Comments on: Trans 2008-02-15: “The Economist” - Episode 4-03 http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2008/02/16/trans-2008-02-15-the-economist-episode-4-03/ A fan podcast focused on ABC's hit TV series, "Lost." Sun, 07 Sep 2008 18:34:46 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6 By: Muddy http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2008/02/16/trans-2008-02-15-the-economist-episode-4-03/#comment-33554 Muddy Thu, 21 Feb 2008 21:14:31 +0000 http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2008/02/16/trans-2008-02-15-the-economist-episode-4-03/#comment-33554 Thanks for the podcast... you have been and always will be the best. Thanks for the podcast… you have been and always will be the best.

]]> By: Joe in TX http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2008/02/16/trans-2008-02-15-the-economist-episode-4-03/#comment-33548 Joe in TX Tue, 19 Feb 2008 18:01:27 +0000 http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2008/02/16/trans-2008-02-15-the-economist-episode-4-03/#comment-33548 I too say thanks for resurrecting the podcast!! I'm a long time listener! BTW, I don't mind if you guys spend more than 8 minutes in the Recap section! ;) I like to take you guys along on my iPod during some of my runs! :) I too say thanks for resurrecting the podcast!! I’m a long time listener! BTW, I don’t mind if you guys spend more than 8 minutes in the Recap section! ;)

I like to take you guys along on my iPod during some of my runs! :)

]]> By: Julie http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2008/02/16/trans-2008-02-15-the-economist-episode-4-03/#comment-33547 Julie Tue, 19 Feb 2008 17:10:24 +0000 http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2008/02/16/trans-2008-02-15-the-economist-episode-4-03/#comment-33547 Thanks for bringing back the pod cast!!!! I am a first time listener and you guys are awsome!!!!! I'll be listening every week. Thanks for bringing back the pod cast!!!! I am a first time listener and you guys are awsome!!!!! I’ll be listening every week.

]]> By: cat http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2008/02/16/trans-2008-02-15-the-economist-episode-4-03/#comment-33544 cat Tue, 19 Feb 2008 00:31:28 +0000 http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2008/02/16/trans-2008-02-15-the-economist-episode-4-03/#comment-33544 Ryan and Jen, any thoughts as to the "dog" sightings? Vincent obviously has a connection with Jack's father and there was a picture on Jacob's wall and in the Economist, there is a shot of a dog in the vet clinc. I'm sure this all connected but am at a bit of a loss to understand what it all means? Maybe Vincent travels through the space time continum? Insights appreciated! Ryan and Jen, any thoughts as to the “dog” sightings? Vincent obviously has a connection with Jack’s father and there was a picture on Jacob’s wall and in the Economist, there is a shot of a dog in the vet clinc. I’m sure this all connected but am at a bit of a loss to understand what it all means? Maybe Vincent travels through the space time continum? Insights appreciated!

]]> By: Halley http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2008/02/16/trans-2008-02-15-the-economist-episode-4-03/#comment-33541 Halley Mon, 18 Feb 2008 16:40:02 +0000 http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2008/02/16/trans-2008-02-15-the-economist-episode-4-03/#comment-33541 MAANNN. This has bothered me ever since the second episode when we first meet Daniel Faraday. Jack, Kate, and Daniel stumble upon gas masks and other radioactive materials. Isn't that what Ben used to kill of Dharma? I haven't heard anyone talking about this, but it's something to think about. Maybe the Freighter Four are there to seek revenge on Ben for what he did to the Dharma Initiative. MAANNN.
This has bothered me ever since the second episode when we first meet Daniel Faraday.
Jack, Kate, and Daniel stumble upon gas masks and other radioactive materials.
Isn’t that what Ben used to kill of Dharma?
I haven’t heard anyone talking about this, but it’s something to think about.
Maybe the Freighter Four are there to seek revenge on Ben for what he did to the Dharma Initiative.

]]> By: George http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2008/02/16/trans-2008-02-15-the-economist-episode-4-03/#comment-33540 George Mon, 18 Feb 2008 07:19:01 +0000 http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2008/02/16/trans-2008-02-15-the-economist-episode-4-03/#comment-33540 I'm so excited that you are back to the podcast... I started watching Lost after the first season (caught up on iTunes) and it was your podcast that got me to really enjoy the show. I love the HawaiiUP podcast also. Thanks again for the return to the airwaves. I’m so excited that you are back to the podcast… I started watching Lost after the first season (caught up on iTunes) and it was your podcast that got me to really enjoy the show. I love the HawaiiUP podcast also.

Thanks again for the return to the airwaves.

]]> By: jarofclay73 http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2008/02/16/trans-2008-02-15-the-economist-episode-4-03/#comment-33537 jarofclay73 Sun, 17 Feb 2008 20:11:15 +0000 http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2008/02/16/trans-2008-02-15-the-economist-episode-4-03/#comment-33537 Jen, If it's any consolation, I'm also a "Skater", but for different reasons. I feel that if Jack gets romantically involved with anyone on the island, it should be Juliet. It seems like there is a bond and chemistry with Juliet that Jack never had with Kate. And, evidently, bearded Jack is no longer hot to Kate in the future. I think Kate's bond with Sawyer was solidified early in Season 3. No matter how many times they fight, they end up back with each other. And it seems like her relationship with Sawyer is the least dysfunctional. So, Jack ends up with Juliet and Kate ends up with Sawyer. Everyone's happy right? Jen,

If it’s any consolation, I’m also a “Skater”, but for different reasons.

I feel that if Jack gets romantically involved with anyone on the island, it should be Juliet. It seems like there is a bond and chemistry with Juliet that Jack never had with Kate. And, evidently, bearded Jack is no longer hot to Kate in the future.

I think Kate’s bond with Sawyer was solidified early in Season 3. No matter how many times they fight, they end up back with each other. And it seems like her relationship with Sawyer is the least dysfunctional.

So, Jack ends up with Juliet and Kate ends up with Sawyer. Everyone’s happy right?

]]> By: jarofclay73 http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2008/02/16/trans-2008-02-15-the-economist-episode-4-03/#comment-33536 jarofclay73 Sun, 17 Feb 2008 19:52:09 +0000 http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2008/02/16/trans-2008-02-15-the-economist-episode-4-03/#comment-33536 Hey, it's Clayton from KITV! Glad to hear you again! While the Official Lost Podcast is currently now a video podcast with features that I expect to find in a future DVD set, we all know we can get our fix here instead. I wonder if the writers strike included podcasts? As for the time anomaly, the only thing we learned from the experiment is that there is 31 minutes of unaccounted time for the payload. The payload clock thinks time is 31 minutes ahead of the actual (or island) time. That doesn't necessarily mean it took the payload 31 minutes to get there, although I wouldn't rule that theory out either. Daniel Faraday also told Frank to stay on the same bearing no matter what. The last time we heard something like that is when Ben told Michael to stay on a certain bearing and he would find rescue. So, for some odd reason, if you can't stay on a certain bearing, you can't sail or fly away or to the island. That's also backed up by Michael and Sawyer seemingly to float back to the island on the raft and Desmond who can't seem to sail away from the island. Hey, it’s Clayton from KITV! Glad to hear you again! While the Official Lost Podcast is currently now a video podcast with features that I expect to find in a future DVD set, we all know we can get our fix here instead. I wonder if the writers strike included podcasts?

As for the time anomaly, the only thing we learned from the experiment is that there is 31 minutes of unaccounted time for the payload. The payload clock thinks time is 31 minutes ahead of the actual (or island) time. That doesn’t necessarily mean it took the payload 31 minutes to get there, although I wouldn’t rule that theory out either.

Daniel Faraday also told Frank to stay on the same bearing no matter what. The last time we heard something like that is when Ben told Michael to stay on a certain bearing and he would find rescue. So, for some odd reason, if you can’t stay on a certain bearing, you can’t sail or fly away or to the island. That’s also backed up by Michael and Sawyer seemingly to float back to the island on the raft and Desmond who can’t seem to sail away from the island.

]]> By: Pali http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2008/02/16/trans-2008-02-15-the-economist-episode-4-03/#comment-33535 Pali Sun, 17 Feb 2008 18:51:55 +0000 http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2008/02/16/trans-2008-02-15-the-economist-episode-4-03/#comment-33535 SWEEEEEET! thanks for another great podcast... Ryan, you are now my 'pusher' of all things lost :) damn this waiting another 6 days for the next episode!!! thanks again for coming back you two. SWEEEEEET! thanks for another great podcast… Ryan, you are now my ‘pusher’ of all things lost :)

damn this waiting another 6 days for the next episode!!!

thanks again for coming back you two.

]]> By: guest http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2008/02/16/trans-2008-02-15-the-economist-episode-4-03/#comment-33534 guest Sun, 17 Feb 2008 13:56:43 +0000 http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2008/02/16/trans-2008-02-15-the-economist-episode-4-03/#comment-33534 thanks for the show. Since I live in europe I recongized some of Bens money as EURO, which exist since 2001 ( i think). thanks for the show.
Since I live in europe I recongized some of Bens money as EURO, which exist since 2001 ( i think).

]]> By: Debudavid http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2008/02/16/trans-2008-02-15-the-economist-episode-4-03/#comment-33531 Debudavid Sun, 17 Feb 2008 03:22:09 +0000 http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2008/02/16/trans-2008-02-15-the-economist-episode-4-03/#comment-33531 once again many thanks for a great show! once again many thanks for a great show!

]]> By: tvscifi.com http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2008/02/16/trans-2008-02-15-the-economist-episode-4-03/#comment-33525 tvscifi.com Sat, 16 Feb 2008 19:16:32 +0000 http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2008/02/16/trans-2008-02-15-the-economist-episode-4-03/#comment-33525 You mentioned in the podcast that it isn't clear why Locke gave Sayid Charlotte when he didn't have to. But in the episode Sayid told Locke he could get onto the ship, if he brings back Charlotte. Locke gets a little grin on his face. So I think he wants his own spy aboard the ship. You mentioned in the podcast that it isn’t clear why Locke gave Sayid Charlotte when he didn’t have to. But in the episode Sayid told Locke he could get onto the ship, if he brings back Charlotte. Locke gets a little grin on his face. So I think he wants his own spy aboard the ship.

]]> By: Lib4 http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2008/02/16/trans-2008-02-15-the-economist-episode-4-03/#comment-33516 Lib4 Sat, 16 Feb 2008 12:41:33 +0000 http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2008/02/16/trans-2008-02-15-the-economist-episode-4-03/#comment-33516 Love you guys Love the podcast FYI instead of having your readers copy and paste your podcast MP3 link embed this code into your post and we can then click the link to open in a new window. <a HREF="http://media.libsyn.com/media/hawaii/lostcast20080215.mp3" rel="nofollow"> Lostcast20080215</a> <a HREF="http://www.pageresource.com/html/newwin.htm" rel="nofollow"> See here for further info</a> keep up the great work...... Love you guys
Love the podcast

FYI instead of having your readers copy and paste your podcast MP3 link embed this code into your post and we can then click the link to open in a new window.


Lostcast20080215


See here for further info

keep up the great work……

]]>