he does get there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think Rebecca hits the nail on the head re: Ethan.  But my question is how quickly/perfectly was the universe able to course-correct?  Amy should have been kidnapped by the Others until Sawyer intervened.  Had he not been there, she would&#8217;ve presumably had a baby named Ethan with an Other (Mr. Rom, perhaps.)  Instead, Sawyer saves her and brings her back to Dharma.  The universe takes three years to find Ethan a new dad, then a while longer to bring him back to the Others, but he does get there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris W</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2009/03/18/next-namaste-episode-5x09/comment-page-2/#comment-37178</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris W</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 16:45:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/?p=285#comment-37178</guid>
		<description>I thought this episode was really a dud.  I spent most of the time wondering where it was going, what the characters&#039; motivations were.  In seasons 1-3, the Oceanic survivors were trying to get off the island.  In season 4, they were trying to get back.  What are they trying to do now?  What are their goals?  I found myself really frustrated watching Namaste.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought this episode was really a dud.  I spent most of the time wondering where it was going, what the characters&#8217; motivations were.  In seasons 1-3, the Oceanic survivors were trying to get off the island.  In season 4, they were trying to get back.  What are they trying to do now?  What are their goals?  I found myself really frustrated watching Namaste.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam in Missouri</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2009/03/18/next-namaste-episode-5x09/comment-page-2/#comment-37177</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam in Missouri</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 16:23:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/?p=285#comment-37177</guid>
		<description>I am leaning toward the &#039;77ers being involved in &quot;The Incident&quot; and not the purge.  Then again the Swan hasn&#039;t even been built yet. Plus Richard Alpert knows Sawyer was not Dharma so why would Sawyer or any of his friends be in any danger from Alpert or the &quot;Hostiles&quot;.  How old was Ben when the purge happened? I just assumed he was in how 30&#039;s but it seems as though he was in his mid 20&#039;s [if we go by John&#039;s dream in &quot;Cabin Fever&quot; where Horace said he&#039;d been dead for 12 years in 2004].  If that is the case they have 15 years before anything purge-related happens anyway. Ethan as Horace&#039;s baby was a big let down for me. I&#039;m really thinking Faraday is Jacob now. It&#039;s looking like Sayid might be looking to become a martyr before long.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am leaning toward the &#8217;77ers being involved in &#8220;The Incident&#8221; and not the purge.  Then again the Swan hasn&#8217;t even been built yet. Plus Richard Alpert knows Sawyer was not Dharma so why would Sawyer or any of his friends be in any danger from Alpert or the &#8220;Hostiles&#8221;.  How old was Ben when the purge happened? I just assumed he was in how 30&#8242;s but it seems as though he was in his mid 20&#8242;s [if we go by John's dream in "Cabin Fever" where Horace said he'd been dead for 12 years in 2004].  If that is the case they have 15 years before anything purge-related happens anyway. Ethan as Horace&#8217;s baby was a big let down for me. I&#8217;m really thinking Faraday is Jacob now. It&#8217;s looking like Sayid might be looking to become a martyr before long.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Travis</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2009/03/18/next-namaste-episode-5x09/comment-page-2/#comment-37176</link>
		<dc:creator>Travis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 16:21:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/?p=285#comment-37176</guid>
		<description>Kira,

Sawyer is definitely over 30. I just re-watched season 1, and was reminded that he wrote his &quot;Mr. Sawyer&quot; letter in 1976.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kira,</p>
<p>Sawyer is definitely over 30. I just re-watched season 1, and was reminded that he wrote his &#8220;Mr. Sawyer&#8221; letter in 1976.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ZoneCity</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2009/03/18/next-namaste-episode-5x09/comment-page-2/#comment-37175</link>
		<dc:creator>ZoneCity</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 15:55:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/?p=285#comment-37175</guid>
		<description>Caesar appears to be taking over the leadership position of the AJIRITES.  Soon as the Frank Lapidus tries to assert himself to calm down the Ajira survivors, Caesar immediately shouts him down with alternatives.  So, now that Frank has left the Ajira survivors, it looks like Caesar will take over as the chief of this new tribe.  This is most likely bad news for John Locke, who was prophesized by Walt’s dream, that he was wearing a suit, while a mob of people wanted to do him harm.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Caesar appears to be taking over the leadership position of the AJIRITES.  Soon as the Frank Lapidus tries to assert himself to calm down the Ajira survivors, Caesar immediately shouts him down with alternatives.  So, now that Frank has left the Ajira survivors, it looks like Caesar will take over as the chief of this new tribe.  This is most likely bad news for John Locke, who was prophesized by Walt’s dream, that he was wearing a suit, while a mob of people wanted to do him harm.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bonita (from Atlanta)</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2009/03/18/next-namaste-episode-5x09/comment-page-2/#comment-37174</link>
		<dc:creator>Bonita (from Atlanta)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 15:50:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/?p=285#comment-37174</guid>
		<description>Rebecca: you wondered where Locke was when Lapidus gathered the survivors of 316, he was supposed to be dead in a coffin and was probably off being resurrected.

I think Sun just rocks.  Poor Ben, always taking a beating.  Maybe we&#039;ll see young Ben suffering beatings etc to manipulate people.

I&#039;m waiting to see why Sawyer, et al decided to stay in 77?  Did Daniel discover something?  Is he off Island working on his theories?

And just how central is the addition of Lapidus to the Oceanic 6?  He was supposed to be the original pilot.

I thought the tree through the co-pilot was a shout out to the original Pilot (played by Gregg Grinburg).

Hope Juliet goes all &#039;mama&#039; bear on Jater. both parts.

Personally I really love the Time Travel.  It&#039;s so much fun.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rebecca: you wondered where Locke was when Lapidus gathered the survivors of 316, he was supposed to be dead in a coffin and was probably off being resurrected.</p>
<p>I think Sun just rocks.  Poor Ben, always taking a beating.  Maybe we&#8217;ll see young Ben suffering beatings etc to manipulate people.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m waiting to see why Sawyer, et al decided to stay in 77?  Did Daniel discover something?  Is he off Island working on his theories?</p>
<p>And just how central is the addition of Lapidus to the Oceanic 6?  He was supposed to be the original pilot.</p>
<p>I thought the tree through the co-pilot was a shout out to the original Pilot (played by Gregg Grinburg).</p>
<p>Hope Juliet goes all &#8216;mama&#8217; bear on Jater. both parts.</p>
<p>Personally I really love the Time Travel.  It&#8217;s so much fun.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Edna</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2009/03/18/next-namaste-episode-5x09/comment-page-2/#comment-37173</link>
		<dc:creator>Edna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 15:34:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/?p=285#comment-37173</guid>
		<description>I want the enhanced repeats back! So many things I miss only seeing the epse once on broadcast tv and not being able to record it! (Still haven&#039;t figured out how to record digital stations with my old vcrs and not sure I even CAN! *sigh*). I missed the woman behind Sun, didn&#039;t pay much attention to the buildings being boarded up and almost missed Smokey poofing out of the jungle at Sun and Lapidus! Am looking fwd to the dvd release if I can afford it! Still need to get season 4, much less 5 when IT&#039;s available! LOL!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I want the enhanced repeats back! So many things I miss only seeing the epse once on broadcast tv and not being able to record it! (Still haven&#8217;t figured out how to record digital stations with my old vcrs and not sure I even CAN! *sigh*). I missed the woman behind Sun, didn&#8217;t pay much attention to the buildings being boarded up and almost missed Smokey poofing out of the jungle at Sun and Lapidus! Am looking fwd to the dvd release if I can afford it! Still need to get season 4, much less 5 when IT&#8217;s available! LOL!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TVSciFi</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2009/03/18/next-namaste-episode-5x09/comment-page-2/#comment-37172</link>
		<dc:creator>TVSciFi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 15:29:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/?p=285#comment-37172</guid>
		<description>I can understand the abandon buildings, but who took the time to board them up? Smokie? Christian?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can understand the abandon buildings, but who took the time to board them up? Smokie? Christian?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Edna</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2009/03/18/next-namaste-episode-5x09/comment-page-2/#comment-37171</link>
		<dc:creator>Edna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 15:23:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/?p=285#comment-37171</guid>
		<description>Well Kira, John Locke went back in time in the island flashes to a year or so before he was born. Remember he told Richard Alpert he would be born in a year or two?
I&#039;m not sure when they were born had anything to do with the flashes. Remember also, the back of the statue they saw. That had to be a LONNNG time ago, as Miles said when he saw it after they&#039;d also seen in that very quick flash that it was before the well John went down was even dug.
Time paradoxes give me a headache, but LOST is my Excedrin LOL!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well Kira, John Locke went back in time in the island flashes to a year or so before he was born. Remember he told Richard Alpert he would be born in a year or two?<br />
I&#8217;m not sure when they were born had anything to do with the flashes. Remember also, the back of the statue they saw. That had to be a LONNNG time ago, as Miles said when he saw it after they&#8217;d also seen in that very quick flash that it was before the well John went down was even dug.<br />
Time paradoxes give me a headache, but LOST is my Excedrin LOL!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kira</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2009/03/18/next-namaste-episode-5x09/comment-page-2/#comment-37170</link>
		<dc:creator>Kira</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 14:42:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/?p=285#comment-37170</guid>
		<description>Sorry, another thought..how does it work that probably NONE of them were even born in 1974 (are any of them over 30?)..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry, another thought..how does it work that probably NONE of them were even born in 1974 (are any of them over 30?)..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brenda in Maryland</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2009/03/18/next-namaste-episode-5x09/comment-page-2/#comment-37169</link>
		<dc:creator>Brenda in Maryland</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 14:37:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/?p=285#comment-37169</guid>
		<description>Follow up to my earlier theory that Amy/Paul were others ... Ethan probably is Paul&#039;s son, and would have been born to them in the Others camp, but Sawyer interfered and Amy had to go back to the DI. But if she did sneak out and Ethan is Paul&#039;s child, that would be another example of the universe course-correcting.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Follow up to my earlier theory that Amy/Paul were others &#8230; Ethan probably is Paul&#8217;s son, and would have been born to them in the Others camp, but Sawyer interfered and Amy had to go back to the DI. But if she did sneak out and Ethan is Paul&#8217;s child, that would be another example of the universe course-correcting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pete in Rocklin CA</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2009/03/18/next-namaste-episode-5x09/comment-page-2/#comment-37168</link>
		<dc:creator>Pete in Rocklin CA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 14:25:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/?p=285#comment-37168</guid>
		<description>Why do several people believe young Ben is creepy?  Personally I don&#039;t see it.  He seems almost innocent to me.  Yeah, his dad is a jerk.  But we haven&#039;t seen young Ben take actions that would indicate to us that he was always a manipulative, horrible person.  My theory is that it will be some action (or inaction) by our Losties back in 1977 that will be a contributing factor in transforming young Ben into evil older Ben.

Also, the most plausible reason for La Fleur seemingly having no awareness of Ben on the island is that Ben and father just arrived.  Unless the writers offer a better explanation next week.

I agree with Nels (or is it Rebecca) that Farraday isn&#039;t physically gone but rather gone crazy as implied by Charlotte when she talked about a crazy man in the past that scared her.

Regarding the rundown condition of the buildings in the Aljira flight time frame, that could be the passage of three years since the O6 left.  Or maybe the Losties in 1977 will somehow radically change the passage of time and events in a way that disproves the claim made throughout the series that you cannot change things.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why do several people believe young Ben is creepy?  Personally I don&#8217;t see it.  He seems almost innocent to me.  Yeah, his dad is a jerk.  But we haven&#8217;t seen young Ben take actions that would indicate to us that he was always a manipulative, horrible person.  My theory is that it will be some action (or inaction) by our Losties back in 1977 that will be a contributing factor in transforming young Ben into evil older Ben.</p>
<p>Also, the most plausible reason for La Fleur seemingly having no awareness of Ben on the island is that Ben and father just arrived.  Unless the writers offer a better explanation next week.</p>
<p>I agree with Nels (or is it Rebecca) that Farraday isn&#8217;t physically gone but rather gone crazy as implied by Charlotte when she talked about a crazy man in the past that scared her.</p>
<p>Regarding the rundown condition of the buildings in the Aljira flight time frame, that could be the passage of three years since the O6 left.  Or maybe the Losties in 1977 will somehow radically change the passage of time and events in a way that disproves the claim made throughout the series that you cannot change things.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Night from Bordeaux</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2009/03/18/next-namaste-episode-5x09/comment-page-2/#comment-37166</link>
		<dc:creator>Night from Bordeaux</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 14:03:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/?p=285#comment-37166</guid>
		<description>I totally agree with Matt from Ohio about the barracks:
Plus remember the barracks have been deserted for 3 years now, that&#039;s why other&#039;s ville looks like a ghost town.

I also agree with him about how he feels about the show.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I totally agree with Matt from Ohio about the barracks:<br />
Plus remember the barracks have been deserted for 3 years now, that&#8217;s why other&#8217;s ville looks like a ghost town.</p>
<p>I also agree with him about how he feels about the show.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt from Ohio</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2009/03/18/next-namaste-episode-5x09/comment-page-2/#comment-37165</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt from Ohio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 13:56:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/?p=285#comment-37165</guid>
		<description>also one more thing, how can we ever say there is a bad episode of Lost anymore? 3 years from now we will say we would KILL for even a bad Lost episode. You will remember this show and how it made you feel the rest of your life, enjoy it while it lasts, and think how much fun it will be to watch the DVD&#039;s of seasons 1-6 in a row someday. You will be catching something new every single day!

Appreciate what you have now, at least it&#039;s not Heroes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>also one more thing, how can we ever say there is a bad episode of Lost anymore? 3 years from now we will say we would KILL for even a bad Lost episode. You will remember this show and how it made you feel the rest of your life, enjoy it while it lasts, and think how much fun it will be to watch the DVD&#8217;s of seasons 1-6 in a row someday. You will be catching something new every single day!</p>
<p>Appreciate what you have now, at least it&#8217;s not Heroes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt from Ohio</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2009/03/18/next-namaste-episode-5x09/comment-page-2/#comment-37164</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt from Ohio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 13:51:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/?p=285#comment-37164</guid>
		<description>no way, no how Sun is Chang&#039;s baby. It&#039;s Miles, 110%. There would be no purpose to them alluding to the fact that Miles was on the Island before, if he were not, and it&#039;s typical Lost writers to have the close up of the baby in the 1st episode of season 5 and shortly thereafter explain that Miles had been there before, almost as long as Charlotte. And if you remember this season&#039;s opening scene, we see baby Miles, then we see Daniel with the DI shortly afterwards, it makes total sense. 

Sun, Ben, Locke and Frank didn&#039;t go back to 1977 for reasons of a lack of &quot;destiny&quot; as Locke would put it, and that is that. The rest had to to shape what is happening today. And i totally agree that what happened with the Losties in &#039;77, always happened in &#039;77. I don&#039;t think there is anything changed at all. 

And as for why &quot;othersville&quot; is so damaged, it&#039;s because of Smokey destroying it when Ben allowd it to last season.. I know the old DI pictures are still up on the wall, but that doesn&#039;t mean that they wouldn&#039;t have been anyways, maybe it was because the room was only used for storage or maybe it was because you have the likes of Ben, Ethan and maybe Amy (being the older lady in the book club in season 3) having DI roots and not taking pictures of themselves or their parents down. I just think it would have been unreal if any of the Losties would have went in that room in the period that &quot;Locke&#039;s people&quot; lived there and saw that photo, what a crazy twist to the show that would have been.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>no way, no how Sun is Chang&#8217;s baby. It&#8217;s Miles, 110%. There would be no purpose to them alluding to the fact that Miles was on the Island before, if he were not, and it&#8217;s typical Lost writers to have the close up of the baby in the 1st episode of season 5 and shortly thereafter explain that Miles had been there before, almost as long as Charlotte. And if you remember this season&#8217;s opening scene, we see baby Miles, then we see Daniel with the DI shortly afterwards, it makes total sense. </p>
<p>Sun, Ben, Locke and Frank didn&#8217;t go back to 1977 for reasons of a lack of &#8220;destiny&#8221; as Locke would put it, and that is that. The rest had to to shape what is happening today. And i totally agree that what happened with the Losties in &#8217;77, always happened in &#8217;77. I don&#8217;t think there is anything changed at all. </p>
<p>And as for why &#8220;othersville&#8221; is so damaged, it&#8217;s because of Smokey destroying it when Ben allowd it to last season.. I know the old DI pictures are still up on the wall, but that doesn&#8217;t mean that they wouldn&#8217;t have been anyways, maybe it was because the room was only used for storage or maybe it was because you have the likes of Ben, Ethan and maybe Amy (being the older lady in the book club in season 3) having DI roots and not taking pictures of themselves or their parents down. I just think it would have been unreal if any of the Losties would have went in that room in the period that &#8220;Locke&#8217;s people&#8221; lived there and saw that photo, what a crazy twist to the show that would have been.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Edna</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2009/03/18/next-namaste-episode-5x09/comment-page-2/#comment-37163</link>
		<dc:creator>Edna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 13:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/?p=285#comment-37163</guid>
		<description>I LOVED last night&#039;s episode &quot;Namaste&quot;! The show drives me crazy, but I enjoy that! Having all the twists and turns in the plot are great and keep me interested. I am SO bored with other shows after all the wild ride LOST has given us and when it&#039;s run is over after next season, I hope I have all the seasons on dvd to relive.
I think Sun, Lapidus and the 316ers are all in the future or some altered present. The way the DHARMA buildings look creeped me out, just seeing Ben&#039;s office when we saw Ilana and Caesar in it the first time, much LESS seeing the lights on the dock all rusted and fallen over and the signs swinging on the buildings from a single link of their hangers... Christian being there to show Sun where/when Jin is in relation to where/when she and the 316ers are..... Sheesh, what a ride!
I really enjoyed Sawyer showing Jack who is boss now and I hope it stays that way, myself! I never liked Jack and I always have felt he is way too controlling. I am hoping Jack and Kate leave Sawyer and Juliet alone and let them continue on with their relationship, but I have a feeling now that they are back, the whole Love Quadrangle or whatever the heck it is will only come back into play again...
I also missed Locke last night and am looking forward to seeing him soon.
Young Ethan may have been kidnapped by the hostiles as Ben kidnapped Alex and the kids from 815 were kidnapped. So many mysteries, so little time!
I Love LOST!
Thanks for the great podcast and blog, Jen and Ryan!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I LOVED last night&#8217;s episode &#8220;Namaste&#8221;! The show drives me crazy, but I enjoy that! Having all the twists and turns in the plot are great and keep me interested. I am SO bored with other shows after all the wild ride LOST has given us and when it&#8217;s run is over after next season, I hope I have all the seasons on dvd to relive.<br />
I think Sun, Lapidus and the 316ers are all in the future or some altered present. The way the DHARMA buildings look creeped me out, just seeing Ben&#8217;s office when we saw Ilana and Caesar in it the first time, much LESS seeing the lights on the dock all rusted and fallen over and the signs swinging on the buildings from a single link of their hangers&#8230; Christian being there to show Sun where/when Jin is in relation to where/when she and the 316ers are&#8230;.. Sheesh, what a ride!<br />
I really enjoyed Sawyer showing Jack who is boss now and I hope it stays that way, myself! I never liked Jack and I always have felt he is way too controlling. I am hoping Jack and Kate leave Sawyer and Juliet alone and let them continue on with their relationship, but I have a feeling now that they are back, the whole Love Quadrangle or whatever the heck it is will only come back into play again&#8230;<br />
I also missed Locke last night and am looking forward to seeing him soon.<br />
Young Ethan may have been kidnapped by the hostiles as Ben kidnapped Alex and the kids from 815 were kidnapped. So many mysteries, so little time!<br />
I Love LOST!<br />
Thanks for the great podcast and blog, Jen and Ryan!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kira</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2009/03/18/next-namaste-episode-5x09/comment-page-2/#comment-37162</link>
		<dc:creator>Kira</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 13:28:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/?p=285#comment-37162</guid>
		<description>I think that Jin, in the past, taught Charlotte and possibly other DI kids Korean, which is why, in the future, he looks to her to translate. 
Also, there&#039;s NO WAY that Saywer, Juliette, at al don&#039;t recognize young Ben (first of all, they couldn&#039;t have done a better casting job!). I&#039;m sure they&#039;re watching him closely (unless he just showed up, but then a new kid in a new place isn&#039;t going to visit a &quot;criminal&quot; his first day, he&#039;s been there a while)... 
I definitely think the Losties can and will change the future as we know it. Maybe Sun, as a few peeps mentioned, is Pierre&#039;s child and was given to Sun&#039;s Korean parents as an infant, to protect her or something (a la Heroes). 
Jack, and probably Kate, will screw up multi-relationships. Jack will make a power play and Kate will undoubtedly get in Juliette&#039;s face (hope J opens a can of whoop ass on her!)
Anyway, I&#039;ve been watching the 2nd season repeats on G4 and remember why I love the show..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that Jin, in the past, taught Charlotte and possibly other DI kids Korean, which is why, in the future, he looks to her to translate.<br />
Also, there&#8217;s NO WAY that Saywer, Juliette, at al don&#8217;t recognize young Ben (first of all, they couldn&#8217;t have done a better casting job!). I&#8217;m sure they&#8217;re watching him closely (unless he just showed up, but then a new kid in a new place isn&#8217;t going to visit a &#8220;criminal&#8221; his first day, he&#8217;s been there a while)&#8230;<br />
I definitely think the Losties can and will change the future as we know it. Maybe Sun, as a few peeps mentioned, is Pierre&#8217;s child and was given to Sun&#8217;s Korean parents as an infant, to protect her or something (a la Heroes).<br />
Jack, and probably Kate, will screw up multi-relationships. Jack will make a power play and Kate will undoubtedly get in Juliette&#8217;s face (hope J opens a can of whoop ass on her!)<br />
Anyway, I&#8217;ve been watching the 2nd season repeats on G4 and remember why I love the show..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rebecca in Copenhagen</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2009/03/18/next-namaste-episode-5x09/comment-page-2/#comment-37161</link>
		<dc:creator>Rebecca in Copenhagen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 13:21:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/?p=285#comment-37161</guid>
		<description>Hi Nels -
My guess is that Ben is discovered by Cesar and the rest of the Ajira survivors as they begin to investigate the island and that&#039;s when he&#039;s brought to the &quot;infirmary&quot; or whatever they called it. He was definitely around when Frank make his initial comments, so I figured that Locke would be too...although perhaps he was somewhere in the jungle on his back, waiting to wake up so a camera could take an extreme close-up shot of his eye ;) I&#039;m less concerned with the showdown between Locke and Ben, but I was hoping to get some of Locke and the other Losties in this episode. Maybe next time...

One more thing...
I&#039;ve seen a lot about people being frustrated with the baby Ethan reveal, because they were hoping for the birth of a more central character like Desmond, or a more mysterious character like someone we haven&#039;t met yet who could not have been born without Juliet&#039;s time traveling. My only issue with this latter case is that we&#039;ve heard Daniel say from the beginning that we cannot change what has already happened in the future...if someone dies, you&#039;re not able to stop it even if you go back and do everything in your power. The universe course-correcting is only part of it - the point is that Juliet, Sawyer, Jin and Miles always went back to 1974 to become part of the Dharma Initiative, Sawyer always saved Amy from the Others, Juliet always assisted with Ethan&#039;s birth. Speculation about whether Amy would have survived and then gone on to be Horace&#039;s wife and have his son makes no difference - Because it always happened. As cool as it would have been for the baby to be some important character we will meet in later episodes, it was Ethan because it had to be.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Nels -<br />
My guess is that Ben is discovered by Cesar and the rest of the Ajira survivors as they begin to investigate the island and that&#8217;s when he&#8217;s brought to the &#8220;infirmary&#8221; or whatever they called it. He was definitely around when Frank make his initial comments, so I figured that Locke would be too&#8230;although perhaps he was somewhere in the jungle on his back, waiting to wake up so a camera could take an extreme close-up shot of his eye <img src='http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' />  I&#8217;m less concerned with the showdown between Locke and Ben, but I was hoping to get some of Locke and the other Losties in this episode. Maybe next time&#8230;</p>
<p>One more thing&#8230;<br />
I&#8217;ve seen a lot about people being frustrated with the baby Ethan reveal, because they were hoping for the birth of a more central character like Desmond, or a more mysterious character like someone we haven&#8217;t met yet who could not have been born without Juliet&#8217;s time traveling. My only issue with this latter case is that we&#8217;ve heard Daniel say from the beginning that we cannot change what has already happened in the future&#8230;if someone dies, you&#8217;re not able to stop it even if you go back and do everything in your power. The universe course-correcting is only part of it &#8211; the point is that Juliet, Sawyer, Jin and Miles always went back to 1974 to become part of the Dharma Initiative, Sawyer always saved Amy from the Others, Juliet always assisted with Ethan&#8217;s birth. Speculation about whether Amy would have survived and then gone on to be Horace&#8217;s wife and have his son makes no difference &#8211; Because it always happened. As cool as it would have been for the baby to be some important character we will meet in later episodes, it was Ethan because it had to be.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nels</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2009/03/18/next-namaste-episode-5x09/comment-page-2/#comment-37160</link>
		<dc:creator>Nels</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 13:03:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/?p=285#comment-37160</guid>
		<description>Rebecca in Copenhagen: an earlier episode set up Ben as being unconscious and the Ajira folk going through the buildings so having them meet Locke right after the crash wouldn&#039;t fit the timeline since we now know that Ben actually wasn&#039;t injured by the crash itself but by Sun instead. The showdown between Ben and Locke is coming soon, I&#039;m sure though.

I can&#039;t help but now think that Ben actually set up Lapidus and Sun to go to the big island on purpose.  He rarely seems to make such a poor move so perhaps he knows something more than he is leading on.  Although I&#039;m convinced he does think that Locke is truly dead.

Ethan turning to an &quot;Other&quot; might be why the children are important to the Others.  Ethan seems to be the only baby born on the island so that may make him &quot;special&quot; in some way compared to those who have been shuttled off in the sub to give birth off the island.

Jack is certainly going to screw things up for LeFleur and gang and that&#039;s what will progress the story into more dire straits.  How that is going to affect &quot;The Incident&quot; is going to be interesting.

Faraday is &quot;gone&quot; according to Sawyer.  I&#039;m sure he meant mentally gone and we&#039;ll have the tie-in to him showing up under the Orchid soon.

For the 2007 island stuff with Sun and Lapidus, it would seem that the 3 years since Ben released Smokie into the barracks has turned it into a ghostown, which is why nobody seems to have gone back to live there.  They&#039;ll still be at the Temple, most likely.

Anyway, certainly not a bad episode IMHO and definitely sets the groundwork for the future playing board.  I think we almost know where and when everybody is (sans Desmond/Penny) now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rebecca in Copenhagen: an earlier episode set up Ben as being unconscious and the Ajira folk going through the buildings so having them meet Locke right after the crash wouldn&#8217;t fit the timeline since we now know that Ben actually wasn&#8217;t injured by the crash itself but by Sun instead. The showdown between Ben and Locke is coming soon, I&#8217;m sure though.</p>
<p>I can&#8217;t help but now think that Ben actually set up Lapidus and Sun to go to the big island on purpose.  He rarely seems to make such a poor move so perhaps he knows something more than he is leading on.  Although I&#8217;m convinced he does think that Locke is truly dead.</p>
<p>Ethan turning to an &#8220;Other&#8221; might be why the children are important to the Others.  Ethan seems to be the only baby born on the island so that may make him &#8220;special&#8221; in some way compared to those who have been shuttled off in the sub to give birth off the island.</p>
<p>Jack is certainly going to screw things up for LeFleur and gang and that&#8217;s what will progress the story into more dire straits.  How that is going to affect &#8220;The Incident&#8221; is going to be interesting.</p>
<p>Faraday is &#8220;gone&#8221; according to Sawyer.  I&#8217;m sure he meant mentally gone and we&#8217;ll have the tie-in to him showing up under the Orchid soon.</p>
<p>For the 2007 island stuff with Sun and Lapidus, it would seem that the 3 years since Ben released Smokie into the barracks has turned it into a ghostown, which is why nobody seems to have gone back to live there.  They&#8217;ll still be at the Temple, most likely.</p>
<p>Anyway, certainly not a bad episode IMHO and definitely sets the groundwork for the future playing board.  I think we almost know where and when everybody is (sans Desmond/Penny) now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brenda in Maryland</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2009/03/18/next-namaste-episode-5x09/comment-page-2/#comment-37159</link>
		<dc:creator>Brenda in Maryland</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 13:03:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/?p=285#comment-37159</guid>
		<description>How did Ethan become an Other ... I think Paul and Amy were Others who had infiltrated the DI. Paul&#039;s execution, and Amy&#039;s intended execution, were actually meant as a way to get them out of the DI and back to the Others, since somehow the Others can be reincarnated after being shot (remember when Bea shot Mikhail?). That&#039;s why Richard wanted Paul&#039;s body and Amy so readily agreed, and also why Paul had an ankh. I think Amy knows Paul is alive, but he is with the Others, and perhaps the baby is even Paul&#039;s if she snuck out to meet him. Before the Purge, the Others will get Amy and Ethan out, and Ethan will get Paul&#039;s last name, which I bet is Rom.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How did Ethan become an Other &#8230; I think Paul and Amy were Others who had infiltrated the DI. Paul&#8217;s execution, and Amy&#8217;s intended execution, were actually meant as a way to get them out of the DI and back to the Others, since somehow the Others can be reincarnated after being shot (remember when Bea shot Mikhail?). That&#8217;s why Richard wanted Paul&#8217;s body and Amy so readily agreed, and also why Paul had an ankh. I think Amy knows Paul is alive, but he is with the Others, and perhaps the baby is even Paul&#8217;s if she snuck out to meet him. Before the Purge, the Others will get Amy and Ethan out, and Ethan will get Paul&#8217;s last name, which I bet is Rom.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: iwantdesmondshair</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2009/03/18/next-namaste-episode-5x09/comment-page-2/#comment-37158</link>
		<dc:creator>iwantdesmondshair</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 12:55:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/?p=285#comment-37158</guid>
		<description>Actually , ben and sun might be in the mid 90&#039;s, who knows</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually , ben and sun might be in the mid 90&#8242;s, who knows</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: iwantdesmondshair</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2009/03/18/next-namaste-episode-5x09/comment-page-2/#comment-37157</link>
		<dc:creator>iwantdesmondshair</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 12:46:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/?p=285#comment-37157</guid>
		<description>Phil - I don&#039;t think 316 TT at all. I think it&#039;s implied that it crashed in the same time period it took off in. Jack and company &quot;flashed&quot; off the plane to 1977 while the plane just went down and crashed. That&#039;s what I have taken from it any way.

I hope that TT is over soon, I think that will end up hurting the show if it goes on for much longer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Phil &#8211; I don&#8217;t think 316 TT at all. I think it&#8217;s implied that it crashed in the same time period it took off in. Jack and company &#8220;flashed&#8221; off the plane to 1977 while the plane just went down and crashed. That&#8217;s what I have taken from it any way.</p>
<p>I hope that TT is over soon, I think that will end up hurting the show if it goes on for much longer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phil R</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2009/03/18/next-namaste-episode-5x09/comment-page-2/#comment-37156</link>
		<dc:creator>Phil R</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 12:42:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/?p=285#comment-37156</guid>
		<description>What I just cannot wrap my brain around is that the island might exist in multiple times and locations. I don&#039;t think it has jumped the shark at all... but the logic behind the setup is beyond me right now. The plane obviously jumped in SOME time, but it is unknown how much.

Does this mean there are multiple versions of the island out there? Or that what Frank and Sun are experiencing a version of the island as a result of the other 815ers doings? 
How on earth did Ben know the outriggers would be there? Only way is that they landed in a time that Ben would know that they existed. 


My brain hurts trying to figure out the logic behind all of this... 

I hope one day they come out with the complete history of the island- unabridged.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What I just cannot wrap my brain around is that the island might exist in multiple times and locations. I don&#8217;t think it has jumped the shark at all&#8230; but the logic behind the setup is beyond me right now. The plane obviously jumped in SOME time, but it is unknown how much.</p>
<p>Does this mean there are multiple versions of the island out there? Or that what Frank and Sun are experiencing a version of the island as a result of the other 815ers doings?<br />
How on earth did Ben know the outriggers would be there? Only way is that they landed in a time that Ben would know that they existed. </p>
<p>My brain hurts trying to figure out the logic behind all of this&#8230; </p>
<p>I hope one day they come out with the complete history of the island- unabridged.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2009/03/18/next-namaste-episode-5x09/comment-page-2/#comment-37155</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 12:39:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/?p=285#comment-37155</guid>
		<description>Dave,
I would say that Ben cared about the station but did not intervene because that station was important in regard to inputting the numbers so there wouldn&#039;t be a major eletronic pulse, such as happened when Locke destroyed the computer. He had to know about it and what it was meant for or he wouldnt have inputted the numbers when Locke was trapped under the blast doors. The Pearl was used to monitor the other stations, including the Swan. So there is no way Ben could know about the Pearl and not know about the Swan. Remember, when Locke turned on the monitors at the Pearl it showed Jack walking in the Swan. Which brings me back to Ben knowing the Swans importance and keeping an eye on it but not initiating contact with the person inside of it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dave,<br />
I would say that Ben cared about the station but did not intervene because that station was important in regard to inputting the numbers so there wouldn&#8217;t be a major eletronic pulse, such as happened when Locke destroyed the computer. He had to know about it and what it was meant for or he wouldnt have inputted the numbers when Locke was trapped under the blast doors. The Pearl was used to monitor the other stations, including the Swan. So there is no way Ben could know about the Pearl and not know about the Swan. Remember, when Locke turned on the monitors at the Pearl it showed Jack walking in the Swan. Which brings me back to Ben knowing the Swans importance and keeping an eye on it but not initiating contact with the person inside of it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: iwantdesmondshair</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2009/03/18/next-namaste-episode-5x09/comment-page-2/#comment-37154</link>
		<dc:creator>iwantdesmondshair</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 12:35:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/?p=285#comment-37154</guid>
		<description>One other thing I am a little frustrated with is Ethan. If he was born in 1977 that would make him 27 years old in 2004 when the plane crashed. I don&#039;t think that guy looked 27. Anyway no more complaints, I&#039;m just pumped for next week now to see where some of this is going.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One other thing I am a little frustrated with is Ethan. If he was born in 1977 that would make him 27 years old in 2004 when the plane crashed. I don&#8217;t think that guy looked 27. Anyway no more complaints, I&#8217;m just pumped for next week now to see where some of this is going.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: iwantdesmondshair</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2009/03/18/next-namaste-episode-5x09/comment-page-1/#comment-37153</link>
		<dc:creator>iwantdesmondshair</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 12:27:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/?p=285#comment-37153</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m frustrated with the direction of the show right now, what is everyone goal right now?? I&#039;m as big a fan as they come and I have to say that the next 3 or so episodes might make or break the show for me. I hope they handle the eventual &quot;Sun time travel to see Jin&quot; episode well because I&#039;m so over the time travel aspect of the show. I guess this type of episode needed to happen, I&#039;m just not sure the direction (or lack of) of the show is what I would like to see.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m frustrated with the direction of the show right now, what is everyone goal right now?? I&#8217;m as big a fan as they come and I have to say that the next 3 or so episodes might make or break the show for me. I hope they handle the eventual &#8220;Sun time travel to see Jin&#8221; episode well because I&#8217;m so over the time travel aspect of the show. I guess this type of episode needed to happen, I&#8217;m just not sure the direction (or lack of) of the show is what I would like to see.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: paintergirl1</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2009/03/18/next-namaste-episode-5x09/comment-page-1/#comment-37152</link>
		<dc:creator>paintergirl1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 12:23:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/?p=285#comment-37152</guid>
		<description>Does anyone have a screencap of the girl behind Sun in the barracks?  

How did the others know to create a runway?  Did they somehow know that the Ajira flight would need it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does anyone have a screencap of the girl behind Sun in the barracks?  </p>
<p>How did the others know to create a runway?  Did they somehow know that the Ajira flight would need it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2009/03/18/next-namaste-episode-5x09/comment-page-1/#comment-37151</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 12:09:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/?p=285#comment-37151</guid>
		<description>Robert, Desmond lived in the Swan for three years and Ben either never knew or never cared.  Mikhail had the ability to monitor this station as we saw, but he also never did anything about it.  I&#039;m still not clear as to whether Kelvin was an Other or an original Dharma person.  I&#039;m not sure whether Ben knew about the Swan, but he certainly ignored its sole inhabitant... who oh by the way would turn out to be the son-in-law of his archnemesis.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Robert, Desmond lived in the Swan for three years and Ben either never knew or never cared.  Mikhail had the ability to monitor this station as we saw, but he also never did anything about it.  I&#8217;m still not clear as to whether Kelvin was an Other or an original Dharma person.  I&#8217;m not sure whether Ben knew about the Swan, but he certainly ignored its sole inhabitant&#8230; who oh by the way would turn out to be the son-in-law of his archnemesis.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2009/03/18/next-namaste-episode-5x09/comment-page-1/#comment-37150</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 12:07:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/?p=285#comment-37150</guid>
		<description>Count me among the number who really enjoyed this episode.  You can call it &quot;filler,&quot; but if you read the posts for the last several weeks, we&#039;re all about &quot;is Ben on the island?&quot; and &quot;who&#039;s the baby?&quot; and &quot;why didn&#039;t they show us how the O6 actually get back?&quot; and &quot;who&#039;s on the canoe?&quot;  Just because it wasn&#039;t a mind-blower doesn&#039;t mean it&#039;s a &quot;filler.&quot;  Someone a few episodes back likened Lost to a jigsaw puzzle... the more complete the puzzle is the less surprises we&#039;ll find.  I am impressed by how elegantly all of the pieces have fit together.

Cat, you wrote:
&quot;As someone mentioned above, we need to find out how Ethan went from a darma baby to a hostile and what is with the name.&quot;
Probably the same way Ben did.  There may have been several Dharma folks recruited.  We&#039;ve already seen via Pierre Chang that names aren&#039;t always what they seem.

You also mentioned:
&quot;I was surprised to see young Ben and am a bit concerned that Sawyer, as head of security, didn’t know that young Ben was there.&quot;
I was of the opinion that maybe ironically Ben wound up on the same sub that Jack/Kate/Hurley were on.

I do wonder why Sun didn&#039;t wind up with the other Ajira folks.  The whole thing is becoming very (here&#039;s my hangup again) &quot;Donnie Darko&quot; esque where there seems to be people going back in the past to &quot;influence&quot; the future.  I&#039;m intrigued to see how this all plays out.  

As much as I like LaFleur Sawyer, Jack (Hurley?) does have a point... they&#039;ve had a comfortable life but if the Incident and Purge happen, that&#039;s not saying much.  And yet Jack for all his struggles to get home winds up on the island 30 years earlier (when his father was likely his age, and perhaps involved with the island as welll...).

I wonder whether Ben&#039;s list of &quot;the good people&quot; and compulsion for tracking down the 815 survivors will relate to his time with Dharma and whose names he remembers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Count me among the number who really enjoyed this episode.  You can call it &#8220;filler,&#8221; but if you read the posts for the last several weeks, we&#8217;re all about &#8220;is Ben on the island?&#8221; and &#8220;who&#8217;s the baby?&#8221; and &#8220;why didn&#8217;t they show us how the O6 actually get back?&#8221; and &#8220;who&#8217;s on the canoe?&#8221;  Just because it wasn&#8217;t a mind-blower doesn&#8217;t mean it&#8217;s a &#8220;filler.&#8221;  Someone a few episodes back likened Lost to a jigsaw puzzle&#8230; the more complete the puzzle is the less surprises we&#8217;ll find.  I am impressed by how elegantly all of the pieces have fit together.</p>
<p>Cat, you wrote:<br />
&#8220;As someone mentioned above, we need to find out how Ethan went from a darma baby to a hostile and what is with the name.&#8221;<br />
Probably the same way Ben did.  There may have been several Dharma folks recruited.  We&#8217;ve already seen via Pierre Chang that names aren&#8217;t always what they seem.</p>
<p>You also mentioned:<br />
&#8220;I was surprised to see young Ben and am a bit concerned that Sawyer, as head of security, didn’t know that young Ben was there.&#8221;<br />
I was of the opinion that maybe ironically Ben wound up on the same sub that Jack/Kate/Hurley were on.</p>
<p>I do wonder why Sun didn&#8217;t wind up with the other Ajira folks.  The whole thing is becoming very (here&#8217;s my hangup again) &#8220;Donnie Darko&#8221; esque where there seems to be people going back in the past to &#8220;influence&#8221; the future.  I&#8217;m intrigued to see how this all plays out.  </p>
<p>As much as I like LaFleur Sawyer, Jack (Hurley?) does have a point&#8230; they&#8217;ve had a comfortable life but if the Incident and Purge happen, that&#8217;s not saying much.  And yet Jack for all his struggles to get home winds up on the island 30 years earlier (when his father was likely his age, and perhaps involved with the island as welll&#8230;).</p>
<p>I wonder whether Ben&#8217;s list of &#8220;the good people&#8221; and compulsion for tracking down the 815 survivors will relate to his time with Dharma and whose names he remembers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2009/03/18/next-namaste-episode-5x09/comment-page-1/#comment-37149</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 12:06:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/?p=285#comment-37149</guid>
		<description>&quot;I also love that he must have been ultimately successful in hiding The Swan from the “Others,” affirming that its existence was indeed a mystery to Ben and friends when we first found it in Season One.&quot;     I must disagree with this thought. It was shown that Ben and Juliet knew about the Swan when they were shown in the Pearl station, which monitored the Swan. Also, Radzinski inferred that they were planning on hiding the Swan from the Hostiles, which they more than likely did. However, Ben was not a hostile. He was a part of the Dharma Intitiative, and as such had the chance to know of the Swan before they did the purge. And once the purge was performed, Ben and the hostiles had all the time they needed to go thru Dharma files to gather all the information they wanted about the different Dharma stations.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I also love that he must have been ultimately successful in hiding The Swan from the “Others,” affirming that its existence was indeed a mystery to Ben and friends when we first found it in Season One.&#8221;     I must disagree with this thought. It was shown that Ben and Juliet knew about the Swan when they were shown in the Pearl station, which monitored the Swan. Also, Radzinski inferred that they were planning on hiding the Swan from the Hostiles, which they more than likely did. However, Ben was not a hostile. He was a part of the Dharma Intitiative, and as such had the chance to know of the Swan before they did the purge. And once the purge was performed, Ben and the hostiles had all the time they needed to go thru Dharma files to gather all the information they wanted about the different Dharma stations.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lydia from Massachusetts</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2009/03/18/next-namaste-episode-5x09/comment-page-1/#comment-37148</link>
		<dc:creator>Lydia from Massachusetts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 11:32:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/?p=285#comment-37148</guid>
		<description>Oh, I had to add that Young Ben&#039;s facial expression when we first saw him last night reminded me so much of Old Ben!  Well done!  (As well, I thought Teen Locke had many of the mannerisms of Old Locke last season.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, I had to add that Young Ben&#8217;s facial expression when we first saw him last night reminded me so much of Old Ben!  Well done!  (As well, I thought Teen Locke had many of the mannerisms of Old Locke last season.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lydia from Massachusetts</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2009/03/18/next-namaste-episode-5x09/comment-page-1/#comment-37147</link>
		<dc:creator>Lydia from Massachusetts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 11:29:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/?p=285#comment-37147</guid>
		<description>Jeff in Azusa brings up something I have been wondering about too -- why did the New Arrivals room look like it had never been re-occupied when Sun and Frank Lapidus were in it?  I had the same feeling when Cesar was in the room with the maps near the crash site.  The desk with the skull on it looked like it was abandoned much earlier than 2004.  I wonder if this is an indication that the past on the island was changed.  Maybe The Purge didn&#039;t happen and something else did that prevented The Others from occupying the Dharma compound?  Hmm.

Another thing nagging me is the &quot;war&quot; that Widmore told Locke is coming.  Everybody on message boards seems to think this refers to a war between Ben and Widmore or Dharma and The Others, but I am wondering if it is something much bigger than that.  I wonder if it ties into the repeated statements of &quot;God help us all.&quot;   Could there be a much bigger, world war coming?  Could it be a holy war - religion-based?  Or a nuclear war?

I like Claudia&#039;s idea of Pierre Chang&#039;s baby being baby Sun.  I thought the baby&#039;s mother looked a little like Sun, in fact, and if Sun&#039;s already on the island in 1977 that does seem like it could explain why she didn&#039;t flash to that time with the other 815ers on 316.

(Oh, and I had a hard time with the opening scene of the crash seeing as I am flying somewhere tomorrow!  I avoided the show altogether for the first season and a half because I didn&#039;t want to watch anything to do with a plane crash!)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jeff in Azusa brings up something I have been wondering about too &#8212; why did the New Arrivals room look like it had never been re-occupied when Sun and Frank Lapidus were in it?  I had the same feeling when Cesar was in the room with the maps near the crash site.  The desk with the skull on it looked like it was abandoned much earlier than 2004.  I wonder if this is an indication that the past on the island was changed.  Maybe The Purge didn&#8217;t happen and something else did that prevented The Others from occupying the Dharma compound?  Hmm.</p>
<p>Another thing nagging me is the &#8220;war&#8221; that Widmore told Locke is coming.  Everybody on message boards seems to think this refers to a war between Ben and Widmore or Dharma and The Others, but I am wondering if it is something much bigger than that.  I wonder if it ties into the repeated statements of &#8220;God help us all.&#8221;   Could there be a much bigger, world war coming?  Could it be a holy war &#8211; religion-based?  Or a nuclear war?</p>
<p>I like Claudia&#8217;s idea of Pierre Chang&#8217;s baby being baby Sun.  I thought the baby&#8217;s mother looked a little like Sun, in fact, and if Sun&#8217;s already on the island in 1977 that does seem like it could explain why she didn&#8217;t flash to that time with the other 815ers on 316.</p>
<p>(Oh, and I had a hard time with the opening scene of the crash seeing as I am flying somewhere tomorrow!  I avoided the show altogether for the first season and a half because I didn&#8217;t want to watch anything to do with a plane crash!)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rebecca in Copenhagen</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2009/03/18/next-namaste-episode-5x09/comment-page-1/#comment-37146</link>
		<dc:creator>Rebecca in Copenhagen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 11:19:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/?p=285#comment-37146</guid>
		<description>PS - Also wanted to point out that we&#039;ve heard the code 14-J before, in &quot;The Shape of Things to Come&quot; after Alex is taken by Keamy and Co. and has to disarm the sonic fence...she enters the numbers 16 23 and then the phone rings in Ben&#039;s house, where Locke answers it and hears a recorded voice saying &quot;Code 14-J&quot; over and over. Just wanted to add that :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>PS &#8211; Also wanted to point out that we&#8217;ve heard the code 14-J before, in &#8220;The Shape of Things to Come&#8221; after Alex is taken by Keamy and Co. and has to disarm the sonic fence&#8230;she enters the numbers 16 23 and then the phone rings in Ben&#8217;s house, where Locke answers it and hears a recorded voice saying &#8220;Code 14-J&#8221; over and over. Just wanted to add that <img src='http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rebecca in Copenhagen</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2009/03/18/next-namaste-episode-5x09/comment-page-1/#comment-37145</link>
		<dc:creator>Rebecca in Copenhagen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 11:04:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/?p=285#comment-37145</guid>
		<description>Am I the only one that was a little disappointed that Sun, Lapidus and Ben didn&#039;t encounter Locke on the beach before running off into the jungle? You would think that when Frank gathered everyone around him to make a few announcements that Locke would have been a part of it. That interaction would have been such a satisfying mind freak!

I did like the episode, though - whether or not it was more of a set-up, I think there were some great moments. Young Ben was indeed super-creepy. I&#039;m wondering about the timeline with him - Is his meeting with Sayid before or after his conversation with long-haired Richard in the jungle? I wouldn&#039;t be surprised if his interest in Sayid is based on his desire to join the Others and free himself of his father&#039;s judgment and resentment...

I do love that Sawyer is the second person to comment on Jack&#039;s fashion choices - in 316, Kate sees Christian&#039;s shoes and assumes that he&#039;ll be wearing them on the plane (&quot;Wouldn&#039;t hiking boots be a better choice?&quot;) and then when Sawyer is passing around outfits to the &quot;new recruits&quot;, he tells Jack that a suit is &quot;not exactly Island wear&quot; - Classic!

One more thought, though - It did bother me a little that after three years and everything these characters have been through, Jack and Sawyer couldn&#039;t help returning to their old dynamic like, as soon as they meet again. Sawyer asks how Locke died, and Jack brushes it off saying &quot;it doesn&#039;t matter&quot; - Sawyer says he &quot;has the work assignments covered&quot; and Jack ends up being a janitor - Jack challenges Sawyer for authority only to have Sawyer put him right back in his place...I don&#039;t know, I&#039;m just so tired of that. Though I would certainly take Sawyer&#039;s improvising over Jack&#039;s planning any day...

Best line of the episode was Ben&#039;s &quot;How&#039;d that work out for everyone?&quot; after Frank reminds Sun that he came on a boat full of commandos whose only mission was to get Ben.
Too funny :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Am I the only one that was a little disappointed that Sun, Lapidus and Ben didn&#8217;t encounter Locke on the beach before running off into the jungle? You would think that when Frank gathered everyone around him to make a few announcements that Locke would have been a part of it. That interaction would have been such a satisfying mind freak!</p>
<p>I did like the episode, though &#8211; whether or not it was more of a set-up, I think there were some great moments. Young Ben was indeed super-creepy. I&#8217;m wondering about the timeline with him &#8211; Is his meeting with Sayid before or after his conversation with long-haired Richard in the jungle? I wouldn&#8217;t be surprised if his interest in Sayid is based on his desire to join the Others and free himself of his father&#8217;s judgment and resentment&#8230;</p>
<p>I do love that Sawyer is the second person to comment on Jack&#8217;s fashion choices &#8211; in 316, Kate sees Christian&#8217;s shoes and assumes that he&#8217;ll be wearing them on the plane (&#8220;Wouldn&#8217;t hiking boots be a better choice?&#8221;) and then when Sawyer is passing around outfits to the &#8220;new recruits&#8221;, he tells Jack that a suit is &#8220;not exactly Island wear&#8221; &#8211; Classic!</p>
<p>One more thought, though &#8211; It did bother me a little that after three years and everything these characters have been through, Jack and Sawyer couldn&#8217;t help returning to their old dynamic like, as soon as they meet again. Sawyer asks how Locke died, and Jack brushes it off saying &#8220;it doesn&#8217;t matter&#8221; &#8211; Sawyer says he &#8220;has the work assignments covered&#8221; and Jack ends up being a janitor &#8211; Jack challenges Sawyer for authority only to have Sawyer put him right back in his place&#8230;I don&#8217;t know, I&#8217;m just so tired of that. Though I would certainly take Sawyer&#8217;s improvising over Jack&#8217;s planning any day&#8230;</p>
<p>Best line of the episode was Ben&#8217;s &#8220;How&#8217;d that work out for everyone?&#8221; after Frank reminds Sun that he came on a boat full of commandos whose only mission was to get Ben.<br />
Too funny <img src='http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cat</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2009/03/18/next-namaste-episode-5x09/comment-page-1/#comment-37144</link>
		<dc:creator>cat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 10:56:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/?p=285#comment-37144</guid>
		<description>Interesting episode but definately a filler.  Why Sun was the only one of the Oceanic 6 that did not flash to the 70s is intriguing.  Perhaps it is as simple as Mrs. Hawking saying that if they didn&#039;t all go back, things could get disrupted.

As someone mentioned above, we need to find out how Ethan went from a darma baby to a hostile and what is with the name.

I was surprised to see young Ben and am a bit concerned that Sawyer, as head of security, didn&#039;t know that young Ben was there.  

The Swan construction was very interesting.  Radzinsky - the scientist who goes nuts.  Painting the map on the ceiling and making edits to the orientation film perhaps?  Before he goes nuts and kills himself?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting episode but definately a filler.  Why Sun was the only one of the Oceanic 6 that did not flash to the 70s is intriguing.  Perhaps it is as simple as Mrs. Hawking saying that if they didn&#8217;t all go back, things could get disrupted.</p>
<p>As someone mentioned above, we need to find out how Ethan went from a darma baby to a hostile and what is with the name.</p>
<p>I was surprised to see young Ben and am a bit concerned that Sawyer, as head of security, didn&#8217;t know that young Ben was there.  </p>
<p>The Swan construction was very interesting.  Radzinsky &#8211; the scientist who goes nuts.  Painting the map on the ceiling and making edits to the orientation film perhaps?  Before he goes nuts and kills himself?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Knives Monroe</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2009/03/18/next-namaste-episode-5x09/comment-page-1/#comment-37143</link>
		<dc:creator>Knives Monroe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 08:42:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/?p=285#comment-37143</guid>
		<description>You are right, thank you for pointing that out! :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are right, thank you for pointing that out! <img src='http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: carmel</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2009/03/18/next-namaste-episode-5x09/comment-page-1/#comment-37142</link>
		<dc:creator>carmel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 08:30:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/?p=285#comment-37142</guid>
		<description>To Jeff and Knives: Ajira flight did land in 2007. we&#039;re so invested in the little hidden details we forget to check the big flashy signs, like a transition subtitle that says &quot;30 years ago&quot; before moving back to Dharma time... :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To Jeff and Knives: Ajira flight did land in 2007. we&#8217;re so invested in the little hidden details we forget to check the big flashy signs, like a transition subtitle that says &#8220;30 years ago&#8221; before moving back to Dharma time&#8230; <img src='http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew from San Francisco</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2009/03/18/next-namaste-episode-5x09/comment-page-1/#comment-37141</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew from San Francisco</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 07:50:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/?p=285#comment-37141</guid>
		<description>Hi,
Great podcast, great episode.  A lot to talk about, but I wanna focus on baby Ethan.  The question is how does Ethan become an Other.  My guess is that Paul isn&#039;t dead, at least not anymore.  I believe that Paul is actually the father of Ethan.  Richard wanted his body so he could resurrect Paul, who the became a hostile.  If he didn&#039;t father Ethan, at the very least he might one day raise him as his own, at which point he&#039;ll take his father&#039;s last name, Rom.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,<br />
Great podcast, great episode.  A lot to talk about, but I wanna focus on baby Ethan.  The question is how does Ethan become an Other.  My guess is that Paul isn&#8217;t dead, at least not anymore.  I believe that Paul is actually the father of Ethan.  Richard wanted his body so he could resurrect Paul, who the became a hostile.  If he didn&#8217;t father Ethan, at the very least he might one day raise him as his own, at which point he&#8217;ll take his father&#8217;s last name, Rom.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Knives Monroe</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2009/03/18/next-namaste-episode-5x09/comment-page-1/#comment-37140</link>
		<dc:creator>Knives Monroe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 07:45:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/?p=285#comment-37140</guid>
		<description>Oh! And lets give the Runway they began building in Early Season 3 some credit, as it came to fruition in &#039;Namaste&#039;. I now forever, and for always until this series ends, believe that we are in for an amazing journey and the destination will be very very rewarding!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh! And lets give the Runway they began building in Early Season 3 some credit, as it came to fruition in &#8216;Namaste&#8217;. I now forever, and for always until this series ends, believe that we are in for an amazing journey and the destination will be very very rewarding!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Knives Monroe</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2009/03/18/next-namaste-episode-5x09/comment-page-1/#comment-37139</link>
		<dc:creator>Knives Monroe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 07:43:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/?p=285#comment-37139</guid>
		<description>************************
Regarding Rose and Bernard:

If you go back to the Season 3 Episode &#039;Not In Portland&#039;, there is a scene in which Carl is in Room 23... If you look at the video he is being forced to watch BACKWARDS its actually English, and if you read it the Anagram says, 

&quot;Only fools are enslaved by space and time&quot; If you read it as a anagram it says,
&quot;Bones of Nadlers may lay lost deep in cave&quot;

To me this indicates that Rose and Bernard are indeed our Adam and Eve, being that Nadler is their last name! The stones they had with them can indicate one another. How they came to be there, is something I wonder if we will find out.

*****************************

Looks like our Producers, and Writers kind of knew what they were getting themselves into after all :)

xxxWest-Sayidxxx</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>************************<br />
Regarding Rose and Bernard:</p>
<p>If you go back to the Season 3 Episode &#8216;Not In Portland&#8217;, there is a scene in which Carl is in Room 23&#8230; If you look at the video he is being forced to watch BACKWARDS its actually English, and if you read it the Anagram says, </p>
<p>&#8220;Only fools are enslaved by space and time&#8221; If you read it as a anagram it says,<br />
&#8220;Bones of Nadlers may lay lost deep in cave&#8221;</p>
<p>To me this indicates that Rose and Bernard are indeed our Adam and Eve, being that Nadler is their last name! The stones they had with them can indicate one another. How they came to be there, is something I wonder if we will find out.</p>
<p>*****************************</p>
<p>Looks like our Producers, and Writers kind of knew what they were getting themselves into after all <img src='http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>xxxWest-Sayidxxx</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Claudia</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2009/03/18/next-namaste-episode-5x09/comment-page-1/#comment-37138</link>
		<dc:creator>Claudia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 07:29:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/?p=285#comment-37138</guid>
		<description>Hi Ryan and Jen,
Hello from sunny Los Angeles.

Love the podcast. Long time listener first time posting.
What was up with that image that we saw behind Sun?
It makes sense in a lost sort of way if it is Claire, after all we assume that she has been with her father this whole time. I also have to wonder why Sun did not travel back like the rest. The thing that comes to mind is if you kind of think about it Ben didn’t go back in time when there is a young Ben on the island. Charlotte&#039;s body disappears and there is a young Charlotte in the 70&#039;s. I am starting to think that maybe Sun could have been the child we saw early on in the season with Dr. candle ( or whatever his name is. ) Maybe there is no way that they can interact with one another there for cannot be in the same time line. I know that we saw Locke in 2007 in the same time line as Locke in 2004 so this maybe a far stretch but we will have to see. Also I have never been a Sawyer fan but I like this new Sawyer the one thing that I don’t like is that we have seen in the past that when our losties  are redeemed they die so I don’t want sawyer to be a complete hero. One more thing I am starting to suspect that they are going to wrap up the Rose and Bernard story in a neat little package as they did with Rousseau, I think that it is obvious 
That they are the ones in the caves our Adam and Eve. The black and white rock I think that since they had already lived there they went back and they eventually die. Well that’s all for now. Keep up the good work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Ryan and Jen,<br />
Hello from sunny Los Angeles.</p>
<p>Love the podcast. Long time listener first time posting.<br />
What was up with that image that we saw behind Sun?<br />
It makes sense in a lost sort of way if it is Claire, after all we assume that she has been with her father this whole time. I also have to wonder why Sun did not travel back like the rest. The thing that comes to mind is if you kind of think about it Ben didn’t go back in time when there is a young Ben on the island. Charlotte&#8217;s body disappears and there is a young Charlotte in the 70&#8242;s. I am starting to think that maybe Sun could have been the child we saw early on in the season with Dr. candle ( or whatever his name is. ) Maybe there is no way that they can interact with one another there for cannot be in the same time line. I know that we saw Locke in 2007 in the same time line as Locke in 2004 so this maybe a far stretch but we will have to see. Also I have never been a Sawyer fan but I like this new Sawyer the one thing that I don’t like is that we have seen in the past that when our losties  are redeemed they die so I don’t want sawyer to be a complete hero. One more thing I am starting to suspect that they are going to wrap up the Rose and Bernard story in a neat little package as they did with Rousseau, I think that it is obvious<br />
That they are the ones in the caves our Adam and Eve. The black and white rock I think that since they had already lived there they went back and they eventually die. Well that’s all for now. Keep up the good work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Connie in Alaska</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2009/03/18/next-namaste-episode-5x09/comment-page-1/#comment-37137</link>
		<dc:creator>Connie in Alaska</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 07:19:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/?p=285#comment-37137</guid>
		<description>@Jeff-perhaps the 815ers prevent the purge?  I had the same thought about the barracks...something is missing here.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Jeff-perhaps the 815ers prevent the purge?  I had the same thought about the barracks&#8230;something is missing here.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Knives Monroe</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2009/03/18/next-namaste-episode-5x09/comment-page-1/#comment-37136</link>
		<dc:creator>Knives Monroe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 07:05:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/?p=285#comment-37136</guid>
		<description>Very observant and very authentic. You may have something there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very observant and very authentic. You may have something there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff in Azusa, CA</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2009/03/18/next-namaste-episode-5x09/comment-page-1/#comment-37135</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff in Azusa, CA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 06:53:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/?p=285#comment-37135</guid>
		<description>One thought:

If my island history is correct, the barracks were built and used by the dharma initiative, but after the purge, they were eventually taken over by the &quot;hostiles&quot; or &quot;others&quot; and it became othersville. Later the others abandoned othersville, and locke and his group moved in and it became eggtown. Over the years different groups have moved into the barracks and made it their own.

In this episode, we see Sun and Lapidus enter the barracks and it felt really strange. like a ghost town. And the strangest part was when they went into the new arrivals orientation room. It didn&#039;t look like a room that had gone through 30+ years of use, with several different owners. It looked like it had been left exactly the way it was when the DI were purged, and then just left that way to rot. Complete with 30 year old photos on the wall and welcome signs still swinging in the breeze.

I had been thinking that Sun, Lapidus, Ben and the rest of flight 316 stayed in 2008 while the O6 (minus Sun) flashed into the past. But when the turbulence started it was night, and when they started to crash, it was suddenly day. That and the distinct &quot;ghost town&quot; feeling makes me wonder. What year are the 316ers in?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One thought:</p>
<p>If my island history is correct, the barracks were built and used by the dharma initiative, but after the purge, they were eventually taken over by the &#8220;hostiles&#8221; or &#8220;others&#8221; and it became othersville. Later the others abandoned othersville, and locke and his group moved in and it became eggtown. Over the years different groups have moved into the barracks and made it their own.</p>
<p>In this episode, we see Sun and Lapidus enter the barracks and it felt really strange. like a ghost town. And the strangest part was when they went into the new arrivals orientation room. It didn&#8217;t look like a room that had gone through 30+ years of use, with several different owners. It looked like it had been left exactly the way it was when the DI were purged, and then just left that way to rot. Complete with 30 year old photos on the wall and welcome signs still swinging in the breeze.</p>
<p>I had been thinking that Sun, Lapidus, Ben and the rest of flight 316 stayed in 2008 while the O6 (minus Sun) flashed into the past. But when the turbulence started it was night, and when they started to crash, it was suddenly day. That and the distinct &#8220;ghost town&#8221; feeling makes me wonder. What year are the 316ers in?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Luke in California</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2009/03/18/next-namaste-episode-5x09/comment-page-1/#comment-37134</link>
		<dc:creator>Luke in California</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 06:36:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/?p=285#comment-37134</guid>
		<description>Hi everyone. So I thought tonight&#039;s episode was actually really strong, for a connecting episode. We are, obviously, still waiting for things back on the Island of 1977 to kick into high gear, but the acting last week and tonight has really carried the episodes. Loved the appearances of baby Ethan and teenage Ben, of course, but I also thought the moments we were already expecting were really well done. We knew, for example, that Sayid would make his appearance, but the way Sawyer and Jin dealt with it was engaging and believable. Great, creepy stuff from Christian, as well.

My only concern with the way things are going is that, for the moment at least, the Losties have no direction. There is no crisis, no mission, and while it&#039;s understandable, it puts them in a very risky position in terms of the story. Even in next week&#039;s preview, there is little to indicate much in the way of plot advancement; rather, we just see more of the same dissension and relational conflict that they&#039;ve been struggling with all along. Sure, that&#039;s a large part of what makes the show so great, but as it stands, nobody has any clue why they had to return or what the next step is. And no matter how much thinking Sawyer does, it&#039;s still not going to reveal their reason for being there. Daniel or Christian may help with that. The &quot;war&quot; predicted by Widmore will undoubtedly bring some focus back, and I have full faith in the writers to keep things interesting. Just thought I&#039;d mention it, though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi everyone. So I thought tonight&#8217;s episode was actually really strong, for a connecting episode. We are, obviously, still waiting for things back on the Island of 1977 to kick into high gear, but the acting last week and tonight has really carried the episodes. Loved the appearances of baby Ethan and teenage Ben, of course, but I also thought the moments we were already expecting were really well done. We knew, for example, that Sayid would make his appearance, but the way Sawyer and Jin dealt with it was engaging and believable. Great, creepy stuff from Christian, as well.</p>
<p>My only concern with the way things are going is that, for the moment at least, the Losties have no direction. There is no crisis, no mission, and while it&#8217;s understandable, it puts them in a very risky position in terms of the story. Even in next week&#8217;s preview, there is little to indicate much in the way of plot advancement; rather, we just see more of the same dissension and relational conflict that they&#8217;ve been struggling with all along. Sure, that&#8217;s a large part of what makes the show so great, but as it stands, nobody has any clue why they had to return or what the next step is. And no matter how much thinking Sawyer does, it&#8217;s still not going to reveal their reason for being there. Daniel or Christian may help with that. The &#8220;war&#8221; predicted by Widmore will undoubtedly bring some focus back, and I have full faith in the writers to keep things interesting. Just thought I&#8217;d mention it, though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Knives Monroe</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2009/03/18/next-namaste-episode-5x09/comment-page-1/#comment-37133</link>
		<dc:creator>Knives Monroe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 06:00:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/?p=285#comment-37133</guid>
		<description>To answer your question Connie:

I&#039;d like to think so. And Yes Ethan was huge. Who&#039;s to say that Ethan was telling the truth about his last name &quot;Rom&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To answer your question Connie:</p>
<p>I&#8217;d like to think so. And Yes Ethan was huge. Who&#8217;s to say that Ethan was telling the truth about his last name &#8220;Rom&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Connie in Alaska</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2009/03/18/next-namaste-episode-5x09/comment-page-1/#comment-37132</link>
		<dc:creator>Connie in Alaska</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 05:49:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/?p=285#comment-37132</guid>
		<description>Do you think Jack with get to know Roger Linus since he is in the Workman group now?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do you think Jack with get to know Roger Linus since he is in the Workman group now?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
