<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Cost of Living</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2006/11/01/the-cost-of-living/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2006/11/01/the-cost-of-living/</link>
	<description>A fan podcast focused on ABC's hit TV series, "Lost."</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2008 18:30:20 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: You don&#8217;t really need to read this. &#187; LOST Video Podcast</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2006/11/01/the-cost-of-living/#comment-33006</link>
		<dc:creator>You don&#8217;t really need to read this. &#187; LOST Video Podcast</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2007 04:45:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2006/11/01/the-cost-of-living/#comment-33006</guid>
		<description>[...] I would write something about my thoughts on the latest episode of Lost but Ryan from the Transmission seems to have covered most of what I would say: The Cost of Living [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I would write something about my thoughts on the latest episode of Lost but Ryan from the Transmission seems to have covered most of what I would say: The Cost of Living [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Watch Satellite TV on PC</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2006/11/01/the-cost-of-living/#comment-25653</link>
		<dc:creator>Watch Satellite TV on PC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 May 2007 13:54:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2006/11/01/the-cost-of-living/#comment-25653</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Watch Satellite TV on PC...&lt;/strong&gt;

Watch Satellite TV on PC from over 3000 stations with simple software. No messy hardware installation or monthly fee....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Watch Satellite TV on PC&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Watch Satellite TV on PC from over 3000 stations with simple software. No messy hardware installation or monthly fee&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#187; Comment on The Cost of Living by Unlimited Movie Downloads</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2006/11/01/the-cost-of-living/#comment-25447</link>
		<dc:creator>&#187; Comment on The Cost of Living by Unlimited Movie Downloads</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2007 08:54:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2006/11/01/the-cost-of-living/#comment-25447</guid>
		<description>[...] Original post by unknown [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Original post by unknown [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Unlimited Movie Downloads</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2006/11/01/the-cost-of-living/#comment-25441</link>
		<dc:creator>Unlimited Movie Downloads</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 May 2007 03:27:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2006/11/01/the-cost-of-living/#comment-25441</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Unlimited Movie Downloads...&lt;/strong&gt;

 Nice comments. Well, time to take a break and go download some nice...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Unlimited Movie Downloads&#8230;</strong></p>
<p> Nice comments. Well, time to take a break and go download some nice&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: the cost of living :: Newstack</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2006/11/01/the-cost-of-living/#comment-9312</link>
		<dc:creator>the cost of living :: Newstack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Dec 2006 19:27:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2006/11/01/the-cost-of-living/#comment-9312</guid>
		<description>[...] Read more: here [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Read more: here [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: remy</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2006/11/01/the-cost-of-living/#comment-8705</link>
		<dc:creator>remy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Nov 2006 07:49:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2006/11/01/the-cost-of-living/#comment-8705</guid>
		<description>Great guys to read you all digging secret. It make me like the show a bit more. 

But man, I hate these scene of violence!!! How can anyone do not complain about this hate that perspire from the ohters! It has nothing to do with the spirit of the show. I'm disgusted by the hate, the violence,the hypocrisie of the caractere.This is not our show. 

I'm disgusted and about to drop this show that does not go to the direction i liked in the show. Of course the story is complicated, but keep your gun down, put your hate away, take the violence out. Their are nice way to make a show clever. the choose now is simply dumb, stupid, makes me puke of hate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great guys to read you all digging secret. It make me like the show a bit more. </p>
<p>But man, I hate these scene of violence!!! How can anyone do not complain about this hate that perspire from the ohters! It has nothing to do with the spirit of the show. I&#8217;m disgusted by the hate, the violence,the hypocrisie of the caractere.This is not our show. </p>
<p>I&#8217;m disgusted and about to drop this show that does not go to the direction i liked in the show. Of course the story is complicated, but keep your gun down, put your hate away, take the violence out. Their are nice way to make a show clever. the choose now is simply dumb, stupid, makes me puke of hate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2006/11/01/the-cost-of-living/#comment-8503</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Nov 2006 16:30:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2006/11/01/the-cost-of-living/#comment-8503</guid>
		<description>OK, I seem to have interpreted a Locke comment differently than most other people.

When Locke said "Don't I feel stupid" to Nikki discovering the monitors could view other stations, it was because last year, in that rage he was in after viewing the Pearl Orientation film, he thought the Pearl was just watching the Swan, and he was devestated to think his "mission" of pushing the button was just some sort of pschological game. The "stupid" comment I took to mean was, even he hadn't gotten so pissed off, he might ave realized that maybe it wasn't necessarily the Swan the film was talking about, and he might have kept pressing the button, as opposed to what happend in the season 2 finale.

I don't hate the two new characters yet. Im willing to give them the benefit of the doubt for now. Remember, the Lost creators don't introduce anything new without a plan, and I'm sure their flashbacks will makeus understand/like them. We shouldn't hate them just because their introduction was slightly clumsy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK, I seem to have interpreted a Locke comment differently than most other people.</p>
<p>When Locke said &#8220;Don&#8217;t I feel stupid&#8221; to Nikki discovering the monitors could view other stations, it was because last year, in that rage he was in after viewing the Pearl Orientation film, he thought the Pearl was just watching the Swan, and he was devestated to think his &#8220;mission&#8221; of pushing the button was just some sort of pschological game. The &#8220;stupid&#8221; comment I took to mean was, even he hadn&#8217;t gotten so pissed off, he might ave realized that maybe it wasn&#8217;t necessarily the Swan the film was talking about, and he might have kept pressing the button, as opposed to what happend in the season 2 finale.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t hate the two new characters yet. Im willing to give them the benefit of the doubt for now. Remember, the Lost creators don&#8217;t introduce anything new without a plan, and I&#8217;m sure their flashbacks will makeus understand/like them. We shouldn&#8217;t hate them just because their introduction was slightly clumsy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: iAndy</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2006/11/01/the-cost-of-living/#comment-7943</link>
		<dc:creator>iAndy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Nov 2006 00:48:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2006/11/01/the-cost-of-living/#comment-7943</guid>
		<description>Groping for a gestalt here, needing some seriously holistic help to stay focused since the producers are leaving us high and dry for 90+ days.  Gilian Anderson said ...America did not know what TO DO with her... so she went to England.  Will we see 'Skully in "Lost" next year?? Because this thing is clearly an extra-terrestial (sic) Jurassiac Park wherein some of the animals have escaped??</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Groping for a gestalt here, needing some seriously holistic help to stay focused since the producers are leaving us high and dry for 90+ days.  Gilian Anderson said &#8230;America did not know what TO DO with her&#8230; so she went to England.  Will we see &#8216;Skully in &#8220;Lost&#8221; next year?? Because this thing is clearly an extra-terrestial (sic) Jurassiac Park wherein some of the animals have escaped??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SF Lostie</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2006/11/01/the-cost-of-living/#comment-7915</link>
		<dc:creator>SF Lostie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Nov 2006 18:26:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2006/11/01/the-cost-of-living/#comment-7915</guid>
		<description>Here's a longshot theory...Jack said the xrays belong to a 40 year old man...I can't forget that Ben (when he was Henry Gale) said the others came to the camp to find Locke.  Maybe Locke's paralysis was caused by a tumor, and the island hasn't helaed it, but has numbed the pain.  Perhaps Jack is being tricked into operating on Locke for some reason b/c he's some kind of chosen Other.  It sure seems like the Others or the island are luring Locke that way.  

Of course we don't know if Locke's paralysis was a spinal thing though.  Just a thought.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s a longshot theory&#8230;Jack said the xrays belong to a 40 year old man&#8230;I can&#8217;t forget that Ben (when he was Henry Gale) said the others came to the camp to find Locke.  Maybe Locke&#8217;s paralysis was caused by a tumor, and the island hasn&#8217;t helaed it, but has numbed the pain.  Perhaps Jack is being tricked into operating on Locke for some reason b/c he&#8217;s some kind of chosen Other.  It sure seems like the Others or the island are luring Locke that way.  </p>
<p>Of course we don&#8217;t know if Locke&#8217;s paralysis was a spinal thing though.  Just a thought.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex Bock</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2006/11/01/the-cost-of-living/#comment-7908</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex Bock</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Nov 2006 17:33:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2006/11/01/the-cost-of-living/#comment-7908</guid>
		<description>I can´t stand all these negative comments about Paolo and Niki. As far as I remember John Locke did not said anyhting until his 3rd appearence in the show on that scene when he was eating an orange. For sure Paolo and Niki will obtain more space in this whole story. Rodrigo Santoro is a huge actor in his Country, he made terrific blockbusters such as "Carandiru" (The history of a penitentiary rebellion), "Bicho de sete cabeças" (the history of a drugs addict) and many others as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can´t stand all these negative comments about Paolo and Niki. As far as I remember John Locke did not said anyhting until his 3rd appearence in the show on that scene when he was eating an orange. For sure Paolo and Niki will obtain more space in this whole story. Rodrigo Santoro is a huge actor in his Country, he made terrific blockbusters such as &#8220;Carandiru&#8221; (The history of a penitentiary rebellion), &#8220;Bicho de sete cabeças&#8221; (the history of a drugs addict) and many others as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jay</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2006/11/01/the-cost-of-living/#comment-7725</link>
		<dc:creator>Jay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Nov 2006 23:44:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2006/11/01/the-cost-of-living/#comment-7725</guid>
		<description>Another note about the London scene being set up right now.  I just noticed that there's a sign on the side of the Bank of Hawaii building that says "Widmore Industries."  

Also, there's a scene being shot right now (11/6/06 at 1 p.m.) inside a store on the south side of King street, just a little west of Nuuanu (looks like an antique store).  Didn't see any actors as I walked by, though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another note about the London scene being set up right now.  I just noticed that there&#8217;s a sign on the side of the Bank of Hawaii building that says &#8220;Widmore Industries.&#8221;  </p>
<p>Also, there&#8217;s a scene being shot right now (11/6/06 at 1 p.m.) inside a store on the south side of King street, just a little west of Nuuanu (looks like an antique store).  Didn&#8217;t see any actors as I walked by, though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jay</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2006/11/01/the-cost-of-living/#comment-7716</link>
		<dc:creator>Jay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Nov 2006 21:26:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2006/11/01/the-cost-of-living/#comment-7716</guid>
		<description>SPOILER ALERT!

If you're in Honolulu, you should check out Fort Street Mall in front of Pioneer Plaza (downtown).  The "Lost" crew is turning the underground entry to the Satellite City Hall into a London subway entry (as of 11/6/06 at 11 a.m.).  It's looking really cool.  Maybe we haven't seen the last of Mr. Echo yet (think they'll try to explain more of his experience in London?).  

I work downtown and we got notice that that Fort Street Mall will be closed to pedestrian traffic tomorrow for shooting.  Also, last Thursday, they were filming on Nuuanu.  They had some old 1940's looking taxi cabs and an old red phone booth set up.  Looked like they were filming more London scenes.  There appeared to be some filiming going on in O'Toole's as well (blacked out all the windows).  I heard from a co-worker that they're still doing some filming on Nuuanu today as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SPOILER ALERT!</p>
<p>If you&#8217;re in Honolulu, you should check out Fort Street Mall in front of Pioneer Plaza (downtown).  The &#8220;Lost&#8221; crew is turning the underground entry to the Satellite City Hall into a London subway entry (as of 11/6/06 at 11 a.m.).  It&#8217;s looking really cool.  Maybe we haven&#8217;t seen the last of Mr. Echo yet (think they&#8217;ll try to explain more of his experience in London?).  </p>
<p>I work downtown and we got notice that that Fort Street Mall will be closed to pedestrian traffic tomorrow for shooting.  Also, last Thursday, they were filming on Nuuanu.  They had some old 1940&#8217;s looking taxi cabs and an old red phone booth set up.  Looked like they were filming more London scenes.  There appeared to be some filiming going on in O&#8217;Toole&#8217;s as well (blacked out all the windows).  I heard from a co-worker that they&#8217;re still doing some filming on Nuuanu today as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2006/11/01/the-cost-of-living/#comment-7715</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Nov 2006 21:23:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2006/11/01/the-cost-of-living/#comment-7715</guid>
		<description>Sorry about that guys but something important came up. 

Back to what I was saying . . . .... ..........................
I do not want to bore any one but look at the show in the long run with that everything happened for a reason and maybe something will come off of Mr Ekos death. Yeah the episode was lacking at times but I feel that they did not pull off Mr Eko death so quiskly. Maybe the island/smoke monster killed him for his feelings and for failing to push the button. Back to talking about the pilot maybe he was killed because the island did not like the fact that the pilot crashed the plane killing the people. As for Eko maybe the smoke monster gave him a second chance during the first meeting. Maybe Mr Eko's purpose was to uncover the Pearl and help a few of the Losties along the way. 
Other people have already said what I wanted to say so it will be stupid to repeat it. Guys looked at the show as a whole and think what if things happened differently how would of things have turned out. 

With that in mind I say bye and will be commenting after the show. 

P.S. Sorry for any mistakes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry about that guys but something important came up. </p>
<p>Back to what I was saying . . . &#8230;. &#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;..<br />
I do not want to bore any one but look at the show in the long run with that everything happened for a reason and maybe something will come off of Mr Ekos death. Yeah the episode was lacking at times but I feel that they did not pull off Mr Eko death so quiskly. Maybe the island/smoke monster killed him for his feelings and for failing to push the button. Back to talking about the pilot maybe he was killed because the island did not like the fact that the pilot crashed the plane killing the people. As for Eko maybe the smoke monster gave him a second chance during the first meeting. Maybe Mr Eko&#8217;s purpose was to uncover the Pearl and help a few of the Losties along the way.<br />
Other people have already said what I wanted to say so it will be stupid to repeat it. Guys looked at the show as a whole and think what if things happened differently how would of things have turned out. </p>
<p>With that in mind I say bye and will be commenting after the show. </p>
<p>P.S. Sorry for any mistakes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jim</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2006/11/01/the-cost-of-living/#comment-7638</link>
		<dc:creator>jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Nov 2006 22:00:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2006/11/01/the-cost-of-living/#comment-7638</guid>
		<description>Hey, a little respect here. Ryan, "snobby"? "Devolved"? 
         The words that describe the R.O. style would be, "thoughtful", "perceptive", and "user-friendly"!
         And, yes, it's only a TV show, albeit a really different, thought provoking one. So let's put on a pot of Kona, pop some popcorn, and chill everybody!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey, a little respect here. Ryan, &#8220;snobby&#8221;? &#8220;Devolved&#8221;?<br />
         The words that describe the R.O. style would be, &#8220;thoughtful&#8221;, &#8220;perceptive&#8221;, and &#8220;user-friendly&#8221;!<br />
         And, yes, it&#8217;s only a TV show, albeit a really different, thought provoking one. So let&#8217;s put on a pot of Kona, pop some popcorn, and chill everybody!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Suz</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2006/11/01/the-cost-of-living/#comment-7612</link>
		<dc:creator>Suz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Nov 2006 16:08:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2006/11/01/the-cost-of-living/#comment-7612</guid>
		<description>Since its inception, LOST has been known for its great writing so I don't undertand why they are having so much trouble writing for the new (and annoying) characters Nikki and Paolo.  They both come off awkward.  I do not understand why they felt they needed these new characters since we have entered the world of the Others and all those new characters.  Aren't Damon and Carlton watching the dailies to see how badly the two come off?  I love this show and I care about it so it hurts to see this giant embarrassment each week!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since its inception, LOST has been known for its great writing so I don&#8217;t undertand why they are having so much trouble writing for the new (and annoying) characters Nikki and Paolo.  They both come off awkward.  I do not understand why they felt they needed these new characters since we have entered the world of the Others and all those new characters.  Aren&#8217;t Damon and Carlton watching the dailies to see how badly the two come off?  I love this show and I care about it so it hurts to see this giant embarrassment each week!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sharon</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2006/11/01/the-cost-of-living/#comment-7600</link>
		<dc:creator>Sharon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Nov 2006 13:13:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2006/11/01/the-cost-of-living/#comment-7600</guid>
		<description>Hurley or Bernard need to casually sneak in a "Frogurt" when addressing Paolo. Wouldn't that make everything nice again...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hurley or Bernard need to casually sneak in a &#8220;Frogurt&#8221; when addressing Paolo. Wouldn&#8217;t that make everything nice again&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2006/11/01/the-cost-of-living/#comment-7552</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Nov 2006 20:14:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2006/11/01/the-cost-of-living/#comment-7552</guid>
		<description>I'm still a huge fan of the show. I wouldn't spend so much time thinking about it if I wasn't.  And I've said since episode 3x01 that Season Three is incredibly strong, overall.  Better than Season Two, at least.  But if there's something that sets "LOST" fans apart from fans of other shows, I'd like to think it's the fact that we appreciate quality entertainment, that we have high standards, and that we can be honest when something falls short of those standards.

It's partially the fault of "LOST" that sets the bar so high, in a way.  I can love the show, name some episodes as the best hour of television ever, but still honestly say that "The Cost of Living" or "Fire + Water" were total letdowns.

Just because I'm a big fan of a band doesn't mean I'm going to adore every album or song they put out.

I have high hopes for the show, and haven't given up on it (though some friends have).  One weak episode does not a shark jumping make.  But I hope other fans can allow each other the luxury of being disappointed once in a while.  We're watching a TV show, not holding together a secret cult!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m still a huge fan of the show. I wouldn&#8217;t spend so much time thinking about it if I wasn&#8217;t.  And I&#8217;ve said since episode 3&#215;01 that Season Three is incredibly strong, overall.  Better than Season Two, at least.  But if there&#8217;s something that sets &#8220;LOST&#8221; fans apart from fans of other shows, I&#8217;d like to think it&#8217;s the fact that we appreciate quality entertainment, that we have high standards, and that we can be honest when something falls short of those standards.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s partially the fault of &#8220;LOST&#8221; that sets the bar so high, in a way.  I can love the show, name some episodes as the best hour of television ever, but still honestly say that &#8220;The Cost of Living&#8221; or &#8220;Fire + Water&#8221; were total letdowns.</p>
<p>Just because I&#8217;m a big fan of a band doesn&#8217;t mean I&#8217;m going to adore every album or song they put out.</p>
<p>I have high hopes for the show, and haven&#8217;t given up on it (though some friends have).  One weak episode does not a shark jumping make.  But I hope other fans can allow each other the luxury of being disappointed once in a while.  We&#8217;re watching a TV show, not holding together a secret cult!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nieto</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2006/11/01/the-cost-of-living/#comment-7546</link>
		<dc:creator>Nieto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Nov 2006 19:15:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2006/11/01/the-cost-of-living/#comment-7546</guid>
		<description>Man, what happened to you? 
When did you devolve into a "snobby critic"
and lose that "thing" that lets you just enjoy the show?
I used to like your site because it had insight,
but now its just a whiney blog filled with complaints of how the show doesn't 
ammount up to your vision.
I don't know why i wrote this,
you're probably never gonna see it anyway.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Man, what happened to you?<br />
When did you devolve into a &#8220;snobby critic&#8221;<br />
and lose that &#8220;thing&#8221; that lets you just enjoy the show?<br />
I used to like your site because it had insight,<br />
but now its just a whiney blog filled with complaints of how the show doesn&#8217;t<br />
ammount up to your vision.<br />
I don&#8217;t know why i wrote this,<br />
you&#8217;re probably never gonna see it anyway.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tulsi</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2006/11/01/the-cost-of-living/#comment-7544</link>
		<dc:creator>Tulsi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Nov 2006 18:44:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2006/11/01/the-cost-of-living/#comment-7544</guid>
		<description>Perhaps the Others or BenHenry's men did not ask Jack to operate on him right away when the plane crashed because they didn't know who was going to be on the plane. They had to send someone to infiltrate and get names of the losties and tailies.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perhaps the Others or BenHenry&#8217;s men did not ask Jack to operate on him right away when the plane crashed because they didn&#8217;t know who was going to be on the plane. They had to send someone to infiltrate and get names of the losties and tailies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: scott</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2006/11/01/the-cost-of-living/#comment-7493</link>
		<dc:creator>scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Nov 2006 07:33:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2006/11/01/the-cost-of-living/#comment-7493</guid>
		<description>Does Juliet's favorite book being Carrie shed light on her message to Jack?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does Juliet&#8217;s favorite book being Carrie shed light on her message to Jack?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jjj</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2006/11/01/the-cost-of-living/#comment-7482</link>
		<dc:creator>jjj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Nov 2006 05:12:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2006/11/01/the-cost-of-living/#comment-7482</guid>
		<description>I agree that the show is skipping around too much and not explaining things at all that could use a line or two - and overexplaning things that they need not.  Charlie's waltzing back to the main group, and to Claire, after the hatch blew up was ridiculous.  Did he even look for Locke or Eko?  I doubt it - he certainly didn't seem to care they were missing and neither did anyone else.  Sayid also could have had a line or two to Locke about what happened on the boat - and would have been nice to see Sun and Jin for a moment.  

I don't like the new characters of Niki &#38; Paulo either.  It's not that they were given pointless dribble for dialogue - but the point I think most people are making is that the majority does not want any new characters introduced.  We already have the new "Others" characters - Ben, Juliet, Tom and their whole camp.  I love that Lost is a show with many characters - but enough is enough already!  They don't need to bring in new people because they've killed off others.  How about developing the characters we already know and love?  Or can't the writers be creative enough to come up with more backstory for them?  We know little about Claire or Desmond, and I would like to see Rose and Bernard again as well.  We've also hardly seen Hurley this season.  It doesn't seem like a lot of the flashbacks are adding as much to the story as they used to, so maybe the writers think they need new characters - I don't know, but I wish they would find another way.  Less flashbacks and more main story might help - setting up flashbacks for EVERY episode has been fun to watch for the most part thus far, but maybe it's also created a box that the writers are having a hard time getting out of.   

I've been  wary about the progression of Lost, seeing as it comes from the creator of Alias - which started out as a pretty good show and just got more and more ridiclous and far-fetched as the seasons went on.  I was hoping that Lindeloff would help this from recurring, but maybe he is not enough.  I hope I am wrong and the show can pull it all together for us!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that the show is skipping around too much and not explaining things at all that could use a line or two - and overexplaning things that they need not.  Charlie&#8217;s waltzing back to the main group, and to Claire, after the hatch blew up was ridiculous.  Did he even look for Locke or Eko?  I doubt it - he certainly didn&#8217;t seem to care they were missing and neither did anyone else.  Sayid also could have had a line or two to Locke about what happened on the boat - and would have been nice to see Sun and Jin for a moment.  </p>
<p>I don&#8217;t like the new characters of Niki &amp; Paulo either.  It&#8217;s not that they were given pointless dribble for dialogue - but the point I think most people are making is that the majority does not want any new characters introduced.  We already have the new &#8220;Others&#8221; characters - Ben, Juliet, Tom and their whole camp.  I love that Lost is a show with many characters - but enough is enough already!  They don&#8217;t need to bring in new people because they&#8217;ve killed off others.  How about developing the characters we already know and love?  Or can&#8217;t the writers be creative enough to come up with more backstory for them?  We know little about Claire or Desmond, and I would like to see Rose and Bernard again as well.  We&#8217;ve also hardly seen Hurley this season.  It doesn&#8217;t seem like a lot of the flashbacks are adding as much to the story as they used to, so maybe the writers think they need new characters - I don&#8217;t know, but I wish they would find another way.  Less flashbacks and more main story might help - setting up flashbacks for EVERY episode has been fun to watch for the most part thus far, but maybe it&#8217;s also created a box that the writers are having a hard time getting out of.   </p>
<p>I&#8217;ve been  wary about the progression of Lost, seeing as it comes from the creator of Alias - which started out as a pretty good show and just got more and more ridiclous and far-fetched as the seasons went on.  I was hoping that Lindeloff would help this from recurring, but maybe he is not enough.  I hope I am wrong and the show can pull it all together for us!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jim</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2006/11/01/the-cost-of-living/#comment-7475</link>
		<dc:creator>jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Nov 2006 04:07:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2006/11/01/the-cost-of-living/#comment-7475</guid>
		<description>Nice going, Brian, they certainly did find a glass eye in the Arrow hatch. I haven't seen or heard (on podcasts) any other reference to this old clue. (I guess we suffer from clue overload with this show!)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice going, Brian, they certainly did find a glass eye in the Arrow hatch. I haven&#8217;t seen or heard (on podcasts) any other reference to this old clue. (I guess we suffer from clue overload with this show!)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yemi</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2006/11/01/the-cost-of-living/#comment-7461</link>
		<dc:creator>Yemi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Nov 2006 23:52:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2006/11/01/the-cost-of-living/#comment-7461</guid>
		<description>.                                             ~ Eko ~

.                                       He walked softly 
.                                                and
.                                      carried a big stick

.                                      ~ Rest in Peace ~</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>.                                             ~ Eko ~</p>
<p>.                                       He walked softly<br />
.                                                and<br />
.                                      carried a big stick</p>
<p>.                                      ~ Rest in Peace ~</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brad</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2006/11/01/the-cost-of-living/#comment-7459</link>
		<dc:creator>Brad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Nov 2006 23:29:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2006/11/01/the-cost-of-living/#comment-7459</guid>
		<description>I think Eko may have appeared repentant in Season 2, but his heart never changed.  That is the true test of repentance.  I think in season 2 Eko wrestled with the guilt of his brothers death more than he was sorry for the wrongs he had done. (if you can seperate guilt and repentance)

Maybe when faced with judgement and having to make the decision to own his sins and repent of them or justify them and deny having lived wrongly... he chose to justify them.  Just a thought.

I wonder what would have happened if Eko had not followed Yemi/smokey into the woods after his anti-confession?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think Eko may have appeared repentant in Season 2, but his heart never changed.  That is the true test of repentance.  I think in season 2 Eko wrestled with the guilt of his brothers death more than he was sorry for the wrongs he had done. (if you can seperate guilt and repentance)</p>
<p>Maybe when faced with judgement and having to make the decision to own his sins and repent of them or justify them and deny having lived wrongly&#8230; he chose to justify them.  Just a thought.</p>
<p>I wonder what would have happened if Eko had not followed Yemi/smokey into the woods after his anti-confession?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: esbaker</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2006/11/01/the-cost-of-living/#comment-7447</link>
		<dc:creator>esbaker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Nov 2006 19:35:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2006/11/01/the-cost-of-living/#comment-7447</guid>
		<description>OK, I agree with you Brad that Eko was urepentant and justified his wrongs, so the island judged him and killed him. But throughout Season 2, he was showing signs of repent. So when did he change his mind? Last minute? Just before dying?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK, I agree with you Brad that Eko was urepentant and justified his wrongs, so the island judged him and killed him. But throughout Season 2, he was showing signs of repent. So when did he change his mind? Last minute? Just before dying?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brad</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2006/11/01/the-cost-of-living/#comment-7446</link>
		<dc:creator>Brad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Nov 2006 19:14:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2006/11/01/the-cost-of-living/#comment-7446</guid>
		<description>OK guys give Paulo and Nikki a little slack.  They represent the audience who knows nothing about the show.  We've been watching LOST for 2 seasons, but if there are any new viewers to the show then they have no idea what is going on.

That is why there is seemingly forced dialogue... for example:

When Paulo asks about the plane and Nikki says that's where Eko's dead brother is... all of it is said this for the benefit of the guy who has no idea what's in the plane...  

When Nikki explains the Pearl as a viewing station connected to other stations of the Dharma initiative, it's not for Lockes benefit, but for the viewing audience who doesn't have a clue...

Some people are showing up late to the party, but we are glad they came.  The downside is we have to endure seemingly bad dialogue...

If everyone would go buy or rent the DVD's this wouldn't be a problem, but alas...


My other comment is... regardless of the hand Eko was dealt in life, he commited terrible sins... and justice demands payment.

Eko's greatest sin was the fact that he was unrepentant and justified his wrongs.  The island let Eko judge himself.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK guys give Paulo and Nikki a little slack.  They represent the audience who knows nothing about the show.  We&#8217;ve been watching LOST for 2 seasons, but if there are any new viewers to the show then they have no idea what is going on.</p>
<p>That is why there is seemingly forced dialogue&#8230; for example:</p>
<p>When Paulo asks about the plane and Nikki says that&#8217;s where Eko&#8217;s dead brother is&#8230; all of it is said this for the benefit of the guy who has no idea what&#8217;s in the plane&#8230;  </p>
<p>When Nikki explains the Pearl as a viewing station connected to other stations of the Dharma initiative, it&#8217;s not for Lockes benefit, but for the viewing audience who doesn&#8217;t have a clue&#8230;</p>
<p>Some people are showing up late to the party, but we are glad they came.  The downside is we have to endure seemingly bad dialogue&#8230;</p>
<p>If everyone would go buy or rent the DVD&#8217;s this wouldn&#8217;t be a problem, but alas&#8230;</p>
<p>My other comment is&#8230; regardless of the hand Eko was dealt in life, he commited terrible sins&#8230; and justice demands payment.</p>
<p>Eko&#8217;s greatest sin was the fact that he was unrepentant and justified his wrongs.  The island let Eko judge himself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2006/11/01/the-cost-of-living/#comment-7443</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Nov 2006 18:00:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2006/11/01/the-cost-of-living/#comment-7443</guid>
		<description>Aside from all of the reveals - and nots - I am perplexed at the emensity of the island.  I know the 'magnet' may have been shielding it from radars and such, but DAMN its huge!  Its a small continent.  

No posible way for a land mass that size not to go unnoticed.  Unless, people do go there regularly and Benry has the boys take care of them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Aside from all of the reveals - and nots - I am perplexed at the emensity of the island.  I know the &#8216;magnet&#8217; may have been shielding it from radars and such, but DAMN its huge!  Its a small continent.  </p>
<p>No posible way for a land mass that size not to go unnoticed.  Unless, people do go there regularly and Benry has the boys take care of them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2006/11/01/the-cost-of-living/#comment-7442</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Nov 2006 17:47:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2006/11/01/the-cost-of-living/#comment-7442</guid>
		<description>I don't understand the negativity about this episode... I'll admit it wasn't  one of the best, however, the previous few weeks people couldn't stop gushing about how excited they were that "Lost" was back to its season one form.  Four winning episodes followed by one mediocre episode shouldn't ring the death knell for this great show.  

Perhaps more importantly.... does anyone else remember when the Tailies found the "Arrow" hatch and Eko found the Bible with the removed film clip from the "Swan"?  Didn't they also find a glass eye?  If I remember correctly they did and that could explain a bit about ol' Patchy.  Does anyone else remember that glass eye?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t understand the negativity about this episode&#8230; I&#8217;ll admit it wasn&#8217;t  one of the best, however, the previous few weeks people couldn&#8217;t stop gushing about how excited they were that &#8220;Lost&#8221; was back to its season one form.  Four winning episodes followed by one mediocre episode shouldn&#8217;t ring the death knell for this great show.  </p>
<p>Perhaps more importantly&#8230;. does anyone else remember when the Tailies found the &#8220;Arrow&#8221; hatch and Eko found the Bible with the removed film clip from the &#8220;Swan&#8221;?  Didn&#8217;t they also find a glass eye?  If I remember correctly they did and that could explain a bit about ol&#8217; Patchy.  Does anyone else remember that glass eye?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bryan</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2006/11/01/the-cost-of-living/#comment-7438</link>
		<dc:creator>Bryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Nov 2006 17:06:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2006/11/01/the-cost-of-living/#comment-7438</guid>
		<description>I don't think people would hate Paulo and Nikki as much if they actually wrote some good dialogue for them that added some insight into their characters, or even added something to the story. They just seem like a couple Leiutenant Smiths right now, soon to be devoured by the evil monster after beaming down to the planet's surface.

Actually, I just wish the writers would write some good dialogue for ANY of the characters. It really has been sliding lately and this episode was the worst.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think people would hate Paulo and Nikki as much if they actually wrote some good dialogue for them that added some insight into their characters, or even added something to the story. They just seem like a couple Leiutenant Smiths right now, soon to be devoured by the evil monster after beaming down to the planet&#8217;s surface.</p>
<p>Actually, I just wish the writers would write some good dialogue for ANY of the characters. It really has been sliding lately and this episode was the worst.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2006/11/01/the-cost-of-living/#comment-7399</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Nov 2006 02:42:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2006/11/01/the-cost-of-living/#comment-7399</guid>
		<description>I don't know, I think everyone is starting to get over analysis fatigue. I don't like Paulo and Nikki so far, but they've had what.... 4 minutes of air time each tops? Give them a chance to settle in!

The producers won't please all of the people all of the time, but I overall really enjoyed yesterday's episode, minus the clunky multi screens thing between Nikki and Locke.

People are far too busy moaning about it not being like Season 1... Well, we're two years down the line. Is your life exactly the same as it was 2 year ago? We get complaints from people saying its not Season 1, yet people complain the show isn't moving fast enough... You guys put the producers in a no win situation. How can it be like Season 1, and yet need to move faster?

We've moved far quicker than ever before in the last 5 episodes. I don't want everything ruined within 6 episodes that they've built up. I want the big reveal at the end. I don't want to ruin it with big reveals half way through the series. This is a sci-fi suspense drama for lords sake!

If you don't want to watch the show anymore people. Don't. It won't effect the 2nd biggest TV show in the world (1st if you divide CSI into its constituent parts) to the point where it will get cancelled before Season 4 anyway. Sky One have effectively paid for Season 4, so it will happen no matter what.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know, I think everyone is starting to get over analysis fatigue. I don&#8217;t like Paulo and Nikki so far, but they&#8217;ve had what&#8230;. 4 minutes of air time each tops? Give them a chance to settle in!</p>
<p>The producers won&#8217;t please all of the people all of the time, but I overall really enjoyed yesterday&#8217;s episode, minus the clunky multi screens thing between Nikki and Locke.</p>
<p>People are far too busy moaning about it not being like Season 1&#8230; Well, we&#8217;re two years down the line. Is your life exactly the same as it was 2 year ago? We get complaints from people saying its not Season 1, yet people complain the show isn&#8217;t moving fast enough&#8230; You guys put the producers in a no win situation. How can it be like Season 1, and yet need to move faster?</p>
<p>We&#8217;ve moved far quicker than ever before in the last 5 episodes. I don&#8217;t want everything ruined within 6 episodes that they&#8217;ve built up. I want the big reveal at the end. I don&#8217;t want to ruin it with big reveals half way through the series. This is a sci-fi suspense drama for lords sake!</p>
<p>If you don&#8217;t want to watch the show anymore people. Don&#8217;t. It won&#8217;t effect the 2nd biggest TV show in the world (1st if you divide CSI into its constituent parts) to the point where it will get cancelled before Season 4 anyway. Sky One have effectively paid for Season 4, so it will happen no matter what.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brent</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2006/11/01/the-cost-of-living/#comment-7396</link>
		<dc:creator>Brent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Nov 2006 01:52:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2006/11/01/the-cost-of-living/#comment-7396</guid>
		<description>*hated Paulo and Nikki</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>*hated Paulo and Nikki</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brent</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2006/11/01/the-cost-of-living/#comment-7395</link>
		<dc:creator>Brent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Nov 2006 01:51:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2006/11/01/the-cost-of-living/#comment-7395</guid>
		<description>I don't see what all the fuss is about over Paulo and Nikki. How could you be opposed to the idea of new characters, which brings with it the promise of intriguing back stories and drama? I'll agree that right now they seem like clichéd, superficial people, but if Lost has taught us one lesson it's never to judge a book by its cover. And it's not as if they're being shoved down our throats - their presence this season has increased gradually and they have just started to develop as characters. Damon and Carlton even said in their podcast that Paulo, Nikki, and the rest background characters would get a flashback episode where it shows exactly what they do when the Adventurer Club is out and about. I think that would be an interesting episode in the vein of "The Other 48 Days". Give them a chance and I'm sure the new characters will grow on us; they always do. I am willing to bet that in a few months time, everyone will be looking back and saying "Remember when we all Paulo and Nikki?"</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t see what all the fuss is about over Paulo and Nikki. How could you be opposed to the idea of new characters, which brings with it the promise of intriguing back stories and drama? I&#8217;ll agree that right now they seem like clichéd, superficial people, but if Lost has taught us one lesson it&#8217;s never to judge a book by its cover. And it&#8217;s not as if they&#8217;re being shoved down our throats - their presence this season has increased gradually and they have just started to develop as characters. Damon and Carlton even said in their podcast that Paulo, Nikki, and the rest background characters would get a flashback episode where it shows exactly what they do when the Adventurer Club is out and about. I think that would be an interesting episode in the vein of &#8220;The Other 48 Days&#8221;. Give them a chance and I&#8217;m sure the new characters will grow on us; they always do. I am willing to bet that in a few months time, everyone will be looking back and saying &#8220;Remember when we all Paulo and Nikki?&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam S</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2006/11/01/the-cost-of-living/#comment-7394</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam S</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Nov 2006 01:48:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2006/11/01/the-cost-of-living/#comment-7394</guid>
		<description>As far as the show is concerned, we are moving along way to slow.  At this rate we will be done with season 5 in a month on the island.  We have to many new things without old answers.  And what is the deal with killing off a character as soon as they get pulled over by HPD?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As far as the show is concerned, we are moving along way to slow.  At this rate we will be done with season 5 in a month on the island.  We have to many new things without old answers.  And what is the deal with killing off a character as soon as they get pulled over by HPD?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2006/11/01/the-cost-of-living/#comment-7390</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Nov 2006 01:10:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2006/11/01/the-cost-of-living/#comment-7390</guid>
		<description>I have to agree with Ryan on the disappointing points of this episode.  Nikki and Paolo are destined for demise which is infuriating because it seems like the producers are willing to bring peripheral characters into the mix only to get rid of them abruptly.  It is only a matter of time for someone (if it hasn't been done yet) to edit the entire LOST series to separate the flashbacks from the present (2004).  I would be interested to see how long the show would be without the background flashbacks and just concentrating on what's happening in the now.  The one thing that really bothers me is that we know Jack is a confrontational sort and when Ben reveals his foiled intentions, wouldn't Jack just ask him why they would go through all this deception?  I scream these questions at the television screen when these moments arrive.  Couldn't Jack say, "Ben, why couldn't you just introduce yourself when we crashed instead of hunt and study us?"    I'm stealing this idea from Jay and Jack but I agree with them.  The Fall Season Finale better not be cheesy or a needless cliffhanger.  If I see Ben on the operating table being opened up by Jack and then the 'Others' drag in a near-dead Sawyer and have the LOST logo appear on screen with that noise, I'll just stop watching the show.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to agree with Ryan on the disappointing points of this episode.  Nikki and Paolo are destined for demise which is infuriating because it seems like the producers are willing to bring peripheral characters into the mix only to get rid of them abruptly.  It is only a matter of time for someone (if it hasn&#8217;t been done yet) to edit the entire LOST series to separate the flashbacks from the present (2004).  I would be interested to see how long the show would be without the background flashbacks and just concentrating on what&#8217;s happening in the now.  The one thing that really bothers me is that we know Jack is a confrontational sort and when Ben reveals his foiled intentions, wouldn&#8217;t Jack just ask him why they would go through all this deception?  I scream these questions at the television screen when these moments arrive.  Couldn&#8217;t Jack say, &#8220;Ben, why couldn&#8217;t you just introduce yourself when we crashed instead of hunt and study us?&#8221;    I&#8217;m stealing this idea from Jay and Jack but I agree with them.  The Fall Season Finale better not be cheesy or a needless cliffhanger.  If I see Ben on the operating table being opened up by Jack and then the &#8216;Others&#8217; drag in a near-dead Sawyer and have the LOST logo appear on screen with that noise, I&#8217;ll just stop watching the show.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam from Grapevine</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2006/11/01/the-cost-of-living/#comment-7388</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam from Grapevine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Nov 2006 01:00:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2006/11/01/the-cost-of-living/#comment-7388</guid>
		<description>I'm guessing Nikki and Paolo are Red Shirts.  Introduced to be eatten by the monster next week.

Jack is being played... don't know exactly how... but then again maybe it's Juliet being manipulated.  All I know is there's a lot more to be seen.

With the glimpse of the eye-patch guy, we're being shown there's more factions on the island.  Remember the french lady, her daughter, the missing kids with dirty feet and teddy bears, etc... I think the next season or two should get really crazy with conflicts with groups we haven't even encountered yet.  I mean why would the Others be hiding on the small island?

I liked the episode, sad to see Eko leave, it was a little uneven (way too many plotlines in one episode), hope we find out more about the monster (or that there is more than one), and what the heck did the pilot do to deserve getting eatten in the first episode!?!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m guessing Nikki and Paolo are Red Shirts.  Introduced to be eatten by the monster next week.</p>
<p>Jack is being played&#8230; don&#8217;t know exactly how&#8230; but then again maybe it&#8217;s Juliet being manipulated.  All I know is there&#8217;s a lot more to be seen.</p>
<p>With the glimpse of the eye-patch guy, we&#8217;re being shown there&#8217;s more factions on the island.  Remember the french lady, her daughter, the missing kids with dirty feet and teddy bears, etc&#8230; I think the next season or two should get really crazy with conflicts with groups we haven&#8217;t even encountered yet.  I mean why would the Others be hiding on the small island?</p>
<p>I liked the episode, sad to see Eko leave, it was a little uneven (way too many plotlines in one episode), hope we find out more about the monster (or that there is more than one), and what the heck did the pilot do to deserve getting eatten in the first episode!?!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jim</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2006/11/01/the-cost-of-living/#comment-7380</link>
		<dc:creator>jim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Nov 2006 00:02:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2006/11/01/the-cost-of-living/#comment-7380</guid>
		<description>Well, Ryan, you finally showed your grumpy side. (Not to worry; it's kind of charming.) While not one of the best episodes ever, last night's episode had its moments. It really is a shame to say good-bye to AAA, a great actor who created a great character. And Nikki and Paolo are indeed a disaster; kind of like dropping two characters from "Friends" into "Seinfeld"!
      But the possibilities of Jack's situation vis-a-vis Ben's surgery are fascinating. Does the Hippocratic Oath come into play? And surely your skin crawled just a tad when the eye-patch guy appeared.
      Keep the faith, everybody.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, Ryan, you finally showed your grumpy side. (Not to worry; it&#8217;s kind of charming.) While not one of the best episodes ever, last night&#8217;s episode had its moments. It really is a shame to say good-bye to AAA, a great actor who created a great character. And Nikki and Paolo are indeed a disaster; kind of like dropping two characters from &#8220;Friends&#8221; into &#8220;Seinfeld&#8221;!<br />
      But the possibilities of Jack&#8217;s situation vis-a-vis Ben&#8217;s surgery are fascinating. Does the Hippocratic Oath come into play? And surely your skin crawled just a tad when the eye-patch guy appeared.<br />
      Keep the faith, everybody.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Connie from Alaska</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2006/11/01/the-cost-of-living/#comment-7374</link>
		<dc:creator>Connie from Alaska</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Nov 2006 22:47:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2006/11/01/the-cost-of-living/#comment-7374</guid>
		<description>I think Eko all along, from the time he shot that guy to save his brother's life, was going to come to terms with his actions in his own way and was not going to let the Church or organized religion tell him what he had to do.  The Church was the center of village life, yet it didn't keep his brother from being threatened as a child or killed as an adult, nor did it protect the village from being extorted by drug dealers and in fact kept the people from rising up and taking matters into their own hands.  We all know that Eko is all about taking matters into his own hands.  That said, I do think he had a profound spiritual side and believed in God and that God would not condemn him for rejecting the teaching of the Church, but would honor his genuine faith, love for his brother and efforts to atone for his sins on his own terms.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think Eko all along, from the time he shot that guy to save his brother&#8217;s life, was going to come to terms with his actions in his own way and was not going to let the Church or organized religion tell him what he had to do.  The Church was the center of village life, yet it didn&#8217;t keep his brother from being threatened as a child or killed as an adult, nor did it protect the village from being extorted by drug dealers and in fact kept the people from rising up and taking matters into their own hands.  We all know that Eko is all about taking matters into his own hands.  That said, I do think he had a profound spiritual side and believed in God and that God would not condemn him for rejecting the teaching of the Church, but would honor his genuine faith, love for his brother and efforts to atone for his sins on his own terms.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nancy</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2006/11/01/the-cost-of-living/#comment-7373</link>
		<dc:creator>Nancy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Nov 2006 22:46:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2006/11/01/the-cost-of-living/#comment-7373</guid>
		<description>So Sayid is back but where are Sun and Jin? Didn't Sun get hurt in the boat? And where's the boat or the pieces of it? I feel like in this season, the writers are skipping over days on the island. Like what happened after the hatch exploded? Every episode makes me think I'm missing something. Maybe we're suppose to think that way?

I'm sad about Eko on many levels. I'm disappointed that he killed in the church. He had the option of sparing that man's life and didn't. And I'm sad that he's dead because he was a multi-dimentional charater, unlike our new "friends" who seem to have wandered off a photo shoot.

I'm curious to know if we should trust Juliet. And why doesn't Jack ask "where'd you get the xray machine and all the equipment"? Juliet recording her own 3/4" video? Why couldn't she just spell something out in french fries?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So Sayid is back but where are Sun and Jin? Didn&#8217;t Sun get hurt in the boat? And where&#8217;s the boat or the pieces of it? I feel like in this season, the writers are skipping over days on the island. Like what happened after the hatch exploded? Every episode makes me think I&#8217;m missing something. Maybe we&#8217;re suppose to think that way?</p>
<p>I&#8217;m sad about Eko on many levels. I&#8217;m disappointed that he killed in the church. He had the option of sparing that man&#8217;s life and didn&#8217;t. And I&#8217;m sad that he&#8217;s dead because he was a multi-dimentional charater, unlike our new &#8220;friends&#8221; who seem to have wandered off a photo shoot.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m curious to know if we should trust Juliet. And why doesn&#8217;t Jack ask &#8220;where&#8217;d you get the xray machine and all the equipment&#8221;? Juliet recording her own 3/4&#8243; video? Why couldn&#8217;t she just spell something out in french fries?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tinach</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2006/11/01/the-cost-of-living/#comment-7371</link>
		<dc:creator>tinach</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Nov 2006 22:23:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2006/11/01/the-cost-of-living/#comment-7371</guid>
		<description>Ryan, I agree with you completely. 

Suddenly Sayid is back on the beach, and there is no mention of what happened to Sun or Jin. What's up with that?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ryan, I agree with you completely. </p>
<p>Suddenly Sayid is back on the beach, and there is no mention of what happened to Sun or Jin. What&#8217;s up with that?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: heather</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2006/11/01/the-cost-of-living/#comment-7370</link>
		<dc:creator>heather</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Nov 2006 22:18:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2006/11/01/the-cost-of-living/#comment-7370</guid>
		<description>Actually, Gretchen, the Church was explained.  The woman from the Clinic (who told her son, the altar boy, that Eko was a "bad man") told Eko, before he left for London, that he owed Yemi a church.  He was in London because he had essentially assumed Yemi's life as a priest and Yemi was to leave for London, to continue his studies.

Anyway, yeah, not the strongest episode I have seen, but I didn't hate it.  I was disappointed to see Eko die, not becuase I was so attached to his character (in fact his quirky actions and over-wrought spirituality annoyed me most of the time), but because his character seemed so undeveloped and therefore had so much potential.  I was intrigued to see where they were going to go with Eko, especially regarding his relationship with Locke. 

I also don't think Eko as a "bad man" was at all out of character.  He was a drug-running warlord, turned fake priest.  That is pretty bad, but he was the kind of bad guy that you feel for (thanks to poignant flashbacks of his childhood).

Totally agreed that the smoke monster bashing him up against the tree was lame.  Come on, it is a smoke monster, not King Kong, but whatever.  R.I.P. Eko.

Hmmm.  The white tunics, the funeral and the creepy, somewhat inappropriate music piped through the speakers was interesting.  Definitely plays into the idea of a cult and mind control.  Would the Jack we know really wear a white tunic and follow Ben anywhere though?  I thought that was out of character for Jack.  Is Jack softening or is he gaining some control?

I think Juliet is for real based on our introduction to her in this season's first episode: trying not to lose it, staring into the mirror and burning the muffins and later ranting about free will...which comes up again in her speech to Jack.  To kill a Mocking Bird...Why that specific movie?  Any ideas?

Nikki and Paolo seemed like the "Lost for Idiots" guides in this episode.  They were there just to dumb things down enough for new viewers possibly (i.e. when they are on their way to the plane and the hatch they conveniently drop the info that Eko's brother is in the plane). 

I can't wait to find out what is going on in the hatch with the eye patch guy.  That was a great moment in an otherwise not so great episode.  Oh and I want more Desmond!  Anyone else curious about desmond and his interesting new ability to see the future (which just got brushed under the rug in this episode).  Now if Desmond get's bashed against a tree by a big smoke monster I will really be mad.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, Gretchen, the Church was explained.  The woman from the Clinic (who told her son, the altar boy, that Eko was a &#8220;bad man&#8221;) told Eko, before he left for London, that he owed Yemi a church.  He was in London because he had essentially assumed Yemi&#8217;s life as a priest and Yemi was to leave for London, to continue his studies.</p>
<p>Anyway, yeah, not the strongest episode I have seen, but I didn&#8217;t hate it.  I was disappointed to see Eko die, not becuase I was so attached to his character (in fact his quirky actions and over-wrought spirituality annoyed me most of the time), but because his character seemed so undeveloped and therefore had so much potential.  I was intrigued to see where they were going to go with Eko, especially regarding his relationship with Locke. </p>
<p>I also don&#8217;t think Eko as a &#8220;bad man&#8221; was at all out of character.  He was a drug-running warlord, turned fake priest.  That is pretty bad, but he was the kind of bad guy that you feel for (thanks to poignant flashbacks of his childhood).</p>
<p>Totally agreed that the smoke monster bashing him up against the tree was lame.  Come on, it is a smoke monster, not King Kong, but whatever.  R.I.P. Eko.</p>
<p>Hmmm.  The white tunics, the funeral and the creepy, somewhat inappropriate music piped through the speakers was interesting.  Definitely plays into the idea of a cult and mind control.  Would the Jack we know really wear a white tunic and follow Ben anywhere though?  I thought that was out of character for Jack.  Is Jack softening or is he gaining some control?</p>
<p>I think Juliet is for real based on our introduction to her in this season&#8217;s first episode: trying not to lose it, staring into the mirror and burning the muffins and later ranting about free will&#8230;which comes up again in her speech to Jack.  To kill a Mocking Bird&#8230;Why that specific movie?  Any ideas?</p>
<p>Nikki and Paolo seemed like the &#8220;Lost for Idiots&#8221; guides in this episode.  They were there just to dumb things down enough for new viewers possibly (i.e. when they are on their way to the plane and the hatch they conveniently drop the info that Eko&#8217;s brother is in the plane). </p>
<p>I can&#8217;t wait to find out what is going on in the hatch with the eye patch guy.  That was a great moment in an otherwise not so great episode.  Oh and I want more Desmond!  Anyone else curious about desmond and his interesting new ability to see the future (which just got brushed under the rug in this episode).  Now if Desmond get&#8217;s bashed against a tree by a big smoke monster I will really be mad.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2006/11/01/the-cost-of-living/#comment-7364</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Nov 2006 21:45:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2006/11/01/the-cost-of-living/#comment-7364</guid>
		<description>Allright guys, I am back and ready to comment:

                    Like what I said before, all of you have very good comments and I really do not understand why sooooooooooooo many people do not like this episode. Push aside the small stuff like that you guys mentioned and look at the whats going on in the show. I think this episode, "The 23rd Psalm" and "?" were the best Mr Eko episodes from his character. I will explain myself, first off (with reguards to this show and in general) that EVERYTHING HAPPENS FOR A REASON. I will start off to say that there is another force that could make the Losties see things like the island for example. It does not allways have to the "black smoke monster". Maybe the island and "smokie" are working togeather in deciding the Losties next course on the island. Think about it. Let me start in trems of people who died then I will go wider. Think about How, WHEN, and WHY some of the characters died. The first person to die and many of you may not see this as being important but believe he is. The first person to die was Marshall Mars. Imagine if he did not die or even get hurt, how would have things turned out for Kate and even the other Losties. Or even think what would have happened if he died immediately during the crash and never got a chance to have full conservations with Jack and showing him the mug shots. Then how would have things again turned out for Kate and possibly the other Losties. Marshall Ed Mars played a big role in determining Kate's fate on the island. Her episodes and other episodes that she played a big role in prove this. Think about it. Next in line I would say has to be Boone who's death had a big affect on EVERYBODY'S LIVES'. This is where I would say I HAVE to comment the most on. First lets start with Locke's vision in "Deus Ex Machina". What if the island never gave him this vision, then what would have happened. Next in line would be what would of haved happened if the island did not take away Locke's legs when they had just reached the plane. Who would of haved climbed into the plane, Locke himself?  
                      Sorry guys but urgent maters are at hand and I have to go. I will finish explaining myself sometime this weekend. In the mean time read my comments so far and tell me what you think so far. You will probly be confused but think about it. No I am not thinking to hard about it. Most of this stuff is in plain sight if you have the mind to think this way. SO please read and reply. I need to know if this makes sence to any one so I can explain in sinple terms. I have to go now, comment later.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Allright guys, I am back and ready to comment:</p>
<p>                    Like what I said before, all of you have very good comments and I really do not understand why sooooooooooooo many people do not like this episode. Push aside the small stuff like that you guys mentioned and look at the whats going on in the show. I think this episode, &#8220;The 23rd Psalm&#8221; and &#8220;?&#8221; were the best Mr Eko episodes from his character. I will explain myself, first off (with reguards to this show and in general) that EVERYTHING HAPPENS FOR A REASON. I will start off to say that there is another force that could make the Losties see things like the island for example. It does not allways have to the &#8220;black smoke monster&#8221;. Maybe the island and &#8220;smokie&#8221; are working togeather in deciding the Losties next course on the island. Think about it. Let me start in trems of people who died then I will go wider. Think about How, WHEN, and WHY some of the characters died. The first person to die and many of you may not see this as being important but believe he is. The first person to die was Marshall Mars. Imagine if he did not die or even get hurt, how would have things turned out for Kate and even the other Losties. Or even think what would have happened if he died immediately during the crash and never got a chance to have full conservations with Jack and showing him the mug shots. Then how would have things again turned out for Kate and possibly the other Losties. Marshall Ed Mars played a big role in determining Kate&#8217;s fate on the island. Her episodes and other episodes that she played a big role in prove this. Think about it. Next in line I would say has to be Boone who&#8217;s death had a big affect on EVERYBODY&#8217;S LIVES&#8217;. This is where I would say I HAVE to comment the most on. First lets start with Locke&#8217;s vision in &#8220;Deus Ex Machina&#8221;. What if the island never gave him this vision, then what would have happened. Next in line would be what would of haved happened if the island did not take away Locke&#8217;s legs when they had just reached the plane. Who would of haved climbed into the plane, Locke himself?<br />
                      Sorry guys but urgent maters are at hand and I have to go. I will finish explaining myself sometime this weekend. In the mean time read my comments so far and tell me what you think so far. You will probly be confused but think about it. No I am not thinking to hard about it. Most of this stuff is in plain sight if you have the mind to think this way. SO please read and reply. I need to know if this makes sence to any one so I can explain in sinple terms. I have to go now, comment later.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: frank</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2006/11/01/the-cost-of-living/#comment-7363</link>
		<dc:creator>frank</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Nov 2006 21:43:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2006/11/01/the-cost-of-living/#comment-7363</guid>
		<description>Connie--

Maybe 'drug dealer with a heart of gold' would be overstating it a bit!!!  :)  But don't you think that they set up his character as someone who had this life-altering event (his brother's death due to his actions), and who was trying to in some way repent for those actions?  You expect him to have 'relapses' and all, but the way it ended last night made it seem as if he was just the same guy all along.  This was a guy who took a 40-day vow of silence after he killed someone who was attacking him ... suddenly, he thinks that he's done nothing that needs forgiving?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Connie&#8211;</p>
<p>Maybe &#8216;drug dealer with a heart of gold&#8217; would be overstating it a bit!!!  <img src='http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  But don&#8217;t you think that they set up his character as someone who had this life-altering event (his brother&#8217;s death due to his actions), and who was trying to in some way repent for those actions?  You expect him to have &#8216;relapses&#8217; and all, but the way it ended last night made it seem as if he was just the same guy all along.  This was a guy who took a 40-day vow of silence after he killed someone who was attacking him &#8230; suddenly, he thinks that he&#8217;s done nothing that needs forgiving?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: johanngut</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2006/11/01/the-cost-of-living/#comment-7362</link>
		<dc:creator>johanngut</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Nov 2006 21:42:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2006/11/01/the-cost-of-living/#comment-7362</guid>
		<description>Being a die-hard, and an ARG-er...and a Nikki and Paulo hater too...I can't bring myself to going off on a rant about how good or bad the show was.  The bottom line for me is that I was thoroughly entertained and on the edge of my seat to see what was going to happen next.  In reality, isn't this what brings us back to this show, time and time again?  Yes the dialogue could've been better, yes Nikki and Paulo just need to shut their mole-holes and die, yes I too am disappointed that my favorite character is now gone.  

Given all that the creative team has given us, and what they are trying to sustain, I am grateful for the world they have given us.  No other show on TV, except for maybe Heroes, brings me back to the TV wanting to know what's going to happen next.  Even if I'm a little disappointed or underwhelmed, I still invest my time in the world of the show. It's funny how we've come to expect so much as fans.  All the "they should haves" and  "could haves" are a testament to just how much this show makes us think!  Honestly, what other drama on TV takes us to a whole other world every week, right on our own planet...quite the way that Lost does? And yes, we as fans have some fantastic ideas about how things should play out, and we preconceive more stuff than the writers could ever come up with.  Unfortunately, it's our own imaginations that get in the way sometimes. 

So, in a nutshell for a review this week is: 
Awesome show, it's stimulated my imagination yet again to go away and theorize more about lots of things that may or may not come to pass.  I may not like how some things turn out, but that's ok!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Being a die-hard, and an ARG-er&#8230;and a Nikki and Paulo hater too&#8230;I can&#8217;t bring myself to going off on a rant about how good or bad the show was.  The bottom line for me is that I was thoroughly entertained and on the edge of my seat to see what was going to happen next.  In reality, isn&#8217;t this what brings us back to this show, time and time again?  Yes the dialogue could&#8217;ve been better, yes Nikki and Paulo just need to shut their mole-holes and die, yes I too am disappointed that my favorite character is now gone.  </p>
<p>Given all that the creative team has given us, and what they are trying to sustain, I am grateful for the world they have given us.  No other show on TV, except for maybe Heroes, brings me back to the TV wanting to know what&#8217;s going to happen next.  Even if I&#8217;m a little disappointed or underwhelmed, I still invest my time in the world of the show. It&#8217;s funny how we&#8217;ve come to expect so much as fans.  All the &#8220;they should haves&#8221; and  &#8220;could haves&#8221; are a testament to just how much this show makes us think!  Honestly, what other drama on TV takes us to a whole other world every week, right on our own planet&#8230;quite the way that Lost does? And yes, we as fans have some fantastic ideas about how things should play out, and we preconceive more stuff than the writers could ever come up with.  Unfortunately, it&#8217;s our own imaginations that get in the way sometimes. </p>
<p>So, in a nutshell for a review this week is:<br />
Awesome show, it&#8217;s stimulated my imagination yet again to go away and theorize more about lots of things that may or may not come to pass.  I may not like how some things turn out, but that&#8217;s ok!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gretchen</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2006/11/01/the-cost-of-living/#comment-7360</link>
		<dc:creator>Gretchen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Nov 2006 21:29:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2006/11/01/the-cost-of-living/#comment-7360</guid>
		<description>Well, now I have one more reason not to like this "pod" of shows.  I hate the storyline and they killed off Eko.  And, as Ryan rightly points out, there's a lot about him we still don't know.  Why the church?  Why was he in London?  

And the smoke monster picking up Eko and throwing him was just stupid.  Sorry.

And Rodrigo Santoro is gorgeous, but I don't need to see him coming out of the potty, just so the writers can make the point that he's a jerk.  Yuk.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, now I have one more reason not to like this &#8220;pod&#8221; of shows.  I hate the storyline and they killed off Eko.  And, as Ryan rightly points out, there&#8217;s a lot about him we still don&#8217;t know.  Why the church?  Why was he in London?  </p>
<p>And the smoke monster picking up Eko and throwing him was just stupid.  Sorry.</p>
<p>And Rodrigo Santoro is gorgeous, but I don&#8217;t need to see him coming out of the potty, just so the writers can make the point that he&#8217;s a jerk.  Yuk.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jose</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2006/11/01/the-cost-of-living/#comment-7357</link>
		<dc:creator>Jose</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Nov 2006 20:49:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2006/11/01/the-cost-of-living/#comment-7357</guid>
		<description>Kimster had clearly summed it up for me.  What I am really getting tired of is the lack of "realism" in the show.  I know, I know.. LOST is supposed to be a si-fi show, but, c'mon, why can't Jack ask all the questions any human being in his position would ask?  Why didn't he (and Sawyer and Locke) ask those questions to Tom the first time they met in Season 2 while trying to reach Michael?  Why has Benry gone through all these bizarre, creepy (and ultimately stupid) strategies to get Jack to operate on him?....
We all agree, the show is not as satisfying anymore.  That makes me sad.  But I decided to watch AT LEAST until the end of this season.  If things do not get better (or at least as good as they used to be), I will be one more among the thousands who will not come back to LOST.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Kimster had clearly summed it up for me.  What I am really getting tired of is the lack of &#8220;realism&#8221; in the show.  I know, I know.. LOST is supposed to be a si-fi show, but, c&#8217;mon, why can&#8217;t Jack ask all the questions any human being in his position would ask?  Why didn&#8217;t he (and Sawyer and Locke) ask those questions to Tom the first time they met in Season 2 while trying to reach Michael?  Why has Benry gone through all these bizarre, creepy (and ultimately stupid) strategies to get Jack to operate on him?&#8230;.<br />
We all agree, the show is not as satisfying anymore.  That makes me sad.  But I decided to watch AT LEAST until the end of this season.  If things do not get better (or at least as good as they used to be), I will be one more among the thousands who will not come back to LOST.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pete</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2006/11/01/the-cost-of-living/#comment-7356</link>
		<dc:creator>Pete</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Nov 2006 20:29:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2006/11/01/the-cost-of-living/#comment-7356</guid>
		<description>Did we ever figure out why Eko was going to America???????
I think the writers had bigger plans for Eko that had to be cut short unfortunately.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did we ever figure out why Eko was going to America???????<br />
I think the writers had bigger plans for Eko that had to be cut short unfortunately.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Connie from Alaska</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2006/11/01/the-cost-of-living/#comment-7355</link>
		<dc:creator>Connie from Alaska</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Nov 2006 20:11:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2006/11/01/the-cost-of-living/#comment-7355</guid>
		<description>I think most of you who are upset with Eko's demise are having a hard time wrapping your head around the fact that he wasn't the "murdering drug dealer with a heart of gold" that you all hoped he would be.

What is hard about accepting Nikki and Paolo is that we are being asked to instantly bond with and accept people we do not know, have not invested any time in and have no interest in doing so.  It's like your divorced mom announcing she's remarrying and her new dude has three kids and now we're instantly going to be one big happy family of love.  That hardly ever happens!

I have a feeling that Benry's tumor is another ruse to tame Jack.  They couldn't do it by breaking him down mentally, so now they are going to appeal to his ego (only you, Jack, Super Spinal Surgeon Man, can do this job) and his need to atone for the deaths of all the patients he lost on the operating table by saving Benry.  Why they need to obtain Jack's cooperation through his own free will is still a mystery.  It seems like each of the Other captives are being led to the same outcome although through very different means.

Hope things even out during the Episode fest beginning 2/7.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think most of you who are upset with Eko&#8217;s demise are having a hard time wrapping your head around the fact that he wasn&#8217;t the &#8220;murdering drug dealer with a heart of gold&#8221; that you all hoped he would be.</p>
<p>What is hard about accepting Nikki and Paolo is that we are being asked to instantly bond with and accept people we do not know, have not invested any time in and have no interest in doing so.  It&#8217;s like your divorced mom announcing she&#8217;s remarrying and her new dude has three kids and now we&#8217;re instantly going to be one big happy family of love.  That hardly ever happens!</p>
<p>I have a feeling that Benry&#8217;s tumor is another ruse to tame Jack.  They couldn&#8217;t do it by breaking him down mentally, so now they are going to appeal to his ego (only you, Jack, Super Spinal Surgeon Man, can do this job) and his need to atone for the deaths of all the patients he lost on the operating table by saving Benry.  Why they need to obtain Jack&#8217;s cooperation through his own free will is still a mystery.  It seems like each of the Other captives are being led to the same outcome although through very different means.</p>
<p>Hope things even out during the Episode fest beginning 2/7.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2006/11/01/the-cost-of-living/#comment-7354</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Nov 2006 20:03:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2006/11/01/the-cost-of-living/#comment-7354</guid>
		<description>I will comment later on about the show, you guys have some very good points, but . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I will comment later on about the show, you guys have some very good points, but . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2006/11/01/the-cost-of-living/#comment-7353</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Nov 2006 19:36:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2006/11/01/the-cost-of-living/#comment-7353</guid>
		<description>Sorry in my second line, I meant to say this episode characterizes what is missing since season 1 and a chunk of season 2...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry in my second line, I meant to say this episode characterizes what is missing since season 1 and a chunk of season 2&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2006/11/01/the-cost-of-living/#comment-7352</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Nov 2006 19:34:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2006/11/01/the-cost-of-living/#comment-7352</guid>
		<description>Well, that just about does it for me. This episode characterizes what was unique to season 1--mystery, suspense and wonder. It seems to me that that forces beyond control of the writers have made this season so tedious to watch. This program is not a 5 year series; it should be wrapping up major plot points.

The inclusion of the 2 new characters feel so contrived, oh sure they're young and sexy, but they do not move the plot forward. By the way, what happened to the middle-aged couple from last season? Did they retire and relocate to another part of the island?  ABC should have commissioned this program as a limited series, instead it is on the verge of turning into Twin Peaks, Alias, or worse The X-Files. Too many plot diversions will lead to viewer apathy.

Sorry to see Ecko go, I'll miss the air of menace and melancholy he brought to the series. However I do like the evolution of Jack's character as revealed lately, he is more patient and devious as a captive.

I will watch the next installment before considering LOST a waste of time which is lamentable--this show had me hooked. 

That's not to say I won't return to the Transmission. I love the commentary and insight. Take care.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, that just about does it for me. This episode characterizes what was unique to season 1&#8211;mystery, suspense and wonder. It seems to me that that forces beyond control of the writers have made this season so tedious to watch. This program is not a 5 year series; it should be wrapping up major plot points.</p>
<p>The inclusion of the 2 new characters feel so contrived, oh sure they&#8217;re young and sexy, but they do not move the plot forward. By the way, what happened to the middle-aged couple from last season? Did they retire and relocate to another part of the island?  ABC should have commissioned this program as a limited series, instead it is on the verge of turning into Twin Peaks, Alias, or worse The X-Files. Too many plot diversions will lead to viewer apathy.</p>
<p>Sorry to see Ecko go, I&#8217;ll miss the air of menace and melancholy he brought to the series. However I do like the evolution of Jack&#8217;s character as revealed lately, he is more patient and devious as a captive.</p>
<p>I will watch the next installment before considering LOST a waste of time which is lamentable&#8211;this show had me hooked. </p>
<p>That&#8217;s not to say I won&#8217;t return to the Transmission. I love the commentary and insight. Take care.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: writerboy</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2006/11/01/the-cost-of-living/#comment-7348</link>
		<dc:creator>writerboy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Nov 2006 18:22:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2006/11/01/the-cost-of-living/#comment-7348</guid>
		<description>I have to say, like so many of you have already voiced, I was disappointed in last night's episode.  Not really because my favorite character died, because just like in real life, no one is safe and any one can go at any time. No, I was disappointed because the show took one of its best characters and gave him an unworthy exit.  When will the makers of this show realize that viewers have an invested interest in most if not all the Losties?  So what if Adewale wanted off the show?  You would think the creative team of the show would come up with a better plan.  Why not shoot scenes with him in it now and have them play over several episodes, concluding with his death?  And why introduce the tailies at all if all of them were going to die?  Was the plan all along for them to be red shirts, albeit developed red shirts?

If the plot calls for the character to die, so be it, but Eko's death seemed pointless and his resolution rushed in the same fashion that Ana-Lucia's did.  My biggest problem is now who is left to be Locke's foil?  First it seemed it was going to be Walt, and then he left.  Then it was Eko, and now he's gone.   Could it be Desmond?

In regards to the new Losties, Nikki and Paolo - I'm leaving judgement until we get to know and see a little more about them.  I do think thus far their inclusion has been worthless.  Why not have Sun and Jin tag along with Locke, Sayid and Desmond?  Or Charlie and Hurley for that matter.  There are already established characters on this show that we don't need more.  One of the best qualities of this show was that it never lowed itself to what other shows do to grab viewers - showcase talentless eye-candy.  But again I'm going to wait to see how these characters develop before completely writing them off.

The more I see Juliette, the more and more I get the feeling that she may be the darker one compared to Ben.  There is something very sinister and cold about her smile and her eyes.  Sure on the surface she appears sweet and sincere, but I can't help feeling she is like a trapped animal and is willing to do whatever it takes to get out.  One thing that is striking to me is her obvious skills at manipulation.  She has Jack pretty much trained that she is fully comfortable/confident to come into his side of the room and sit cross-legged on the table while talking to him.  For a fertility doctor, she seems more like a well-trained psychologist.  Oh..and I'm sorry, but she looks nothing like Sarah (Julie Bowen).  The only similarities I see is that they are both white women. 

Some other things that I am hoping the show will go back to are:

- Michael and Walt.  Did they or didn't they make it out safe and alive?  It would just be nice to know what happened to close that loose end.

- What exactly happened to Eko, Locke and Desmond when the hatch imploded?

- What is up with the guys in the Arctic scene in last season's finale?  To have last season end with that, and here we are on episode 5 and it hasn't been revisited is strange to me.  If you had missed that scene, would it even matter?  I have to honestly say that when Episode 1 of this seaon aired, I thought Juliette was Penelope.  They look more alike than she and Sarah.

- Where the heck is Vincent?  Did he finally get eaten by a polar bear?  Maybe he's with eye-patch guy?

- Where the heck is Danielle?

That's it for now.  Next week's episode has a lot to make up for.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to say, like so many of you have already voiced, I was disappointed in last night&#8217;s episode.  Not really because my favorite character died, because just like in real life, no one is safe and any one can go at any time. No, I was disappointed because the show took one of its best characters and gave him an unworthy exit.  When will the makers of this show realize that viewers have an invested interest in most if not all the Losties?  So what if Adewale wanted off the show?  You would think the creative team of the show would come up with a better plan.  Why not shoot scenes with him in it now and have them play over several episodes, concluding with his death?  And why introduce the tailies at all if all of them were going to die?  Was the plan all along for them to be red shirts, albeit developed red shirts?</p>
<p>If the plot calls for the character to die, so be it, but Eko&#8217;s death seemed pointless and his resolution rushed in the same fashion that Ana-Lucia&#8217;s did.  My biggest problem is now who is left to be Locke&#8217;s foil?  First it seemed it was going to be Walt, and then he left.  Then it was Eko, and now he&#8217;s gone.   Could it be Desmond?</p>
<p>In regards to the new Losties, Nikki and Paolo - I&#8217;m leaving judgement until we get to know and see a little more about them.  I do think thus far their inclusion has been worthless.  Why not have Sun and Jin tag along with Locke, Sayid and Desmond?  Or Charlie and Hurley for that matter.  There are already established characters on this show that we don&#8217;t need more.  One of the best qualities of this show was that it never lowed itself to what other shows do to grab viewers - showcase talentless eye-candy.  But again I&#8217;m going to wait to see how these characters develop before completely writing them off.</p>
<p>The more I see Juliette, the more and more I get the feeling that she may be the darker one compared to Ben.  There is something very sinister and cold about her smile and her eyes.  Sure on the surface she appears sweet and sincere, but I can&#8217;t help feeling she is like a trapped animal and is willing to do whatever it takes to get out.  One thing that is striking to me is her obvious skills at manipulation.  She has Jack pretty much trained that she is fully comfortable/confident to come into his side of the room and sit cross-legged on the table while talking to him.  For a fertility doctor, she seems more like a well-trained psychologist.  Oh..and I&#8217;m sorry, but she looks nothing like Sarah (Julie Bowen).  The only similarities I see is that they are both white women. </p>
<p>Some other things that I am hoping the show will go back to are:</p>
<p>- Michael and Walt.  Did they or didn&#8217;t they make it out safe and alive?  It would just be nice to know what happened to close that loose end.</p>
<p>- What exactly happened to Eko, Locke and Desmond when the hatch imploded?</p>
<p>- What is up with the guys in the Arctic scene in last season&#8217;s finale?  To have last season end with that, and here we are on episode 5 and it hasn&#8217;t been revisited is strange to me.  If you had missed that scene, would it even matter?  I have to honestly say that when Episode 1 of this seaon aired, I thought Juliette was Penelope.  They look more alike than she and Sarah.</p>
<p>- Where the heck is Vincent?  Did he finally get eaten by a polar bear?  Maybe he&#8217;s with eye-patch guy?</p>
<p>- Where the heck is Danielle?</p>
<p>That&#8217;s it for now.  Next week&#8217;s episode has a lot to make up for.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2006/11/01/the-cost-of-living/#comment-7347</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Nov 2006 18:19:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2006/11/01/the-cost-of-living/#comment-7347</guid>
		<description>Finally we learn why Eko was building a church - 'cause he owed his brother one for defiling his brother's church.  Eko good?  Who the heck ever thought that?  This guy was pure, unadulterated evil from day one.  He was the consumated wolf in sheep's clothing.  Masquerading as a priest and everyone thinks he was good - come on everyone - open your eyes to who this guy really was.  The black smoke monster was probably there to take him directly to outer darkness.  Too bad he wouldn't repent, it would have saved his soul.

The reference to the resurrection was a nice touch and does Juliet really think "he" doesn't know what she did?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Finally we learn why Eko was building a church - &#8217;cause he owed his brother one for defiling his brother&#8217;s church.  Eko good?  Who the heck ever thought that?  This guy was pure, unadulterated evil from day one.  He was the consumated wolf in sheep&#8217;s clothing.  Masquerading as a priest and everyone thinks he was good - come on everyone - open your eyes to who this guy really was.  The black smoke monster was probably there to take him directly to outer darkness.  Too bad he wouldn&#8217;t repent, it would have saved his soul.</p>
<p>The reference to the resurrection was a nice touch and does Juliet really think &#8220;he&#8221; doesn&#8217;t know what she did?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kimster</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2006/11/01/the-cost-of-living/#comment-7346</link>
		<dc:creator>Kimster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Nov 2006 18:11:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2006/11/01/the-cost-of-living/#comment-7346</guid>
		<description>Last night everytime they went to Eko's flashback it felt forced. I didn't care about his flashback. I just wanted to know more about what was happening on the island. I'm not sure what his flashback added, except to make the true nature of his character somewhat more dubious and to make us possibly like him a little less as a person before killing him off. I was glad that he wasn't repetent in the way we all expected him to be, as they built up the plot of the show to his big "confession".

This is the first time that I can remember that the smoke monster identified itself as being other than what it appeared. For instance, if we believe that Christian Shephard was also the smoke monster, he never said to Jack, "You talk to me as if I am really your father."

I thought that was a really interesting aspect to the show. Maybe the smoke monster likes to play it like that before it does you in.

The Losties dialogue was absolutely contrived. Probably some of the worst yet on the show and Nikki and Paolo really did not help that at all. I am hoping they are just there to be killed off, blown up, shot, drowned, whatever, because if these are the replacements for Ana Lucia, Libby, Eko it is a sad day in the evolution of Lost.

This show is notorious for leaving the obvious unsaid which can be so frustrating that when they finally do say the obvious it sounds so stupid. The first time they went to the Pearl I thought they should think more about the other cameras. I know these things are left unspoken so they can be revisited as future plots and I think this was a perfect case in point. But don't make it so contrived when you finally do get around to exploring that idea since we've all been thinking it since day one!

Also, why doesn't Jack just explode in a rant and say to Benry:

I will save your life, if you will just tell me:

Who are you people? Why are you here on this island? Where are we? How did you get here? What are you doing here? What is your purpose? If you claim to be good, tell me who you are and how you are good?

--- and that would be peppered with a lot of expletives ---

I know that if Benry answered all that it would take all the fun out of the story arc... but I have to say that is the most realistic thing that Jack could say or do, instead of what he has been saying or doing. I know he asked it to Juliet but he didn't really freak out on it or stress it. If I was crashed on an island and these people took me captive, I would definitely be asking Where in god's name are we? Who the hell are you people? They want something from Jack. If I were Jack, I would want those answers.

Jack killing Benry isn't in his nature. Jack saves people. That's what he does (or tries to do). But maybe, they want to do something out of character for Jack so they can have a Jack flashback that leaves us dubious about his nature too. But if he does kill Benry, believe me, he is going to regret it. He is going to find out that he was set up and that Benry really was one of the good guys and that Juliet is just out for some revenge because Benry burned her by not wanting to be part of her Stephen King book club... ok it's probably deeper than that, like scorned her in love...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Last night everytime they went to Eko&#8217;s flashback it felt forced. I didn&#8217;t care about his flashback. I just wanted to know more about what was happening on the island. I&#8217;m not sure what his flashback added, except to make the true nature of his character somewhat more dubious and to make us possibly like him a little less as a person before killing him off. I was glad that he wasn&#8217;t repetent in the way we all expected him to be, as they built up the plot of the show to his big &#8220;confession&#8221;.</p>
<p>This is the first time that I can remember that the smoke monster identified itself as being other than what it appeared. For instance, if we believe that Christian Shephard was also the smoke monster, he never said to Jack, &#8220;You talk to me as if I am really your father.&#8221;</p>
<p>I thought that was a really interesting aspect to the show. Maybe the smoke monster likes to play it like that before it does you in.</p>
<p>The Losties dialogue was absolutely contrived. Probably some of the worst yet on the show and Nikki and Paolo really did not help that at all. I am hoping they are just there to be killed off, blown up, shot, drowned, whatever, because if these are the replacements for Ana Lucia, Libby, Eko it is a sad day in the evolution of Lost.</p>
<p>This show is notorious for leaving the obvious unsaid which can be so frustrating that when they finally do say the obvious it sounds so stupid. The first time they went to the Pearl I thought they should think more about the other cameras. I know these things are left unspoken so they can be revisited as future plots and I think this was a perfect case in point. But don&#8217;t make it so contrived when you finally do get around to exploring that idea since we&#8217;ve all been thinking it since day one!</p>
<p>Also, why doesn&#8217;t Jack just explode in a rant and say to Benry:</p>
<p>I will save your life, if you will just tell me:</p>
<p>Who are you people? Why are you here on this island? Where are we? How did you get here? What are you doing here? What is your purpose? If you claim to be good, tell me who you are and how you are good?</p>
<p>&#8212; and that would be peppered with a lot of expletives &#8212;</p>
<p>I know that if Benry answered all that it would take all the fun out of the story arc&#8230; but I have to say that is the most realistic thing that Jack could say or do, instead of what he has been saying or doing. I know he asked it to Juliet but he didn&#8217;t really freak out on it or stress it. If I was crashed on an island and these people took me captive, I would definitely be asking Where in god&#8217;s name are we? Who the hell are you people? They want something from Jack. If I were Jack, I would want those answers.</p>
<p>Jack killing Benry isn&#8217;t in his nature. Jack saves people. That&#8217;s what he does (or tries to do). But maybe, they want to do something out of character for Jack so they can have a Jack flashback that leaves us dubious about his nature too. But if he does kill Benry, believe me, he is going to regret it. He is going to find out that he was set up and that Benry really was one of the good guys and that Juliet is just out for some revenge because Benry burned her by not wanting to be part of her Stephen King book club&#8230; ok it&#8217;s probably deeper than that, like scorned her in love&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HeyBrah</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2006/11/01/the-cost-of-living/#comment-7337</link>
		<dc:creator>HeyBrah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Nov 2006 16:54:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2006/11/01/the-cost-of-living/#comment-7337</guid>
		<description>I see the the 13 week hiatus of Lost, as "Jigsaw" would say in "Saw 3" as the show's final test.  How Lost does in the first couple of episodes in February will force ABC management's hands into whether or not they'll approve a fourth season.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I see the the 13 week hiatus of Lost, as &#8220;Jigsaw&#8221; would say in &#8220;Saw 3&#8243; as the show&#8217;s final test.  How Lost does in the first couple of episodes in February will force ABC management&#8217;s hands into whether or not they&#8217;ll approve a fourth season.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2006/11/01/the-cost-of-living/#comment-7332</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Nov 2006 16:34:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2006/11/01/the-cost-of-living/#comment-7332</guid>
		<description>The purpose of Nikki and Paolo is clear. As soon as one hot character dies on the show they have to be replaced.

Granted Nikki popped in a bit late after Libby died (or did Nikki replace Ana Lucia) but do a tally. It's actually pretty sad. The first season you have a character die and it really meant something. Now they remove characters left and right and just slide in some new eye candy.

For the show I give a resounding...meh. Depending on how you view the seasons is how you can view the show. Compared to the first season the show was terrible. Compared to this season the show was par for the course. Let me explain.

The first season you had a real mystery going on. People crashed on an island and they are trying to figure a way off while trying to understand the crazy crap that was going on around them. You also had real character development. There was heart to the show and that is one of the things that made it so successful.

The second season you still had mystery with the hatch and plenty of conflict with the others and the tailies. There was still some good character development and plenty of mysteries. Unfortunately many more questions popped up than answers but the second season was still quite good.

The third season doesn't really have any of what made the first two seasons so successful. One of the big reasons Lost was so successful seems to be seriously lacking: heart. We know just about all there is to know about the main characters which makes the back-stories just boring. Echo killed some guys and went to London? Big deal. Locke grew pot? Yawn.

There really isn't any more mystery either. At least nothing that seems all that interesting. The others? I looks like they are just a bunch of Dharma people who decided to stay on the island. They know how to leave and they also know about what happens outside. So why do they stay and why do they not help the other castaways? Those are about the only questions left and I'm not sure the answers will be anything better than, "They're crazy and a bunch of jerks."

Even though this post is pretty negative I'm still going to watch the show. I really loved Lost even though I think that they may have gotten a bit off track. I think that the show just hast to return some of the mystery and heart back and things will be fine. After all, if Heroes can do it then Lost should be able to.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The purpose of Nikki and Paolo is clear. As soon as one hot character dies on the show they have to be replaced.</p>
<p>Granted Nikki popped in a bit late after Libby died (or did Nikki replace Ana Lucia) but do a tally. It&#8217;s actually pretty sad. The first season you have a character die and it really meant something. Now they remove characters left and right and just slide in some new eye candy.</p>
<p>For the show I give a resounding&#8230;meh. Depending on how you view the seasons is how you can view the show. Compared to the first season the show was terrible. Compared to this season the show was par for the course. Let me explain.</p>
<p>The first season you had a real mystery going on. People crashed on an island and they are trying to figure a way off while trying to understand the crazy crap that was going on around them. You also had real character development. There was heart to the show and that is one of the things that made it so successful.</p>
<p>The second season you still had mystery with the hatch and plenty of conflict with the others and the tailies. There was still some good character development and plenty of mysteries. Unfortunately many more questions popped up than answers but the second season was still quite good.</p>
<p>The third season doesn&#8217;t really have any of what made the first two seasons so successful. One of the big reasons Lost was so successful seems to be seriously lacking: heart. We know just about all there is to know about the main characters which makes the back-stories just boring. Echo killed some guys and went to London? Big deal. Locke grew pot? Yawn.</p>
<p>There really isn&#8217;t any more mystery either. At least nothing that seems all that interesting. The others? I looks like they are just a bunch of Dharma people who decided to stay on the island. They know how to leave and they also know about what happens outside. So why do they stay and why do they not help the other castaways? Those are about the only questions left and I&#8217;m not sure the answers will be anything better than, &#8220;They&#8217;re crazy and a bunch of jerks.&#8221;</p>
<p>Even though this post is pretty negative I&#8217;m still going to watch the show. I really loved Lost even though I think that they may have gotten a bit off track. I think that the show just hast to return some of the mystery and heart back and things will be fine. After all, if Heroes can do it then Lost should be able to.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: peacefrogi</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2006/11/01/the-cost-of-living/#comment-7330</link>
		<dc:creator>peacefrogi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Nov 2006 16:27:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2006/11/01/the-cost-of-living/#comment-7330</guid>
		<description>first off? i agree with all the previous posts - especially Josh, Fuber and Dave. (and you too Ryan!) i  really WANTED to like last night's episode and yet, it was lacking. the writing, the directing, the newbies ... it all just seemed so ... amatuerish.

if the rumors are true and AAA wanted off the show then fine. done. let him go. i don't really care that they kill of characters we like b/c that is what i always found to be so bold about LOST - they never really stuck to conventional tv formula in that regard. but why not have the polar bear kill him two epis ago? for that matter, why not kill Ekko off back at the hatch implosion so that we could have focused on one of the MANY other storylines that keep popping up? watching Ekko get flung around like a paper doll after a year and a half of building up his individual strength and perserverence was the biggest 'huh?' moment i've ever had watching this show. we'd already established that Ekko stood his ground when physically confronted by the smoke moster. that was one of the coolest moments of last season. and so ... what? Ekko is 'afraid' of the monster now? why now? cuz he's physically weak? or did the smoke monster change its mind and now wants to kill Ekko? the magnetic force relieved its shackles and now it kills at will? then how do you explain it killing the pilot back at the start of the show? none of it makes any sense. but even more than not making any sense ... it was a cop-out and a crappy way to send off a BAD ASS character we've grown to love.

as opposed to the new characters, who we all agree are tremendously annoying. they don't fit in to the group - they seem like they just got off the plane from LA and landed on the set LOL. actually i was over them BEFORE they got to the new hatch -- as they were approaching the clearing and Paolo asks "what's Ekko doing?" and Niki replies "that's the plane where his brother died" or some such other trite dialogue.  WTF??? are you kidding me?? it was as if the Network leaned over to Damon/Lindeloff and said "you know, american audiences are far too stupid to remember what happened LAST season. have the new girl say something about his brother being in the plane ...." 

was anyone else as insulted as i was????

ugh ... i used to stand firm that LOST was the best show on tv. but i'm sad to say that i'm just not feeling it anymore. not much was resolved this week and we are once again given more questions than answers and now they go on hiatus vacation until february? next week better be good ...

thank god we still have Battlestar Gallactica.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>first off? i agree with all the previous posts - especially Josh, Fuber and Dave. (and you too Ryan!) i  really WANTED to like last night&#8217;s episode and yet, it was lacking. the writing, the directing, the newbies &#8230; it all just seemed so &#8230; amatuerish.</p>
<p>if the rumors are true and AAA wanted off the show then fine. done. let him go. i don&#8217;t really care that they kill of characters we like b/c that is what i always found to be so bold about LOST - they never really stuck to conventional tv formula in that regard. but why not have the polar bear kill him two epis ago? for that matter, why not kill Ekko off back at the hatch implosion so that we could have focused on one of the MANY other storylines that keep popping up? watching Ekko get flung around like a paper doll after a year and a half of building up his individual strength and perserverence was the biggest &#8216;huh?&#8217; moment i&#8217;ve ever had watching this show. we&#8217;d already established that Ekko stood his ground when physically confronted by the smoke moster. that was one of the coolest moments of last season. and so &#8230; what? Ekko is &#8216;afraid&#8217; of the monster now? why now? cuz he&#8217;s physically weak? or did the smoke monster change its mind and now wants to kill Ekko? the magnetic force relieved its shackles and now it kills at will? then how do you explain it killing the pilot back at the start of the show? none of it makes any sense. but even more than not making any sense &#8230; it was a cop-out and a crappy way to send off a BAD ASS character we&#8217;ve grown to love.</p>
<p>as opposed to the new characters, who we all agree are tremendously annoying. they don&#8217;t fit in to the group - they seem like they just got off the plane from LA and landed on the set LOL. actually i was over them BEFORE they got to the new hatch &#8212; as they were approaching the clearing and Paolo asks &#8220;what&#8217;s Ekko doing?&#8221; and Niki replies &#8220;that&#8217;s the plane where his brother died&#8221; or some such other trite dialogue.  WTF??? are you kidding me?? it was as if the Network leaned over to Damon/Lindeloff and said &#8220;you know, american audiences are far too stupid to remember what happened LAST season. have the new girl say something about his brother being in the plane &#8230;.&#8221; </p>
<p>was anyone else as insulted as i was????</p>
<p>ugh &#8230; i used to stand firm that LOST was the best show on tv. but i&#8217;m sad to say that i&#8217;m just not feeling it anymore. not much was resolved this week and we are once again given more questions than answers and now they go on hiatus vacation until february? next week better be good &#8230;</p>
<p>thank god we still have Battlestar Gallactica.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Avery</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2006/11/01/the-cost-of-living/#comment-7329</link>
		<dc:creator>Avery</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Nov 2006 16:24:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2006/11/01/the-cost-of-living/#comment-7329</guid>
		<description>I thought Ben and Juliet knew everything about Jack already? So why is so 'miraculous' that a spinal surgeon fell out of the sky? This makes no sense at all. 
Killing off Eko stinks! He was one of my favorite characters.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I thought Ben and Juliet knew everything about Jack already? So why is so &#8216;miraculous&#8217; that a spinal surgeon fell out of the sky? This makes no sense at all.<br />
Killing off Eko stinks! He was one of my favorite characters.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jergenson</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2006/11/01/the-cost-of-living/#comment-7328</link>
		<dc:creator>jergenson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Nov 2006 16:22:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2006/11/01/the-cost-of-living/#comment-7328</guid>
		<description>Has anyone noticed how all the emphasis is going toward the beautiful, soap opera style characters? The addition of Paolo and Nikki just piles it on. And as far as Juliet's taped message: I thought it was something out of an absurdist play. Why couldn't she have just slipped him a note in his food? It's depressing to watch a show fall off like this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Has anyone noticed how all the emphasis is going toward the beautiful, soap opera style characters? The addition of Paolo and Nikki just piles it on. And as far as Juliet&#8217;s taped message: I thought it was something out of an absurdist play. Why couldn&#8217;t she have just slipped him a note in his food? It&#8217;s depressing to watch a show fall off like this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: frank</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2006/11/01/the-cost-of-living/#comment-7327</link>
		<dc:creator>frank</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Nov 2006 16:07:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2006/11/01/the-cost-of-living/#comment-7327</guid>
		<description>When Ben first came out, I thought that he was wearing old-timey pajamas, like Ebenezer Scrooge wears.  All that was missing was the nightcap...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When Ben first came out, I thought that he was wearing old-timey pajamas, like Ebenezer Scrooge wears.  All that was missing was the nightcap&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bryan</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2006/11/01/the-cost-of-living/#comment-7324</link>
		<dc:creator>Bryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Nov 2006 15:39:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2006/11/01/the-cost-of-living/#comment-7324</guid>
		<description>I've been a defender of the direction of this show but his is one of the first episodes I didn't like. I think the dialogue was poorly written and very unLost-like. Killing off Eko isn't sitting well with me either. I think there was way too much he had to offer to just write him off like that. It seemed too sudden, too abrupt.

I dont understand why people don't like Paolo and Nikki, but i think their addition to the story has been treated in a very forced manner and I agree that the show was looking for more eye candy and not substance.

Eko's revelation to Locke at the end that they 'are next' was very anti-climactic. No kidding they are next, everyone is next on this show. That was a great opportunity for a great reveal, or even an opportunity for Locke to keep it to himself as a secret as a cliffhanger.

I'm getting bored with the show, not because there aren't enough answers, but because the production values and the dialogue has gotten flat. 

I think they are milking this story to extend the series, but simple fact is if future episodes are as flat as last night's there isn't going to be an audience watching season 4.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been a defender of the direction of this show but his is one of the first episodes I didn&#8217;t like. I think the dialogue was poorly written and very unLost-like. Killing off Eko isn&#8217;t sitting well with me either. I think there was way too much he had to offer to just write him off like that. It seemed too sudden, too abrupt.</p>
<p>I dont understand why people don&#8217;t like Paolo and Nikki, but i think their addition to the story has been treated in a very forced manner and I agree that the show was looking for more eye candy and not substance.</p>
<p>Eko&#8217;s revelation to Locke at the end that they &#8216;are next&#8217; was very anti-climactic. No kidding they are next, everyone is next on this show. That was a great opportunity for a great reveal, or even an opportunity for Locke to keep it to himself as a secret as a cliffhanger.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m getting bored with the show, not because there aren&#8217;t enough answers, but because the production values and the dialogue has gotten flat. </p>
<p>I think they are milking this story to extend the series, but simple fact is if future episodes are as flat as last night&#8217;s there isn&#8217;t going to be an audience watching season 4.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2006/11/01/the-cost-of-living/#comment-7322</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Nov 2006 15:39:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2006/11/01/the-cost-of-living/#comment-7322</guid>
		<description>Yeah I know it was not very subtle but what does anyone make of the allusion to Christ's resurrection when Locke and Eko push aside the large boulder from Yemi's "tomb" and find that he is not there?  Also, why couldn't Desmond foresee the smoke monster's attack? Do his visions come and go?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah I know it was not very subtle but what does anyone make of the allusion to Christ&#8217;s resurrection when Locke and Eko push aside the large boulder from Yemi&#8217;s &#8220;tomb&#8221; and find that he is not there?  Also, why couldn&#8217;t Desmond foresee the smoke monster&#8217;s attack? Do his visions come and go?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2006/11/01/the-cost-of-living/#comment-7319</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Nov 2006 15:07:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2006/11/01/the-cost-of-living/#comment-7319</guid>
		<description>Ryan, I completely agree with you.  Insanely contrived, and if AAA wanted off the show, they should have used his last episode more effectively.  It's not that he died that bothers me so much, it's that it did nothing to move the plot along.  

I won't go into anything else too much, as I agree with most of the comments above, especially regarding the newbies, but the one thing I did like and found intriguing was Juliet's message to Jack.  It worked for me, and I can't wait to see what she's got up her sleeve.

One last thing...when Locke said "Don't I feel stupid now?" it was the first time I ever harbored the idea Lost had lost its touch.  Sad.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ryan, I completely agree with you.  Insanely contrived, and if AAA wanted off the show, they should have used his last episode more effectively.  It&#8217;s not that he died that bothers me so much, it&#8217;s that it did nothing to move the plot along.  </p>
<p>I won&#8217;t go into anything else too much, as I agree with most of the comments above, especially regarding the newbies, but the one thing I did like and found intriguing was Juliet&#8217;s message to Jack.  It worked for me, and I can&#8217;t wait to see what she&#8217;s got up her sleeve.</p>
<p>One last thing&#8230;when Locke said &#8220;Don&#8217;t I feel stupid now?&#8221; it was the first time I ever harbored the idea Lost had lost its touch.  Sad.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fuber</title>
		<link>http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2006/11/01/the-cost-of-living/#comment-7318</link>
		<dc:creator>Fuber</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Nov 2006 15:01:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hawaiiup.com/lost/2006/11/01/the-cost-of-living/#comment-7318</guid>
		<description>So, we are still left with a biggest question yet... what is the deal with Ben's people? (I henceforth remove the title of "Others" from them).  

Two days before the planes crashes, Ben finds out that he has a spinal tumor.  The plane crashes, if this is just some normal group, why wouldn't they just befriend any survivors?  Had they befriended any survivors, I'm sure Jack would have gladly performed surgery on Ben.  However, since Ben's people have been sneaky and threatening, they had to come up with this whole plan to "break" Jack.  Of all the questions to be answered, this is the biggest.

A few questions and comments...

-Why hasn't Jack asked what happened to the kidnapped people the other's took right after the plan wrecked?

-  I believe Juliet is being honest.  Remember how she was crying at the beginning of the season listening to "Downtown"?  Her "slide show" statements lend more credibility to my theory that she's miserable.  The only conflict is her williness to kill Kate when Mr. Ford attempted escape.  

-  Nikki and Paolo - "kick over the television" - Amen, "my brother".  I'm still hoping there is a very good reason they're around.

-  Eko - worst week ever.  His attempt to blow up the hatch doors knocks him out, the hatch implodes, a polar bear tries to eat him and then the black smoke kills him.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, we are still left with a biggest question yet&#8230; what is the deal with Ben&#8217;s people? (I henceforth remove the title of &#8220;Others&#8221; from them).  </p>
<p>Two days before the planes crashes, Ben finds out that he has a spinal tumor.  The plane crashes, if this is just some normal group, why wouldn&#8217;t they just befriend any survivors?  Had they befriended any survivors, I&#8217;m sure Jack would have gladly performed surgery on Ben.  However, since Ben&#8217;s people have been sneaky and threatening, they had to come up with this whole plan to &#8220;break&#8221; Jack.  Of all the quest